Morris Canal mixed-use building (Case P2026-000063)

At a glance

Based on auto-generated captions; names and details may be misheard.

  • What: preliminary and final major site plan with one sign variance for a five-story mixed-use building with 96 apartments (10 affordable), about 1,800 square feet of retail and 25 parking spaces in the Morris Canal redevelopment area (case P2026-000063).
  • Where it stands: approved 7-0 on October 13 with staff conditions plus four added conditions.
  • Next: resolution memorialization at a later meeting.

The proposal

  • Through lot with frontage on Pacific Avenue, Holiday Street and the light rail line. Unit mix: 16 studios, 44 one-bedrooms, 24 one-bedroom-plus-dens, 11 two-bedrooms and one three-bedroom; the 10 affordable units (four studios, five one-bedrooms, one three-bedroom) were approved by the state's affordable housing division the same day.
  • 25 garage spaces (3 required), 49 bike spaces, trash chutes on all floors, a rooftop lounge and terrace, green roof, and no vinyl siding. Six street trees plus a contribution for two more.
  • Only deviation: two residential signs instead of one, because there are two lobbies.
  • The redevelopment plan calls for a 10-foot walkway along the light rail line; the owner grants the city an easement and maintains it.

Conditions and discussion

  • Added conditions: forestry permits before the zoning permit; a fence along the rail line (replace the chain link if it proves to be the applicant's, otherwise work with the transit agency); inquire about a loading space with the city and the transit agency; and ADA ramps and crosswalks aligned with the walkway on Pacific and Holiday, subject to transit agency and city approval.
  • Commissioners raised shade trees along the rail line (transit rules likely bar planting within 25 feet), bike racks, trash door placement, retained mature street trees and good-neighbor construction practices near historic homes.
  • A nearby resident objected that the building would crowd the neighborhood and worsen parking; the board attorney explained that the board applies the redevelopment plan and does not make the rules.
  • City planning staff said they agree with the testimony and that the easement fits the plan's park goals; Ward described the plan's vision for a trail along the light rail line and the difficulty of coordinating with the transit agency. Commissioners praised the design and affordable housing; vote 7-0 including Councilwoman Little.

Sources

  • 2026-10-13 - Planning Board (video of the October 13 Planning Board meeting, auto-captions)
  • No Planning Board agenda page is on file for this meeting.

Discussion time

About 61 minutes across 1 meeting (from transcript timestamps; approximate).

Meeting Minutes
2026-10-13 - Planning Board 61

Log

  • 2026-10-13 - Planning Board - Approved 7-0 with staff conditions plus four added (forestry permits, fence, loading space, crosswalks). About 61 minutes, the longest item of the night.