2026-10-13 - City Council

Summary

Based on auto-generated captions; names, numbers and some motions may be misheard.

Time on topic (from transcript timestamps; approximate, includes side talk; the roughly 5-minute recess at 3:07-3:12 and the uncaptioned first 4 minutes are not counted):

Topic Minutes Share
Memorial Field final design and permitting 201 76%
Noyes and Cypress Streets school drop-off restricted access ordinance 18 7%
Other business 10 4%
Zoning ordinance parking flexibility 10 4%
Zoning ordinance nonconforming lots and structures 6 2%
Police Department federal law enforcement grant 5 2%
Zoning roadway classification update 5 2%
State fire and building code alignment 5 2%
Council rules ethics complaint form 2 1%
Merrimack Street Penacook parking time limit 2 1%
Zoning map flood insurance study update 1 <1%
  • Tuesday, October 13, 2026, City Council Chambers.
  • Captions start about 4 minutes in and the meeting adjourned at about 4:34 on the video clock, roughly 11:40 p.m. The council voted to meet past 11:00 p.m. The long Memorial Field public hearing took the whole evening.

Other business

4:11-8:02, 4:27:22-4:33:53

  • Roll call showed all 15 members present, including Mayor Champlin.
  • Councilor Brown asked to add language to the September 14 minutes about her request for Memorial Field funding options and the city manager's reply. The mayor declined, saying minutes are a brief summary of action, not a transcript. After a motion to move the question (two-thirds), the minutes were adopted by voice vote.
  • Consent calendar approved by voice vote with items 7 (Noyes and Cypress ordinance) and 22 (ethics complaint form) pulled. Councilor Brown recused herself from items 20, 21, 23, 24 and later the police grant, citing a family employment connection with the police department.
  • Closing announcements: Councilor Horne thanked organizers of the first Penacook fall festival and listed Penacook Historical Society events and trick-or-treat hours (Penacook October 30, Concord October 31); Councilor Kretovic congratulated a colleague named citizen of the year and thanked Community Development for the September master plan workshop; Councilor Schultz said they now chair a rebooted public transportation subcommittee meeting the next day; Councilor Brown announced an October 30 historical-figures event; Councilor Foote gave health reminders; the mayor asked members to silence phones and noted the October 26 voter registration deadline and the November 3 election. Adjourned by voice vote.

Memorial Field final design and permitting

8:02-2:37:50, 3:12:29-4:03:17

  • Item 26I (hearing) and item 35 (action): resolution appropriating $1.2 million for final design and permitting, with $600,000 of general obligation bonds and notes and $600,000 accepted as a donation from the Concord School District. The mayor moved it first on the hearing agenda.
  • David Gill (Parks and Recreation) recapped the process since June 2023 and the joint city-school committee's September revised plan: rebuild fields in place to fix drainage, add about 55 parking spaces, estimated total near $22 million (phase one about $13 million plus). The $1.2 million is a not-to-exceed figure and is needed for grant competitiveness (Land and Water Conservation up to $1 million; Outdoor Legacy up to a $15 million project, one-to-one match). Design and permitting takes about 12 months; construction realistically 2028 to 2029.
  • The city manager listed possible non-bond sources: recreation reserve about $529,600 uncommitted, impact fees about $86,000 uncommitted, and roughly $140,000 expected left from the bleacher removal appropriation. Councilor Kurtz confirmed the 50/50 split applies only to this phase.
  • Councilor Brown questioned who was responsible for years of deferred maintenance (the city manager answered the council sets capital priorities) and debt service on the police station, middle school and golf course.
  • Roughly 20 speakers testified for over two hours. Supporters (youth sports organizers, coaches, parents, the high school athletic director, a contractor, a renter, students) described an unusable track, poor drainage, injuries, no bleachers, borrowed lights and games moved out of town. Others asked to hold off until the cost split is agreed in writing, to use surplus or reserves rather than bond, to bid the design competitively, and to reconsider turf. Two Merrimack Valley school board members (speaking as private citizens) and a Penacook resident asked for a different split, citing district usage data, a petition with roughly 600 to 670 signatures calling for Concord School District to pay all construction costs, and higher need in Penacook. After a speaker said the mayor had made light of an earlier witness, the mayor apologized to anyone who took offense.
  • Hearing closed after 2:37. After a recess, the council debated. Supporters: Kurtz, Fennessy, Todd, Foote, Keach, Schlosser, Sekou, with Davie and Kalob "reluctantly". Several said they would approve no more money beyond $1.2 million until a memorandum of understanding with the school board sets cost sharing, control and revenue, and asked staff to start that work now. Davie said he would not support 50/50 for construction; Kalob asked for grant specifics, a capital campaign and public-private options and disliked bonding.
  • Against: Horne (long remarks on cumulative tax burden, debt service, unresolved ownership and control questions and Penacook fairness), Schultz (tax fairness) and Brown (wanted the MOU and a competitive bid first, and suggested returning the golf course to an enterprise fund).
  • Funding source: the mayor asked whether to keep bonding or use reserves and impact fees; the city manager said it is an opportunity-cost choice and traditionally bonded. Todd preferred keeping the reserves for next year's budget, which favors bonding. The captions do not show a separate vote on a reserves alternative.
  • Vote: after moving the question and a disputed voice vote, a motion to reconsider (apparently by Fennessy) passed and a roll call approved the resolution 12-3. No: Horne, Schultz, Brown.

Noyes and Cypress Streets school drop-off restricted access ordinance

4:07:48-4:25:18

  • Item 7, pulled from consent by Councilor Kretovic and Councilor Grady Sexton: proposed Section 17-6-12 restricting access to Noyes and Cypress Streets at school drop-off and pick-up near the new Runlet Middle School.
  • Kretovic moved to notice it in November for a December public hearing, saying she was not inclined to delay further and citing neighborhood safety. Grady Sexton supported a hearing and said the neighborhood had to hire a lawyer.
  • Others wanted legal and committee review first: questions on enforceability and whether the transportation advisory committee and the Traffic Operations Committee should weigh in. Schultz and others said the earlier committee hearing was lengthy. Davie did not support the ordinance as written but wanted another venue.
  • After a motion to move the question, Kretovic's motion failed on a voice vote. The mayor's substitute motion to notice it in November for a December hearing, with referrals to the city solicitor and the two committees, was seconded and passed by voice vote.

Zoning ordinance parking flexibility

2:39:07-2:48:26, 4:04:04-4:04:28

  • Item 26B/28 (article 28-7): planning staff (Tim Thompson) said the amendment replaces most parking variances from the Zoning Board with conditional use permits and waivers decided by the Planning Board, keeps the same abutter notice, and caps residential parking at one space per unit as state law now requires. He estimated it could cut 20 to 50 Zoning Board cases a year.
  • Councilors Davie, Brown and Kalob asked about housing goals, notice, accessible parking and pipeline projects; applicants could already use it since the hearing was posted.
  • One resident objected to one space per unit and to the cul-de-sac length change. Approved by voice vote.

Zoning ordinance nonconforming lots and structures

2:48:28-2:53:40, 4:04:28-4:04:50

  • Item 26C/29 (article 28-8): lets certain special exceptions become conditional use permits and removes the variance step when a lot is subdivided around an unchanged older home. Staff said it has already avoided at least three variances and expects tens a year.
  • No public testimony. Approved by voice vote.

Zoning map flood insurance study update

2:53:40-2:54:38, 4:04:50-4:05:12

  • Item 26D/30: minor text amendment updating references to the federal flood insurance study. No testimony; approved by voice vote.

Zoning roadway classification update

2:54:38-2:58:50, 4:05:12-4:06:03

  • Item 26E/31 (appendices B and C): updates arterial and collector street lists, including several Ward 5 streets, to match how they function; done at the transportation engineer's request.
  • A resident called the draft confusing; a Transportation Advisory Committee member questioned labeling Pleasant and South Streets arterials. Thompson answered at the vote and the amendment was approved by voice vote.

State fire and building code alignment

2:58:50-3:02:46, 4:06:03-4:06:57

  • Items 26F and 26G (32 and 33), tied together: housekeeping reorganization of the city fire code and building and housing maintenance codes to match adopted state codes. The city solicitor presented; the fire chief and building official were available.
  • No testimony. Taken as one motion and approved by voice vote.

Police Department federal law enforcement grant

3:02:46-3:07:08, 4:06:57-4:07:48

  • Item 26H/34: accept and appropriate $23,397 in unmatched U.S. Department of Justice grant funds. Under an agreement the police department receives $18,397 and Merrimack County $5,000. Police said it funds phone-forensics technology and breaching equipment.
  • One resident urged spending on body cameras instead. Councilor Brown recused herself. Approved by voice vote.

Merrimack Street Penacook parking time limit

2:37:53-2:39:07, 4:03:38-4:04:04

  • Item 26A/27: change the north side of Merrimack Street in Penacook from a 2-hour limit to 10 hours, Monday to Friday 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., on the parking committee's recommendation, tied to converting the former Penacook branch library (under sale agreement) into a duplex.
  • No questions or testimony; approved by voice vote.

Council rules ethics complaint form

4:25:18-4:27:22

  • Item 22, pulled by Councilor Brown: Rules Committee (chair Kretovic) recommendation to adopt a voluntary ethics complaint form in the council rules. Brown said it does not change the ordinance, but noted only three of five committee members attended the meeting that advanced it and raised concerns about members' past dual roles.
  • Move the question carried; the recommendation was approved by voice vote.

Agenda

Proposed Noyes/Cypress Street school-hours restricted access ordinance (pulled from consent); referrals on pedestrian signals; items tabled to Nov 9 public hearings incl. opioid settlement reserve and golf course improvement reserve.

Items taken up (from the meeting recording)

See 2026-10-13 - City Council for the summary and votes.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

04:11six meeting of the conquered city

04:13council. Uh would you all please stand

04:15and join me in the pledge of allegiance?

04:20>> I pledge algiance to the flag of the

04:22United States of America and to the

04:25republic for which it stands, one nation

04:28under God. Indivisible with liberty and

04:31justice for all.

04:37>> Madison clerk, would you please call the

04:40role?

04:40>> Yes. Councelor Rum

04:42>> here.

04:42>> Mayor Chimplan,

04:44>> yes.

04:44>> Present.

04:45>> Councelor Davyy

04:46>> here.

04:46>> Councelor Fennessy,

04:47>> present.

04:48>> Councelor Foot,

04:48>> present.

04:49>> Councelor Grady Son,

04:50>> here.

04:51>> Councelor Horn here.

04:52>> Councelor Caleb

04:53>> here. Councelor Ke

04:54>> here.

04:54>> Councelor Kred here.

04:56>> Councelor Kurts

04:57>> present.

04:57>> Councelor Schlasher

04:58>> here. Councelor Schultz

04:59>> here.

05:00>> Councelor Seiku

05:01>> here.

05:01>> And councelor Todd

05:02>> here.

05:04>> Thank you. Uh I'll entertain a motion uh

05:07to approve the minutes of the September

05:0914th uh city council meeting.

05:11>> Moved and seconded.

05:13>> Uh councelor Brown.

05:14>> Yes. I have a correction to the minutes

05:16on page 16 after the first well it's the

05:20incomplete paragraph. I would like to

05:23add the language that says, "Councelor

05:24Brown asked staff to provide funding

05:26options for the 600,000 memorial field

05:29design permitting appropriation,

05:31including consideration of the

05:33recreation reserve, the city manager

05:35interrupted to state that the city would

05:37not be doing that." When councelor Brown

05:40replied that it would be helpful to know

05:41the options, the city manager responded,

05:43"No, thank you."

05:44>> That's a novel. I don't think we'll make

05:46the change, counselor. It it is brief

05:48and I have it written and I am happy to

05:51uh send it over to the city clerk for

05:52inclusion.

05:54>> We won't entertain those changes. Any

05:56other discussion?

05:56>> Excuse me, your honor. I didn't hear

05:58what you said.

05:58>> I said we won't entertain those changes.

06:01>> Would you explain why this corresponds

06:03with RSA 912

06:06which relates to minutes? A brief

06:07description. This is a brief

06:09description.

06:09>> That's not a brief description. The

06:11brief description is what was

06:12transcribed by the city clerk. No, this

06:14I'm sorry, your honor, but that excludes

06:16the city manager's comment, his denial

06:19that we would have funding options,

06:21which I think is very significant.

06:23>> Councelor,

06:25you're making a common mistake with with

06:27folks who aren't familiar with minutes,

06:29which is to think to confuse a minutes

06:32with a transcription. This is not a

06:34transcription. It is a brief summary of

06:36what action was taken by the city

06:38council.

06:39>> Yes. And it is significant that the city

06:41manager refused to provide information

06:43asked by a counselor. It's

06:45>> incorrect.

06:46>> It was three refusals by stating you

06:49would not provide it and then saying no

06:51thank you when I asked.

06:52>> I have a I have a a motion to move the

06:54question. Is there a second?

06:55>> Second.

06:56>> All right. Moved and seconded. All in

06:57favor?

06:58>> I opposed.

06:59>> No.

07:00>> The motion passes by the required

07:02two-thirds majority. All in favor of

07:04approving the minutes, please signify by

07:06saying I.

07:07>> I.

07:07>> Opposed? No.

07:08>> No. Eyes have it. The minutes are

07:10adopted. Thank you. This moves us to the

07:12consent agenda. I believe two items were

07:15pulled. Item seven and item 22.

07:18>> 22. Correct.

07:19>> Thank you.

07:20>> All right. Um I'll entertain a motion to

07:23approve the uh calendar. Second.

07:26>> Moved and seconded. Council Brown.

07:27>> Yes. I'm recusing myself from items 20,

07:3021, 23, and 24.

07:33>> Excellent. Thank you very much.

07:34>> Is there a reason?

07:36What is the reason?

07:38>> Oh, that's right. The reason

07:40>> the reason is um that my husband is

07:43employed by the conquered police

07:45department.

07:46>> Thank you very much.

07:47>> Thank you, councelor. Um all right. All

07:50those in favor of uh the motion as

07:54presented, please sign by saying I.

07:56>> I oppose. No. The eyes have it. Motion

07:59is adopted.

08:02That brings us to the uh public hearing

08:05portion of tonight's agenda. Um just by

08:08a show of hands, how many people are

08:10here uh to testify on item uh excuse me

08:18>> 26

08:19>> 26 I Yeah,

08:23>> 26 I is memorial field.

08:26>> There we go. [laughter]

08:27There we go. All right. All right. with

08:31uh unless uh unless council objects, I'm

08:33going to move that up to the first item

08:35>> on the public hearing agenda.

08:38>> Excellent idea.

08:39>> So, madam city clerk, item 26 I

08:43>> it is a resolution appropriating the sum

08:45of $1.2 $2 million in the memorial field

08:48project for final design and permitting

08:50authorizing the issuance of general

08:52obligation bonds and notes in the sum of

08:54$600,000 and accept accepting the sum of

08:57$600,000 in donations from the conquered

09:01school district for this purpose.

09:02>> Mr. City Manager members of the council,

09:06um Mr. Gill is here. Um we discussed

09:09just doing a very very brief

09:10presentation to get everybody up to

09:12speed

09:13of where we were. All right.

09:20>> Welcome, Mr. Gil.

09:22>> Good evening, Mayor, members of city

09:24council. Hopefully,

09:27this works perfectly.

09:45Good evening, mayor, members of city

09:46council, city manager. Um, just a quick

09:49recap of where where we've been. Uh,

09:51this process started in June of 2023.

09:54Uh, when city council and the school

09:56board um jointly came together to begin

09:59the master planning process for Memorial

10:01Field. Um, kind of an overview of the

10:04meetings. um had several public meetings

10:07in 2003 2004.

10:09Um we met with the students. I think

10:12everybody's familiar with some of the uh

10:15issues with Memorial Field regarding

10:17drainage. Um

10:21field conditions, bleachers, such. Um

10:27fall of two 2024

10:30um the school board and city council

10:32came together and created a joint

10:34committee to kind of look at um how to

10:36best move forward.

10:38Um the joint committee held meetings um

10:42I think 10 in total over the past three

10:44years. Um

10:48back in November and December 2025,

10:51uh we re presented back to school board

10:54and to city council at that time their

10:56recommended plan um and to recommend um

11:01jointly funding the final design and

11:03permitting. Um there was no conversation

11:06about construction. It was just the next

11:07phase. Um

11:11due to increasing costs um um city

11:14council at their December meeting kind

11:15of uh postponed their decision. Uh they

11:18tabled it to get some more information.

11:20We were going into budget season and it

11:22was a big number and a lot to a lot to

11:24figure out. Um the joint city school

11:28committee came back together and then

11:30September um third of this year they

11:33came back with a slightly revised uh

11:36plan. is more of the needs and wants of

11:39the memorial field. Um, and it's also

11:42keeps that $1.2 million equally shared.

11:46Um, I think everybody will recognize

11:48this as basically the layout we have

11:52here. Um,

11:55it basically honors, you know, the the

11:57field locations and the layout that

11:59we've had for the past 55 years has

12:01worked. However, the drainage has not.

12:05Um it does not have a turf field. You

12:07know, fencing needs to be improved,

12:09field lights need to be improved. Um so

12:12this plan basically honors the current

12:15layout, but everything is rebuilt in

12:16place um to solve the drainage issues.

12:20It does add a little bit of parking

12:22improvement. Um you'll see the bus lane

12:26is kind of improved going up the hill a

12:27little bit. Um it does add about 55

12:30parking spaces. Um this does not solve

12:33the memorial field of parking issue. As

12:35we all know when we have multiple events

12:37going on uh South Fruit Street both

12:39sides as well as the state hospital

12:41grounds are are full with parking. Um

12:44but it has worked for the past 50

12:47something years and the thought was how

12:49do we improve it slightly? Um however uh

12:52not to the full extent it should be.

12:57This is the estimated cost. Um this is

12:59what was approved by um the joint city

13:02school committee. $1.2 million is what

13:06we're discussing this evening. Um

13:08estimated phasing um is laid out in

13:11front. Um obviously phasing can be done

13:14multiple ways multiple times. U but $1.2

13:18million is to get us to the point of

13:20final design for construction documents,

13:22get all the state permits and ready to

13:24go.

13:26That's just a rendering of what it could

13:28look like um going forward.

13:33And just for a timeline, I know there's

13:35a lot of conversations regarding, you

13:36know, if if if funding is approved, how

13:39long it will take. Um it is about a 12

13:41month process for final design and

13:44permitting. Um so if things are

13:46approved, um you know, by by May, we're

13:49we're coming back at with the 40% we're

13:52going to re redefine the cost estimates.

13:54uh we do begin to start meeting with the

13:56state staff to give them an idea of the

13:58project coming forward. It also helps

14:01when we get into final design, they're

14:02already involved and and give us some

14:04guidance of things in case we um we over

14:08over miss something. Uh we have to

14:10create a new operations plan um

14:13staffing, maintenance, revenue

14:14projections. Um you know, if we have one

14:17turf field, two turf fields, uh there's

14:20going to be new equipment. um if we're

14:22going to have um the same number of

14:24fields that are lit or we're going to

14:26add more fields are going to be lit. So,

14:28that all has to be looked at because if

14:29there's an operation cost, it won't be

14:32shown in next year's budget, but it is

14:34going to be shown in in a future budget

14:36um once we're in operation. Um end of

14:39October final design process,

14:41construction um documents, um grants and

14:45sponsorships. Um I I kind of atalicized

14:47this. We are very good at getting land

14:49of water conservation grants for our

14:51recreation projects over the past 10

14:53years and we've got about 2.5 million in

14:55grant donations for park project

14:57constructions.

14:59So um land and water conservation

15:01increased their max award to $1 million

15:04this year. So it it does require one

15:07toone match. It does not solve the $14

15:09million construction cost but there are

15:11grant monies out there. Uh the other one

15:14is the outdoor legacy grant program

15:17similar to LWCF.

15:19It does require a onetoone match, but

15:23that can be up to a $15 million project.

15:26So if you had a $30 million project, it

15:28could pay half. If we have a $14 million

15:31project, it could pay 7 million. Um so

15:34they're out there. Um you do need to

15:36have a final design. You do need to be

15:38moving forward to to be competitive in

15:40those grants. The second grant that I

15:42mentioned is competitive nationwide. Um,

15:44but we do have seven non 27 nonprofits

15:47that use Memorial Field. So, in the

15:50event that we're going to put a grant

15:51application together, I think it could

15:53be competitive nationally because we

15:55have so many different groups using it.

15:57Um, obviously the city and the school

16:00district need to create options how to

16:01pay for construction. That's going to

16:03take some time. I respect I understand

16:06that you know by the end of the December

16:0927 all permits in place city council and

16:13the school board hopefully we can agree

16:14on how to move forward with phase one.

16:17And I I this this next piece regarding

16:20if funding is in place we could follow.

16:22I I put this in there for the audience

16:24and also folks at home. Um just because

16:27we have a final design say we take the

16:30next 12 months to do that. you still

16:32need to put it out out for RFP and then

16:34it's a 12-month construction. Um, I do

16:37realize the timeline I created here is

16:40outside the normal city budget. So, if

16:42it's delayed to the spring of 2028, you

16:47just move everything out six months. So,

16:49it's not like we can get anything built

16:52realistically um until 28 at the best.

16:57Um realistically it's going to be 2029

17:00depending on how we proceed.

17:05All the reports, all the information,

17:07all the public hearings are on our

17:08website. Uh the links there. It also

17:11provides links to the U minutes of the

17:14joint city school uh committee and all

17:16their meetings. Okay. So, uh, the mayor

17:21and the two members of the ad hoc

17:24committee have talked to me about, uh,

17:26different ways to finance some of this.

17:28And I'm just going to leave you the I'll

17:30give you the three pieces that you have

17:31out there whether or not you could use

17:33the dollars for, uh, uh, design or for

17:38construction. Um, and um, but keeping in

17:42mind, I I'll put some um, qualifiers on

17:45there. So the first piece is um the

17:49recreation reserve. You have $879,600

17:54in there now. However, so 879600

17:58$350,000 is already committed to other

18:01projects that you approved in 2027. So

18:04you already have the you already have

18:05I'm just going to go over the numbers

18:07for the public because you already have

18:08these numbers um available. So you have

18:11that leaves you 529,600

18:14in the recreation reserve. Understanding

18:17as you as you understand that you

18:18already have looked forward to having

18:20commitments on how to spend those monies

18:22when you've done everything from bond

18:25payments on the community centers to uh

18:28the golf course uh

18:31clubhouse project, but it's 529,600.

18:36You also have impact fees. in the impact

18:38fee account. You'll recall uh this is

18:41considered a this site is considered a

18:44uh citywide uh project. So you can use

18:47any monies from any of the impact fees

18:50uh uh sectors, the four sectors. Right

18:52now you have $96,000 in there and more

18:54will come in as housing. I mean this is

18:56this changes over time. Um of that

19:0086,000 is not committed. So that's

19:0386,000 you have available there. And uh

19:07David just gave me some preliminary

19:09numbers just the other day on you

19:11remember the the dollars you

19:12appropriated $385,000

19:15out of the um uh community improvement

19:18fund. I think it was a uh is it

19:19community improvement get the right name

19:21for exactly uh the capital project fund.

19:24Sorry, capital project fund uh for

19:26taking down the bleachers and cleaning

19:27up that area of that you you should have

19:31about 140,000 left of that. So that'll

19:34be 140,000 underspent good work of

19:37general services and parks and

19:39recreation. Um but we don't have all the

19:41final bills and we haven't closed that

19:43out yet. So that's probably something

19:44you're going to want to wait a little

19:46bit before you tap into any of those

19:48dollars. So I just wanted to make sure

19:49you understood you have those three

19:51sources of dollars out there um of which

19:55you can decide something to do with or

19:56not do with. Either way, you're going to

19:58have a number of expenses associated

20:00with this for the next 20 years. Uh so

20:03how you spend it is really something uh

20:05you might want to consider going

20:06forward.

20:07>> Thank you.

20:08>> Thank you. Uh any questions for Mr. Gil

20:10or Mr. Espel?

20:13[clears throat]

20:13>> Yes. Thank you Mr. Gil. Just for

20:15clarification, thank you for the

20:16presentation. Um for myself and for

20:19everyone at home, the the question

20:22before us tonight that lays out a 5050

20:24split for the 1.2 for final um design

20:28and permitting. That 50/50 split applies

20:32only to this. No agreements have been

20:35set or made about financing arrangements

20:38for any steps beyond

20:41this phase.

20:42>> That is correct. That is correct. Just

20:43for this this for this ask is 50/50

20:45>> and any question about that would come

20:47back to this body to determine.

20:50>> Absolutely.

20:50>> Okay. Thank you very much,

20:52>> Council President.

20:53>> Thank you, your honor. Uh this I I

20:55suppose is for you, Mr. City Manager.

20:57Um, I've been on the joint uh school

21:00board and city board meeting for a

21:02number [clears throat] of years and I

21:03believe that we've been trying to get

21:04this conversation rolling since long

21:06before 2023 and my recolle recollection

21:10it's over 15 years and they have finally

21:12come to the table the school district to

21:14participate with us. Is that about

21:16correct? I

21:16>> I haven't been counting the years but

21:18it's been it's been a while.

21:19>> Thank you.

21:20>> It's been quite quite a few years.

21:21>> Thank you [clears throat] councelor

21:23Brown.

21:23>> Yes. Uh Mr. I think last month you said

21:26that maintenance has been deferred for

21:2850 years. Is that correct on memorial

21:32field?

21:32>> Yeah, I I think uh and that was a

21:34context of missed opportunities in the

21:36past. I think if you go back through the

21:38CIPs um the CIP for Memorial Field was

21:41very well built out for many years and I

21:44think um at at various times you know

21:47the council had to uh rep prioritize and

21:50use funds elsewhere. So there was a lot

21:52of missed opportunities I think in the

21:54past but it is what it is.

21:56>> Follow up your honor.

21:57>> Follow up.

21:57>> Um how long have you been responsible

22:00for Memorial Field?

22:02>> Uh Memorial Field um came over in 2012

22:09when we did the parks and recreation

22:12reorganization. Uh parks the grounds

22:14division and cemetery division came out

22:16of general services and we created the

22:17parks and recreation department.

22:20>> Question. Yes. for uh the city manager.

22:22Uh Mr. City Manager,

22:24uh according to our code of ordinances

22:2730-2-2,

22:29the division of grounds maintenance is

22:32responsible for parks, athletic field,

22:35Beaver Meadow Golf Course, and we're

22:38looking at major projects that have

22:40resulted that have had deferred

22:42maintenance and now are costing um

22:45millions of dollars. Who um who was

22:49responsible for uh Memorial Field before

22:51it went to Mr. Gil in 2012?

22:54>> It's the same group that's responsible

22:56for it all along. It's the city council.

22:58>> I I'm sorry, but the city council

23:00doesn't ride lawnmowers. Who is

23:02responsible for maintaining and bringing

23:04forward

23:04>> maintaining? That's different than

23:05respons.

23:06>> Well, I I'm I'm looking at this or at

23:08the code that says maintain and repair

23:09all municipal parks, playgrounds,

23:11athletic fields, and recreation areas.

23:14So, this is something that if it's been

23:15deferred 50 years, who's responsible for

23:18that?

23:18>> City council.

23:20>> Is that something that we should go out

23:21to the parks and check or is that

23:23something that the city manager should

23:24have brought to us a lot sooner?

23:26>> And that and that's what happens. What

23:27David Mr. Gil was referring to was when

23:30you when you look at the capital

23:31improvement projects, you prioritize

23:33which projects should get done when.

23:34Just like roads,

23:36>> which roads get done when, which parks

23:38get done when, and you decide when to

23:41how much to invest, and and which which

23:44ones have priorities. In the past,

23:47particularly over the last decade or so,

23:50um, Memorial Field has been not as high

23:52a priority as Keech Park, uh, as, uh,

23:56Merrill Merryill Park as a lot of parks

23:58as Terrell Park. that that you've given

24:00those higher priorities, the pools, the

24:03splash pad, things like that.

24:06>> Follow up on that.

24:07>> So, this is coming to us after budget

24:10and we have uh two major projects that

24:13are only partially funded. The police

24:16station and uh the school, the middle

24:19school, those have already been they've

24:22only been bonded this year, and that

24:24that debt hasn't hit the tax bills yet.

24:26Can you tell us what the debt service is

24:28this year? just for um the police

24:31station, the golf course, and we

24:34probably do know what the debt service

24:35is for the middle school.

24:39>> I can tell you it's 6,271,400.

24:45That is the debt service this year for

24:47project

24:48>> for police station, the middle school,

24:51and the golf course.

24:52>> That's incorrect.

24:53>> Uh

24:54>> all right.

24:55>> I would love to see your corrections.

24:56>> Council Caleb, you're interested. Um Mr.

24:59Gil, where does the uh drainage repair

25:02fall under the phasing?

25:03>> Um in every phase.

25:05>> Every phase.

25:05>> Yeah. Basically, um if you look at phase

25:07one, um you know, the every the track,

25:12the natural grass, the baseball field,

25:14all drainage is included in all those

25:17aspect. That's why they're all in phase

25:18one al together.

25:20>> Okay. Thank you. Followup.

25:21>> Thanks for asking that because I noticed

25:23it as well. Yes. Followup.

25:25>> Yeah. Um, so the drainage system, how

25:27long has this been uh out of commission?

25:31>> Uh, I've been here for work with the

25:34city for 28 years and it's always been

25:37uh an issue. It's um nicknamed the swamp

25:40for a reason. Uh the 1972 edition, which

25:43is basically all the lower right hand

25:45side of the field is about a foot and a

25:47half, two foot below the rest of it. Um

25:49I think when it was installed in the

25:5170s, it was probably great. I think

25:53somewhere in the the 90s ear that that

25:58started to fail. It just hold the poor

26:00soils with compaction that's just

26:04>> okay. Thank you.

26:04>> Council second.

26:06>> Thank you honor David. I have uh some

26:08few questions for you and for me it's

26:10really related to the budget and the

26:13money. So listening to you first I want

26:17to say there's no doubt that memorial

26:19field to many people I talked to need

26:22the work. So I'm not questioning if it's

26:25needed. My questions to you is today we

26:29have a 1.2 million budgeted for this uh

26:33design and we said the first phase cost

26:37roughly 13 plus million. Is there a

26:40possibility if there is one

26:43to do the first phase because it seem

26:45like the first phase is 80 five to 90%

26:50of the project. Is that correct? First

26:54>> uh we talking about phase one compared

26:56to phase two and three probably I

26:58haven't looked at percentages but it's

26:59probably about that.

27:00>> So based on my math right now we have 3

27:03million and 5 million which is 8 million

27:06phase one and phase 2. So we will be

27:08left by 13 plus something million and

27:11that's where my question is if there is

27:14a way to design it if there is one

27:19because the overall 1.2 2 million is

27:22based on the 22 million that's why the

27:24design is that high right is that

27:26correct

27:28>> um yes I think if you if you go back to

27:32previous presentations the the final

27:35cost estimates have ranged from 25 all

27:37the way to 32 million

27:39>> um this is by far the the less expensive

27:42of all the options we looked at um

27:45>> I get that but is it the 1.2 2 based on

27:50the 22 million. Is that correct?

27:52>> Yes, that is to design the full master

27:54plan for the complex and then at a later

27:56date, you know, we can look at phasing

28:00as a different option. You can phase us,

28:02you know, multiple ways, but 1.2 gives

28:04us the blueprint that we need to go out

28:06to do an RFP for construction documents

28:09and get all the permits before we even

28:11figure out um can't do anything else

28:15without the final design and permitting.

28:18So there's no other option for us to

28:21qualify for the grant that we are

28:23looking for unless we do the full design

28:25or partial design can make us qualified.

28:28I it's it's it's all up to the grantees.

28:31I think um anytime you have a nearly

28:35complete master plan um you're in the

28:38process of final design towards the end

28:40of it. uh when you apply for a grant um

28:43the likelihood of the grantor giving us

28:45money is greatly enhanced rather than a

28:48concept or um concept that's not

28:52approved or approved. So I think it just

28:55strengthens our hand when we have that

28:57final design. So, if someone's going to

28:59give us a million dollars or someone's

29:01going to give us $7 million, we can say

29:03with a straight face, um, it can be used

29:07as long as the funding the rest of the

29:09funding is in place. If you don't have

29:11that, I don't think we would be

29:12competitive. It's a lot of work to apply

29:14for these [clears throat] federal grants

29:15and we would not be competitive.

29:18>> Thank you. So, my understanding is there

29:20is no alternative for partial design. Is

29:23that correct?

29:24>> Uh, not that I can see.

29:26>> Thank you.

29:30Um I guess a question for uh city

29:32manager. I asked because I've heard a

29:34couple different things. Do you know how

29:36um the school district is paying for

29:38their 600k share of the 1.2 million? Are

29:41they is this something they took a bond

29:43out for or are they they have the cash?

29:45>> We we have a we have a check for

29:47$600,000. [clears throat]

29:49>> I don't know how they how they financed,

29:51>> but we have we have cash.

29:52>> They did. Okay.

29:53>> Okay. Thank you.

29:56Thank you, your honor. Uh, is it is it

29:59true uh, Director Gil, that the 1.2

30:03million for uh, design and permitting is

30:05a not to exceed and we could actually be

30:08less than that.

30:09>> 100 100%. That's our goal is to be less

30:12than that, but that's will not exceed

30:151.2.

30:16>> Thank you.

30:17>> Any other questions before I open public

30:19hearing?

30:22>> Mr. Gil, thank you so much. Appreciate

30:23you. [clears throat]

30:24>> Thank you. Don't go far.

30:26>> I'll leave this up.

30:33>> Who would like to testify?

30:36I see a hand right there.

30:47>> Yes, please.

30:49>> Ask them what they live in.

30:52>> I'm sorry. I apologize. Councelor

30:55Schultz is asking if people are willing

30:57to indicate what ward they're from.

30:59>> Of course.

31:00>> Thank you.

31:00>> I mean, I will. I can't speak for

31:02everybody else.

31:02>> Please.

31:03>> I'm happy to make a decision for

31:04everybody.

31:04>> Thank you. [laughter] There you go.

31:06Isn't power wonderful? Would you uh

31:09would you please also identify yourself

31:10at the city?

31:11>> Of course. Emma, ward six.

31:14>> Um I am a lifelong conquered resident. I

31:18was born here. I was raised here. I went

31:20to conquer public schools. I used

31:22Memorial Field um when I ran track, when

31:25I played lacrosse. Um and I used it

31:28then. I came back after college and law

31:31school. I bought a home on South Fruit

31:33Street, mere steps away from Memorial

31:36Field. It has been my wonderful neighbor

31:40for nearly 20 years. I love hearing the

31:42band walk by at 8 a.m. every other day.

31:45I love hearing the football games on

31:47Friday nights. I love all of the

31:49excitement and joy that Memorial Field

31:52brings to this community. Not just for

31:55schools though, because also in addition

31:57to school use of Memorial Field, you

32:00have general public use. I have used it

32:02my own self to do track workouts. My

32:05three children uh run a lot. um they

32:09currently cannot use the track and

32:11they've been procluded from using it um

32:13as high school track athletes and as

32:15middle school track athletes leaving

32:18them with no home meets last year which

32:20really put a damper on their competition

32:23opportunities. Um and I've also used it

32:26as the president of Conquered Crush

32:28Youth Lacrosse. I have been the

32:30president of this nonprofit since 2020.

32:35Um, and I've been a board member since

32:38before that. And I can tell you that the

32:40administrative hurdles that come with

32:42scheduling and using um, field space for

32:46a program that serves 150 children in

32:50the community every year. Um, we are

32:53lucky in that we have sufficient funding

32:55that allows us to ensure any child who

32:57wants to play for us can play for us.

32:59Um, and so we're not an exclusive

33:01organization in that way. We take any

33:04and all ch any and all children, but we

33:06do have to find places for them to

33:07practice and we have to find places for

33:09them to um compete. Typically, we've

33:12used Memorial Field um whereas Dave Gil,

33:15Dave and his team do a fantastic job

33:18getting those fields ready for us, but

33:20we have a very short season. It is eight

33:22weeks. It starts the first weekend in

33:24April and ends the first weekend in

33:26June. We cannot use Memorial Field until

33:30May. So, my kids are playing all of

33:33their games away for the first month of

33:36the season, which then forces them to

33:40compact the rest of their season. If

33:42we're going to have any home games, we

33:44really have to pack those in over the

33:46course of really four to five weeks,

33:48depending on what that looks like. And

33:50we are using more or less every field

33:53that is available to us to make that

33:55happen. If it rains, we can't use it. If

33:58it snows, we can't use it. Um, if it has

34:02been wet all week but nice on Sunday, we

34:05can't use it because the field and the

34:07drainage are such that it is not safe

34:10for the kids to use. Um, and the parks

34:13and reccks department honestly don't

34:16want anybody on it because the fields

34:18are already in such a state that any

34:20amount of traffic or usage is going to

34:23make them in even worse shape, which is

34:25then going to make it even the rest of

34:28the community unable to use the fields.

34:30And so the the lack of our ability to

34:32use it really does hamper our ability to

34:35give kids a competitive edge on those

34:38fields. And we have found that some of

34:40our kids don't end up playing in high

34:42school. They don't want to continue to

34:43move on because they haven't had that

34:45level of success that having consistent

34:47field space would give them for year

34:49over year, week over week practice. So,

34:53I love Memorial Field. I don't even mind

34:56that people park in front of my house

34:58and sometimes walk through my garden um

35:00and sometimes leave trash on my lawn

35:02because what that actually shows me is

35:04that people are using the field for what

35:07is intended for is a community gathering

35:09space. It is a jewel for our city. It is

35:12large. It is gorgeous. It has so much

35:14space and so much potential that we

35:16should have the opportunity to use it

35:19and to use [snorts] it well. And the

35:21track is in abhorrent shape. Like it

35:25really is terrible. And it's not good

35:27enough to even host a high school meet

35:29at four lanes. And so you really need to

35:31if you're thinking about doing it, it's

35:34not just doing it in situ, which is

35:35certainly the best way to do it. But you

35:38have to think also forward about

35:39expanding that space to allow it to be

35:41used for something beyond just

35:45recreational use. If you're going to put

35:47that level of effort into it, it needs

35:49to be sufficient so it can be used by

35:51the state, you know, by the high school

35:53for a competitive purpose and host meets

35:56which will bring in revenue, which will

35:58bring in opportunity for people to come

36:00to our fair city and see what we can

36:02provide. Um, and I think that it's a

36:04really important opportunity for the

36:06city to move forward and to show that it

36:09invests in its community and its

36:11recreational opportunities because

36:13that's what bring people to our city to

36:15live here, to invest here, and to be

36:18here, and to become lifelong residents

36:20of this city. That's all.

36:22>> Thank you. Any questions? Councelor

36:24Schulz.

36:25>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Quick question

36:26because I'm just clueless about how this

36:28works now. So, [clears throat] how does

36:30your nonprofit interact with the what I

36:34assume to be uh the conquered high

36:37school lacrosse team?

36:39>> So, we don't we are a separate nonprofit

36:43um and we do youth lacrosse. So, we um

36:46we run a program for kindergarten

36:49through 8th grade and we work with the

36:53folks at Conquered Parks and Rex usually

36:55starting about like November, December

36:58to start working on what fields we're

36:59going to use for games. Um and then I

37:02have the cell phones for the people who

37:05I need to have cell phones for um to

37:07make sure that our games can get played

37:08on the days that they get played for.

37:11But we're a separate nonprofit. We are

37:12not integrated with conquered high

37:15across.

37:15>> Thank you.

37:16>> We would like to be more integrated, but

37:17that requires that's on the school side.

37:19That has nothing to do with the city

37:21side.

37:21>> That's perfect.

37:22>> Thank you, your honor. Thank you so much

37:23for volunteering in the community. I

37:25think it's really important and it

37:26should be recognized. The time and

37:28effort that you give is a lot and it's

37:31sometimes the most rewarding and

37:32sometimes the most frustrating thing

37:34that you can do. So, first

37:35congratulations on that. Um, I'm not

37:38sure if you recall the conversations

37:40that we've had in the community

37:41regarding Terrell Park. And Terrell

37:43Park, the plans there are for an

37:45astroturf field that is specifically

37:48rectangle for lacrosse and soccer play.

37:51Um, those conversations because of the

37:54cost, the city council has put those off

37:56to the side. But there is a conversation

37:58about astroturf fields in regards to

38:00Memorial Field. Is that something that

38:03you're in favor of so that the play can

38:04be longer and more controlled versus the

38:07grass fields?

38:10>> Yes, it is. We would like to if we had

38:13turf fields, we would probably be able

38:15to use them in April for games and

38:17competitions. Although I will say

38:19depending on the quality and the

38:20improvements made in the drainage, it

38:22could be possible that grass fields

38:24would also meet that need. A lot of it

38:26would come down to maintenance and what

38:27the parks and reccks department

38:29determines as an appropriate use at that

38:31time.

38:31>> Great. Thank you so much,

38:35>> Council Brown.

38:36>> Thank you. Hi. Hi. So, I Your children

38:39are just phenomenal athletes and it's

38:42because their parents are phenomenal

38:43athletes. Um, so you have been there

38:46frequently um for yourself, for your

38:48kids? When did you start when did you

38:51see that Memorial Field needed work? Is

38:55that something that just kind of

38:56happened last year or

39:00>> um

39:01I mean like I said I've lived and

39:03conquered my whole life.

39:05>> So h so when should we have started

39:07this?

39:08>> I think there were discussions and

39:10thoughts about it even when I was in

39:11high school although I wasn't I can't

39:13say I was very cognizant of what those

39:15discussions were. Um but noticing it

39:18even then I can tell you we would play

39:21um on the field and they would be wet.

39:24Um the field that we would play our

39:26varsity lacrosse games on that field's

39:29not fully big enough for a full girls

39:31lacrosse game. Um there's there was

39:34never really access to the football

39:35field. The interior of the track for

39:37anything other than football which is

39:39fine. um you know so really limited in

39:41terms of scope and the track I think was

39:43resurfaced and redone in my memory

39:48although um it's certainly so it was

39:50better for a bit than what it was when I

39:52was using it in high school but it has

39:54been a deteriorating space for some time

39:56>> since okay for like the last 30 years

39:59>> say

39:59>> yes

40:01>> uh do do uh kids in your program come

40:05from all across the city

40:07>> yes okay from every word

40:08>> thank Any

40:11other questions? Thank you so much.

40:13>> Thank you very much. We appreciate it.

40:15>> Is there anyone else who'd like to

40:16testify on this?

40:18>> Mr. Schwit,

40:22[clears throat]

40:22>> you can be next. Be be prepared.

40:24[laughter]

40:27>> Good catch.

40:34>> Good evening.

40:35>> Good evening. Good evening, members of

40:37the city council, mayors, city manager,

40:39city clerk. I'm Roy Schwiker. I'm from

40:42Ward 4, which is zone A for the school

40:45board. And

40:48I have quite a selection of old

40:49newspapers I never had a chance to read.

40:52So, I was reading one was maybe 10 years

40:54old recently, and it had an article

40:56about how Memorial Field was, you know,

40:58in really bad shape, needed to have

41:00something done. So, I can't talk about

41:0230 years, but certainly it's been around

41:05for a while. And my impression is that

41:09uh maybe it should stay, you know, not

41:12such a high priority for the city at

41:14least for a while. We have other things

41:16that we're spending money on like water

41:19and I can't see is how the city is going

41:23to benefit that much from Memorial Field

41:25as compared to some of the other ways we

41:27might spend our money. and

41:31particular most of the things that are

41:32proposed in this master plan seem to be

41:35for the benefit of the school district

41:37and not for the city. And I understand

41:40that many of the people paying for them

41:42are the same. In fact, if the school

41:44district pays for something, it will

41:46cost me more than if the city pays for

41:48it because, you know, the school

41:50district is a smaller entity than the

41:53city. But, you know, still I'm I

41:56actually agree with the people in

41:57Pentacook that it's kind of unfair that,

41:59you know, we're spending so much money,

42:01you know, for the benefit of the school

42:03district. We should let them, you know,

42:05put up a higher share of the money based

42:07on what they want to do. I think we

42:10should uh unfortunately, I like your

42:14idea of let's scale back the project and

42:16then we can scale back this thing. I

42:19hate to call it a master plan. It seems

42:20like they've already got their plan. All

42:22they want to do is have some consultant

42:25pay a million, pay them a million

42:26dollars so they can rubber stamp and say

42:28this is a good plan as compared to we

42:30have a bunch of people in the city that

42:32earn six figure salaries. Aren't they

42:34good enough to say this is a good plan

42:35and you know be done with it? And you

42:38know once again this is follows the

42:40usual process city projects. You get a

42:43bunch of golfers on a committee. They

42:44say we want a fancy club clubhouse. You

42:47get public safety people. We want a uh

42:50police station that uh cost 10 million

42:53more than it should because we want it

42:54so huge we'll never need another one.

42:57And I think we're talking the same thing

42:58of Memorial Field. It's kind of awfully

43:01expensive for what we're going to get

43:03out of it now considering the other

43:04stuff that uh we have to do. And one

43:07thing I'd particularly like to speak of

43:09is I read a book by a woman named Alex

43:11Morgan. She's a soccer player. Some of

43:14you may have heard of her. and she is

43:16very negative on turf fields. She says

43:20the playing quality is much less and the

43:24professional women's soccer players

43:26that's one of their goals is to

43:27eliminate turf fields from all of their

43:30matches. You know, play them only on

43:31grass because the turf is more dangerous

43:33to them. And in particular, she claims

43:36that it causes cancer on young kids. She

43:38shouldn't let the young kids play on the

43:40turf fields. I don't know how much of

43:42this is still true, but uh I think the

43:45idea of turf field costs more, so

43:47therefore it's better. That may not be

43:48true at all. You may want to rethink

43:51whether you really want a turf field in

43:53any case. So anyway, that's that's my

43:56opinion. We need to scale the whole

43:58project back. We need to make the school

44:01district pay a higher percentage of it

44:02even though it cost me more money. We

44:04need to get rid of the turf fields.

44:06Thank you.

44:06>> Thank you, Mr. Shriker. Any questions

44:07for Mr. Striker?

44:09>> Council Su. I just have one. Seem like

44:12you support the project and you agree

44:14that it's not safe the condition of the

44:17field right now.

44:18>> I'm sorry. I'm not an expert on fields.

44:20I don't know whether it's safe or not.

44:22I'm willing to accept that opinion, but

44:24I'm not going to render that opinion if

44:25you understand the difference.

44:28[clears throat]

44:28>> Okay.

44:29>> Any other any other questions? Thank

44:32you.

44:33>> Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Mr.

44:35Shrier.

44:36>> Thank you. Thank you.

44:38>> Yes, ma'am.

44:43Welcome.

44:45>> Hello.

44:47My name is Katrina Malone. I am Ward 10.

44:50While I was not born and raised in

44:52conquered, New Hampshire, I've been a

44:54resident for about 17 years now. I'm on

44:56the board for the booster club for the

44:58football team and the lacrosse team at

45:00the high school. So, while Memorial

45:03definitely has a strong place in my

45:05heart for my kids and also all of the

45:07kids of our communities that play, it's

45:09also goes out to any of the sporting

45:11teams that come to our city. Um, I've

45:14heard comments of how bad the lacrosse

45:16field is, how we can't play on it, you

45:19know, early in the season. Um, we've had

45:21to bust the kids over at the beginning

45:22of this year over to the um National

45:25Guard field so that we could play games

45:27and have practices over there for the

45:28safety of the kids. The fields get

45:31closed often because of rain because of

45:33the drainage. Um I have two boys. One

45:36plays lacrosse. The other plays football

45:38and basketball. So they both take

45:40advantage greatly of the fields down

45:42there. Um my son that plays basketball

45:45is in trainings down there as well. I am

45:47actually on the co-ed softball team here

45:49in conquered for the summer. So while we

45:52are seem to be talking a lot about the

45:54student athletes that are here, it also

45:56is a community

45:58place. It's not just for student

46:00athletes. Um I have people on my team

46:02that come from um Barnstead, the Sea

46:05Coast, NSHA because they love coming

46:08here to play. They love actually the

46:10conquered softball league that we play

46:12in. Um they enjoy it greatly. They think

46:14we have a good camaraderie. They think

46:16that we have a good group going and we

46:18really enjoy our time here. We do have

46:20to play in Penuk sometimes and that's or

46:22not Penuk Penrook sometimes and that's

46:24fine. But we use both fields for

46:26softball at Memorial. And we can't use

46:30we can't go very far out into the

46:32outfield for softball at the main field

46:34because of if it's rained, you're just

46:37soaked. And while we love playing

46:39softball, we all are adults in our 40s

46:42and 30s and 50s, some of us. Um so we

46:45don't we're trying to avoid injury as

46:47well. Um, but as a as a parent, I

46:52I definitely feel slightly embarrassed

46:56when we go to that field. It is um I'm

47:00there on Friday nights for the home game

47:02to work with the booster clubs and sell

47:03merchandise and, you know, I'll be

47:06walking along just the path and tripping

47:08over everything because the asphalt is

47:10raised on the road that you come in on.

47:13Um, so it's kind of a hazard and I've

47:14seen many kids do the same thing as

47:16they're walking in and parents and then

47:17the the people that are elderly trying

47:19to get in and see their grandchildren

47:20play. It really is it it really is kind

47:23of terrible to see that we're the we're

47:26the uh,

47:28you know, we we are such a great city

47:31and we've done so much downtown. Um, I

47:35think it only makes sense for us to

47:36really look at Memorial not just from

47:38the kid aspect, but also from a

47:39community aspect with how much we

47:41actually do there. Um, throughout

47:44spring, summer, and into fall, there's

47:46many events that are held there. So,

47:49that was all.

47:49>> Thank you. Any questions from Miss

47:50Balone? Counselor Brown.

47:52>> Yes. When you've encountered issues at

47:54the field, who do you reach out to? Do

47:57you talk to Steve Larie from the school?

48:00>> Yep.

48:01>> We'll do that. And then also if um I

48:03forget his name who works the grounds

48:05there.

48:06>> Is it wheels?

48:07>> Wheels.

48:07>> Yeah. So I've I've said oh you know hey

48:10and you know stopped him when he's on

48:12his golf cart and things like that. So

48:13I'm always very polite and but honest

48:16too of you know this is it's getting a

48:18little crazy when you're you're trying

48:20to get to a field and it's just swamp in

48:23the lacrosse.

48:23>> So it's it's it's not it's not for lack

48:26of you you communicating to people.

48:28>> Oh no. I'm more than happy to

48:30communicate. Like I said, respectfully,

48:32but yeah,

48:33>> absolutely.

48:34>> Thank you.

48:34>> Any other questions for Miss?

48:38>> Well, thank you so much.

48:38>> Thank you.

48:39>> Thank you very much.

48:40>> Anyone else like to speak? Yes, sir.

48:45[clears throat]

48:48>> Good evening.

48:49>> Good evening.

48:52>> It's 16.5 font, so it should be pretty

48:54quick.

48:56[laughter]

48:57Uh, good evening. My name is Alan

48:59Robbitas and I'm here in front of you

49:01merely to represent my concerns as a W

49:03five resident about the memorial field

49:05project. It also seems appropriate to

49:08identify myself as a resident

49:10represented by conquered school

49:12district, a distinctly separate but

49:14awkwardly supplemental governing body

49:16for the people that reside in my area.

49:18I felt it appropriate this evening to

49:20come to the table not to create division

49:22between the folks who support the

49:23memorial field project moving forward

49:26and those who do not, but perhaps to

49:29provide some context on how awkward the

49:31lack of clarity sounding surrounding

49:33this potential project has become.

49:36Last city council meeting as I sat

49:39listening to the memorial field

49:40discussion, I found it preposterous to

49:43hear that the cost split has yet to be

49:45determined between the city of conquered

49:47and the conquered school district. Nor

49:50has a final budget been nailed down.

49:52Obviously, such a budget would be

49:54difficult to extrapolate without knowing

49:56the financial responsibilities between

49:59the two parties.

50:01Admittedly, I cannot assert that I have

50:02a conser comprehensive knowledge of how

50:05civic business affairs are handled at

50:07your level. I have, however, found

50:10myself on a partnership LLC tax return

50:13year after year for the past 25 years.

50:16And I can honestly say through the lens

50:18of my business experience, you have put

50:20the cart before the horse. In no way,

50:23shape or form should a partnership

50:25initiate business dealings together

50:28before the partnership has ex executed

50:30an operating agreement and have clear

50:33understanding on how the profit and loss

50:35split is to be handled. I don't know all

50:38of you personally, but I can certainly

50:41say I have been watching as many

50:43residents have.

50:47I know there are multiple attorney types

50:49that sit on this council.

50:51I'm not sure what type of lawyering you

50:53practice, but if a couple of people came

50:55into your office and said they were

50:57going to initiate business operations

51:00in a partnership structure without an

51:03operating agreement or a clear

51:05understanding of the split of the

51:07proposed company, would you tell them

51:10that this is prudent to move forward?

51:13Would you honestly tell them these are

51:15the types of things that can be figured

51:16out later and it's not all that

51:19important to understand who is

51:20responsible for what at the outset of

51:23doing business. A question that should

51:25be rhetorical, but I'm not so sure

51:28anymore. I also know there are members

51:30of this council who are very

51:31business-minded, entrepreneurial

51:33individuals who make their living on a

51:36service or product they provide through

51:38their own businesses. Would you jump

51:40into a business venture with someone

51:41that you have yet to determine what

51:43their or your level of interest in said

51:46venture is? Would you initiate business

51:49operations and worry about the minutiae

51:52of the holdings of the company later?

51:54Again, a question that should be

51:56rhetorical, but as I stated before, I'm

51:59not so sure it is anymore. At the start

52:01of new business in the very same council

52:03meeting mentioned earlier, I heard a

52:05lengthy discussion about the impending

52:07vacancy of our city manager and the

52:10process of recruitment. We heard how

52:12important that position was to get

52:13right. That we should take our time and

52:16work through the process diligently,

52:18methodically, even patiently to asssure

52:21we have access to the best candidates

52:23and we make our selection for the next

52:24city manager carefully as it is so

52:27important to conquer's future.

52:32I'll hit that one more time, I'm sure.

52:36Perhaps for the sake of conjecture,

52:38let's talk about how important that is

52:40compared to the memorial field project.

52:43Understanding that the city manager is

52:45paid at the 100th percentile in the

52:46state, a pay rate I would assume most

52:48thriving cities would aspire in order to

52:50attract and retain the best employees.

52:53For the sake of easy math, let's

52:55generalize the city manager position

52:58costs this city $250,000 annually. And

53:01let's also take the liberty of saying

53:03that the memorial field project comes in

53:05slightly under its full projection as we

53:08see here tonight at a sweet deal of just

53:11$22 million.

53:13In extremely simplified terms, the

53:15Memorial Field project without debt

53:18costs associated with the bond payments

53:21could fund the city manager position as

53:23it is for 88 years. It seems like the

53:27city has recognized the need to be

53:28methodical and patient with their

53:30decisions on the operating budget side.

53:33But when it comes to capital improvement

53:34expenditures, the city has put both feet

53:37on the gas pedal. What exactly are the

53:40priorities for Conquer these days? Is it

53:42the goal to gentrify this community one

53:44big ticket item after the other without

53:46even a knowledge of how much this is

53:48going to cost? Or worse, who is

53:51responsible for the cost to start with?

53:54I implore you to take your own advice

53:56and work through decisions regarding

53:58Memorial Field diligently,

53:59comprehensively, carefully, even

54:02patiently. Because in some very

54:04oversimplified terms, Memorial Field

54:06might have a similar impact to conquered

54:08as 88 years of salary for the best paid

54:11city manager in the state. And as such,

54:14we should make sure we got this right.

54:17It appears when looking at large bonded

54:19projects, the decision makers of

54:21conquered have developed a champagne

54:23taste on a beer budget. Perhaps a sign

54:26at the entrance to Memorial Field

54:28stating, "Bring your own lawn chair,"

54:29would be the best answer currently to

54:31allow all the needed time for all of the

54:34variables and competing priorities to be

54:36figured out before we proceed.

54:40>> Thank you for your time.

54:41>> Any questions for Mr. Council?

54:44>> Thank you for your testimony.

54:46>> Sure. So listening to you here and

54:49[snorts]

54:50seeing what David Gell and I think you

54:52watch

54:54>> um the presentation.

54:56>> Yeah.

54:56>> What would you want to see between the

54:58school board and the city council?

55:01Because based on what you just said, we

55:03don't know who's responsible for what,

55:05>> right?

55:06>> I think this stuff has to get nailed

55:07down through [clears throat] a business

55:08lens. I think it's preposterous to just

55:10wing it and hope that the school board

55:12shows up. Truth be told, um, you know,

55:15I've been frustrated like a lot of

55:16citizens with the school board. If you

55:18guys just told the school board that

55:20this was their baby, I think they would

55:22build you a Foxboro stadium on the backs

55:24of the taxpayer at this point. There is

55:26no end in sight for the money they will

55:28spend. And I don't know why we haven't

55:31figured out the split. I mean, is it

55:338020 down the road? Is it 6040? The

55:37answer, I don't know. We'll figure it

55:38out later. Seems to be a bad business

55:40play to me. I think you guys will be

55:43left just holding the bag on this one.

55:47>> Any other questions for Mr. Reidas?

55:50>> Thank you.

55:51>> Thank you folks.

55:52>> Thank you very much.

55:53>> Would anyone else like to testify for

55:54you?

55:55>> Yes, sir. In the back.

56:06>> Welcome.

56:09Just one minute.

56:12>> Please state your name for the city town

56:14city clerk rather.

56:15>> Hello. Um I'm Alec Valeris. I'm a

56:17sophomore at conquered high. I'm a

56:19member of the varsity cross country team

56:21and the conquered high school marching

56:22band. Um so I'm just going to talk a

56:25little bit about the troubles that uh

56:27we've all been facing with Memorial

56:29Field. So um every football game uh the

56:32band as you guys all know puts on our

56:34halftime show. Um down at Memorial

56:36Field. We start at the high school and

56:38we walk down to the uh field and um

56:42walking down to the field. Once we enter

56:44the parking lot, uh the ground starts to

56:46get a bit rough. Um and once we're in

56:49like that area where the gates are to

56:51the field and we're walking down, um

56:53I've noticed several times, and this has

56:55happened to me too, that um you see a

56:57lot of people stumbling and tripping

56:58over the big bulges um that are there.

57:02And um not only is that like unsafe, but

57:05like we can't really do anything about

57:06that because when we're marching, we're

57:08supposed to be like looking forward and

57:09all that nonsense. But um it's just hard

57:13it's hard for us to like focus on both,

57:16you know, playing um and not tripping

57:19and marching and like looking

57:20professional [clears throat] when we're

57:22all worried about, you know, are we

57:23going to fall in front of all these

57:24people who are watching us? And um I

57:27think that's just something that we can

57:28get fixed too. Um, another thing is once

57:31we're done marching down, we'll go into

57:32the um, stands and um, our drum line has

57:36to sit on like some random place on the

57:40side of us because there's no room for

57:41us to sit. Like last year, I know we had

57:43the big stands and there was room, but

57:45now this year we're on like some tractor

57:47trailer stand set up and our uh drum

57:50wines on next to us and um our job is to

57:52like bring energy to the uh field show

57:55and the football game and we can't do

57:57that if like we can't even communicate

57:58with each other and now if the band

58:01falls apart then everybody's like,

58:02"Well, I don't want to be here." And now

58:04you don't have people showing up to the

58:05football game. And um another part of

58:07our job is to work with the student

58:09section because we're supposed to get

58:10the student section all, you know, hyped

58:12and riled up. But we can't do that if

58:14the student section is on the other side

58:16of the field from us because there's

58:18nowhere for them to sit because we don't

58:19have any stands anymore. So that's

58:22another problem we face. Um, also for

58:24the cross country team and track and

58:27field team, we um used to run at the

58:30track, you know, for our track workouts,

58:32but um, ever since it got condemned,

58:33we've been forced to find random places

58:36that just happen to be 800 meters, 400

58:38meters, 200 meters, and we're forced to

58:41run there. Um, we are allowed to run on

58:43the track on our free time. And for, you

58:46know, today I went down there to do my

58:48workout and it was raining and there is

58:52like a bunch of just random puddles in

58:54the middle of the track which is flat.

58:56So it doesn't really make any sense why

58:57there's puddles there. But I was running

59:00and you know my shoes are getting

59:02soaked. Um, you know, I'm tripping all

59:04over the place because there's like

59:06roots popping up from the track and I'm

59:09thinking like, well, how are we going to

59:11like how are we supposed to like get

59:12better and use our utilities that we

59:16have if we can't even like, you know, go

59:17on like a run where we're supposed to be

59:20going on a run for and um, yeah, that's

59:24kind of all I want to say. Thank you.

59:26>> Thank you. Any questions for Mr.

59:28Rabidis? Councelor Schultz.

59:30>> Mr. Councelor, I mean, sorry, Mr.

59:33Valeris, your name is printed right on

59:35your sleeve, so I apologize.

59:37>> Councelor Schultz,

59:38>> if it's any uh consolation, the mayor

59:40messes up my name sometimes, too.

59:43[laughter]

59:44>> As a sophomore coming here speaking the

59:47way you did, I'm sure we can all say we

59:50agree on the fact that you're very well

59:52spoken and you should maybe go into uh

59:56youth and government or apply to Boys

59:59Nation in a year or two. What do you

1:00:01know where in your neighborhood people

1:00:04vote? What ward you are in?

1:00:07>> What neighbor? If you don't mind saying

1:00:08which neighborhood you live in five.

1:00:10>> Oh, you already know. That's great.

1:00:12>> So when you vote, you now know it's W

1:00:15five. Thank you.

1:00:16>> I vote until you're old enough.

1:00:18[laughter]

1:00:20>> Once

1:00:24council president, did you have your

1:00:25hand up?

1:00:26>> Jenny.

1:00:26>> No, sir.

1:00:27>> All right. Council Brown.

1:00:28>> Yes. Thank you for coming. It's so

1:00:31important that you share your

1:00:33experience, what you're doing. And I

1:00:35know the band, you're right, they are so

1:00:37important to the games because kids who

1:00:39like don't really care about football,

1:00:41like even my own kids, will say, "I'm

1:00:43going for the band. That's why we go."

1:00:45So, it's so important. Um, thank you for

1:00:48doing that. And I'm [clears throat] just

1:00:49curious because we just we have a a golf

1:00:52a new golf clubhouse that's almost

1:00:54completely built. Do you Does uh

1:00:56Conquered High go there? Do you guys use

1:00:58the golf course at all or or the fields

1:01:00there at all?

1:01:01>> Maybe our golf team.

1:01:02>> Maybe. Okay.

1:01:04>> All right. Thank you. Thank you very

1:01:06much for coming today.

1:01:08>> Uh I just want to say thank you for

1:01:10being here. Also, you don't seem scared

1:01:12to be up there, which is awesome. You

1:01:14should not be. Um I would like to know

1:01:17what instrument you play.

1:01:18>> Uh I play the alto saxophone.

1:01:20>> Awesome. Awesome. I am a former band kid

1:01:22and I thank you for your service.

1:01:24>> Yeah. And he plays a mean piano. I was

1:01:26gonna say that [laughter] too, but not

1:01:28in the marching band.

1:01:30>> Would you believe that I played alto

1:01:31saxs?

1:01:32>> I It's a great instrument.

1:01:34>> And [laughter]

1:01:35you can be honest as you were earlier.

1:01:37Do you believe?

1:01:39>> Yeah. He didn't make the band though.

1:01:41[laughter]

1:01:44>> That's why I said he can be honest.

1:01:46>> This council ke Rhode Island all state

1:01:48band.

1:01:50>> I stay corrected.

1:01:51>> But and my daughters were in the color

1:01:53guard with the band. So, thank you so

1:01:54much. And I agree with councelor Schultz

1:01:57uh that you should think about uh trying

1:01:59a youth government uh and uh you're very

1:02:02well spoken and we appreciate your

1:02:03testimony.

1:02:04>> Thank you.

1:02:05>> Thank you. Great work.

1:02:08[applause]

1:02:11>> Would anyone else like to testify?

1:02:12>> You did excellent.

1:02:14>> Yes, sir. Mr. Washurn.

1:02:27Welcome.

1:02:29>> Yes, sir. Uh my name is Bob Washurn. I

1:02:31live in W 8.

1:02:34Uh I'm glad Memorial Field finally makes

1:02:38it to the council.

1:02:40Uh in response to a previous uh

1:02:43observation, it's not the council's

1:02:46fault

1:02:47that city property is not properly

1:02:49maintained. the manager proposes and the

1:02:53council disposes. And if the NA manager

1:02:56never proposed maintenance, then how can

1:02:59it be the council's fault?

1:03:02I find the uh I've got mixed emotions

1:03:06about the architect.

1:03:09Namely, the council has never approved

1:03:12the footprint. We are now hiring an

1:03:15architect to design.

1:03:19So, and I'm I'm relieved that the 1.2

1:03:23million goes for the entire phases, the

1:03:26224.

1:03:28>> Yes.

1:03:29>> And not just one phase. So, so, so I'm

1:03:32I'm thinking, okay, but you still

1:03:35haven't approved the footprint.

1:03:38So, how do you hire an architect to

1:03:41design something that you, the council,

1:03:44haven't approved yet?

1:03:47Uh I find the financing of the 600,000

1:03:51questionable

1:03:53to the extent that why would the

1:03:55taxpayers

1:03:57bond over 20 years 600,000

1:04:01when there's ample surplus funds

1:04:03available to fund that 600,000.

1:04:06You got a partial briefing on some of

1:04:08the reserve funds tonight. However, the

1:04:12city closed its books June 30th. You

1:04:15have yet to be told on purpose what that

1:04:19surplus carry forward is.

1:04:24I'm suggesting that maybe surplus funds

1:04:27available

1:04:29that be used more equitably to fund

1:04:32this.

1:04:34I agree with the previous speaker about

1:04:37his partnership

1:04:40experience.

1:04:42I think that point should be well taken.

1:04:46that we are proceeding blindly here not

1:04:48knowing who's paying for what living in

1:04:52war 8 I'm going to hit by both both

1:04:54bills no matter who who who pays what

1:04:58I'm in the conquered school district

1:05:00city of conquered so whoever whatever

1:05:03the total number is I'm paying for it

1:05:06but I think the council should prior to

1:05:09going into any further agreements

1:05:12get it in writing

1:05:14have the school board commit to what

1:05:18it's funding and the SC council agree to

1:05:22what it's funding.

1:05:27The other concern I had was New

1:05:30Hampshire DRRA recommends that you have

1:05:33uh surplus of roughly 17%.

1:05:37Historically, concrete surplus has been

1:05:39in excess of 21%.

1:05:42So even if you didn't have other funds

1:05:46available, there are funds the undesated

1:05:49fund balance that's available for that

1:05:51600,000.

1:05:56And I'm hoping beyond hope

1:05:59that the 1.2 million architectural fee

1:06:04goes out for a publicly advertised

1:06:06competitive bid process.

1:06:09Far too often I've seen these consultant

1:06:12[clears throat and snorts] contracts

1:06:14and architectural contracts not go out

1:06:17for a competitive process and I think

1:06:20the taxpayers are entitled to that

1:06:22process.

1:06:25Uh I'm not sure, you know, I look at the

1:06:28support behind me and I'm with it. It's

1:06:32long overdue we do something about

1:06:35Memorial Field, but I think we ought to

1:06:37do it intelligently.

1:06:40Uh, so I'm not sure how it's going to

1:06:41end tonight. I suspect yes, you will

1:06:45approve the 600,000 hopefully from

1:06:47surplus funds, but you are mindful of

1:06:50the fact that you need additional

1:06:54written agreements with the school board

1:06:56as to who's going to fund what.

1:06:59Now, I'm looking at the list. The total

1:07:01is the 224.

1:07:04Uh,

1:07:05and I see controversial items there. Of

1:07:10course, the the most controversial to me

1:07:13is whether it's going to be a sodfield

1:07:16or turpp field.

1:07:18And I've heard arguments on both sides

1:07:23injury on against the uh uh turf and

1:07:28maintenance cost against the sad.

1:07:33However, a turf field also requires

1:07:37maintenance.

1:07:38And if you don't maintain the Turk

1:07:41field,

1:07:43it shortens its useful life, which I

1:07:45believe is 10 years. Don't quote me that

1:07:48because I'm not an architect, but uh but

1:07:50that's my concerns that I wanted to

1:07:52share with you tonight.

1:07:53>> Thank you, Mr. Washburn. Any questions

1:07:55for Mr. Washurn?

1:07:58>> Council Caleb,

1:07:59>> can I ask a question of the city manager

1:08:01related to testimony? Um are do we know

1:08:05yet what the surplus or deficit is from

1:08:08the prior year? No.

1:08:09>> What you what you end up doing is you

1:08:11usually you get the you get the numbers

1:08:13and then you have them audited. So you

1:08:15actually have the official numbers and

1:08:17remember you used about Audrey correct

1:08:19me if I'm wrong about 1.4 million

1:08:22>> 3.4

1:08:23>> oh 3 I'm sorry 3.4 million uh money. Uh,

1:08:28no, no. The the amount the one point the

1:08:30amount of money that was used for out of

1:08:34um a designated fund balance was it 3.4?

1:08:36>> Yeah, 3.4 for the full fiscal year.

1:08:38>> 3.4. So, you're not going to make all

1:08:41that up. So, you so the surplus is it's

1:08:45pulling numbers out of the air over

1:08:47here. Uh, so um that's not it doesn't

1:08:50work that way.

1:08:51>> Thank you.

1:08:52>> Can I just clarify what what what you're

1:08:54both saying is that we use was it 3.4

1:08:57$3.4 million surplus funds

1:09:00>> to balance this year's budget

1:09:03>> to pay for things in this year's budget.

1:09:04I say that more for the general public

1:09:06than for you council.

1:09:08>> Councor.

1:09:09>> Yes. Thank you for being here. I know

1:09:11you were on the council um for years

1:09:14before and you have a financial

1:09:16background. We're looking at some

1:09:18massive projects and the debt service.

1:09:21We know what they are because the the

1:09:23bonds have been sold. So, we know that,

1:09:26you know, this year we're paying 3.4

1:09:28million just for the middle school bond,

1:09:31and that's only half of what they had

1:09:33approved. And uh

1:09:35>> that's that's incorrect.

1:09:36>> No, that I I I actually have it printed

1:09:38out, and I'm happy to share. This is

1:09:40from the middle school and and you know,

1:09:42they they sold the bond. They use the

1:09:43same Hilltop securities that we do. So,

1:09:46that was March 26. It's I got it off

1:09:48their website. So, do you think it's

1:09:51wise for us to bond more items when we

1:09:55have not seen when these massive

1:09:58projects, that's just one. We also

1:10:00approved the police station and we've

1:10:02only bonded half of that and we have

1:10:05completely bonded the new clubhouse. Um,

1:10:08do you think it's wise for us to go and

1:10:10bond uh something else?

1:10:13>> You're not being asked to bond it right

1:10:15now.

1:10:16>> Okay. You're being asked to approve the

1:10:191.2 million for architectural and permit

1:10:23fees. At that point in time, when that's

1:10:26done, you'll be asked to bond.

1:10:29>> Yes.

1:10:30>> And I I think the advantage of that is

1:10:34you're going to have a a better

1:10:35understanding

1:10:37of what it is you're being asked to buy

1:10:39into.

1:10:40>> Exactly.

1:10:40>> Okay. So yes, I'm painfully aware of the

1:10:45uh bonding cost currently in the tax

1:10:48rate,

1:10:50>> but uh I think proceeding with just this

1:10:541.2 million uh puts you in a in a better

1:10:58position

1:11:00to understand what the full cost of the

1:11:0322.4 is going to be. And in the

1:11:07meantime,

1:11:09what's the split? I think that what's

1:11:11the split is going to be a crucial

1:11:13number.

1:11:14The other issue that I brought up was

1:11:18not what's in the undesated fund

1:11:20balance, but what's in the tentative

1:11:23number

1:11:24>> of the current surplus from last year's

1:11:28budget.

1:11:29>> That number is readily available.

1:11:31Tenative.

1:11:32>> We don't have to wait that be audited.

1:11:35It's available,

1:11:36>> but not to you,

1:11:38>> Counc. Thank you. Uh Mr. Washburn, when

1:11:41you uh served on council for 10 years or

1:11:44so in the 90s, um were you ever um in

1:11:48the position similar to the position

1:11:50that we're in to vote on whether or not

1:11:53to work on the police station or

1:11:55Memorial Field in that era?

1:11:58>> No,

1:11:59>> didn't come up at all in that decade.

1:12:00>> Never came up.

1:12:01>> Interesting. Were there any projects

1:12:02where you had to

1:12:04>> Yes.

1:12:04>> vote to wait

1:12:06>> and defer maintenance? Uh actually the

1:12:08was my classic garage mahal project

1:12:12in which we had the public works garage

1:12:15which uh

1:12:16>> the comp what we call the combined out

1:12:18on North State. Yeah, that was that was

1:12:20a biggie. And I was very [clears throat]

1:12:24reluctant on that. And I I distinctly

1:12:27remember Ronnie Ford was probably one of

1:12:28the best directors of public works that

1:12:31we ever had. And he would sit down with

1:12:33his cup of coffee and you'd nail him

1:12:36with questions left and right and he'd

1:12:38answer them.

1:12:39>> And yeah, that that was the biggie. But

1:12:42we did bond. I forget how many millions

1:12:44it was, but it was a big number.

1:12:46>> But you support it. Did you follow up?

1:12:47>> Follow up. Did you support it in the

1:12:49end?

1:12:50>> I think I did,

1:12:51>> but I I I can't uh

1:12:54>> uh attest.

1:12:55>> That's okay.

1:12:57Was it a lot of money at the time?

1:12:58>> Oh, it was huge.

1:13:00>> And

1:13:02did you feel it was worth it for the

1:13:03city as a whole to spend that money on

1:13:06that project?

1:13:07>> I felt it could have been done a lot

1:13:10more prudently than it was.

1:13:14But you

1:13:14>> there were elements involved in that

1:13:17that uh I [clears throat] seriously

1:13:19question.

1:13:20>> We still have that facility today and we

1:13:23use it all the time as does the school

1:13:25district, right? Hence combined

1:13:26operations maintenance facility.

1:13:28>> It's in excellent condition.

1:13:29>> It's in excellent condition. All right.

1:13:30Thank you, Mr. Washburn, for your

1:13:31service and for answering my question.

1:13:33So I'll wait so other people can

1:13:34testify. All right, I have a question

1:13:36for

1:13:38>> Thank you for testifying and thank you

1:13:40for clarifying that tonight the item in

1:13:42front of us is just for the 1.2 which is

1:13:46600 of it part of the city council. So I

1:13:50appreciate the clarification and thank

1:13:52you for making my life easier because it

1:13:54seemed like you do agree that

1:13:58there is a need but there should be an

1:14:01agreement or an MOU between the two

1:14:05bodies.

1:14:06>> Oh absolutely. Uh I think the need is

1:14:11compelling.

1:14:12>> Thank you.

1:14:14>> Okay, councelor Brown.

1:14:15>> Yes. Um we had somebody had mentioned

1:14:18the the DRRA at 17%. Isn't it actually

1:14:21is it by state law that we would have uh

1:14:24municipalities have between five and

1:14:2717%.

1:14:28>> I believe the the bottom line is five,

1:14:30right?

1:14:31>> And I believe the top line is 17

1:14:33>> is 17 and we are actually currently

1:14:35>> that's her recommendation,

1:14:36>> right?

1:14:37>> I'm not sure if this a statutory

1:14:40requirement.

1:14:41>> It is a recommendation.

1:14:42>> Okay. Thank you very much.

1:14:44>> Thank you. Any other questions? Thank

1:14:46you, Mr. Wash. Appreciate it. Would

1:14:48anyone else like to testify?

1:14:50>> Yes.

1:14:50>> Uh, red shirt.

1:14:53[clears throat]

1:14:58>> Welcome.

1:15:00>> Wherever you wish, as long as you're in

1:15:01front of a microphone.

1:15:02>> Hello.

1:15:03>> Hello.

1:15:03>> Hi. Um, I'm Courtney Lec. I am in Ward

1:15:064. Um, I come to testify in several

1:15:10different roles. Um, I am a PTA member

1:15:13on two of the elementary school boards

1:15:15and I'm also the vice president of the

1:15:17Conquered Capitals football and cheer

1:15:19program. I am also a proud um spouse of

1:15:22a conquered high football coach who has

1:15:24been there for over 11 years who

1:15:26previously coached at Conquered Capitals

1:15:28for approximately seven or eight years.

1:15:30Um,

1:15:32I don't know where to start. Um, so I am

1:15:35not born and raised in conquered. Um but

1:15:38since being here for the last 15 years

1:15:41um I have noticed that there's a steady

1:15:44decline in the ability to have fields

1:15:48available for the conquered youth. Um

1:15:51our program for the Capitals just for

1:15:53football alone has approximately 65

1:15:55athletes from across the city. Um and

1:15:58also outside of surrounding areas that

1:16:00don't have local programs. Um I work

1:16:04very well. Well, I hope um the feeling

1:16:06is mutual with the city parks and recck

1:16:09department. Um David Gil and their

1:16:12recreation director um has worked really

1:16:14well with us. We have had a lot of

1:16:16hiccups around field availability. Um

1:16:20we've had to shift certain um athletic

1:16:24events like games. We've had to call out

1:16:27other school districts who have middle

1:16:28school teams um to rearrange their

1:16:32schedule in transportation because of

1:16:34lack of field availability, whether it's

1:16:36the weather or the lack of fully

1:16:39functioning lights um at the football

1:16:41field. Um we're currently working really

1:16:43closely with the athletic program at the

1:16:46high school to help supply and help us

1:16:49with um supporting our program with the

1:16:52temporary lights that are in place. Um,

1:16:54so they've been kind enough to move them

1:16:56to and from practice fields at Martin

1:16:58Field for both soccer and our youth

1:17:00program. Um, so it's really it's really

1:17:04really tough to be able to sustain a

1:17:07consistent schedule and a a routine for

1:17:11those kids um, and for the program when

1:17:14there's a lack of field availability

1:17:16because of weather or sufficient

1:17:18resources such as lighting and other

1:17:20things. Um, and really we We don't

1:17:24[clears throat] turn anybody away when

1:17:25it comes to our football and cheer

1:17:27programs. So, if you know financials is

1:17:29an issue to be able to support, we offer

1:17:32scholarships and we allow for um anybody

1:17:35who's willing and interested to

1:17:36participate to be able to do that. So,

1:17:39to add those additional barriers kind of

1:17:42spans more resources being taken because

1:17:45some individuals don't have

1:17:46transportation outside of those set

1:17:48times that we're now moving around. So,

1:17:51I really I really truly believe that

1:17:53supporting the redevelopment of this

1:17:55this football field and the overall

1:17:58field program um is very important not

1:18:00only for football but for the other

1:18:02sports fields as well.

1:18:04>> Thank you. Thank you. Any questions for

1:18:06Miss Le Schultz?

1:18:08>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. You're doing so.

1:18:10Um [laughter]

1:18:12that's an inside joke. I shouldn't have

1:18:14done that. Um so when you say because I

1:18:17totally am just ignorant of this. When

1:18:19you say the Capitals, is is that

1:18:22referring to I don't an external team

1:18:26from the high school and middle school

1:18:29or

1:18:30>> Yes.

1:18:30>> because I'm just clueless.

1:18:33>> Yeah. So, um the conquered Capitals is a

1:18:35youth football program. Um so we see it

1:18:38really as a a feeder program into the

1:18:40high school. Um we work really closely

1:18:42especially our seventh and eighth grade

1:18:44team um to help coordinate getting them

1:18:47familiar with the staff for the um

1:18:49conquered high football team, the other

1:18:51older athletes. We have um some

1:18:54conquered high athletes here that played

1:18:57for the Capitals. Um so we start tackle

1:18:59football at third grade and it goes to

1:19:01eighth grade and then our hope is that

1:19:03they love the game and they've learned a

1:19:04lot of skills and they continue on into

1:19:06the high school. So, it's a separate

1:19:08nonprofit um much like how um a prior

1:19:11speaker talked about conquered crush for

1:19:13lacrosse.

1:19:14>> Thank you.

1:19:14>> Of course,

1:19:18>> Brown.

1:19:18>> Yes. Do you have um Penokeook athletes?

1:19:22Do you see a lot of Penokeook athletes

1:19:23at Memorial Field or is it predominantly

1:19:26conquered high

1:19:27>> specific to Conquered Capitals or

1:19:29>> uh or just you know in with the

1:19:31different groups that you work with when

1:19:32you're at the field? Do you see Marramac

1:19:34Valley there? Um, I can't speak to if

1:19:36I've seen them there. I know for their

1:19:38youth program, they have a separate um,

1:19:40entity who does their youth football

1:19:42program. Um, and I've also been told

1:19:45that Marramax Valley's field is much

1:19:46much nicer than conquers. I haven't gone

1:19:48there myself. Um, but being the capital

1:19:51city, I would think that we would strive

1:19:53to have a very good, you know, field and

1:19:56opportunity for students to have their

1:19:58athletics there.

1:19:59>> Yeah. Thank you.

1:20:01>> Any other questions? Thank you so much

1:20:03for your time. Thank you.

1:20:08>> Yes.

1:20:13>> Hello, city council.

1:20:14>> Welcome.

1:20:15>> Uh, my name is Jennifer Chase. I'm a W 2

1:20:18resident and I am going to share a

1:20:20little bit of my personal history

1:20:21because I find it's relevant in this

1:20:22situation. So, uh, my father was Navy

1:20:25and they were my both my parents were

1:20:27originally from conquered. So when he

1:20:28retired, we moved back here, found a

1:20:30home in Lowden, and I actually graduated

1:20:32out of Marramac Valley in the 90s. So at

1:20:35the time, we were Scally Valley. I don't

1:20:37know if that's changed, but we didn't

1:20:40have um athletic facilities like there

1:20:43is now. We had Ralph Park and we had the

1:20:44track and that was good enough. I was

1:20:47too poor anyway, so I wasn't going to be

1:20:48able to play sports or music my entire

1:20:51life. And that's just how it is, right?

1:20:53Your family make choices. We had dinners

1:20:55together. We played games together. We

1:20:56did those things. But I wasn't a sports

1:20:58kid. Um, we were always jealous of the

1:21:01memorial field facilities. We wished we

1:21:04had those. It was such a like a leg up

1:21:06that conquered had over us and it was

1:21:08just part of our identity, you know. Uh,

1:21:10and I moved on and when I moved out of

1:21:12my own house in Lowden because Louden

1:21:14has no, you know, low access, no entry

1:21:17level apartments in Lowden. Uh, so I

1:21:19lived in Penuk. Uh, that was my starter

1:21:21apartment. I had a one landlord that I

1:21:23moved from Penuk into Conquered. And

1:21:25when I was finally ready to buy, I found

1:21:27a house in Panakook. And now I get to

1:21:29listen to the football games that didn't

1:21:31happen before. I got to watch my niece

1:21:33play lacrosse on the field and they have

1:21:35these beautiful bleachers and these

1:21:36wonderful stands and I can hear it from

1:21:38my house. And it's such a nice thing to

1:21:40see that my community put in so much

1:21:42work and made a big plan and saved over

1:21:44time so that they could put in

1:21:46investments into our facilities. Uh, and

1:21:49it's a beautiful thing. So, I think now

1:21:53to a couple of other people's points, I

1:21:55just want to reiterate that

1:21:57Panakook isn't saying that these things

1:21:59shouldn't happen. We're just saying that

1:22:02maybe we shouldn't be paying for them.

1:22:04Uh, you know, they weren't facilities

1:22:06that we could use growing up. So, at the

1:22:08very least, you're asking Pentec

1:22:1610% of the community, but at that same

1:22:19time, we're only 10% of the community,

1:22:21right? So maybe we could be given a

1:22:24little grace in this and pay a lower

1:22:25percentage or at least be told what

1:22:27percentage we're going to be asked to

1:22:28pay for a facility that we just don't

1:22:30have the fair access to, especially in a

1:22:33community that has nearly half of which

1:22:35is on free or reduced lunch. So I mean I

1:22:38hear everybody up here talking about all

1:22:40the sports that they play which is a

1:22:41luxury that a lot of kids couldn't even

1:22:43take advantage of in this community and

1:22:46you're asking us to pay a higher rate.

1:22:49That's all.

1:22:50>> Any questions?

1:22:52El Brown,

1:22:53>> I just want to say, yeah, I grew up the

1:22:55same way. Uh, we couldn't afford

1:22:57extracurriculars. Um, so I recognize

1:23:00that, but I love that you came back and

1:23:02you're contributing to your community.

1:23:04>> Yeah. So, thank you for your testimony.

1:23:06>> Thank you,

1:23:07>> Miss Chase. Do you do you feel that in

1:23:10the in the instance of the uh 12 uh the

1:23:131.2 2 million for the uh uh master plan

1:23:17and permitting. Do you feel that

1:23:20conquered the conquered school district

1:23:22paying for 50% of that mitigates the

1:23:26impact on you and other Marramac Valley

1:23:28people?

1:23:29>> No. As it was mentioned by a couple

1:23:31other folks, it's really putting the

1:23:33cart before the horse. There's no reason

1:23:35that we should be moving this forward at

1:23:36all until figuring out who's paying for

1:23:38what so that they can have an

1:23:39appropriate level of say in those

1:23:41specific decisions. This feels like a

1:23:44way to nickel and dime us into a 50-50

1:23:46split because we've gotten this far

1:23:49already. It's something that I've seen

1:23:50happen over the course of many projects

1:23:52that have been,

1:23:54you know, uh, opposed by the community.

1:23:57>> But, and you do realize, as councelor

1:23:58Curts asked in the response to her

1:24:01questions, that the 50-50 split on this

1:24:04is in no way influences how the any

1:24:07other cost sharing would

1:24:08>> Do we have that in writing?

1:24:11Yes,

1:24:11>> we could write it down.

1:24:12>> I can write it down and hand it to you

1:24:14if you like.

1:24:14>> I mean, it just it it feels like it's a

1:24:17we've been sitting on this for 12 years.

1:24:1912 at least years already. I don't

1:24:21understand why we can't take a couple

1:24:23more. We could do it in a couple of

1:24:25hours and figure out the percentage.

1:24:26We've already got the studies. The fact

1:24:28that those negotiations haven't been

1:24:30done yet, just feels a little bit

1:24:34the fact that it's been asked for so

1:24:35insistently, including a petition with

1:24:37over 600 signatures,

1:24:39and it's still not even addressed. I

1:24:42mean, there's a reason for that, right?

1:24:44Like, why are we at least not

1:24:46acknowledging that that's the concern

1:24:47and addressing why that process is is in

1:24:49that order?

1:24:51>> Thank you.

1:24:52>> Thank you.

1:24:55>> Pass a second.

1:24:55>> Thank you, honor. What is an ideal

1:24:57partnership look like to you?

1:25:00>> I think that depends on the facility,

1:25:01right? Like some fields the high school

1:25:03uses 88 or 89% of the time where others

1:25:07are only used 57% of the time, you know?

1:25:10So, I think that's a starting point of

1:25:12assessing basic projects on a a peace

1:25:15meal as far as who's paying what for

1:25:16each part.

1:25:18>> Hello. I'm just talking about the item

1:25:20that we have in front of us today. How

1:25:23can we even say what will be splitting

1:25:25up if we don't even know who's paying

1:25:27for it?

1:25:28>> Thank you.

1:25:30>> Any other questions?

1:25:32>> All right. Thank you very much.

1:25:33>> Thank you.

1:25:34>> Anyone else like to testify?

1:25:35>> Yes.

1:25:46>> Welcome.

1:25:47>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor and city

1:25:49councilors. First of all, thank you all

1:25:51for your time serving on this council.

1:25:53Um, as a member of the school board, I

1:25:56feel like I need to preface my remarks

1:25:58by saying that I'm here representing

1:25:59only myself as a taxpayer and resident

1:26:02and your constituent.

1:26:04>> I know who you are, but would you

1:26:06identify yourself?

1:26:06>> My name is Maline Mino and I'm a

1:26:08resident of W 4.

1:26:09>> Thank you.

1:26:10Um, I'm really here as the mom of two

1:26:12daughters who are athletes and I'm here

1:26:14to advocate uh for them and I'm here to

1:26:17urge you to move forward with uh urgency

1:26:19on the needed improvements to Memorial

1:26:21Field. I just spent most of my last

1:26:24weekend at Memorial Field actually

1:26:26because one of my daughters had a soccer

1:26:28tournament there and that soccer

1:26:31tournament and all of the uses that I

1:26:33saw there this weekend were community

1:26:35use. I saw lots of community members

1:26:37running on the track. I saw a baseball

1:26:39game. I don't know who they were, but

1:26:41they certainly weren't conquered school

1:26:42district. Um, I saw community members

1:26:45there all day Saturday, all day Sunday,

1:26:48and they were all enjoying our community

1:26:50resource, which is Memorial Field.

1:26:53There's been a lot of discussion about

1:26:55relative usage and cost sharing. And I

1:26:58wanted to bring forward one thing that I

1:27:00don't think has been looked at. And that

1:27:04for this part of the project that we are

1:27:06considering currently, the 50/50 split

1:27:09based [clears throat] on distribution of

1:27:10property values in the entire city, a

1:27:1350/50 split means that conquered school

1:27:15district taxpayers are paying more than

1:27:1895% of the cost. So we can argue about

1:27:22does the school district use the

1:27:24football field 83% of the time or 88% of

1:27:28the time or 90 or 95% of the time. But

1:27:31either way, conquered school district

1:27:33taxpayers for a 50/50 split are paying

1:27:37for more than 95% of the project cost if

1:27:40it is entirely taxpayer funded. So, I

1:27:44did want to bring that up because

1:27:46certainly the school district does not

1:27:48use the field

1:27:51more than 95% or 96% of the time.

1:27:56Middle school athletes only have three

1:27:57years and high school athletes only have

1:27:59four years. We've already lost whole

1:28:02seasons with no home meets, nohere to

1:28:06practice, busing our students to other

1:28:08towns so that they can have somewhere to

1:28:11practice. We, the school district,

1:28:13hosted a senior night somewhere that's

1:28:16not even in conquered this evening.

1:28:19That's not a feeling of community.

1:28:21That's not a feeling of home. So, I'm

1:28:24urging you to please move forward right

1:28:26now on the design and permitting of

1:28:29these memorial field improvements. Thank

1:28:31you.

1:28:31>> Thank you. Any questions for Miss

1:28:34Council Brown?

1:28:35>> Yes. I know you're not here as a school

1:28:37board member, but um

1:28:40you know, the school board and this was

1:28:42before you were on the board. Uh there

1:28:44had been talk about the school only

1:28:46being, you know, 85 million and then

1:28:49we're going to get 70 million in school

1:28:51building aid. None of that panned out

1:28:53and 168 million was approved, 75 million

1:28:58was bonded.

1:29:00You know, I would like you to consider

1:29:03um and advocate with other school board

1:29:06members that perhaps the conquered

1:29:09school board will take some would take

1:29:12the 1.2 2 million out of their funds

1:29:15because they have contingency funds that

1:29:18they have saved up and could outright

1:29:21cover this design right now. Right now

1:29:24and then we can work on

1:29:25>> point of order.

1:29:26>> Yes, counselor.

1:29:27>> Is this a question for a conquered

1:29:29resident in her role as a resident? Uh

1:29:31yes, this is

1:29:32>> I actually heard a question and I heard

1:29:34you begin the statement by saying I know

1:29:35you're you're not here as in your

1:29:37capacity as a school board member but so

1:29:39I would like to hear the question for

1:29:41Miss Mano a resident of Ward 4.

1:29:44>> How about I ask you a question? Um let's

1:29:47see. Brier Hydro Brier Hydro I know

1:29:50that's your that's where you work and

1:29:51your

1:29:52>> or your employer and we have um a pilot

1:29:57>> counselor. Is this relevant to the

1:29:58issue? I'm pointing out that we are

1:30:00asking we are asking taxpayers to to

1:30:04they're we're being asked to approve

1:30:07something that is going to increase

1:30:09taxes on taxpayers and they have no say.

1:30:12>> Councelor, can I remind you that that

1:30:14before we vote on this, you have an

1:30:16opportunity to make public statements

1:30:18and that questions that are public

1:30:20statements or pronunciations are not

1:30:22really questions. So if you have a

1:30:24question for the person testifying that

1:30:27relate to this and [clears throat]

1:30:28relate to their experience with this

1:30:31project, please go ahead. If not, please

1:30:34conclude.

1:30:35>> How do you who do you communicate with

1:30:38when there is an issue at Memorial

1:30:40Field?

1:30:43>> So

1:30:45I don't communicate with anyone. I see

1:30:48the deplorable condition that the field

1:30:50is in and I just wish we had something

1:30:53better. I hear from my daughter's middle

1:30:57school track coach that we can't host

1:31:00meets, that we can't practice on the

1:31:03track, that we don't have decent

1:31:07facilities, and it just makes me sad and

1:31:10it makes me want better for our

1:31:12community.

1:31:14>> Followup.

1:31:15>> Followup. So, who should we when people

1:31:19see these issues? Who is the right body

1:31:22to go to?

1:31:22>> How does she know that?

1:31:23>> I believe it's the park and recck

1:31:25department since they manage the

1:31:26property.

1:31:29>> Your honor,

1:31:30>> I have my hand.

1:31:32>> One second. Do you have a question?

1:31:34>> Councelor.

1:31:35>> All right. I recognize council.

1:31:37>> Thank you. Would you believe I really

1:31:39appreciate your testimony here today and

1:31:41on behalf of the council, we apologize

1:31:42for how rudely you were treated. I

1:31:44appreciate that. Thank you.

1:31:46>> Thank you.

1:31:47>> Any other questions?

1:31:49>> Thank you, Miss Manow. Appreciate it.

1:31:51>> Thank you, Miss Man.

1:31:52>> Would anyone else

1:32:11My partner's coming.

1:32:13I'll start by introducing myself for the

1:32:15record. My name is Jessica Wheeler

1:32:16Russell. I am a resident of Panakook in

1:32:19Ward 2. I also serve on the Remac Valley

1:32:22School Board as does my partner here,

1:32:24Tracy Bricky. [snorts]

1:32:26Um, but I am here in my own capacity as

1:32:29a private citizen and not on behalf of

1:32:31the board. Get your name. My name is

1:32:33Tracy Brickie and I um am a resident of

1:32:37Panakook Ward one and um

1:32:42so um I did send in some prepared

1:32:44remarks but I actually have modified

1:32:46them a little bit. So I'd like to kind

1:32:47of reread to enter them into the record

1:32:50again. So as I said before my name is

1:32:52Jessica Wheeler Russell. I'm a resident

1:32:54of Pentacook where I've been raising my

1:32:55family for the past nine years which is

1:32:57MVSD pride and I've been serving on the

1:33:01Marramac Valley school board for

1:33:04six years now six years. Um I'm speaking

1:33:07tonight again as a private citizen not

1:33:09on behalf of the board but I'm also here

1:33:11representing those of my constituents.

1:33:14I'm speaking with them, not representing

1:33:16them as their elected official, but

1:33:18those people who cannot be here because

1:33:19they cannot afford to be here

1:33:22due to time or just parenting and all

1:33:25that good stuff. Um, so what I am saying

1:33:29tonight is I'm asking you not to move

1:33:30forward with the 5050 split of this cost

1:33:32for the master plan, especially if it's

1:33:34being bonded. The uh 2425 planning costs

1:33:38were split evenly and tonight's 600 m

1:33:41$600,000 [clears throat]

1:33:42match would continue the same pattern.

1:33:44Each match makes the split harder to

1:33:46change. And [clears throat] I understand

1:33:47that you're saying that that doesn't

1:33:49mean it's set in stone, but I don't

1:33:51trust that.

1:33:53And by the time this $22 million

1:33:55construction arrives, we'll be told it

1:33:56is already settled. Master plan may be

1:33:59needed for grants, but it doesn't

1:34:00require um understanding who is paying

1:34:02which portion. Grants do reduce the

1:34:05total cost, but they do not decide who

1:34:06pays the rest. And that decision comes

1:34:08first. A 50-50 split, even on this item,

1:34:11means Penns twice. Our households would

1:34:14pay for Conquered High's athletic

1:34:15complex through city taxes while also

1:34:17paying our own schools at a higher rate.

1:34:20As folks here are, you know, probably

1:34:22know, Penuk, despite being in the same

1:34:25city as Conquered School District, we

1:34:27have a higher tax rate due to state

1:34:29funding issues.

1:34:31Um and I understand that um it might be

1:34:35that conquered pays you know n CST

1:34:39residents would be paying 95% of cost

1:34:41but MV we pay 100% of our own costs for

1:34:43our own upkeep our own responsibilities

1:34:45and obligations.

1:34:48So,

1:34:50um, this again creates inequities

1:34:53between our two districts and I asked

1:34:54the council to keep that in mind as we

1:34:56also pay towards Memorial Fields upkeep

1:34:58every year through our city taxes. While

1:35:00MV spends 182,000

1:35:03a year maintaining our own athletics

1:35:05facilities and this is why there is a

1:35:08six there's about 670 individuals who

1:35:10signed a petition which I did help

1:35:12create asking the city council to treat

1:35:14us fairly. There is also precedent for

1:35:17this. MV pays its own way. As I said

1:35:19before, when we've resurfaced our parks

1:35:22track, MV covered the full cost even

1:35:24though it is split nearly evenly between

1:35:26the city uh city land and school. And

1:35:29even though the and we do allow

1:35:31community to use the track very

1:35:32similarly. Envy is being treated

1:35:35differently and according to the city's

1:35:37own usage data, the conquered school

1:35:38district does account for 88% of the

1:35:40hours on varsity football, 83% of

1:35:42varsity soccer and lacrosse, 61 on

1:35:44softball field B, 57 on the track and

1:35:46tennis courts, and 52% on the baseball

1:35:49field. The field CS uh the field CS uses

1:35:52most or the ones in this plan seem to

1:35:54have a little bit more of the expensive

1:35:55artificial turf in it, which is a

1:35:58discussion I suppose for another time.

1:36:00And I also would like you to please

1:36:02consider who you are asking to pay for

1:36:04it because according to the 2026 New

1:36:07Hampshire New Hampshire Department of

1:36:09Education data, 43% of Pennook students

1:36:12qualify for free and reduced lunch. The

1:36:14state average is 24. Conquer school

1:36:17district is 32%. We have a higher need

1:36:20in our community and it shows through

1:36:22those numbers. That's nearly half of the

1:36:24school, which it's when I found that

1:36:27out, going a little off script, was wild

1:36:30to me to understand that there were kids

1:36:32in my my children's classrooms who were

1:36:35food insecure probably.

1:36:38And so these families would be paying

1:36:40for a facility used mainly by another

1:36:42school district. I also want to be clear

1:36:45about our intent because it's being

1:36:46misrepresentative, misrepresented in

1:36:49certain areas. Those of us in Pentook

1:36:51who are concerned about being taxed

1:36:53twice for school facilities, you know,

1:36:55might not have an objection to the city

1:36:57uh city supporting parks and programs we

1:36:59don't use. I don't use Rollins Park, but

1:37:01I'm glad it's there and there's a pool

1:37:03there for other folks to use. I sat here

1:37:06and advocated for lights at Key Park,

1:37:07but that does not benefit my children,

1:37:09my family, and probably a majority of

1:37:11the people that I serve in my in my uh

1:37:14district.

1:37:16And I also support addressing things

1:37:18like pedestrian safety at the heights.

1:37:21Folks at the table also know that I'm

1:37:23very passionate about pedestrian safety

1:37:25and uh folks on the heights need it just

1:37:27as much as we do. We choose to live in

1:37:30conquered and I support that good work.

1:37:33But this is about something different.

1:37:34It's asking Pennook, a community with

1:37:36less wealth than many of its conquered

1:37:38neighbors, to help pay for an athletic

1:37:40complex used mainly by another school

1:37:42district and sometimes by private

1:37:44schools for their teams. So, when I say

1:37:46this isn't about refusing to fix the

1:37:47field, I do mean that the drainage

1:37:49problems and worn out track are real.

1:37:51They should be fixed, but it's about who

1:37:53carries the burden. And this is another

1:37:55multi-million dollar project on top of a

1:37:57new police station and the Beaver Meadow

1:37:59Golf Course and the other obligations

1:38:02that have been placed upon the tax base.

1:38:04And each one is felt more heavily in

1:38:06Panakook. It's also about some needs

1:38:09versus wants, but that's really part of

1:38:11the plan, so I won't get into the

1:38:12details about that. But I do ask the K

1:38:15city council to hold on this

1:38:17appropriation or make it conditional

1:38:20until the city and the school district

1:38:21agree on the actual split um that is

1:38:24fair to penoke taxpayers, not an

1:38:26automatic 50/50 and until the plan is

1:38:28scaled to fully what the truly needs

1:38:30versus wants. And to kind of speak what

1:38:33I mean about needs versus wants, I

1:38:35understand that um having sat in my

1:38:38position as long as I have to that you

1:38:42want to give the kids the best that you

1:38:45can. And often those of us who sit in

1:38:48that particular position, we're weighing

1:38:51the, you know, what the kids we feel

1:38:53like the kids should have versus what

1:38:55that looks like to our tax base. So,

1:38:58I've had to say no to things before that

1:39:00would have been great for our school,

1:39:02but unfortunately, I understand that we

1:39:06have specific obligations to our

1:39:08taxpayers. And at that, I'll just I'll

1:39:10leave it at that. I don't know if you

1:39:11wanted to say anything. Um, well, I was

1:39:14going to uh say um

1:39:18when when it was brought up that I think

1:39:21you already said this though. When it

1:39:22was brought up that CSD um taxpayers are

1:39:25paying for 95% of the project, well,

1:39:28Marramac Valley School District people

1:39:31pay for 100% of the facilities in

1:39:35Marramac Valley. And we have we have

1:39:38allowed the conquered school district to

1:39:42come up and use our facilities uh free

1:39:44of charge without

1:39:47when they're because the memorial field

1:39:49has been terrible. I do want to say um

1:39:52when councelor Brown asked about how

1:39:55long memorial field has been like this.

1:39:58I hate to say this, but next summer,

1:40:01next summer, I will celebrate my 50th

1:40:04high school reunion from Conquered High

1:40:06School. And I was in the marching band.

1:40:09And if it rained, I marched in water up

1:40:14to my ankles. So, it's been a long time.

1:40:16>> Been a long time. Um, and I have just

1:40:20one more thing I would like to say to

1:40:21you, Mr. Mayor. I believe that you owe

1:40:25somebody an apology.

1:40:27I believe that you totally made light of

1:40:30the of the testimony that was made by

1:40:34Jen earlier and when [clears throat] you

1:40:36said I can write it down for you. That

1:40:39was really

1:40:42a terrible response to her comment and I

1:40:46believe you owe an apology.

1:40:48>> Well, I will apologize if you took

1:40:49offense and if she took offense or

1:40:51anybody in the audience took offense, I

1:40:53do apologize. It was not intended.

1:40:56>> Thank you. That's it.

1:40:58>> Council Kee,

1:41:00>> I just had a question. So, and and

1:41:02please don't take this the wrong way,

1:41:03but do you folks consider yourselves

1:41:06resident of conquered or resident of

1:41:08Pinnacook?

1:41:10>> I think that depends, right? I can't

1:41:12speak for Tracy. I actually moved here.

1:41:14I grew up in the upper valley and then I

1:41:16moved here and I my intention was to

1:41:18move for conquered. But as I've grown

1:41:21over time living here with my children,

1:41:24it's really interesting. The village has

1:41:25its own identity and I love it there. I

1:41:27love the people there. I love our feisty

1:41:30little village. It is so great. But I

1:41:33remember when I first moved here feeling

1:41:36this strange almost vibe from a lot of

1:41:39other residents where they felt ignored

1:41:41by conquered by design. And so often I

1:41:45think you're going to find people we'll

1:41:47say panuk because we love panakook. Of

1:41:50course we do. But maybe some of that

1:41:52we're panic cook not conquered really

1:41:54comes from how they feel about how

1:41:57they've been treated. There are certain

1:41:59things I could point to over the last

1:42:01nine years that even I came to that kind

1:42:03of same feeling but I do you know that's

1:42:04a gut reaction of like oh but that

1:42:06doesn't necessarily mean I fully believe

1:42:08that things like when leaf pickups were

1:42:11in jeopardy we were the first to go

1:42:12[clears throat] stuff like that like

1:42:13little things that build up over time.

1:42:15So to answer your question, I feel like

1:42:17I'm a resident of Paneka Conquer, but

1:42:19that's because it could be that I just

1:42:21didn't, you know, grow up here.

1:42:23>> Just to follow up.

1:42:24>> Thank you. And u for the record, I've

1:42:26lived here my whole life. I've left for

1:42:28school and then came back and my first

1:42:29house was on River Road in Pentacook. So

1:42:31I'm from Penuk originally. But the

1:42:34reason I [clears throat] asked that

1:42:34question is because we have 21 parks, I

1:42:37think, in conquered. And

1:42:41each village, if you will, East

1:42:43Conquered, Penuk, the West End, South

1:42:46End, they all contribute to the Heights,

1:42:49they they all contribute to the 21 parks

1:42:52and probably not equally, but that's the

1:42:54nature of living in a municipality. And

1:42:56I just want to point that out. I think

1:42:58you understand that, but that's the ch

1:43:00other challenge we have or I have on

1:43:01this side of the table.

1:43:03>> Thank you.

1:43:04>> Other questions? Councelor Todd.

1:43:06>> Yes. Thank you. Thank you for your

1:43:07testimony. appreciate it. Um just uh and

1:43:10we and we did receive also uh the

1:43:12petition that was circulated. So that I

1:43:14just wanted to let you know that that we

1:43:16did get that as part of the materials

1:43:18and that's part of the public record.

1:43:19Can you remind folks of what the

1:43:21petition calls for in terms of the

1:43:23division of costs for construction of

1:43:25the project? Um I don't have it in front

1:43:27of me but I will give you my personal

1:43:30view because that's a group project and

1:43:31so therefore we often have to

1:43:35come together with some um ideas and I

1:43:39understand I believe the position costs

1:43:41for 100%. Um I personally

1:43:45um find that if this was negotiated in

1:43:48good faith that 100% might not

1:43:50necessarily be the correct number but it

1:43:53sure shouldn't be 50/50. I don't even

1:43:55think it should be 6040.

1:43:57I think that I am I think what I'm

1:44:00really saying here and I'm going to be a

1:44:02little bit more personal about it is I'm

1:44:04quite exhausted of begging to for folks

1:44:08here to see the humanity for those of

1:44:11our families that are economically

1:44:13disadvantaged.

1:44:14And so,

1:44:17you know, I hope that this council

1:44:20enters a good faith argument or uh

1:44:23discussion about

1:44:25um

1:44:27where the numbers should land, but

1:44:30again, it's not my decision. I can only

1:44:33tell you how we feel about it, what our

1:44:35pain is, and and how I hope that you

1:44:38would move forward with understanding

1:44:40that even if it's just 10%, that that

1:44:4210% matters just as much. as everyone

1:44:45else.

1:44:46>> Follow up.

1:44:46>> Yeah, thank you. Thanks. Appreciate

1:44:48that. Um, yes, because I the petition

1:44:50does [clears throat] call for 100%

1:44:52payment by Conquered School District.

1:44:53So, I appreciate your your own personal

1:44:55views and comments on that. Um, I think

1:44:58that uh um would you would you be uh

1:45:02satisfied with negotiations that went

1:45:04forward at the at the proper point for

1:45:06those negotiations, which will be when

1:45:07we actually have a real price and we

1:45:09know exactly what's going to be in the

1:45:11plan. um to include uh let's say the

1:45:15actual percentages of use on each

1:45:17particular field if that was a way to

1:45:18divide the costs. Would that be

1:45:20something you'd be in favor of?

1:45:21>> You actually I think you may have excuse

1:45:23me I [clears throat] believe you have

1:45:25referenced uh I didn't really quite

1:45:27finish my question but thank you your

1:45:28honor [laughter] uh cover I'm giving you

1:45:31some cover.

1:45:31>> Thank you. Uh so I think I think you

1:45:34referenced like that some of the fields

1:45:35like football fields use 88% of the

1:45:37time. So that would be one example of a

1:45:39division of cost. Would that be

1:45:40something that you'd be supportive of,

1:45:42do you think?

1:45:43>> If I understand your question correctly,

1:45:45it's you're asking, "Well, shouldn't we

1:45:46have a plan first before we decide who

1:45:48split?" Is that what you're asking?

1:45:50>> No, I was actually asking you followup.

1:45:52>> Follow uh if you would be comfortable

1:45:54with a split that would be devised based

1:45:57on those percentages of uses for each

1:45:59particular field. Would that be

1:46:00something because we talked about you'd

1:46:02set the 100% you're not necessarily in

1:46:03favor of that. So, I was trying to get

1:46:05at trying to get at what you would

1:46:07support.

1:46:09>> Um, what I would support personally, um,

1:46:13I think fair usage, but I also know that

1:46:18fair usage. I think the other aspect of

1:46:21this, which isn't really technically on

1:46:23the docket for tonight, and so I don't

1:46:24want to deeply discuss this, is the

1:46:26certain things that are rather expensive

1:46:28in this project

1:46:31are stuff that the school is using the

1:46:32most. And so I'm concerned that a lot of

1:46:35the more expensive items, which means

1:46:36we'd still be paying a bit more, would

1:46:39be uh put on the backs of our taxpayers.

1:46:43So, I guess I guess the answer I'm going

1:46:45to give is I mean I I would find it a

1:46:48little more comfortable. Um if it was 80

1:46:5188% of CSD pays for, you know, the turf

1:46:55that they're asking for for I forget

1:46:56which field it was, but um that would

1:46:59make me I think I I would be more

1:47:01satisfied with that than a 50-50 split

1:47:04or like I said before even a 6040.

1:47:06>> Thank you. Appreciate that. Yeah. Um I

1:47:08just wanted to ask if you're aware of

1:47:10the fact that um and this would be for

1:47:12the public as well that my understanding

1:47:14is that David Gil is continuing to

1:47:16collect data going forward through this

1:47:18year on the on those percentages of

1:47:21uses. So I believe that when we get to

1:47:23the end of this year we'll have a

1:47:25compilation of 2026 percentage of use

1:47:28and we'll have 2025 as well because he

1:47:30had tracked that.

1:47:32>> I oops sorry I do have a question

1:47:34though. If they're not using the field

1:47:35as much because it's in such disrepair,

1:47:37why would it be fair to use those

1:47:39[clears throat] statistics?

1:47:41>> If they're not using it, it's not really

1:47:43gonna be my question.

1:47:44>> Yeah, that was my question.

1:47:45[clears throat]

1:47:46>> Thank [laughter] you. Um, now my

1:47:47understanding is that the the uses that

1:47:49are being tracked are based on on permit

1:47:52permitted requests. So, in other words,

1:47:55the school district may not actually be

1:47:57able to use the field at that time, but

1:47:58they've allotted certain amount of time

1:48:00that they know they need to use it for

1:48:01their uh games and so forth. And so

1:48:03they're putting in those requests for

1:48:05permits. Those I think are what's being

1:48:06tracked. And I believe the in addition

1:48:08to that, what's being tracked now, which

1:48:10wasn't tracked in 2025, was uses for

1:48:13physical education classes and other

1:48:15types of uses that uh weren't on a

1:48:17permit basis, but I believe Mr. Gil is

1:48:20tracking those as well. So I guess my

1:48:22question would be

1:48:24you're aware I'm hoping that that that

1:48:26is continuing to be tracked.

1:48:28>> Is that classes for conquered school

1:48:30district,

1:48:31>> right? the uses of that that conquered

1:48:33school district is is using it

1:48:35specifically so that we'll know what

1:48:36that percentage rate is. Um

1:48:38>> I would have Jess's same concern about

1:48:41>> the

1:48:43Memorial Fields not getting the same

1:48:45usage that it's gotten in years past

1:48:47because it just can't because it's in

1:48:49such total disresp.

1:48:54>> Thank you. I think that there's a

1:48:55difference though between the usage and

1:48:56the permit. you're taking a permit out

1:48:58and then if you get to the field and

1:48:59it's raining that day and you can't use

1:49:01it, but the fact of the matter is that

1:49:02you would have used it were not for the

1:49:03rain. Let's say that's that's another

1:49:05example, right?

1:49:06>> But I Well,

1:49:06>> so so in other words, I think it can

1:49:08still be tracked uh with a fair amount

1:49:10of accuracy. [clears throat]

1:49:12>> Um so

1:49:14>> one more followup if you follow up.

1:49:16>> Thank you. And I appreciate you taking

1:49:18>> Would really like to ask a question.

1:49:19>> Yes, I'm sorry about that.

1:49:21>> I'm fine. Uh, no. I just uh uh so I

1:49:24guess that um would you say that it

1:49:27would be better for us to at least have

1:49:29more data and more percentage of

1:49:31information available before we begin

1:49:32negotiations

1:49:34with the school district about a cost?

1:49:36>> Data is always best.

1:49:37>> Okay. Thank you.

1:49:38>> Data is always best. But again, I still

1:49:40don't exactly because if I know that the

1:49:42field if it's going to rain, it's a

1:49:43rainy season and I was trying to plan a

1:49:45sports event, I sure as heck would not

1:49:47go to the field that I know is already

1:49:48poor

1:49:50>> and like I just even with a permit like

1:49:52I

1:49:52>> already are scheduling

1:49:54>> scheduling events in other places

1:49:59>> without even thinking about going to the

1:50:02field. So

1:50:05>> thank you. I believe last time you

1:50:07ladies were here, we had a conversation

1:50:08just briefly about a very complicated

1:50:10formula that the state requires for the

1:50:13split of funding at Marramac Valley

1:50:15schools and that 38% of the population

1:50:18are our kids from Penuk, but 50% of the

1:50:20budget is from the town. Is that

1:50:23correct?

1:50:25>> I'm sorry. Are you talking about how

1:50:26school funding works?

1:50:28>> I'm talking about what percentage of

1:50:30kids live in Penrook that attend the

1:50:32schools. Okay. Oh,

1:50:34>> and what percentage of the budget is

1:50:37funded by those residents?

1:50:39>> So, that is not a quick question. Um, I

1:50:43I think that

1:50:44>> I think that we can get it for you.

1:50:45>> Yeah, that's definitely like a you need

1:50:46to look at the ADM calculation which is

1:50:48on the New Hampshire state's uh

1:50:50Department of Education website. I can't

1:50:51give that answer because we would be

1:50:53here for another hour talking about it.

1:50:55>> But I can get I can get the BA to uh

1:50:58reach out. But the answer is we do pay

1:51:01the majority because we have the most

1:51:02students and that is just

1:51:04>> schoolboard questions

1:51:05>> flat out. But um I think

1:51:08>> your question

1:51:09>> but like again I

1:51:11>> I mean I do feel like you're asking me

1:51:12in the capacity of a school board member

1:51:14simply because I sit there and I do have

1:51:17that knowledge because I have to do it

1:51:19every year.

1:51:21any like I mean I'm gonna tell you I've

1:51:23been doing this for six years and school

1:51:24funding the calculation is so

1:51:26complicated um that um I bet you anybody

1:51:30else in the audience wouldn't actually

1:51:31be able to answer that question except

1:51:33my other school board members behind me

1:51:34>> and let's move on

1:51:35>> council foot thank you your honor um I

1:51:38think I asked almost the exact same

1:51:40question the last time they were here um

1:51:42and let's just round numbers do you

1:51:44think that Panok and conquered residents

1:51:47make up 50% of their valley school

1:51:49district.

1:51:50>> Conquered and Penuk residents make up

1:51:5250% of May.

1:51:54>> Most people in W 2, correct, that are in

1:51:56conquered.

1:51:58>> We're Penic. I mean, there's a 50-50

1:52:00split in W 2, but I would actually ask

1:52:02the W 2 counselor to give more of a

1:52:03detail on that. I don't think your

1:52:05question quite maths out. Um, we have

1:52:10right we have 38% of the kids and so

1:52:12therefore we just pay majority of the

1:52:13costs. I cannot give the exact number

1:52:15and I'm kind of concerned why we would

1:52:18say conquered is in that because

1:52:20technically they're not.

1:52:22>> Well, conquered is in there because

1:52:24we're all conquered.

1:52:25>> Well, and this is the point we're

1:52:26making. I think

1:52:27>> I think I agree with you. May I follow?

1:52:30So, I think we heard testimony that um

1:52:34let's just say it's 50%. um that there

1:52:37are several other communities that play

1:52:40on Ralph Park and the facilities uh for

1:52:44at Marramck Valley. Correct. This the

1:52:46kids from Webster and Louden, do they

1:52:48all play on?

1:52:49>> We all Well, it depends on the team. Um

1:52:51I would like to remind the folks here

1:52:53that we had a series of very uh

1:52:55financial challenges much like most

1:52:56other school districts have across the

1:52:58state where we had to cut

1:52:59>> Why are we talking about

1:53:00>> Sorry, I'm answering who's going to play

1:53:02where. Um cut we had to cut sports

1:53:05teams. Um that does mean that depending

1:53:07on I would assume and this would

1:53:08actually be more of a question for Kenny

1:53:10Edwards our athletics director our usage

1:53:12of Rolls Park did go down but of course

1:53:14of course the kids who are playing on

1:53:17these fields they're playing at MVY it's

1:53:19going to be a mix of kids but [snorts]

1:53:21we also pay for our own stuff and so I'm

1:53:25not exactly sure about the question here

1:53:28>> follow up.

1:53:29>> Thank you. I guess my question is um

1:53:31does conquer taxpayers contribute to the

1:53:34to Ralph Park like we do every other

1:53:35park?

1:53:36>> Yes.

1:53:37>> I should ask city manager.

1:53:39>> Yeah. I I I may

1:53:41>> Yes, you may

1:53:42>> try to pull this together. Um I think

1:53:44the question is if the train leaves the

1:53:46station going 85 miles an hour going

1:53:48east, right? I mean that's that's what

1:53:49we're talking about here.

1:53:52In reality, if you build a new if a new

1:53:54facility is built, it's going to the use

1:53:57of it is going to increase because you

1:53:59can use it earlier in the day, you can

1:54:01use it later at night. If it has a turf

1:54:02field, you're going to be able to use it

1:54:03when it rains, when it snows. It's going

1:54:05to be used from March to December versus

1:54:08now it's used from May till October. So

1:54:12I think what you're going to be talking

1:54:13what you're going to have to this is

1:54:14going to be a lot more complicated than

1:54:16what the discussion is going on here

1:54:18because the capacity has been going down

1:54:20over the years as the facility has

1:54:22deteriorated. But you can dramatically

1:54:25increase it by having a new facility.

1:54:27When you dramatically increase the

1:54:28facility, you're going to be have to

1:54:30look at all the different type of uses

1:54:31that are going to occur there and then

1:54:33you could partition out who's using what

1:54:35when and what share is what. So I think

1:54:38you're not going to you're not going to

1:54:39solve that tonight. There's a there's a

1:54:41there's a lot and I know you're not

1:54:42trying to

1:54:43>> He's asking about do like Webster kids

1:54:45play on Ralph's Park. Yes. Penn kids

1:54:48play in Webster's fields too. So like we

1:54:50have a very um unique relationship

1:54:52because of our other towns, especially

1:54:54the smaller ones that tend to have joint

1:54:57joint facilities. So yes, Panakook

1:54:59taxpayers are also paying um in some

1:55:02fashion to to the Webster kids as well

1:55:05and use their stuff as well. So it's

1:55:07kind of a joint thing. follow up.

1:55:10>> Just a general comment. I I just I don't

1:55:13like this division that is being created

1:55:15and we need to really focus on the 21

1:55:18parks in the schools as a group and so

1:55:21um I would appreciate

1:55:22>> appropriate for the discussion.

1:55:29>> Thank you. You could have saved that for

1:55:31the discussion but that's okay. Okay.

1:55:34Any other questions for uh Miss Wheeler

1:55:37Russell and Miss Briti?

1:55:39>> I do.

1:55:41>> Council Seco, I saw your hand first.

1:55:43>> No, no, no. I just want to say thank you

1:55:44very much. And you and I just discussed

1:55:46earlier about open enrollment which is a

1:55:49law. So if two student from

1:55:53I don't know may pan decided to come

1:55:58that you represent the school board and

1:56:00they play here still an advantage. I

1:56:02think it's always good to have a field

1:56:06that everybody can use. Penuk can use it

1:56:08if they want. It's not that they cannot

1:56:11use it. Is that my understanding? Right.

1:56:13>> Um I'm sorry. Are you saying that con

1:56:15Panuk students can attend conquered high

1:56:18school as an open enrollment?

1:56:19>> If that's the case, I don't know

1:56:21>> that. No. Uh we don't have an open

1:56:23enrollment agreement. There's there's um

1:56:25other things that are there, things like

1:56:27um the CTE uh which is the technical

1:56:29center, but we have an agreement with

1:56:33other schools to allow

1:56:36>> our students to attend their um those

1:56:40schools for uh a certain percentage of

1:56:42time, but I believe this was a couple

1:56:45years ago. Yes, I know conquered backed

1:56:47out of that.

1:56:48>> Sorry. Yes, I'll take the school board

1:56:50hat off. It's hard

1:56:52>> followup. I'm just asking that question

1:56:54if that case

1:56:56>> in that case something come up that they

1:56:59agree that there is an open enrollment

1:57:01agreement because because it doesn't

1:57:03have it today doesn't mean it's not

1:57:05there next year or 5 years from now

1:57:08>> open enrollment is a state question not

1:57:10a local

1:57:11>> no I didn't ask you I'm just saying kids

1:57:13that play either they move from Pacok to

1:57:16Concord or Concord to Penoke to go to

1:57:19school or to play still an

1:57:21[clears throat] opportunity for all of

1:57:22us as the community, right?

1:57:25>> Yes. But the question comes back to you,

1:57:26Sage, and I'm just not um I'm I'm I'm

1:57:28not going to drag that out again. We've

1:57:30been here forever.

1:57:31>> I know. Councilor Brown.

1:57:32>> Yes. I have a question. Thank you for

1:57:34answering all those schoolboard

1:57:35questions. I have a a question for you

1:57:36as Penokeook residents. Um how do you

1:57:40feel about us using $600,000 from the

1:57:45recreation reserve? I know that the

1:57:47recreation reserve is made up of

1:57:49taxpayer money which is Pinnacook and

1:57:51conquered. How do you feel about that as

1:57:53as Pinnacook residents if we take it

1:57:55from the recreation reserve?

1:57:57>> Well, I I I'm really concerned that

1:58:00you're going to make that decision to do

1:58:01it tonight. I don't think that that's a

1:58:04decision that you should be making

1:58:05tonight whether or not to to and then

1:58:08where to take the money from. And I

1:58:09think that there are so many other

1:58:11things that still need to be worked out

1:58:14that I think it's premature.

1:58:16>> Thank you.

1:58:16>> Ditto.

1:58:18>> Thank you. Thank you both.

1:58:19>> Thank you.

1:58:19>> Thank you. Is there anyone else who

1:58:21would like to testify

1:58:23>> right there?

1:58:38Hi everyone. Good to see you. I haven't

1:58:40been here in a while. My name is

1:58:42Meredith Culie, Ward Five. And I didn't

1:58:47prepare anything. And to all the young

1:58:50people in the audience, I just want to

1:58:53role model that you don't have to

1:58:55prepare something. It doesn't have to be

1:58:57perfect, but it is important to use your

1:58:59voice. And I know the football team's

1:59:02motto is be great today. And I just want

1:59:04to acknowledge that all the young people

1:59:07in this room

1:59:09a have absolutely made that clear. And

1:59:12they have done that. They have um been

1:59:15great today by showing up today. And I

1:59:18really encourage them to come up here

1:59:19and just say one or two things about why

1:59:22they're here because your voice matters.

1:59:26I um wanted to say that I moved to

1:59:29conquered 15 years ago and pushed my

1:59:33stroller endlessly around Memorial Field

1:59:37to get my son to go to sleep for nap

1:59:40time. Um I have

1:59:44taught my kids how to play tennis at the

1:59:46tennis courts. We have run the track. I

1:59:49have run endless amounts of stairs up

1:59:52the bleachers which are no longer there.

1:59:54Um, it is a place where I've met new

1:59:57people and have come to watch the uh

2:00:03fireworks which are great.

2:00:06And it really is like the kitchen of Ark

2:00:10City. It's it's the heart. It's where

2:00:12everybody comes together to bond and and

2:00:15meet people and have conversations. And

2:00:19now that um baby of mine is 15 and is a

2:00:24on the freshman football team

2:00:27and is playing is dressing for the games

2:00:31um under the lights and it's it's

2:00:35extraordinary to go to those games and

2:00:37see people old and young and everything

2:00:41in between coming out. But I remember my

2:00:43grandfather probably lived to 89 because

2:00:47he came out to his the high school games

2:00:49um because it was community and I see my

2:00:53my husband and I doing the exact same

2:00:55thing. We are hooked on um sports in

2:00:59conquered. I started coaching last year

2:01:02and for other things and it's I can't

2:01:06tell you how important it is um as a

2:01:09nurse physically as um a parent to get

2:01:13our kids connected and off screens and

2:01:18engaged and active and um having other

2:01:22adults in their lives like these hero

2:01:24coaches that are in the room today. Um,

2:01:28so I just would really like you to I

2:01:31would really like to see you move

2:01:32forward uh in every way imaginable on

2:01:36this renovation.

2:01:38Um, I don't know if my kids will see the

2:01:42fruits of it, but um, I know they won't

2:01:46see the fruits of the school, but I

2:01:48think it's all a positive thing when

2:01:50we're investing in our future and our

2:01:52children. Um, and I can say that uh

2:01:58several community members came together

2:02:00to create the spark um in collaboration

2:02:04with uh parks and wreck to create the

2:02:05spark program um which is a free program

2:02:09in the winter for kids particularly uh

2:02:12who live uh near the citywide community

2:02:14center to come out and play and have a

2:02:16safe space on the weekends. And I see

2:02:20those kids coming not because they're

2:02:22students of the school district, which

2:02:24they are, but they're not coming in a

2:02:26student capacity. They're coming to

2:02:28connect on Friday night and they're

2:02:30coming to be part of of conquered. And I

2:02:35think that's really powerful. And I

2:02:37think I saw one of them refing. He went

2:02:40from being a participant in this program

2:02:42to now being grown more grown up and

2:02:45refing out there having a job at

2:02:47Memorial Field. So, um I'd really like

2:02:50you to um vote to move forward and I

2:02:55hope some of our young people will come

2:02:57up and say a few words because it

2:03:01matters. Um so, thank you.

2:03:04>> Thank you. Any questions? Cir Schultz.

2:03:08It's cool. So, good to see you. Good to

2:03:11see you. Um, because I know you and

2:03:13trust you and I will self-identify as a

2:03:16complete idiot on this topic. So, I

2:03:18appreciate you're answering the question

2:03:21I'm about to ask. I am completely

2:03:24confused by all the nonprofit sports

2:03:27groups that kids who attend our public

2:03:30schools but participate in travel teams.

2:03:34What should a counselor making these

2:03:36decisions understand about that piece of

2:03:39the pie when

2:03:41um it used to be if you went to public

2:03:44school, you played the school sports.

2:03:48What should I understand about that

2:03:50complex system? as I sit here and try to

2:03:54make a good decision.

2:03:55>> I am probably not the best person to to

2:03:58answer that question, but what I can say

2:04:00is that um school itself is not always a

2:04:05uh channel to success for a lot of kids.

2:04:09Some kids have have talents in in music,

2:04:12some people have talents in robotics,

2:04:15and some people have talents out on the

2:04:18fields. and having they I mean the the

2:04:23it I don't know about the research again

2:04:25I'm not the perfect person to ask but

2:04:27what I have seen is that it takes um

2:04:30more touches on the ball um to get where

2:04:34you want to go and be success to get the

2:04:36um to get where you want to go with

2:04:38sports and so these nonprofits not only

2:04:40that but these nonprofits come in and

2:04:43really help kids who have talent or

2:04:47develop talent

2:04:48>> [snorts]

2:04:49>> kids who have just had never had a shot

2:04:51to progress and progress and so that

2:04:53they can have even more success in the

2:04:55field of athletics. Um, and in terms of

2:04:59your question about how it coincides

2:05:02with the school, um, it's my

2:05:06understanding that it that parks and

2:05:09wreck, city of conquered provides, um,

2:05:13field space and has collaborations with

2:05:17these nonprofits who then, um, push

2:05:21athletes on to to achieve at a higher at

2:05:25a higher potential and give them

2:05:27opportunities, give them more adult role

2:05:29models, and David Gil has done always

2:05:32done a excellent job at sort of

2:05:33providing the arena for things other

2:05:36than schools for children to have

2:05:39opportunities. And I know that a lot of

2:05:40the kids who I know and love from Spark

2:05:44just got on to Conquer Caps, which is

2:05:46the nonprofit football. Um I know that

2:05:50Girls on the Run have given a lot of um

2:05:52scholarships to kids to participate and

2:05:56then they have the um Girls on the Run

2:05:59um 5K out of Memorial Field which is a

2:06:02big event. Um so I think it's I think

2:06:06that they're really it's a really

2:06:08because we have the community resources

2:06:09which of course now the track can't do

2:06:12that. I coach for girls on the run but

2:06:14um that so that's that's an issue. I

2:06:17don't know how we're going to get around

2:06:18that this spring, but

2:06:20>> thank you. That answers it well.

2:06:21>> Uh, Mr. Spell

2:06:23>> Meredith is very astute.

2:06:24>> Yes,

2:06:25>> she gave you good advice.

2:06:27[laughter]

2:06:28>> That's how it works.

2:06:30>> It's not a question, but I just want to

2:06:32say thank you for testifying and thank

2:06:34you for all you do in this community. I

2:06:36don't know if there is any fervent

2:06:38advocates that I know for the kids like

2:06:41yourself. And I remember all those

2:06:43questions and conversation that we had

2:06:45around kids and all kids. So, thank you.

2:06:48>> Thank you, counselor.

2:06:49>> Any other questions?

2:06:51>> Seeing none, thank you. Thank you.

2:06:53Anyone else like to testify?

2:06:54>> Thank you.

2:06:55>> Yes, sir.

2:07:02>> Welcome.

2:07:02>> Hello, everyone.

2:07:04>> Uh my name is Mike Leonard. I am the

2:07:06head football coach at Conquer High. I'm

2:07:08also uh the cooking teacher at the high

2:07:10school.

2:07:11Um,

2:07:14I kind of want to start with the kid who

2:07:17came up here who was in the band, right?

2:07:20Um, you know, one of the things he said

2:07:22stuck with me and everybody laughed in

2:07:23the room. He was like, "Yeah, you know,

2:07:25we we got to march with our heads, you

2:07:27know, facing forward and

2:07:31we got to trip over the cracks, right?"

2:07:34To me, like that's not okay, right? the

2:07:37the band can't march normal because of

2:07:39the conditions of the field. Um,

2:07:43grandparents can't come to our football

2:07:45games and watch their kids play,

2:07:49>> right? Like they can't see, if you come

2:07:51to one of our games this year, you

2:07:52cannot see what's going on on the field

2:07:54because it's ground level. Um,

2:07:58we weren't able to have graduation at

2:08:00our school. I don't know if anyone

2:08:01everyone in the room here knows um where

2:08:04we had graduation, but we had it in a

2:08:06parking lot,

2:08:07>> right? When you think of your high

2:08:08school graduation, do you think of a

2:08:10parking lot, right? Like that kind of

2:08:12sucks in my opinion. Um

2:08:16so like I know that this committee has a

2:08:18lot to decide and I know that number up

2:08:20there um is pretty high, right? But you

2:08:24know, I don't know if you guys follow

2:08:25people in the room follow what's going

2:08:26on in London, right? But they they're

2:08:29getting a new field and they started the

2:08:30Lancer Fund, right? And they just had a

2:08:33big presentation at their last home

2:08:35game. They got a donation of 250,000

2:08:37from St. Mary's Bank, right? Um and they

2:08:40were able to do that because they had

2:08:43the the the final design and the permits

2:08:46and all that stuff put together, right?

2:08:49So yeah, I know that what is it 134

2:08:52million is a lot of money for taxpayers,

2:08:54right? I get it. Gas is 460 a gallon.

2:08:56That sucks, right? So, adding more onto

2:08:59it, that that's not cool either. But we

2:09:01don't know what it's going to be that

2:09:03final cost, right? Because, you know,

2:09:05people are willing to help donate,

2:09:06right? We have tons of businesses here

2:09:08in conquered. We got all this stuff. So,

2:09:10um I know it's a big decision. Um if we

2:09:13don't make it today, right, we're just

2:09:14kicking the can down the road, right?

2:09:16And we got guys in jerseys over here,

2:09:18right, who they don't know where they're

2:09:20playing their games. They don't know

2:09:21where they're graduating, right? And and

2:09:23to me, that that's why I'm here. that's

2:09:25why they're here because that sucks for

2:09:26them, right? And so, yeah, if we pass

2:09:28this today, but we can all work together

2:09:30to to raise money, right, and bring that

2:09:32cost down and the taxpayers and all

2:09:34that. But if we just say, ah, just keep

2:09:36kicking the can down the road, right?

2:09:38Then nothing's going to happen and

2:09:40Memorial Field is going to keep falling

2:09:41apart, right? And then we're not going

2:09:42to have anywhere to play our games or

2:09:43anywhere to have PE class for that

2:09:44matter. Uh, so that's all I want to say.

2:09:47>> Thank you, Mr. Leonard. Any questions

2:09:48for Mr. Leonard? Council.

2:09:50>> Yes. I just want to say thank you very

2:09:52much for coming out for your testimony

2:09:53and I want to thank all the coaches. Uh

2:09:56Meredith, you're coaching girls on the

2:09:58run, um the formal sports coaches. It's

2:10:01it's pretty awesome and you are

2:10:03outstanding role models for coming and

2:10:05advocating for your kids. So, thank you

2:10:07for being here.

2:10:10>> Thank you so much.

2:10:11>> Thank you very much. Thanks for your

2:10:13work with the kids. Anyone else like to

2:10:15testify? Yes.

2:10:23Welcome.

2:10:23>> Thank you. I'm not not as cordial as

2:10:27most people. Uh my name is Mona Lisa

2:10:30Eaton and I am in Ward 9 and I have

2:10:36lived here since 2010.

2:10:40Before that I came from Mormon, New

2:10:41Hampshire. And I used to I used to be

2:10:45there for the I was a soccer coach, a

2:10:48softball coach, a baseball coach all the

2:10:50way around. And

2:10:53what what we have to think as a

2:10:55community is how dangerous is that field

2:11:00for the kids that are playing on it or

2:11:02running around it. How much are they

2:11:03going to have a hospital bill because

2:11:06their kid got hurt with their knee or

2:11:08their shoulder or their head? they get

2:11:10concussion because they're sliding in to

2:11:13do the football or they're sliding in to

2:11:15do the soccer. How much is it going to

2:11:17cost that parent or even the state uh or

2:11:21the city if they decide to sue because

2:11:24the thing was not

2:11:27not acceptable to what they were doing.

2:11:31So, it's more of do we want our children

2:11:35grandchildren great grandchildren. I got

2:11:37grandchildren. My daughter played in and

2:11:39my son played in ring. So, you know, we

2:11:42passed the field that has to be

2:11:46satisfied for all the kids, the young

2:11:49kids, the older kids, the middle kids,

2:11:52even little toddlers used to play soccer

2:11:55on our fields and they were good at it.

2:11:57And the teachers are right. And the and

2:12:00the coaches, they grew up and they

2:12:02became college college players. You

2:12:06know, we never had football, but we had

2:12:09a football league. We just couldn't play

2:12:11in it because I was from a poor family.

2:12:14My kids were poor and I'm still poor.

2:12:16But the thing is is how many kids do you

2:12:20want to get hurt? And how many kids do

2:12:24you think if the field got better would

2:12:27not be hurt as much as they're getting

2:12:30right now? Because the last game I went

2:12:33to

2:12:35um for the C conquered Capitals and this

2:12:40was on a different field. It wasn't even

2:12:41on our field. The last game I had a

2:12:44person on my team have a concussion from

2:12:46the conquered field there. We had two

2:12:50people and their field was worse than

2:12:52ours, but they had two people that had

2:12:55gotten their hip and their knee just

2:12:58completely blown out and they had to go

2:13:00to the hospital. And then you got to

2:13:02realize how are you going to have if if

2:13:05it's not good. So you got to put the

2:13:08fire department and the ambulance there

2:13:09so that if anything does happen, they

2:13:12have to be there, right?

2:13:15So my I don't know how to go about it,

2:13:18but my mind is saying why do we have to

2:13:23take the chance to hurt our children or

2:13:26our grandchildren or great-grandchildren

2:13:28or even great great grandchildren. You

2:13:30know, I'm not going to live that old,

2:13:31thank God. But but the point is is how

2:13:35many people do we have to how many kids

2:13:37have to get hurt for us to really buckle

2:13:42down and fix what we need to fix. I know

2:13:45I mean I'm our renter. I have to pay

2:13:48$2,200 for my rent. That's without

2:13:51lights, without anything else. So that's

2:13:53going towards the the taxes. So I'm kind

2:13:58of a taxpayer, too. And I only get 44

2:14:02>> pay.

2:14:03>> You know what I mean? So, I know that

2:14:06there are taxpayers here and I'm sorry

2:14:08if if I'm making you feel bad because

2:14:11I'm a I'm I'm a renter, but my voice and

2:14:16my grandchildren's voice. My son, my

2:14:18grandson just started playing football.

2:14:20I wouldn't I didn't want him to because

2:14:22I was afraid he was going to get hurt

2:14:24because he already had a mild concussion

2:14:26from soccer because the field was was

2:14:29too slippery. So, I don't want that

2:14:33happen to another child. So, my

2:14:34grandson's playing football, which I

2:14:36love, you know, I can't go there anymore

2:14:38because he told me I'm bad for the team.

2:14:41But that's okay, you know, [laughter]

2:14:43but it's just the point. I I don't want

2:14:46any other kids

2:14:48>> now or in the p or in the future to get

2:14:52hurt that that much whether it's an

2:14:54artificial field or a real field that

2:14:57don't even matter to me about any of

2:14:58that. It just matters that the kids

2:15:01don't get hurt.

2:15:03>> That's what I'm more concerned for

2:15:04because we have an an awesome football

2:15:07team, an awesome soccer team, basketball

2:15:10track. I've seen the track and they're

2:15:13pretty they're really really good, you

2:15:15know, and they can go far. All the

2:15:17students that participate, even the

2:15:19wrestlers, I've seen them go to

2:15:21colleges. And that's what we want our

2:15:24future to be. It's our kids to be safe

2:15:27and know you can be safe and go college

2:15:31and do this and do that.

2:15:33>> And that's, you know, I'm not bright and

2:15:36I don't know how to answer question, but

2:15:38that's what that's how I feel. Are you

2:15:41willing to take any question? I I think

2:15:42you're very bright.

2:15:43>> As long as they're not too hard because

2:15:45I was only, you know,

2:15:46>> I came from Raymond. So,

2:15:48>> all right. I'll monitor the questions.

2:15:49[laughter] Any any questions for

2:15:52>> Councelor Brown?

2:15:53>> Yes, you are very eloquent because you

2:15:56communicated passionately about how

2:15:58important our children are and I

2:15:59absolutely agree. But I just want to

2:16:02point out that as a renter, you do pay

2:16:05taxes. Your voice does matter. And I

2:16:08think like 43%

2:16:10of our residents are renters. So please

2:16:13don't ever feel like your voice doesn't

2:16:15matter as a renter because it does come

2:16:17down and it does um you are paying it

2:16:20and and thank you for being here.

2:16:22>> Thank you.

2:16:23>> Any other questions? Councelor Grady St.

2:16:25>> Thank you, your honor. Um thank you so

2:16:26much for your testimony. Um, I'm going

2:16:28to say would you believe because we're

2:16:29supposed to ask questions during this

2:16:31period, but would you believe that I

2:16:32think you had the most effective uh

2:16:35testimony tonight and I am just really

2:16:37grateful for for everything that you've

2:16:40said and for really centering the safety

2:16:41of children. Thank you.

2:16:43>> Any other questions?

2:16:45>> Caseu,

2:16:46>> it's not a question, but I want to say

2:16:47there's four of us renters here and you

2:16:50should not apologize to the people that

2:16:52own home because you pay taxes. We pay

2:16:55taxes and we are proud servant of this

2:16:57community. So, thank you.

2:17:00>> Would you believe any other questions?

2:17:02Councelor Caleb.

2:17:03>> Yes.

2:17:05>> Yes. Four of us up here are renters. I

2:17:08will echo what everyone else has said.

2:17:09Your voice very much matters and you do

2:17:11pay into taxes. Um,

2:17:15thinking about I guess the issue of

2:17:18equity,

2:17:22there are some families who can afford

2:17:25and do send their kids to play on other

2:17:28wreck teams as as we've learned.

2:17:32I'm not sure this is so much a question

2:17:34or maybe do you agree from your

2:17:35perspective that

2:17:39all children deserve equitable access to

2:17:41recreation? So going to a public high

2:17:45school and having adequate good

2:17:48facilities to play, safe facilities to

2:17:50play. I guess my question is is that

2:17:53important to you?

2:17:54>> Yes, because my my grandson he um like

2:17:58like I said, we're poor. we couldn't

2:18:00afford the money to send him to the

2:18:03football this year and they the Capitals

2:18:06gave him the scholarship and told him

2:18:09don't worry about anything we will let

2:18:11you come in and play. So yes, it is very

2:18:15important to me that the other the other

2:18:18places will let us even being poor let

2:18:22us

2:18:23go in and be part of that. It's just

2:18:25like with soccer. He wanted to do soccer

2:18:28and we didn't have the money for it and

2:18:31so they said, "No, just bring them in.

2:18:33We can we we have funds for it." So,

2:18:36yes, I agree with then that's that's the

2:18:40reason why I don't want them to get hurt

2:18:42is because if we play on other fields,

2:18:44you know, then what is going to happen

2:18:47with those, you know what I mean? We

2:18:49need to have make sure we have a good

2:18:51feel for our kids and I understand.

2:18:55Thank you so much for being here. We

2:18:57appreciate it.

2:18:58>> Would you agree that athletics and

2:19:01sports are a great opportunity for young

2:19:04people of limited means to get out of

2:19:07their uh you know to to advance to

2:19:12create the skills that can help build

2:19:14success future in life?

2:19:16>> Yes.

2:19:17>> Yes. I believe that

2:19:19um if you have more children in the

2:19:25the um athletic field or even the band

2:19:29or you know like like some lady said or

2:19:32a guy I don't remember said about the

2:19:35electronics

2:19:36>> they are not going to be as much crime

2:19:41as a kid as you know as like Manchester

2:19:46Manchester has a lot of crime and a lot

2:19:48of kids that are, you know, bullying and

2:19:51whatever. And this gives the kids the

2:19:54opportunity to get out, you know, to get

2:19:56out and say, "Yes, I'm going to be

2:19:58better than what my mother was or my

2:20:01grandmother or my, you know, so yes, it

2:20:03it gives them a better choice and a

2:20:05better way of communicating than getting

2:20:08aggression out."

2:20:10>> Thank you so much for your testimony. it

2:20:12it you have indeed been eloquent

2:20:14>> in your passion and in the way that

2:20:16you've articulated the issues that are

2:20:17important to you. So, thank you so much.

2:20:19>> Thank you.

2:20:20>> Anyone else like to testify?

2:20:23>> Yes.

2:20:27As much as we would like, please refrain

2:20:30from expressions of pleasure or

2:20:32displeasure. Gentlemen,

2:20:38>> welcome. Please, please introduce

2:20:40yourself for this to the city council.

2:20:42>> Um, I'm Raider Aen. I'm part of the

2:20:44Conquer High School football team. I

2:20:46also coach as well for the Conquer

2:20:47Capitals.

2:20:49>> I'm Mason Roaldi. I um am a sophomore at

2:20:52Conquered High School and I run track

2:20:53and play football for the high school as

2:20:55well.

2:20:56>> I'm Parker Price. I'm a junior on

2:20:58Conquered High School's football team.

2:21:00>> Thank you. Please.

2:21:04[laughter]

2:21:05>> You're the youngest.

2:21:08If [snorts] I'm going to be completely

2:21:09honest, I think that Memorial's track is

2:21:12absolutely disgusting. Um, the cracks,

2:21:15the grass, everything. Like, I run

2:21:18track. We can't even practice on our

2:21:21track. I have to practice in the halls

2:21:22at Conquered High School. We do our

2:21:24block starts in the hallways. We do

2:21:27hills. Like, everything about Memorial's

2:21:29track is just unacceptable with the

2:21:31track program. It's just completely

2:21:34unusable.

2:21:37Um, I've been playing at uh the Memorial

2:21:40Field since sixth grade. I've noticed

2:21:42plenty of injuries from holes. Um, and

2:21:46if you notice with the field, it's a

2:21:47little bit humped in the middle, which

2:21:50causes like which can cause injuries.

2:21:53Yeah.

2:21:55>> Uh, I'm just going to pick back off what

2:21:57he said. leg.

2:21:59I've seen like drills been like moved

2:22:01around during practice because like

2:22:02after like a rainstorm, we'll just like

2:22:05barely plant their feet in the ground

2:22:06and then there'll just be like a big

2:22:07hole there. So,

2:22:10>> so what I'm hearing from you is not good

2:22:13playing services for a variety of

2:22:15sports.

2:22:16>> Not at all.

2:22:18>> Questions. Counselor Schultz,

2:22:21>> can you guess what question I'm going to

2:22:22ask? Do you know what um you probably

2:22:25don't know where your parents or

2:22:26guardians vote, but what neighborhood,

2:22:28if you don't mind sharing, generically,

2:22:32do you guys live in?

2:22:34>> Um I live near Broken Ground. I don't

2:22:36know what district that is.

2:22:38>> 10.

2:22:38>> 10.

2:22:39>> It could be nine.

2:22:40>> Guess we live in district 10 then.

2:22:42>> I live near um Beaver Meadow and like

2:22:44around the Penook area.

2:22:47>> I'm still living.

2:22:48>> Thank you.

2:22:48>> What? Three or two? Okay.

2:22:50>> Three. Three.

2:22:52of fantasy.

2:22:53>> Thank you. Uh, this question is for

2:22:56Mason. It's been a few years since I got

2:22:58to see you. Um, he was on one of my

2:23:02basketball teams many years ago. Uh,

2:23:04question for you. Have you seen an

2:23:05impact on the participation of athletes

2:23:09on the track team because of the

2:23:10condition of the track?

2:23:12>> Absolutely. Um,

2:23:15am I allowed to name name a name or

2:23:18>> you probably shouldn't name a name.

2:23:20>> All right. [laughter]

2:23:21You guys may know um this kid who's

2:23:24really really good at triple jump. He is

2:23:26the best in the nation. He's as a

2:23:28sophomore of last year. He was the best

2:23:31class of 28 in the nation for triple

2:23:32jump. And I feel like Memorial Field

2:23:36could have dictated his decision. And so

2:23:38he he's no longer a student at Conquered

2:23:40High School.

2:23:41>> And I feel like that could have been a

2:23:43reason why. like he's the best of the

2:23:45best and he's

2:23:48doesn't get what he deserves, like what

2:23:49he needs to practice on. So, I feel like

2:23:52our great athletes at Conquer High

2:23:54School are being like

2:23:58they don't they no longer want to go

2:23:59because of how horrible our stuff is. I

2:24:02feel

2:24:05>> other questions. Council councelor Brady

2:24:08Stton.

2:24:08>> I feel like the adults have really let

2:24:10you guys down and I'm sorry about that

2:24:13and I hope that we can move forward more

2:24:15quickly with decision- making in the

2:24:16future.

2:24:17>> Thanks,

2:24:18>> Councelor Brown.

2:24:19>> Yes. I just want to say thank you to you

2:24:21guys. It's so important to hear what you

2:24:25are actually experiencing to imagine

2:24:27doing track drills inside like in the

2:24:30hallways. That just seems crazy and it's

2:24:33devastating to hear about a student who,

2:24:36you know, is potentially nationally

2:24:38ranked in the the triple high jump. I

2:24:40think you said

2:24:41>> triple jump. Yeah.

2:24:42>> Yeah. The triple jump. Like that's crazy

2:24:44because that's somebody that we should

2:24:46be celebrating. We should be celebrating

2:24:48our our young athletes. So, thank you

2:24:50for testifying. Your experience and your

2:24:53voice matters. Uh I'm glad you guys

2:24:55came.

2:24:56>> Any other questions?

2:24:58>> Thank you, gentlemen.

2:24:59>> Thank you so much. [snorts]

2:25:00>> Thank you. Anyone else like to testify

2:25:02in the back?

2:25:08[clears throat]

2:25:11>> You know those kids.

2:25:15>> Hello everybody.

2:25:16>> Greetings.

2:25:17>> My name is Tim Lorra. I believe I'm W

2:25:20seven

2:25:22South [laughter] End.

2:25:24>> Um first of all, thank you guys for all

2:25:26you do. this is a lot that you guys have

2:25:27to uh decide in this city of 45,000

2:25:30people. So, I appreciate your time. Um,

2:25:33I do want to say a big uh thank you. I

2:25:35believe is Miss Miss Eden. That was

2:25:37incredible. Um, safety needs to be the

2:25:40first and foremost um for all the kids.

2:25:42And I'm I'm also the high school

2:25:43basketball coach and we actually lost

2:25:45our our point guard to a knee injury on

2:25:47that football field, stepped in one of

2:25:49the potholes um on that field a couple

2:25:51years ago. um and he's been battling

2:25:53that knee injury even into his college

2:25:55career as a football player. Um I know

2:25:58I've worked in the district, but I also

2:26:00wanted to highlight some of the other uh

2:26:01organizations that use the the facility.

2:26:04Um you know, we have the adult softball

2:26:06league that that was mentioned earlier.

2:26:07Uh there's little league baseball that

2:26:09happens there. There's a conquered crush

2:26:10lacrosse. There's also an organization

2:26:13called Fit for a Cause um through the

2:26:15boot camps on Sunday morning um at

2:26:17Memorial Field and raise money for um

2:26:20people dealing with with cancer. Um the

2:26:22person that runs it is is somebody who's

2:26:24fighting that battle herself. Um so it

2:26:27goes well beyond the school district and

2:26:29um I've lived here for for seven years.

2:26:32My my wife is a longtime resident um you

2:26:35know and back in her day of of training

2:26:38as a field hockey player and just as a a

2:26:40resident at conquered high you would see

2:26:42that that track packed people running up

2:26:44and down the bleachers um doing things

2:26:47to to better themselves. Um I just think

2:26:51as the state capital of New Hampshire to

2:26:54drive into Memorial Field and see that

2:26:56facility the way it is, it's we talk

2:26:59about wants and needs. um we didn't want

2:27:01to keep kicking this ball down the road

2:27:02for the last 50 years. Um it's a need

2:27:05and not just for the students that are

2:27:07at the school. Um you know, like coach

2:27:09Leonard said, I know we're looking at

2:27:10that number. Um we got to find a way,

2:27:13right? And and talk about the coaches

2:27:14here, you know, we we get the players we

2:27:17get and we do the best we can to put

2:27:19them in a position to be successful. We

2:27:21have an opportunity right now as a

2:27:22community to find a way to make this

2:27:25situation positive for the kids and for

2:27:28the people that uh use it here in the

2:27:30community as well. Um I know that's a a

2:27:32tall task

2:27:34um but really appreciate you guys taking

2:27:36the time to look through um all of the

2:27:39positives that um that come along with

2:27:42having that facility look the way it

2:27:43does. Um so thank you for your time. Um

2:27:47and I know it's late so thank you.

2:27:49>> Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Lur?

2:27:52Thank you, sir.

2:27:52>> Thank you.

2:27:53>> Appreciate you guys. Thank you so much.

2:27:54>> Anyone else like to testify? Yes, sir.

2:27:56[clears throat]

2:28:01>> Oops.

2:28:05>> Welcome. Thank you. I I won't do better

2:28:07than the last three, but I mean, they've

2:28:10been outstanding testimonies and I'm not

2:28:11a conquered resident, but I think I

2:28:14could say that I you know, between 170

2:28:16Warren,

2:28:17>> you identify yourself.

2:28:18>> Yeah. Steve Larie, athletic director,

2:28:20Conquered High School.

2:28:20>> And do you love Conquered?

2:28:22>> What's that?

2:28:22>> But you love Conquered.

2:28:23>> I do love it. I do. It's just I would

2:28:25say it's my first home, I think, because

2:28:26I spend more hours here um between 170

2:28:30uh Warren Street and 70 South Fruit. Um

2:28:33so I spent a lot of time in that

2:28:34facility. And I I will say like Memorial

2:28:36Field is something like that I've always

2:28:39uh thought is is is a gem. Some there's

2:28:42something special about it. there's the

2:28:43whole Friday night game feel with the

2:28:45band coming down, the football team

2:28:47marching down and um you know this year

2:28:51has been a situation where I I the word

2:28:54has been pitiable uh because that's sort

2:28:57of the the condition and and sort of the

2:28:59response that we get from the other

2:29:00athletic administrators, the other

2:29:02coaches. is we had a coach from an out

2:29:04of state school that we hosted last week

2:29:06and when they host us to play a freshman

2:29:08game in a big city-owned stadium uh in

2:29:13Haveril, Mass. And then we're having

2:29:15their team change in a shed where we

2:29:18store our grass seed and uh fertilizer

2:29:21and things like that which has been a

2:29:22conquered tradition for a long long

2:29:24time. I was a visiting coach and I used

2:29:26that locker room so I I know the deal.

2:29:29But um when you don't have bleachers uh

2:29:34to be able to accommodate people at a

2:29:36football game, when you don't have a

2:29:37track to be able to host um interstate

2:29:42or even just practice practices for your

2:29:45high school athletes, it it it is a

2:29:48situation where other people look at you

2:29:50with now it's pity. Um and it's it's

2:29:54just gotten to that that state. A and

2:29:57the thing is is I think when once you

2:29:59get to that point, we we've worked

2:30:01together really well. We David and I

2:30:03have worked together I think um more

2:30:06this year than than ever in trying to

2:30:08make this work for our student athletes.

2:30:10Uh we don't have Runlet Middle School

2:30:12right now as an option to host our our

2:30:14teams. So the city has in in good faith

2:30:18worked with us to accommodate middle

2:30:20school soccer um and to hold additional

2:30:23games. So, you would think Memorial

2:30:25Field would be getting less usage

2:30:27because of of of its situation and its

2:30:29state, and it is, but we're having to

2:30:32find more and more creative uses uh for

2:30:35for our teams around the city. And the

2:30:38only reason that's happening is because

2:30:39we're working together. Uh we work

2:30:41together with our community groups,

2:30:43everybody that that testified today,

2:30:45whether it's Conquered Crush and Emma

2:30:46Cisty, uh Meredith Kulie and her the

2:30:49groups that she works with. Um Conquered

2:30:52Capitals, Dave and Courtney Levik, like

2:30:54we, you know, we've been shipping lights

2:30:56back and forth between Martin Park and

2:30:58Memorial Field. Those are lights that we

2:31:00rent because we we can't properly light

2:31:03the field. And we're paying for those.

2:31:04Conquered school district's paying for

2:31:06those. We're also paying the light bill

2:31:08as part of our current use agreement,

2:31:11um, our joint use agreement that has

2:31:13been in effect for for a long, long

2:31:15time. The $600,000 check that you have

2:31:19from the Conquered School District is

2:31:20also part of that current that joint use

2:31:23agreement. I used to when I was a

2:31:25teacher a few years ago, not that long,

2:31:28but I used to start the quote at the

2:31:31beginning of the school year, um, a

2:31:33thousand mile journey starts with one

2:31:35single step. Like this is the one step

2:31:38like this. We're we're going to get to a

2:31:41point where we're going to discuss

2:31:43splitting cost and what Memorial Field

2:31:45is going to look like. We have to take a

2:31:48step though as as a community and it's

2:31:50the city council, it's parks and wreck,

2:31:52it's it's the conquered school district,

2:31:55it's it's everybody jointly together

2:31:57saying what you've everyone has said

2:31:59tonight.

2:32:00The conditions at Memorial Field are

2:32:02deplorable. They need to be improved for

2:32:06our student athletes safety, for their

2:32:08well-being, for their uh you know

2:32:11abilities to to to go on to their future

2:32:14success. Uh, all of that needs

2:32:17[clears throat] to happen, but we have

2:32:19to, yeah, I can't speak for the school

2:32:21board, so I can't say what that

2:32:23agreement is going to look like moving

2:32:24forward, but we have to play by the

2:32:26rules that we have. And that $600,000

2:32:29check is an act of good faith in saying

2:32:32we're willing to take this step with the

2:32:34city council. I just want the city

2:32:37council to know that that's where

2:32:39Conquered School District in in in my

2:32:41estimation sees this situation. Please

2:32:44take that step for our student athletes,

2:32:46for our coaches, um and and for for me

2:32:49and for my family to be able to we we

2:32:52hosted a a senior senior night today at

2:32:54Penrook National Guard Field. My um my

2:32:58car currently looks like I'm a DJ

2:33:00because all of the PA equipment owned by

2:33:02the uh school district is is now the AV

2:33:06stuff is in my car. So, I got to go pick

2:33:09up the rest of the stuff in Penrook.

2:33:10It's going to be a long night. Um, but I

2:33:13just want to let you know that that is

2:33:17currently what we're [clears throat]

2:33:18dealing with.

2:33:20>> Thank you, Mr. Lie. Any questions?

2:33:23>> Thank you very much.

2:33:24>> Thank you, sir. Over there.

2:33:35>> Welcome.

2:33:36>> Hi. Thank you. Uh, Chris Galborth, Ward

2:33:39Five. Um, been here about nine years.

2:33:43I'm also a business owner here in

2:33:45conquered, uh, North Branch

2:33:46Construction. Uh, one of the biggest

2:33:48general contractors in the state. Um, my

2:33:52children, I have three boys here that's

2:33:54played sports. Um, I have a middle

2:33:56schooler, high schooler, and one that

2:33:58just graduated. So, I've been down to

2:34:01those fields quite a bit. And the one

2:34:04thing I haven't heard tonight is it's

2:34:06embarrassing to see what the condition

2:34:09of these places are. Um, somebody asked

2:34:12about travel sports. My kids do travel

2:34:14sports. They also do rec sports. They do

2:34:17it all. Um, so I've been at a lot of

2:34:20fields and being the city, the capital

2:34:23of the city, it's pretty embarrassing on

2:34:26the tax rate that we pay and the

2:34:27condition of the place. [clears throat]

2:34:29Um, you know, we're talking about 1.2 2

2:34:31million.

2:34:33It's small. It's only going to get

2:34:35bigger. I'm in construction. Is the time

2:34:39to build is now. It's never going to get

2:34:41cheaper. It's only going to get more

2:34:42expensive. Um when people talk about

2:34:45safety, my my kids turn to his ACL is

2:34:48meniscus. I know the cost of all that.

2:34:51Um, so it's it's really disheartening to

2:34:55see us not just be able to move that

2:34:58first foot forward to really put us in a

2:35:01place to understand what the real cost

2:35:03will be. Um,

2:35:07I have right now in Friday Night Lights,

2:35:10my mother-in-law, I have to help her up

2:35:13to stand so she can actually see her

2:35:14grandson play. It's that's a little

2:35:17embarrassing, you know. I think there

2:35:19was a thousand paid people. So, probably

2:35:231,500 residents, family members at the

2:35:26game and there's [snorts] seating for

2:35:28200, maybe 300 and you can't see you

2:35:32can't see your kids play, you can't see

2:35:33your grandkids play. Um, so I just come

2:35:36back to embarrassing.

2:35:39Um,

2:35:40that's really it's it's disheartening to

2:35:43see all that. Um, I would love for us to

2:35:46push forward to do the 1.2 2 million.

2:35:49It's a small amount to pay to really see

2:35:51the big picture and until you get that

2:35:53done, you don't know what the real costs

2:35:55are going to be.

2:35:57>> Mr. Goblin, could you for those of us

2:35:59who are not in the construction

2:36:00industry, could you speak to the

2:36:01significance of having the master plan

2:36:03and what it really entails?

2:36:05>> So, for for me, I mean, if you don't

2:36:07have a plan in place and be able to put

2:36:11cost to it, how do you know what it's

2:36:14really going to be? How can you start

2:36:16splitting the cost? How can you do a

2:36:19value engineering? You know, until you

2:36:21actually get the full plan, you can't

2:36:24start working on all those parts and

2:36:25pieces. And at a million dollars,

2:36:28million2, and the school district's

2:36:31paying 600,000 as a community member,

2:36:33I'm saying I'm paying 95, 100%, whatever

2:36:36it is, the split,

2:36:38it it doesn't matter. Just let's get it

2:36:40through. Let's push it through and get

2:36:43it for the kids. get it for the

2:36:44community. And to me, as an employer,

2:36:47too, an uncoachable kid is unemployable

2:36:50an adult. So, getting them out off the

2:36:53streets, there's a there's a lot of

2:36:55great things for an athlete. If they're

2:36:58there doing sports, they're choosing

2:37:00that path, then it's better than the

2:37:03other alternative.

2:37:05So, am I hearing you say that having the

2:37:07master plan is a is a critical step

2:37:10towards dividing up or or you know

2:37:14figuring out who pays for what how the

2:37:16share would go.

2:37:17>> 100%. [clears throat] I I understand

2:37:19that you know it'd be great to have the

2:37:21plan going into it, but you don't do the

2:37:2350/50 split now. Figure out the cost

2:37:27after you have that done.

2:37:28>> Thank you. Uh councelor Schultz,

2:37:32>> I'm kind of repetitive today. Uh, where

2:37:34do you vote? Which ward?

2:37:36>> W five.

2:37:37>> Thank you.

2:37:40>> Any other questions?

2:37:42>> Thank you, Mr. Galvin.

2:37:43>> Thank you.

2:37:44>> Anyone else like to testify?

2:37:47I

2:37:47>> thought so.

2:37:48>> All right. Seeing none, I declare the

2:37:50public hearing on 26 I closed.

2:37:53[clears throat] Adam City Clerk uh 26A.

2:37:59It's an ordinance amending the code of

2:38:01ordinances title 2 traffic code chapter

2:38:0318 parking stopping standing and parking

2:38:06parking time is limited limited excuse

2:38:09me in designated places to modify time

2:38:11limits for parking spaces on the north

2:38:15side of Marram Street and Penoke

2:38:17>> Mr. City Manager.

2:38:18>> The other members of the council, this

2:38:20request is in conjunction with the

2:38:21adaptive reuse of the former Penacook

2:38:24Branch Library at Marramac Street. The

2:38:26city and prospective buyer have the

2:38:28property under agreement to be sold and

2:38:31uh is proposing to convert the building

2:38:34into a duplex residential use with one

2:38:36unit on the first floor and another unit

2:38:38on the second floor. The parking

2:38:40committee discussed this request and

2:38:42following discussion, the committee

2:38:43recommends that the time limit on the

2:38:45north side of of Marramac Street in

2:38:47Penokeook be amended from two hours to

2:38:5010 hours and forced Monday through

2:38:52Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Thank

2:38:55you. Any questions for the city manager?

2:38:59Seeing none, anyone like to testify on

2:39:01item 26A?

2:39:05Seeing none, I will declare the public

2:39:07hearing closed. Uh, madam city clerk,

2:39:09item 26B.

2:39:11>> It's an ordinance amending the code of

2:39:13ordinances, title 4, zoning code,

2:39:14chapter 28, zoning ordinance by amending

2:39:17article 28-7,

2:39:19access, circulation, parking, and

2:39:21loading.

2:39:22>> Thank you, Mr. City Manager.

2:39:24>> Members of the council, like to turn

2:39:25over the next several items to Tim

2:39:27Thompson and to go through all the

2:39:29parking information.

2:39:31>> Thank you, Mr. City Manager, members of

2:39:33the council. Uh the ordinance you have

2:39:35in front of you uh in this public

2:39:37hearing is uh a significant revision to

2:39:40the zoning ordinance to introduce uh

2:39:43flexibility in the administration of our

2:39:45parking requirements for new

2:39:47developments. Uh this would take away uh

2:39:51the need to go to the zoning board of

2:39:52adjustment for variances for basically

2:39:55anything parking related. The number of

2:39:56spaces, the dimensions, the driveway

2:39:59access to properties. Uh it replaces

2:40:01those with a combination of conditional

2:40:03use permits and waiverss from site plan

2:40:06regulations uh that are administered by

2:40:08the planning board which can be done

2:40:09concurrently with a site plan or in the

2:40:12case where parking lots do not require

2:40:14site plan review it would be through a

2:40:15conditional use permit with the planning

2:40:17board. uh this will I think help

2:40:19significantly in the administration both

2:40:22from the city side the staff

2:40:23administration and it will alleviate uh

2:40:26a lot of frustration from the

2:40:27development side of the community uh

2:40:29where parking has been a significant

2:40:32challenge as part of our development

2:40:33review process. Uh this is a result of

2:40:36many [clears throat] iterations by staff

2:40:38within the department. Uh the planning

2:40:39board has adopted concurrent site plan

2:40:42regulations earlier in September uh

2:40:44which will become effective uh assuming

2:40:46the council adopts these agendments here

2:40:48tonight. Happy to answer questions.

2:40:49>> Thank you. Any questions for Mr.

2:40:51Thompson? Council Davey.

2:40:52>> Mr. Thompson, would you say that this

2:40:54would help the city accomplish some of

2:40:56its housing production goals.

2:40:58>> It certainly works well in conjunction

2:41:00with the fact the state law now requires

2:41:03that the we cannot require any more than

2:41:05one parking space per unit uh for

2:41:07residential. So that is really the only

2:41:09significant change we've made to parking

2:41:12requirements as part of this amendment.

2:41:14Uh we've focused exclusively other than

2:41:18that one item on flexibility and the

2:41:20administration of the how parking is

2:41:22handled administratively through the

2:41:24review process again which I think will

2:41:26both streamline and assist with both

2:41:28residential and non-residential

2:41:30building.

2:41:31>> Any other questions? Council.

2:41:33>> Yes. I just have two. Um

2:41:36will this affect um neighbors being

2:41:39notified

2:41:41about parking changes?

2:41:43>> The parking changes that typically would

2:41:46go to the zoning board if they are part

2:41:47unless they are something that does not

2:41:49require u site plan review. Uh there

2:41:52would now be a conditional use permit

2:41:53which has the same public notice

2:41:54requirements that the zoning board hero

2:41:56would have. So it's a different board

2:41:58but the zoning the notice requirements

2:42:00for those would be the same.

2:42:02>> Follow up.

2:42:02>> What is that notice? What does that

2:42:03require?

2:42:04>> Basically, direct to butters are

2:42:06notified directly by uh verified mail

2:42:09under state law.

2:42:10>> Well, is that um when you say direct

2:42:12butters, does that include people across

2:42:14the street or is it just on either side?

2:42:16>> Butters are defined in state law as

2:42:17anything that [clears throat] would

2:42:18touch the property if you take away

2:42:19streets or bodies of water.

2:42:20>> Ah, okay. Very good.

2:42:22>> Council FY,

2:42:23>> thank you. Uh just a process question.

2:42:25Uh before the planning board makes

2:42:28recommendations on these types of

2:42:30amendments, do they take any public

2:42:31testimony?

2:42:32>> They do. Thank you. Okay, councelor

2:42:34Caleb.

2:42:34>> Um, does this Sorry if this is a dumb

2:42:37question. Um, does this in any way

2:42:39affect uh any like rules or regulations

2:42:42around accessible parking?

2:42:44>> It does not. If anything, this actually

2:42:47clarifies the requirements to basically

2:42:50reference the federal requirements

2:42:51without having conflicting requirements

2:42:53locally.

2:42:54>> Okay. Thank you.

2:42:55>> Okay. Any other question? Council Brown.

2:42:58>> Yes. Uh, this was my second question. Is

2:43:01is this going to have any impact on

2:43:03projects that are kind of in the

2:43:05pipeline right now? If we approve this

2:43:07tonight, does that change things that

2:43:09we're

2:43:09>> from the moment this public hearing was

2:43:11posted for public hearing, applicants

2:43:13had the option of following either the

2:43:15posted pending ordinance or the existing

2:43:18ordinance. So in effect in in essence,

2:43:21this has been in effect since last

2:43:22month.

2:43:24>> Follow up.

2:43:25>> Yes. So pro how many projects would this

2:43:28impact this ordinance?

2:43:30>> Anything moving forward and anything

2:43:32that's currently not accepted is

2:43:34complete by the planning board.

2:43:35>> Do you could follow up? I'm just look

2:43:37>> off the top of my head. I know we have

2:43:3915 public hearings next month. This

2:43:41month

2:43:41>> that this would impact

2:43:43>> that just in general in terms of site

2:43:45plans and subdivisions that are in front

2:43:46of the planning board. This month we

2:43:47have 15 agenda items.

2:43:49>> Okay. Thank you.

2:43:49>> Councilor Davey.

2:43:50>> Um would you or Mr. I see Mr. Halls in

2:43:53the back. Um would you say this will

2:43:56reduce staff hours spent on zoning

2:43:58board?

2:43:59>> Zoning board 100%. Uh we fully expect

2:44:02that this could reduce the zoning

2:44:03board's workload by anywhere from 20 to

2:44:0850 cases a year.

2:44:10>> Thank you. Any other questions? All

2:44:14right. Thank you. I'll move aside. Thank

2:44:17you. Is there anyone who would like to

2:44:18testify on this? Mr. Shriker.

2:44:26>> Welcome, Mr. Schwiker.

2:44:30Good evening. I'm still Roy Schwacker

2:44:32and still from Ward 4. And uh

2:44:36I I have a concern that as near as I can

2:44:39tell, the city is trying to only get

2:44:42wealthy people to move in and try and

2:44:46get the older and poorer people to

2:44:48leave. And

2:44:51we have an example of, you know, state

2:44:55regulations that were, may I say, forced

2:44:58on us by small towns and people who are

2:45:01not up on what's really happening. But I

2:45:06mean, as an example, I've tried to count

2:45:08the number of parking spaces used on my

2:45:11street, and it's like two and a half per

2:45:12unit. So this one per unit is, you know,

2:45:15just ridiculous.

2:45:17and we have to abide by the state law,

2:45:20but I'm not quite sure what options we

2:45:23have. Like right now, what you're going

2:45:25to say is you only need one unit

2:45:27regardless of what type of thing you're

2:45:29building. Well, let's say we modified

2:45:32our approval to say if you are building

2:45:35lowincome housing that takes section 8

2:45:38vouchers, it only takes one one unit.

2:45:41But if you want to charge more than

2:45:44that, you have to either provide more

2:45:46parking andor do something else like

2:45:49build sidewalks so the people can go

2:45:52somewhere on a sidewalk or pay a subsidy

2:45:55to the bus route so you have a bus

2:45:56route. You know, you need to find, you

2:45:59know, give money to the city to build a

2:46:01parking garage or a parking lot. And if

2:46:05you're putting in a whole subdivision

2:46:07like this, the subdivision road has got

2:46:10to be wider. So you have parking on both

2:46:12sides because if you can't park on your

2:46:14own property, where are all these rest

2:46:16of the two and a half cars going to

2:46:18park? So I think we are really missing a

2:46:21chance here to

2:46:23get yourself give lower priced housing a

2:46:27chance by making it easier to build that

2:46:30as compared to the more expensive stuff.

2:46:32make the more expensive stuff pay in

2:46:35some manner for only having one parking

2:46:39space because I'm not sure that anything

2:46:41in the state law says that as long as

2:46:43you only require one parking space, you

2:46:45can't require sidewalks or you can't

2:46:48require subsidizing the bus or whatever

2:46:51to provide a place, you know, for these

2:46:53people to get out of there. And the

2:46:55other thing that Mr. Thompson didn't

2:46:57mention that's of similar ilk is it also

2:47:00changes the length of a culde-sac

2:47:02that right now the city has a limit and

2:47:06it's proposed to you know go to the

2:47:07state limit but once again you're

2:47:10missing a chance here. If you've got a

2:47:12culde-sac that's 200 feet long and maybe

2:47:15has [clears throat] four houses and the

2:47:16kids have to walk to the school bus stop

2:47:18at the end of the culde-sac. Well, maybe

2:47:20walking 100 feet in the middle of the

2:47:22road is not a bad idea. But under this,

2:47:26you know, if you have a culde-sac that's

2:47:282,000 feet long and have 40 units on it,

2:47:31you're still letting the kids walk to

2:47:33the

2:47:34school bus in the middle of the road,

2:47:36even if there's 40 houses there. So, I

2:47:38think before you change the limit on the

2:47:40length of the road, you need to say,

2:47:42"Okay, but if that road is longer than

2:47:44X, all of a sudden, you need sidewalks

2:47:47or bike lanes or whatever because we

2:47:49can't have that many people walking in

2:47:51the street."

2:47:53So, I really think that we need to

2:47:56figure let's make it easier to build

2:47:58cheaper housing by giving them an

2:48:01advantage and let's also make it harder

2:48:04to build dangerous housing where you're

2:48:06making kids walk 2,000 ft in the middle

2:48:08of the street because you've suddenly

2:48:11increase the length of a culde-sac.

2:48:13Thank you.

2:48:13>> Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Schwer?

2:48:17>> Okay. Thank you, Mr. Schwer.

2:48:21Is there anyone else who would like to

2:48:22testify on item 26B?

2:48:26Right. Hearing none. Seeing none,

2:48:28declare the public hearing closed. Madam

2:48:30of city clerk, item 26 C. It's an

2:48:33ordinance amending the code of

2:48:35ordinances title 4 zoning code chapter

2:48:3828 zoning ordinance by amending article

2:48:4128-8

2:48:42non-conforming lots uses and structures

2:48:45by amending 288-5

2:48:48non-conforming structures and 2885D

2:48:52removal and replacement of certain

2:48:54non-conforming residential structures.

2:48:57>> Mr. City clerk, Mr. Thompson.

2:49:00>> Thank you. [laughter]

2:49:02>> The hour is late.

2:49:05>> Thank you again, Mr. Mayor, members of

2:49:06the council. Uh the purpose of this

2:49:08amendment is uh twofold. One is to

2:49:11change uh requirements for special

2:49:14exceptions for certain non-conformities

2:49:16to conditional use permits. So, the

2:49:18administration is with the planning

2:49:19board. Uh the second and probably more

2:49:21important uh amendment here would

2:49:24eliminate the need to go to the zoning

2:49:26board of adjustment for variances when a

2:49:28lot is subdivided and an existing older

2:49:30home that is not being changed but the

2:49:33lot is changing would then need to go to

2:49:35the zoning board for a variance because

2:49:36it was non-conforming. Uh this would

2:49:39allow that to happen without the need to

2:49:40go to the zoning board. Again, this is a

2:49:42change that we believe will it it's

2:49:44already uh eliminated at least three

2:49:47variances so far. I expect that this is

2:49:50going to eliminate the number of

2:49:51variances uh in the multiples of tens to

2:49:5420s every year.

2:49:59>> Thank you. Uh would it be fair to say

2:50:01that much of I'll call the downtown area

2:50:06non-conforming lots?

2:50:07>> Yes, a lot of the downtown and smaller

2:50:11lots that were designed in the city

2:50:13predate our zoning ordinance which dates

2:50:15back roughly the 1930s. Uh we obviously

2:50:18have homes that are much older than that

2:50:20within the city that don't meet today's

2:50:22setback or density requirements. Uh this

2:50:25would be again a relief valve that takes

2:50:27out an unnecessary step. I can give an

2:50:29example. We had a subdivision on Shaker

2:50:32Road where had an 1850s era house that

2:50:34was not in any way, shape, or form being

2:50:37impacted by the lot that was being

2:50:39created elsewhere, but because the lot

2:50:41itself was changing, it no longer had

2:50:43that non-conforming protection. This

2:50:46would allow that to go forward without

2:50:47the need to go to the zoning board for

2:50:48relief.

2:50:50>> Council,

2:50:51>> thank you. Um, so conquered is an old

2:50:55community founded in 1853.

2:50:58Uh, do other municipalities that are of

2:51:01a similar age. Have they employed this

2:51:04type of ordinance? I know of multiple

2:51:06communities that have either language in

2:51:08their ordinances or interpretations from

2:51:12their legal counsel that say that these

2:51:13types of things would not necessarily

2:51:15need to go to the zoning board. This

2:51:17again is it's codifying varying legal

2:51:20opinion. I think it would not be

2:51:23incorrect to say that even previous city

2:51:25solicitors have had different

2:51:26interpretations of this requirement in

2:51:29the ordinance.

2:51:30>> Followup.

2:51:32I I just noticed that councelor Davey

2:51:34was nodding vigorously and I know that

2:51:36he's a city planner in Rochester

2:51:39>> which

2:51:40>> and a regional planner

2:51:41>> regional planner. So I'm wondering if if

2:51:43you could share

2:51:45>> probably more so as a former zoning

2:51:46board member.

2:51:48>> Dave do have

2:51:50>> what is the question? Sorry.

2:51:51>> No, I just saw you nodding when I asked

2:51:53the question about older communities.

2:51:55>> Well, I was Can I respond?

2:51:56>> Yes, please. I was getting ready to uh

2:52:01affirm what Mr. Thompson was saying and

2:52:03get ready to ask that if this was common

2:52:05throughout New England because I have

2:52:07found that it is. Um a lot of the

2:52:10>> older zoning ordinances

2:52:12don't always mesh well with the town

2:52:15centers and downtowns that we have. Um,

2:52:18if you ask a lot of developers and

2:52:20planners around this state if they would

2:52:23be able to rebuild

2:52:25a piece of their communities downtown

2:52:27following the current zoning, a lot of

2:52:29them would say no. So, a lot of the

2:52:31zoning we have changes we have before us

2:52:33tonight address exactly this issue.

2:52:35>> Followup.

2:52:36>> Followup.

2:52:37>> Uh, what do you think will happen after

2:52:40like this? We passed this. What what is

2:52:43what what could happen? I

2:52:47would find that this would address a lot

2:52:49of the concern we hear around conquered

2:52:51being easy or not easy to develop in.

2:52:55>> Thanks.

2:52:56>> Just uh to follow up on that question,

2:52:59this is a variance that has been

2:53:01typically granted at a 99.9%

2:53:05success rate because there's really

2:53:07nothing changing for these particular

2:53:09homes that are affected by subdivision.

2:53:12Uh so again, this is in in furtherance

2:53:15of the city council goal of being a more

2:53:18responsive and easier place to do

2:53:20development. This was part of our goal

2:53:21is to make make that possible through a

2:53:24fairly minor regulatory change.

2:53:26>> Thank you.

2:53:27>> Any other questions for Mr. Thompson?

2:53:30All right. Thank you, Mr. Thompson. I'll

2:53:31open this for public hearing. Is there

2:53:33anyone who would like to testify in item

2:53:3526 C?

2:53:38>> Seeing none, I'll close the public

2:53:40hearing. Madam City Clerk, item 26D.

2:53:43>> It's an ordinance amending the code of

2:53:45ordinances, title 4, zoning code,

2:53:47chapter 28, zoning ordinance, by

2:53:49amending article 28-2-3, the zoning map.

2:53:53>> Mr. Thompson.

2:53:54>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor, members of the

2:53:56council. As you may recall, about a year

2:53:58or so ago, the city updated the

2:54:00references to the FEMA flood insurance

2:54:03study uh in order to be compliant with

2:54:05the nation's flood insurance program. Uh

2:54:08guess what? We're back doing that again

2:54:09because the feds have updated further

2:54:12flood insurance map information and

2:54:14flood insurance study. So, this minor

2:54:16textual amendment will bring us into

2:54:18compliance to ensure that our residents

2:54:20that uh have ability to access flood

2:54:23insurance can do so.

2:54:24>> Thank you. Any questions for Mr.

2:54:25Thompson?

2:54:27>> Seeing none, I'll open the public

2:54:29hearing. Is there anyone who'd like to

2:54:30testify in item 26D?

2:54:34Seeing none, we'll declare the public

2:54:36hearing closed.

2:54:38Madam City Clerk, item 26E.

2:54:41>> It's an ordinance amending the code of

2:54:42ordinances, title 4, zoning code,

2:54:44chapter 28, zoning ordinance, by

2:54:47amending appendix B and C.

2:54:50>> Mr. Jackson. [laughter]

2:54:51>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor, members of the

2:54:52council. This is a fairly minor uh

2:54:56update uh housekeeping item to update

2:54:59our glossery. Uh the city of conquered

2:55:01utilizes uh classifications of roadways,

2:55:04arterials and collectors and have

2:55:06different standards and various

2:55:07regulatory requirements based on those.

2:55:10Uh this uh amendment will update the

2:55:12list in our ordinance to ensure that

2:55:15we're properly referencing the changes

2:55:17that have occurred within our city's

2:55:18roadway network [laughter] over the

2:55:20course of the last couple decades.

2:55:22>> Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Council

2:55:25Brown?

2:55:25>> Yes. Um, will this ordinance include

2:55:28language that the lists will be

2:55:31re-evaluated after our master plan?

2:55:35>> In this instance, probably not. It's

2:55:38more of a periodic review based on real

2:55:42growth within the city, which would

2:55:43impact traffic volumes and traffic

2:55:45patterns. That's really what determines

2:55:47the classification of a roadway.

2:55:49>> Followup.

2:55:49>> Followup. Um, so some of these changes

2:55:53are going to I think they're um

2:55:55increasing

2:55:57uh some streets in Ward 5, Pleasant,

2:55:59Hopkinington, Langley, and other

2:56:01formalized collectors that they're like

2:56:04um elevating them.

2:56:06>> It's recognizing what they're actually

2:56:08functioning as.

2:56:10>> Okay. So they're already functioning as

2:56:12that. It's not Okay.

2:56:13>> All right. Thank you.

2:56:15>> Any other questions for Mr. Thompson?

2:56:18Right. Seeing none, I'll open the public

2:56:19hearing. Is there anyone who would like

2:56:20to testify on item 26E?

2:56:23Mr. Schwiker.

2:56:33>> Welcome again.

2:56:35>> Hello. I found this whole thing very

2:56:38confusing and I hope the city manager

2:56:40gets the word out that nothing like this

2:56:42will ever be written like this again. I

2:56:45mean, usually when you have something,

2:56:47you try and make it obvious where the

2:56:49changes are, but in this the stuff is

2:56:52just randomly jumbled together. And for

2:56:55instance, I think in one case you have

2:56:57something that was Sheep Davis Road

2:57:00parenthesis Route 106 and

2:57:02[clears throat] it's been changed to

2:57:03Route 106 parenthesis Sheep Davis Road

2:57:05or vice versa. I mean, why do you bother

2:57:08to, you know, put it in twice and

2:57:11confuse everybody? And there's another

2:57:13one, Route Three, from uh the Pemroke

2:57:16line to the Boswin line or something.

2:57:19And instead, it's the list of streets

2:57:21that make up Route Three. I mean, you're

2:57:23really not changing anything. Why is it

2:57:25you make this so confusing nobody can

2:57:28really figure out what's going on? I

2:57:30think we need to, you know, have the

2:57:32staff try and make things clear and easy

2:57:34to understand instead of trying to

2:57:36confuse the world with things. Thank

2:57:38you.

2:57:38>> Thank you, Mr. Schwer. Any questions for

2:57:39Mr. Schwer? Seeing none. Thank you, sir.

2:57:43Would anyone else like to testify on

2:57:44this item?

2:57:46>> Yes.

2:57:56>> Welcome,

2:57:58>> Nicole Fox. Um, word five. Um, I I guess

2:58:02I'll mention that I'm a member of TAC,

2:58:04but I'm obviously just speaking as

2:58:06myself tonight. Um, I was more curious

2:58:09about

2:58:11um the reasoning for um classifying

2:58:16roads like two-lane roads like Pleasant

2:58:19Street and South Street as major

2:58:21arterials. Those have a lot more land

2:58:24uses and functions and simply to

2:58:26transport traffic from one end of the

2:58:28city to the other, which is primarily

2:58:31the function of an arterial.

2:58:35>> [clears throat]

2:58:36>> I'll be happy to ask that during the

2:58:38discussion phase.

2:58:39>> Great. Thank you.

2:58:42>> Anyone else like to testify?

2:58:47Right. Seeing none, I'll declare the

2:58:50public hearing closed.

2:58:52Madam city clerk, item 26F.

2:58:55>> It's an ordinance amending the code of

2:58:56ordinances, title one, general code,

2:58:59chapter 8, fire.

2:59:02>> Mr.

2:59:04City Manager,

2:59:06>> would you like to Tim? You want to do

2:59:08this with disappeared?

2:59:10>> I looked up and you were gone. Mr. Sir,

2:59:14is that

2:59:26>> John?

2:59:36>> Uh, Mr. Mayor, members of the uh

2:59:38council, um John 40 city solicitor. Um

2:59:42so the next two uh items that you have

2:59:45in front of you are uh tied together um

2:59:48in order they will need to be considered

2:59:50and approved or or denied together. Um

2:59:54so uh 26F is a reclassification of the

2:59:58fire uh code. Um so these uh the state

3:00:03has um adopted a statewide code. Um the

3:00:08the fire code um building and uh and um

3:00:13housing maintenance and occupancy code

3:00:14all used to sit under section.

3:00:16>> Could I could I interrupt you for a

3:00:18second?

3:00:18>> Yes.

3:00:18>> It was not apparent to me when I was

3:00:20going over the calendar the agenda that

3:00:23these were tied together as you've just

3:00:25mentioned.

3:00:27Is that true that these two this and

3:00:29item 26 G?

3:00:31>> Yes, they are. They will have to be

3:00:33approved together because um they are

3:00:36this is really separating what was under

3:00:39one ordinance uh into reorganizing into

3:00:42two different ordinances. One for the

3:00:44fire code, one for building. And

3:00:45>> in that case, I'll ask you to pause. I'm

3:00:47going to ask the city clerk to read item

3:00:4926G

3:00:51[clears throat]

3:00:51>> so that we can just have one hearing for

3:00:53both of them. It's an ordinance amending

3:00:55the code of ordinances, title 3,

3:00:57building and housing codes, chapter 26,

3:01:00building regulations, and chapter 27

3:01:02housing maintenance and occupancy code.

3:01:05>> Thank you, Mr. Conford. Please proceed.

3:01:08>> Thank you, your honor. Um, so as I was

3:01:10stating, if you look at the at the

3:01:12report, um, these uh these three uh uh

3:01:16changes are to the to the uh ordinances

3:01:19are grouped together. Um the fire code,

3:01:22the h building and housing code and the

3:01:24housing and maintenance code used to sit

3:01:26together under one section within the

3:01:28ordinances. What we are doing here is um

3:01:32making minor um housekeeping amendments

3:01:35based on adoption of the state codes for

3:01:37the fire code, building code and housing

3:01:39maintenance code. um we are removing

3:01:42things that are either uh duplicative of

3:01:44the state code or in violation of the

3:01:47state code so that we can simplify this

3:01:49and then placing all of these items

3:01:51where they belong. So taking the fire

3:01:53code and putting it under chapter 8 and

3:01:56under fire and so forth. So um in

3:01:59general I think if there's specific

3:02:00questions with regard to fire code

3:02:02issues uh Chief Chisum is here. If uh

3:02:05there's questions regarding building and

3:02:07uh maintenance code uh Mr. Paul I

3:02:09believe is here as well um to answer any

3:02:12subject matter uh issues but in general

3:02:15as a legal principle this is to adopt

3:02:18our and reorganize our ordinances to

3:02:20come into compliance with the adopted

3:02:22state codes.

3:02:23>> Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Morty

3:02:25or Chief Chisum?

3:02:29>> I see none. Thank you.

3:02:32>> I'll open these two items for public

3:02:35hearing. Uh items 26F and 26G. Is there

3:02:38anyone who'd like to testify?

3:02:41Seeing none, I'll declare the public

3:02:43hearing is closed. Madam City clerk,

3:02:46item 26H. [clears throat]

3:02:47>> It is a resolution appropriating the sum

3:02:49of $23,397

3:02:53for law enforcement related programs and

3:02:56accepting the sum of $23,397

3:02:59in unmatched grant funds from the United

3:03:01States Department of Justice grant

3:03:03program for this purpose.

3:03:04>> Mr. City Manager.

3:03:06>> Members of the council, this grant

3:03:07program uh uses is used to make

3:03:10technological upgrades, purchase new

3:03:12equipment, and provide training for the

3:03:14department personnel. These awards have

3:03:16been shared with the county of Marramac

3:03:18who has uh also made equipment and

3:03:21technological enhancements with these

3:03:22funds. As with prior years, there's no

3:03:25match required for this grant. However,

3:03:27we again again will enter into an

3:03:29memorandum of understanding with county

3:03:31of Marramac on the programming and

3:03:33aotment of funds. Under this agreement,

3:03:36the police department will receive

3:03:37$18,397

3:03:40and the county of Marramac will receive

3:03:42$5,000.

3:03:43>> Thank you very much. Any questions for

3:03:45the city manager? Council,

3:03:49>> do we um have any specifics on what

3:03:51these technological upgrades or training

3:03:54is or are? I my brain's not working

3:03:57right now. You know what I'm trying

3:03:58[laughter]

3:03:59>> We're ready for the

3:04:04[clears throat]

3:04:11>> Mr. Mayor and members of the council. Um

3:04:13can you repeat the question?

3:04:16>> I'm [laughter] so sorry.

3:04:18>> What what what was the technological

3:04:20training?

3:04:21>> Yes. Yes. Just specifics. Yeah,

3:04:22>> sure. So, uh, this grant was applied for

3:04:24deput by deputy chief Steve Smuggle

3:04:26before his retirement. Um, and it is for

3:04:29gray key technology. Uh, so cell phones,

3:04:31uh, it was some of the technology

3:04:32advances that we looked for. And then

3:04:34some of the equipment was, um, breaching

3:04:36equipment, so ballistic shields,

3:04:38breaching tools, things like that for

3:04:39us. And the county was looking to

3:04:41upgrade some of their equipment for

3:04:42their patrol deputies. Um, so that's the

3:04:45what we have.

3:04:46>> Thank you so much for that explanation.

3:04:47Appreciate And you I think you all know

3:04:49PJ or

3:04:50>> PJ Fry acting chief administration.

3:04:54>> It's all right.

3:04:55>> Any other council?

3:04:58>> Thank you. Um your honor

3:05:01under the discussion I see that they

3:05:03said department personnel in specialized

3:05:06area for the training. What that

3:05:08entitled specialized areas?

3:05:11>> So some so this specific time we applied

3:05:13for uh those two pieces. So the cell

3:05:16phone which grey key is technology.

3:05:18Sometimes there's training that's

3:05:19required with that. So we applied for

3:05:20that. If we needed the money we'd be

3:05:22able to send them to that training as

3:05:23well since it's a specialized training

3:05:25field for a computer crimes unit.

3:05:28>> Any other questions?

3:05:29>> I I just have a followup.

3:05:30>> Sure.

3:05:31>> So there is no directive of

3:05:34other than the telephone that you

3:05:36mentioned because specialized here areas

3:05:39area means more than one. any other

3:05:43things that you guys are thinking to use

3:05:44it for?

3:05:45>> Not at this moment. This was applied for

3:05:47specifically for that at the time when

3:05:48we wrote it or when it was written. Um,

3:05:50but as it comes forward, that was very

3:05:53specific to what it was for when we made

3:05:54the application. So, that's what it was

3:05:55written for was for the technology

3:05:57pieces. If it comes to the point where

3:05:59that money is there, then we could

3:06:00request for it to be used for other

3:06:02things. And that's a process that we can

3:06:03do uh if that comes to light.

3:06:05>> Thank you.

3:06:05>> Okay. Any other questions?

3:06:08>> Thank you, Chief.

3:06:09>> Thank you. Appreciate it.

3:06:11Is there anyone who'd like to testify?

3:06:14>> Yes, sir.

3:06:19Welcome.

3:06:21>> Easy. Of course.

3:06:23>> Yeah.

3:06:24[clears throat]

3:06:25>> Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr.

3:06:28Mayor. Uh members of the council. Um so

3:06:31I would just like to say that um I know

3:06:33who

3:06:33>> Oh, I'm sorry. My name is uh Chris Lec

3:06:36and I live in conquered here in W 9. Um,

3:06:38and I'd just like to say that um,

3:06:40instead of conquered police requesting

3:06:43uh, special funding for items like

3:06:45breaching shields, that perhaps that

3:06:47money would be best served for body

3:06:49cameras. Body [clears throat] cameras so

3:06:52that their officers when they make

3:06:54mistakes can be held liable. That's it.

3:06:58Any questions for Mr.

3:07:01Thank you.

3:07:02>> Thank you.

3:07:03>> Anyone else like to testify on this

3:07:04item?

3:07:06>> All right. Seeing none, I'll declare the

3:07:08public hearing closed. It takes us to

3:07:11public hearing action. How's the city

3:07:12council doing?

3:07:13>> Can we take a break?

3:07:15>> Can we start with Memorial Field, sir?

3:07:17>> I just think someone wanted a break.

3:07:19>> Sure. I'm sorry.

3:07:20>> A break.

3:07:21>> Have a request for

3:07:21>> You need a break.

3:07:23>> Oh, give us a uh 5 minute break.

3:07:25>> Yeah, that's 10:15.

3:07:29>> She requested.

3:07:30>> I know.

3:07:36I need a

3:07:41>> Wow.

3:12:29We're now in the uh public hearing

3:12:31action phase of our meeting and I've

3:12:33been asked to move uh item 35 uh up to

3:12:37the top of the action list

3:12:40uh just as we moved it up to the top of

3:12:42the public hearing list. City clerk.

3:12:44Item 35.

3:12:45>> It's a resolution appropriating the sum

3:12:47of1,200,000

3:12:50in the memorial field project for final

3:12:53design and permitting authorizing the

3:12:55issuance of general obligation bonds and

3:12:57notes in the sum of $600,000 and

3:13:00accepting the sum of $600,000 in

3:13:02donations from the conquered school

3:13:03district for this purpose.

3:13:05>> Approval.

3:13:06>> Second.

3:13:06>> Second.

3:13:07>> Moved and seconded. Discussion.

3:13:09>> Councelor Curtis.

3:13:10>> Yes. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I will be

3:13:13supporting this um appropriation

3:13:16tonight, but I want to take a moment to

3:13:21um ask my fellow counselors to join me

3:13:25in directing staff to begin work on anou

3:13:30immediately.

3:13:32We have inherited uh those of us who are

3:13:35new newer to council a long history of

3:13:39uh animosity between school board and

3:13:42council and a legacy of distrust between

3:13:46Pinnacook and conquered. I am not

3:13:48willing to hold this project up because

3:13:50of the demands and needs of our children

3:13:53in this community and the many benefits

3:13:57um both to school children and other

3:14:01members of our community. We have kicked

3:14:03this can down the road long enough and

3:14:04we are sitting at a difficult time as

3:14:06council and that we have inherited many

3:14:09significant projects that are the result

3:14:12of deferred maintenance. I'm not willing

3:14:14to not fund this because of that, but I

3:14:18am committed and I ask that everyone

3:14:20else join me in changing the narrative

3:14:23around the way we work with the school

3:14:24district. We have an opportunity and an

3:14:27obligation to be a functioning city that

3:14:31manages two governing bodies

3:14:33[clears throat] as a team for the

3:14:35benefit of our children. and we have an

3:14:37obligation to make sure that the 10% of

3:14:41our residents who live in Penuk trust

3:14:44that we are representing them. So I

3:14:48agree that we need to be working on

3:14:50thisou right now. I will not appropriate

3:14:54another dollar to Memorial Field beyond

3:14:57this 1.2 unless we have a clear

3:15:00understanding between the school board

3:15:03and this council.

3:15:04>> Thank you. Council,

3:15:10>> I agree in some parts with councelor

3:15:14Carts. There are things at Memorial FE

3:15:16field that need attention immediately.

3:15:18We can address safety issues, drainage

3:15:20problems, and failing infrastructure

3:15:23without committing [clears throat]

3:15:24ourselves to designing a $22 million

3:15:27vision for this property.

3:15:29Once we spend substantial money

3:15:31designing the $22 million project, it

3:15:34becomes much harder to reconsider it.

3:15:36And this seems the standard operating

3:15:38procedure for this city. Spend

3:15:40exorbitant money to design something we

3:15:42can't afford and then rely on the sunk

3:15:45cost fallacy to convince our taxpayers

3:15:47that we're losing money if we don't

3:15:48build immediately. And then we have to

3:15:50spend time and resources downsizing the

3:15:53project. as evidenced for the police

3:15:54station and the golf course clubhouse

3:15:56most recently. We are big on we've

3:16:00already spent this much designing it. We

3:16:02can't stop now.

3:16:04Before we invest heavily in final

3:16:06design, I think we need to resolve some

3:16:08fundamental questions about the

3:16:09relationship between the city and

3:16:11conquered school district. I recently

3:16:13had a conversation with a conquered

3:16:15school district board member that

3:16:16reinforced this concern for me. During

3:16:19the conversation, there was discussion

3:16:20about the school district potentially

3:16:22sharing in revenue generated at Memorial

3:16:24Field. There was also discussion about

3:16:26the district wanting greater input into

3:16:28the operations of the facility.

3:16:31I don't raise that conversation as

3:16:34criticism of the school district. In

3:16:35fact, I think it demonstrates exactly

3:16:37why we need a concrete agreement. Those

3:16:40are legitimate issues to discuss. If CSD

3:16:43is going to make a substantial financial

3:16:45investment in Memorial Field, it is

3:16:47reasonable for the district to ask what

3:16:49role it will have in decisions about

3:16:51scheduling, operations, revenue, etc.

3:16:54But those questions also demonstrate

3:16:56that we have not yet fully defined the

3:16:58partnership. Who ultimately controls the

3:17:01facility? Who decides whether a field is

3:17:03playable? Who has priority when city

3:17:06recreation programs, community

3:17:07organizations, and school athletics want

3:17:10the same space? Who receives rental,

3:17:12tournament, concessions, or other

3:17:14revenue? Who pays for the increased

3:17:16maintenance when usage increases? And if

3:17:19CSD is contributing millions of dollars

3:17:21in construction, what rights or control

3:17:23does that investment give the district

3:17:2520 years from now? These questions

3:17:27should be answered before we design, not

3:17:30after. This current situation with the

3:17:33runlet traffic ringing is the perfect

3:17:35example of why we need to iron this out.

3:17:37Now, the city council is considering

3:17:39enacting an ordinance to circumvent

3:17:42plans the school district has in place.

3:17:44If the district and city had worked

3:17:46together on this project from the start,

3:17:47this issue would not even be before us

3:17:49right now, which I might add is well

3:17:52after engineering construction has begun

3:17:54and will most certainly come at a higher

3:17:56cost to the taxpayer. We need a very

3:17:58clearou for this partnership. Theou

3:18:01needs to establish ownership, financial

3:18:03responsibility, operational control,

3:18:05maintenance obligations, public access,

3:18:08and how disagreements would be resolved.

3:18:10Who is going to be responsible for cost

3:18:12overruns? Who has authority to close

3:18:14fields due to weather, unsafe

3:18:16conditions, or maintenance? How are

3:18:17scheduling conflicts resolved? Is there

3:18:19a minimum level of guaranteed public

3:18:21access?

3:18:24Can either party approve changes that

3:18:26increase the other's financial

3:18:27obligation? What happens [clears throat]

3:18:28if one party withdraws funding?

3:18:32But there's also another question I

3:18:33think is even bigger. How can our

3:18:35taxpayers how much can our taxpayers

3:18:37reasonably shoulder? I have a hundred

3:18:40more questions not answered and we

3:18:41simply cannot enter into this process

3:18:43with all of these unknowns. We cannot

3:18:45look at Memorial Field in isolation. Our

3:18:48residents are already telling us that

3:18:49property taxes are becoming increasingly

3:18:51difficult to afford and we are

3:18:53considering another major capital

3:18:54project at a time when taxpayers have

3:18:56not yet experienced the full cumulative

3:18:58impact of decisions that have already

3:19:00been made. Next year, we were told

3:19:03there's a 27.6% 6% increase in debt

3:19:05service costs when the police

3:19:08department's new building and the Beaver

3:19:10Meadow Clubhouse debt comes to be we

3:19:14have to pay the first year on that. I'm

3:19:16not sure if the middle school bond

3:19:18repayment will also start next year, but

3:19:20I do believe the initial $76 million

3:19:22bond was projected to cost taxpayers

3:19:25$400 to $500 per year on average.

3:19:29Coupling that with the city's projected

3:19:31increase and folks could be seeing

3:19:32hundreds up to thousand dollars in

3:19:34increase next year and the years after.

3:19:37And this does not even touch the fact

3:19:39that hundreds of mobile home owners in

3:19:40my ward will likely be seeing a

3:19:42significant increase after the

3:19:44revaluations come through at the end of

3:19:46the year. And I just wanted to talk

3:19:48about embarrassing because I had an

3:19:50email today from a lady who did not want

3:19:52to give her private financial

3:19:54information to the tax assessor to apply

3:19:57for um elderly

3:20:01tax credits because she finds it

3:20:02embarrassing. I've talked to a gentleman

3:20:05who has to put um diesel fuel in his

3:20:09family's heating oil because he can't

3:20:11afford heating oil right right now and

3:20:13he finds that embarrassing. There are

3:20:15folks that visit the wonderful friends

3:20:18of forgotten children next to me to feed

3:20:20their families and they swallow their

3:20:22pride and they find that embarrassing.

3:20:25We as a city need to start assessing

3:20:27wants versus needs. Do we need a $22

3:20:30million sports complex when we had

3:20:33already eliminated dozens of staff

3:20:35positions in our school system?

3:20:39What we need is 42%

3:20:41[clears throat]

3:20:42of our Penuk children that are

3:20:43economically disadvantaged to be able to

3:20:46eat. We need for the average homeowner

3:20:48to be able to afford fuel to heat their

3:20:49homes. For folks that are born and

3:20:51raised here to even be able to afford to

3:20:53live here anymore. I've had multiple

3:20:56conversations with folks, some in actual

3:20:58tears over the reality of not being able

3:21:00to afford to live here. This is not

3:21:03hyperbole. People are going hungry,

3:21:05forgoing medication, forgoing adequate

3:21:07heat in this economy, and we're asking

3:21:09them to foot the bill for a $22 million

3:21:11park. We are quickly losing services

3:21:14from our library, leaf cleanup, city

3:21:16pools, staffing for Marramac Lodge,

3:21:19reduced hours at the citywide community

3:21:20center. Can we then afford to spend $22

3:21:23million on a park? What services are we

3:21:26then going to need to reduce next year

3:21:27and the years after to help pay for this

3:21:30complex?

3:21:32Before we commit significant additional

3:21:34money designing the larger project, we

3:21:35need to know exactly what we are

3:21:37building, why we are building it, who

3:21:39pays for it, who controls it, and most

3:21:40importantly, whether the people we

3:21:42represent can reasonably afford it. My

3:21:44ask is simple. Let's do this project

3:21:46right. We need anou. Each entity needs

3:21:49to come to the table with what they and

3:21:52their corresponding taxpayers are

3:21:54willing to and can afford to pay. And it

3:21:57needs to be equitable for conquered and

3:21:59penoke folks. For this, we need a

3:22:01projection that should show anticipated

3:22:03construction costs, annual operating

3:22:05costs, maintenance, future capital

3:22:07replacement obligations, and projected

3:22:08revenues and splits. With this, we can

3:22:11create anou that covers all the

3:22:13intricacies of ownership and management

3:22:15that I've already laid out. I would give

3:22:18the council something concrete to

3:22:19evaluate rather than asking us to

3:22:21approve the next phase based primarily

3:22:23on a conceptual master plan. I believe

3:22:25we should address the immediate repairs

3:22:27Memorial Field needs, determine what

3:22:29taxpayers can realistically afford over

3:22:31the next several years, and resolve the

3:22:33relationship between the city and school

3:22:34district regarding ownership, financial

3:22:37responsibility, operations, and revenue.

3:22:39We cannot ignore the almost 500

3:22:41community members who signed a petition

3:22:43asking for a clear resolution. Let's

3:22:46please only pay for the design of a

3:22:47complex that we can afford and have

3:22:49transparency and clarity in the process.

3:22:52>> Thank you, councelor. Councelor

3:22:54Fennessy.

3:22:54>> Thank you.

3:22:56>> So, um, first thing is this is the

3:23:01city's

3:23:02complex right now. Right now,

3:23:04everybody's 100% on the hook for

3:23:06everything else. So, um, if something

3:23:09happens tomorrow, you know, when we took

3:23:11down the bleachers, that's all on us.

3:23:13It's our assets. It's just like any

3:23:14other park or community center

3:23:20right now. I I actually think maybe not

3:23:23in the last couple months, but since

3:23:26that I've joined the city council, we've

3:23:28actually had a really good relationship

3:23:29with the school board and the school

3:23:31district. I think we've probably had

3:23:33more cooperation on things. We've had

3:23:35more meetings. We've had more

3:23:37participation from them with respect to

3:23:38Memorial Field. started with them, you

3:23:41know, contributing some money to do this

3:23:43initial work, which uh Mr. Gil reminded

3:23:46us many times, we've probably uh gotten

3:23:50our money's worth for the uh for the

3:23:52amount of design money we spent on those

3:23:54consultants. So, uh

3:23:57I think, you know, right now we have a

3:23:59check, literally a check for $600,000

3:24:03from the school district and all they're

3:24:04asking for is for us to put in 50%.

3:24:08Right now, it's 100% our obligation.

3:24:11Now, do I expect that they will want

3:24:13some additional uh control for, you

3:24:16know, putting some money towards this?

3:24:18Of course they will. And we're going to

3:24:20have to to negotiate some sort of anou.

3:24:23And we're going to have to make hard

3:24:24choices about how much control we want

3:24:26to give up. Right now, we 100% control

3:24:30Memorial Field.

3:24:32100%.

3:24:34But the minute you take money from

3:24:36another governing body, you're going to

3:24:38seed some of that control. And that's a

3:24:41choice we're going to have to make. I'm

3:24:44not sure tonight is the time to make

3:24:45that decision

3:24:47because right now all we have is a

3:24:50conceptual plan. Okay? And I know people

3:24:54have asked questions about, well, can't

3:24:55we just do the the things we need to do,

3:24:57the minor repairs

3:24:59to really fix it, to to fix the issues

3:25:03that have been there for 50 years,

3:25:05you've got to tear up every single field

3:25:08to fix the drainage. Okay? Every single

3:25:12one. The second you touch all of those

3:25:14fields, we're talking, you know, multi

3:25:17multi-million dollars. Okay? So, as

3:25:20councelor Foot knows, we've had

3:25:23>> at least 10

3:25:24>> at least 10 at least 10 meetings uh to

3:25:27try and work through we looked at

3:25:29[clears throat] a lot of different

3:25:30concepts, a lot of different plans. The

3:25:33original numbers we were looking at

3:25:34conceptually were $38 million, I think

3:25:38$36 million. We've tried to shrink the

3:25:41project. Shrink the project. Shrink the

3:25:42project. And right now, uh, I would say

3:25:45the $22 million number there, if you

3:25:49look at it, five million is for new

3:25:51buildings, which may or may not ever get

3:25:53built.

3:25:55The focus that we've had with respect to

3:25:57looking at phase one is addressing the

3:25:59fields and the track, the spaces that

3:26:03are I think if one thing I heard tonight

3:26:05from everybody, whether they want us to

3:26:07move forward or not, everybody agrees

3:26:08that the condition of Memorial Field is

3:26:11not good.

3:26:12And so we have a choice. We can take

3:26:16that first step as someone so eloquently

3:26:19said uh to start that you know thousandm

3:26:22journey or we can't. You know we have

3:26:26that control tonight. We have $600,000

3:26:30there. The school district has said we

3:26:32want to take that first step with you.

3:26:34And the question we have is do we want

3:26:35to join them or not? I think we should

3:26:38but that's up to everybody sitting

3:26:40around this table.

3:26:43Councelor Schultz.

3:26:45>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor.

3:26:50>> Um, I'm going to stick to written

3:26:52remarks.

3:26:54Um, decades of failed economic policies

3:26:57have reached a true nater in New

3:27:00Hampshire and America and conquered. And

3:27:03that is why we can't have nice things

3:27:06right now. Those among us who are

3:27:09benefiting the most ought to shoulder a

3:27:11fairer burden uh of the cost and

3:27:16therefore should pay a bigger share of

3:27:19the city's expenses.

3:27:22This is because why this isn't happening

3:27:25[clears throat] is because current

3:27:27government conditions at both the state

3:27:29and federal level looking at revenues

3:27:31and expenditures have greatly benefited

3:27:34a minority of wealthy people at the

3:27:37expense of all the rest of us. And I

3:27:41hate that. I'm an FDR Democrat who likes

3:27:45investing in good programs, projects,

3:27:48especially for kids, especially for

3:27:50people in need. And too many of our

3:27:52items are in direct conflict with one

3:27:56another. I hate everything about this.

3:28:00But the way the system is right now is

3:28:04wealthy folks aren't paying a bigger

3:28:06share of the burden. The rest of us are

3:28:08taking a bigger cut of that bill. and

3:28:12that is being passed on to cities as

3:28:15well, including Conquered and both of

3:28:19Conquered's school boards.

3:28:22Anything other than that, uh, continues

3:28:26to place too much of a burden on the

3:28:29backs of middle class, even the upper

3:28:31middle class and workingass and poor

3:28:34Concordians. So, it's with no joy that I

3:28:37take in saying that I'm going to vote

3:28:39no. I hate that.

3:28:42But it is where my [clears throat]

3:28:43conscience is. It is in representing

3:28:47uh W nine. It is also, I will add,

3:28:50ironic that the one W nine uh person who

3:28:54testified here today went out of her way

3:28:56to talk about her own poverty as she

3:28:58supported the supported uh voting for

3:29:02this. So, I found that ironic and a

3:29:05little uh humorous knowing how I tend to

3:29:08speak. Um, I am a more privileged

3:29:12person. I am not in poverty

3:29:15and this isn't easy for me. But I have

3:29:18heard from too many people who are

3:29:20struggling to do anything unfortunately

3:29:23other than not support it at this

3:29:25moment. But we've got to change a lot of

3:29:27things and this doesn't get us there for

3:29:30now. So I'll leave it at that. and to

3:29:34just basically ditto a lot of the things

3:29:35that uh councelor Horn said. Thank you.

3:29:39[clears throat]

3:29:39>> Any other discussion? Councelor Brown.

3:29:42>> Yes. Um thank you councelor Horn for

3:29:46your eloquence and thoroughess. Um thank

3:29:49you councelor Schultz. Um and thank you

3:29:53uh to my other fellow counselors,

3:29:55councelor Fennessesy and councelor

3:29:56Kurts. We heard some really compelling

3:29:59testimony from our all of our

3:30:02constituents and I truly believe that

3:30:05our children they we should invest in

3:30:09our children. This is our collective

3:30:12future that is important. I think

3:30:14tonight is too soon. We heard excellent

3:30:18suggestions, ideas. I think we should

3:30:20digest it. I think we should have a

3:30:23decision. We could have a decision next

3:30:25month. But I think in that time we can

3:30:28have anou. I think what is embarrassing

3:30:31are the priorities that the council has

3:30:34put forward has done. I think we need to

3:30:36really examine why we have a brand new

3:30:39golf clubhouse

3:30:42and and students are doing track

3:30:44practice inside the building. That is

3:30:47outrageous. In 2012, David Gil was

3:30:50building a pond at Beaver Meadow. There

3:30:52have there's been millions of dollars of

3:30:55the landscape of Beaver Meadow. Why has

3:30:58a golf course been a priority over our

3:31:02children? Conquered doesn't conquered

3:31:05golfs at the uh conquered um country

3:31:09club. They don't golf there. So, I think

3:31:12we need to really examine where our

3:31:14priorities are. I think it should be in

3:31:16our children. And I I would support this

3:31:22uh but I I like um Mr. Washburn's

3:31:24suggestion that it goes to an RFP and I

3:31:27want theou. I do not I would not support

3:31:29it this evening until we have thatou.

3:31:32But I also think we need to seriously

3:31:34consider turning the golf fund back into

3:31:38an enterprise fund because that is

3:31:40$831,000

3:31:43that is on conquered taxpayers and can

3:31:45be paid for by golfers.

3:31:48So I will not be supporting the motion

3:31:50this evening, but I want us to to focus

3:31:55on this and our kids um and moving

3:31:58forward next month.

3:32:01Council Fantasy,

3:32:02>> will you take a question?

3:32:04>> Sure.

3:32:05>> So, if we get anou, will you support

3:32:07this project?

3:32:09>> I I would also like the RFP that uh Mr.

3:32:11Washburn had said.

3:32:12>> So, if we do an RFP for construction

3:32:15services and we have anou in place when

3:32:18we come around and we do appropriations

3:32:20for construction, you'll support it?

3:32:22>> Uh, no. I want to see what theou says. I

3:32:24I I'm not going to say right now without

3:32:26anything in front of me that I would I

3:32:28would support that, but I will consider

3:32:30it. [clears throat] Yes. Any other

3:32:31discussion?

3:32:33Councelor Todd.

3:32:34>> Uh thank you, your honor. Um I I agree

3:32:37with Councelor Horn's uh statements as

3:32:40well. Uh but I think that one of the

3:32:42pieces that's missing for me is that uh

3:32:45we don't have enough of the data and

3:32:46information that we would require, I

3:32:49think, in order to move forward with

3:32:51anou. But I I appreciate councelor

3:32:54Curts's sentiment that we should start

3:32:56this as soon as possible, as soon as

3:32:58it's practicable for us to start that

3:33:00process. I think it's never, you know,

3:33:02soon enough to begin discussions. Um,

3:33:04and so I would encourage uh staff to do

3:33:07that. Um, I I think that uh there there

3:33:11will be an opportunity for us to

3:33:13continue to uh promote a fair and

3:33:15equitable division in terms of Pinnacook

3:33:17residents and their cost sharing on this

3:33:20proposal. But I don't think that we can

3:33:22actually do that. Um, and I wouldn't

3:33:24feel comfortable doing that without all

3:33:26the required information. A good point

3:33:29that I heard tonight actually came from

3:33:31city manager spell when he said, "Well,

3:33:33there's going to be a real discussion

3:33:34about whether or not we're going to put

3:33:35in a turf field or [clears throat] a sod

3:33:37field, and that's going to determine how

3:33:39much use you're going to have." Well,

3:33:40how much use you're going to have might

3:33:42mean that the Conquered School District

3:33:43might actually use the field more than

3:33:45they use it now. So, we don't know that

3:33:47though until we've made that

3:33:48determination and that decision. We're

3:33:50not going to be able to do that until we

3:33:51go through the final design process and

3:33:53we get back the recommendations and we

3:33:55can have those discussions. So, um I

3:33:57would not feel comfortable personally uh

3:34:00negotiating a final uh draft of anou uh

3:34:04without having that data present. But I

3:34:06am certainly very comfortable moving

3:34:07forward with the discussions now uh to

3:34:10get that process started. Um, I just

3:34:12also wanted to thank uh the committee

3:34:14who uh worked on this and council fenny

3:34:17and foot and also um uh David Gil uh

3:34:21from parks and wreck and other staff who

3:34:23have worked on this plan. Uh you all

3:34:25certainly have put a lot of time and

3:34:27effort into this. It shows. How do I

3:34:29know? Well, the figure that we're

3:34:30looking at there, the 22 million is

3:34:32already a 27% reduction from the figure

3:34:34that we had before. I anticipate that

3:34:37when we go through the final design and

3:34:38planning that percentage of cost will

3:34:40come down even further and so I'm

3:34:42looking forward to seeing those uh

3:34:44additional figures and numbers once we

3:34:46get the final plans in place. Thank you.

3:34:48>> Thank you councel council foot.

3:34:50>> Thank you your honor. Um I'll be

3:34:52supporting this

3:34:54plan. Um I think um you know we heard so

3:34:58many um so many positive things that

3:35:02come out of playing sports.

3:35:05uh whether it's someone that says uh

3:35:08good uh teammates are good employees or

3:35:11just it just it was overwhelming on the

3:35:13positive attributes

3:35:16sports have and you know this is like

3:35:18someone said this is the capital city

3:35:20and we have to do better um council

3:35:24fences and I spent quite a bit of time

3:35:26going over different items and

3:35:27discussions over 10 or so meetings and

3:35:30we can't just have any we can't continue

3:35:32with temporary fixes because temporary

3:35:34fixes is is where has got us to this

3:35:36point we're in today. Um and I and I I

3:35:40wholeheartedly agree with councelor

3:35:42Kurtz. Um um we do need to have an MOU

3:35:46before we spend another nickel beyond

3:35:48the 1.2. And honestly, it's going to

3:35:50take a while to get there because the

3:35:52data, as councelor Todd mentioned, we

3:35:55need to collect that data so we can make

3:35:56a good decision as a uh as a group, as a

3:36:00community. And I'm just going to finish

3:36:02with uh how strongly I feel about youth

3:36:05sports and the people that they produce

3:36:07is um councelor Keech's father who is

3:36:11teach parks named after famously said

3:36:14it's cheaper to recreate than it is to

3:36:16incarcerate and that's the type of

3:36:17people that we want to build in this

3:36:19community. So um I hope um I hope we get

3:36:22a majority or super majority to pass

3:36:25this and advance this project. It's

3:36:26extremely important for the city of

3:36:28conquered. Thank you. Thank you,

3:36:30council. Council Keech.

3:36:31>> Thank you, your honor. [clears throat] I

3:36:32just want to briefly say I'll be in

3:36:34support of this as well. I mean, and

3:36:36maybe it's obvious, but um whether we

3:36:38reach any type of agreement with the

3:36:40school district or not, that facility

3:36:42needs to be repaired. So, why would we

3:36:45walk away from a matching $600,000 grant

3:36:49essentially is what it is. So, we can

3:36:50get all this design work done, find out

3:36:53what the costs are, what the

3:36:55expectations are, and then figure out

3:36:57the agreement. So [clears throat] we

3:36:59we're going to need to do it one way or

3:37:00the other. So why not do it now? So very

3:37:03much in support of it.

3:37:04>> Council council Schllasa.

3:37:06>> Yes. I agree that the Pentacook

3:37:08residents need sort of a fair shake and

3:37:10so that theou will divide the costs a

3:37:14portion the costs fairly. So I think

3:37:16that they've got a good case and I

3:37:18support that. At the same time I think

3:37:20we need to move this this effort

3:37:23forward. We need real numbers that we

3:37:26can talk about how we will divide them.

3:37:28I will support this measure and I agree

3:37:31that we should not uh uh appropriate

3:37:35additional monies until we have a clear

3:37:37understanding of both the cost and how

3:37:39we're going to share it with the the

3:37:41school boards.

3:37:42>> Okay.

3:37:42>> Thank you, councelor. Council Davey,

3:37:46>> um I will reluctantly be supporting this

3:37:49tonight. I

3:37:52don't see myself supporting a 50-50

3:37:54split for the final

3:37:57go at it

3:37:59in a year, year and a half, whenever

3:38:00that is. Um, I want to see staff

3:38:05research as many grants and outside

3:38:07funding opportunities as possible. I

3:38:10would perhaps charge the joint committee

3:38:12with initiating a capital comp campaign

3:38:15of some kind. So,

3:38:17>> thank you, councelor. Anybody else?

3:38:22Sorry, Council Caleb.

3:38:23>> Thank you. Um, yeah, I am also

3:38:28reluctantly

3:38:30supporting this. Um, I first off,

3:38:36I don't love that we are bonding what is

3:38:39essentially $600,000. I

3:38:43to me that feels like a I mean, I

3:38:45understand it's 1.2 million. We've

3:38:47gotten half of that from the conquered

3:38:48school district. The rest rel it's not a

3:38:52low amount of money, but it feels kind

3:38:56of like

3:38:58split like ordering on Door Dash and

3:39:00then it offers you to split your payment

3:39:01into four with CLA.

3:39:04[snorts]

3:39:04>> Not everybody.

3:39:05>> It doesn't feel super responsible. I'm

3:39:07like I'm not loving the bonding aspect

3:39:09of it. Um I thought there would be more

3:39:11talk of that. Honestly, I do appreciate

3:39:13that the city manager ultimately

3:39:16uh

3:39:16>> I'm going to come to that.

3:39:17>> Uhhuh.

3:39:18>> I'm going to come to that.

3:39:19>> Oh, okay. Well, I'll finish my sentence

3:39:21there. I do appreciate that he came

3:39:23ready with the balances that we have

3:39:26available. Um

3:39:30I

3:39:31I took a little look back. Um, one of

3:39:34the first documents on the memorial

3:39:36field page, um, on the website

3:39:40is a report from 2012 from HL Turner

3:39:44about the condition of the bleachers um,

3:39:48and drainage as well. Um, it's a lot.

3:39:51They had some recommendations that

3:39:53weren't not followed through with. Um,

3:39:56and

3:39:57I think about that and I was that 2012 I

3:40:01was still in high school. Um, here I am

3:40:04right now and

3:40:08this is weighing very heavily on me, but

3:40:11I don't feel like I can be complicit in

3:40:14that same playbook of pushing this off,

3:40:19but my generosity I I begins and ends

3:40:22with this 1.2 million. Um, I'm going to

3:40:25need to see a lot to be confident that

3:40:28we can

3:40:30that we are doing everything that we

3:40:32possibly can. Like councelor Davyy said,

3:40:34like others have said, theou first and

3:40:36foremost. Um, super important, but I

3:40:40would like specifics. I would like

3:40:42specifics about potential grants. I

3:40:44would love a framework for a capital

3:40:46campaign, a goal in mind. That would be

3:40:48awesome. Um, exploring public private

3:40:51partnerships. And I also am just

3:40:54unsettled a little bit and not feeling

3:40:57super confident that when this is built

3:41:00eventually

3:41:03are can we run this? Can we do this? Are

3:41:06we responsible enough? Are we ready for

3:41:09this? That kind of freaks me out

3:41:11thinking [clears throat] about the

3:41:13decades admitted admitted by many

3:41:15people. the decades of deferred

3:41:18maintenance, postponing things, and now

3:41:22I'm in this position.

3:41:25And I don't I don't want to vote yes,

3:41:26but I I will for those reasons. And I'm

3:41:31sorry if this sounds mean. It's very

3:41:34late and I'm tired. [laughter]

3:41:36>> Good. Uh, Council Caleb, Council Brown.

3:41:40>> Yes. Uh I would like to know from the

3:41:42city manager what is the budget surplus

3:41:45>> from the end of the year that

3:41:47>> the

3:41:48you don't have the after June 30th we

3:41:51don't know the budget surplus

3:41:56>> so are we still in that phase or you

3:41:59want to

3:42:00>> question

3:42:00>> stay with me so as the resolution that

3:42:03is before you bonds the $1.2 2 million.

3:42:07As councelor Caleb mentioned, the city

3:42:09manager brought to us some of the some

3:42:12of the reserve funds or the uh impact

3:42:14fee dollars that we have available

3:42:17should we want to use that money rather

3:42:19than bond this project. It is

3:42:21traditional to bond all aspects of a

3:42:24construction pro uh uh a construction

3:42:27project.

3:42:28City manager also pointed out that uh

3:42:32some of that like uh certainly not the

3:42:34impact fees which was 90 no 86 I think

3:42:38available

3:42:39uh but the recreation reserve funds that

3:42:43are available which are about 590,000 I

3:42:45think something like that

3:42:48>> 520

3:42:49>> 29

3:42:49>> thank you 529 I didn't write it down 529

3:42:53uh you know could be could be tapped for

3:42:56uh the uh uh master plan uh and uh and

3:43:01uh the permitting. Um, however, that

3:43:05means that that money would not be

3:43:06available, for example, to pay off the

3:43:09debt for the community center or to uh

3:43:14help pay the debt on the clubhouse,

3:43:17which is currently this year's payment

3:43:21for the the clubhouse debt is being

3:43:23entirely covered by uh the golf course

3:43:26re reserve as well as the recreation

3:43:29reserve. So

3:43:31while we might, you know, not bond this,

3:43:35we would probably have to budget to to

3:43:37pay off other debt these funds would

3:43:40take. So I'm opening this up to a

3:43:42general discussion or a sense of the

3:43:45council before you take the vote as to

3:43:48which way you would want to go. Would

3:43:49you want to stay with the bonding as it

3:43:51is currently written or would you want

3:43:53some combination of the impact fees or

3:43:56other funding?

3:43:59Council Sec,

3:44:00>> I'm not going there yet. I just want to

3:44:02say this about the project. I think uh

3:44:05that's why I ask you, are you asking

3:44:08question or are we still going to

3:44:10>> uh Sorry, I didn't I didn't understand

3:44:11what you were asking.

3:44:13>> Okay. I just want to say based on

3:44:15everything that we heard tonight from

3:44:17director Gell presentation to the

3:44:19testimonies of some of our children, the

3:44:21most talented kids in

3:44:24the community and hearing that there is

3:44:27even some that are even the best of the

3:44:29best left the community because they

3:44:32didn't feel they had the support.

3:44:35hearing the need of safety overall and I

3:44:38think sitting around this council for

3:44:40almost three years now I heard that

3:44:43safety has always been our priority

3:44:45either it's public safety when it come

3:44:46to police or whatever we always

3:44:49supported safety and I think this is

3:44:51even more a priority when it come to our

3:44:53own children safety

3:44:56I heard our children travel

3:44:59to other communities to play because we

3:45:02could not give them a place here to play

3:45:05as a father of three and maybe I'm

3:45:08selfish but I will say to you guys we

3:45:10have the responsibility as we have a

3:45:12responsibility on everything and this is

3:45:14not about the money to do

3:45:19the project this is a money to design

3:45:21the project and from there we can move

3:45:24on to other things and I want to say

3:45:27that for all these reason and the aspect

3:45:30of the competition that we want to

3:45:32create in our communities so our kids

3:45:34can go to the Ivy League school to be

3:45:36the ambassador of Concord. I think this

3:45:38is the time for all of us to be

3:45:42looking at all this that plays in and

3:45:45the importance of sports. So for that

3:45:48reason I will join other counelor to

3:45:50support this but I will also say what

3:45:53previous councelor said this is more

3:45:55than I think needed andou should be a

3:45:59requirement. We cannot go two entities

3:46:03cannot come together on an agreement

3:46:05without a written agreement and it

3:46:07should be an MOU and I will not allocate

3:46:09one D as well. I second to everybody

3:46:12what they said this design the only

3:46:13reason I'm supporting it is really to

3:46:15not only get the design but to help get

3:46:18the grant to help literally see the full

3:46:21picture of what this is. So for that is

3:46:24I'm supporting this tonight. Thank you,

3:46:26council. Councelor Fennessy, I thought

3:46:28you did you not put your hand up?

3:46:30>> No, I was going like this.

3:46:31>> Oh, I'm sorry. Flinching a

3:46:32>> little hot under the collar.

3:46:34>> Council Kirks.

3:46:35>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um, Mr. City

3:46:37Manager, uh, could you remind me I noted

3:46:39that we hadund We have $140,000 of

3:46:42capital project funds, but um, I don't

3:46:46recall [clears throat] where that was

3:46:48coming from. Could you remind me? the um

3:46:51those dollars are anticipated to come

3:46:54from the $385,000

3:46:58or so, excuse me, or so that you were

3:47:00using for the bleachers to come down and

3:47:02the monies that's left over. Now, all

3:47:04that is not closed out yet. We don't

3:47:06know.

3:47:06>> So, you don't but it'll be a safe

3:47:08estimate is that about that much will be

3:47:10available.

3:47:11>> May I ask a followup?

3:47:12>> Absolutely. Could I maybe I try to

3:47:14anticipate

3:47:16>> I I I don't think you I'm gonna

3:47:19>> pardon the late hour, but I don't think

3:47:20you should get hung up on where the

3:47:23these individual pieces of money because

3:47:25it's really an opportunity cost. If you

3:47:28take the money from the reserve funds or

3:47:30the impact fee funds or from the

3:47:33leftover funds from that project, you

3:47:35can do that. But once you spend them,

3:47:37you can only spend them once, right? So

3:47:40now next year, now think about you're

3:47:41going to be dealing with a budget in in

3:47:43a few months, a new budget. And you're

3:47:45going to be looking around for dollars

3:47:47so you don't have to raise taxes. And

3:47:50you're going to look to the reserve

3:47:51account. And you're going to look to the

3:47:53impact fee account. And you're going to

3:47:54look to to whether it's to pay the bonds

3:47:58on this project or to pay the

3:48:01uh the uh interest payment on the

3:48:03community center, whatever it's going to

3:48:04be, you're going to be looking at those

3:48:06dollars. that if those dollars aren't

3:48:07there for whatever reason you don't want

3:48:09to spend them, you spent them on

3:48:10something else, then you have to raise

3:48:12them and you're going to raise taxes. So

3:48:15then you can either raise taxes and do

3:48:17it or you can make additional cuts into

3:48:19it. So I wouldn't get hung up. I the

3:48:21where you should get hung up on is do we

3:48:24want to spend the money? And and I've

3:48:26always suggested that if you're going to

3:48:28spend the money on the design, be

3:48:30prepared to go the next step and do the

3:48:33capital. If you don't think you're going

3:48:34to do a capital project out of this,

3:48:37don't spend the money on the design. And

3:48:39based on what I've heard from generally

3:48:42from the council is we all understand

3:48:44something needs to be done out there. So

3:48:46there is going to be a capital project.

3:48:48How it gets done, how it gets uh how it

3:48:50gets paid for is one thing, but you you

3:48:52are going to do something. So if you're

3:48:54going to do a capital project, you need

3:48:55to do do the design. If you want to

3:48:57apply for grants and you want to move

3:48:59forward and come up with anou, whatever

3:49:01it's going to be. So, but the the the

3:49:04really the un the unimportant question I

3:49:07think is is it coming from this pocket

3:49:09or this pocket or this pocket? They're

3:49:10all your pockets. They're all it it's

3:49:12just from a different a different place.

3:49:14So, um if you want to spend all the cash

3:49:16you got right now, go right ahead spend

3:49:18all the cash right now. Doesn't it it

3:49:20what it does is it it does reduce some

3:49:23of your flexibility when you're looking

3:49:25at how to h how to move forward. So,

3:49:28that's why that's why it's been in the

3:49:30bond. It's been as a bond for many, many

3:49:32years. I think this project has probably

3:49:34been in the capital budget for, I'm

3:49:36sure, well over a decade in different

3:49:38elements and pieces. And then finally,

3:49:40the last several years, she said, "Put

3:49:42it all together and actually create a 20

3:49:44maybe 12 or 13, you actually created a

3:49:47memorial field project and lumped them

3:49:49all together and move forward." But

3:49:51there's always been do the track, do the

3:49:54uh do the stands, uh get rid of the

3:49:56contaminated waste underneath this area.

3:49:59That that's all been there. It's just

3:50:01and back if I just go while my voice is

3:50:04delay theou is not a big deal. we did

3:50:07anou you most of you will remember when

3:50:10we did um the community center if you

3:50:12remember that community center was uh

3:50:15being uh uh just as you're getting

3:50:18properties now for uh the Dwey school at

3:50:21the same time that community center

3:50:22property the Dame school was made

3:50:23available and city council wanted to do

3:50:26that because there was going to be no on

3:50:29the heights there would be no really

3:50:31governmental uh entity there there'd be

3:50:34no school there'd be no there'd be So

3:50:36you you stepped forward and said, "Let's

3:50:38do a community center there." And you

3:50:40went to the school district and said,

3:50:41"Hey, can we have the the community

3:50:43center so we can do something here?" And

3:50:44they said, "No." Then you went back a

3:50:46year later and you said, "Hey, can we

3:50:48have the we'd like the the property for

3:50:49a community center?" And they said no.

3:50:51And that went on for years. And then

3:50:53finally after a couple years uh the the

3:50:55conquered school district recognized the

3:50:57fact that they were going to broken

3:50:58ground and they were leaving the heights

3:51:01and everybody agreed the school board

3:51:02and the city council agree wouldn't it

3:51:04be great to have some sort of cultural

3:51:05amenity on the heights created anou

3:51:08that's how all the sharing got done and

3:51:10it got done there was no animosity and

3:51:12it all got worked out and they actually

3:51:14use it sometimes and they use other

3:51:16facilities sometimes and it and it was

3:51:18all was all worked out together so it's

3:51:20there's nothing earthshattering or or it

3:51:23can all be done. It's just a matter of

3:51:24just deciding you want to work together

3:51:26on something and and and make it make it

3:51:29uh make it work. The the last thing I'd

3:51:31add is this sounds like it's going to go

3:51:32very much the same way where when you

3:51:34did that plan, you also said, "Okay,

3:51:36we're going to collect enough revenues

3:51:38from the use of that facility that it's

3:51:41actually going to help offset all these

3:51:43these costs that are associated with the

3:51:45construction and the operation of this."

3:51:47And then after a very short time, you

3:51:49said, "Nah, we don't need that money. uh

3:51:51we're going to we're just going to have

3:51:52the taxpayers are just going to pick up

3:51:54all those costs and that's what we do

3:51:55right now. That's why it's so very cheap

3:51:57to use that facility. Um you're going to

3:51:59run into the same thing with Memorial

3:52:01Field. I'm sure you're going to get

3:52:01people are going to come forward say

3:52:02we'll pay all kinds of money to use

3:52:04Memorial Field. And then six months

3:52:06later they come back and say, "Yeah, we

3:52:08we really like to use it for free." And

3:52:09you'll say, "Yeah, but that's just

3:52:11that's just the way it works."

3:52:13>> Council of Fantasy.

3:52:14>> Thank you. [clears throat] Uh quick

3:52:15question for the city manager. Uh, are

3:52:18there any impact fee dollars that are

3:52:21going to expire if we don't use them

3:52:23now?

3:52:23>> No. No. So, but but then again, you

3:52:26could, let's say you theoretically,

3:52:29let's say you uh did a bond, if you

3:52:31wanted to do a bond, you could take

3:52:33those impact fees, set them aside so

3:52:35they're not used for anything else and

3:52:37can use that as the city's share of the

3:52:40bond payment. So, it doesn't have a tax

3:52:41rate impact on anybody's home going

3:52:43forward. So, there's all kinds of

3:52:45imaginative ways you can do it.

3:52:47eventually you'll run out, but if the

3:52:48housing continues the way it's going,

3:52:50it'll also keep feeding that system so

3:52:52you can use that going forward.

3:52:54>> Thank you,

3:52:55>> Council Caleb. Okay, Council Schultz.

3:52:58>> Oh, I I appreciate that rundown. I do

3:53:01feel though that the how is the most

3:53:04important part and maybe and I I I

3:53:08understand the consequences associated

3:53:10with pulling from these various

3:53:13reserves, but

3:53:16I mean

3:53:17We made our bed. We have to lie in it. I

3:53:19maybe the reduced flexibility is that's

3:53:22just the that's also the price we pay. I

3:53:25don't know. There are other ways of

3:53:28looking at it. I think um not to say

3:53:30that our city manager is wrong. I he

3:53:32knows these numbers. But

3:53:34>> my sorry my point is do whatever you

3:53:37want to do. It really doesn't.

3:53:39>> Okay.

3:53:39>> When it comes to the money this you can

3:53:42make anything work. It's just how you

3:53:44feel going forward doing it and what

3:53:46dollars you want to use. It really does.

3:53:48>> How do we feel?

3:53:49>> I'm going to I'm going to interrupt the

3:53:51discussion. I'm going to entertain a

3:53:53motion to suspend the rules to meet

3:53:55after 11:00.

3:53:56>> Moved and seconded. All those in favor?

3:53:59>> I opposed.

3:54:00>> No.

3:54:01>> The motion passes with the required

3:54:02two-thirds majority.

3:54:05>> All right. Go ahead.

3:54:07>> Oh, no. Uh me

3:54:10>> I thought you I thought you

3:54:11>> I appreciate that. Um the last thing I

3:54:14had was a question because I had earlier

3:54:17written down recreation reserve 879,600

3:54:21350k committed to other projects at this

3:54:24time. Is that

3:54:24>> the city council already committed?

3:54:26>> Right. Right. Those bond payments and

3:54:28whatnot. Okay. So in my mind is

3:54:32recreation reserve impact fees and what

3:54:35we have underspent for the bleachers.

3:54:37>> Right. Councelor Schulz.

3:54:39>> Thank you Mr. Mayor. Um,

3:54:44first of all, I just want to say I hope

3:54:45that folks will stop using your salary

3:54:48as a bludgeon and start being grateful

3:54:50to all the ways you've served this

3:54:52community knowing you're in your less

3:54:54than a year left. I know, Mr. Mayor, but

3:54:57I feel I I didn't like that it happened

3:54:59that way today.

3:55:00>> Quite a while.

3:55:01>> So, uh, questions for you. One is, uh,

3:55:05capital campaign. Have we done something

3:55:07like that before? And what is the

3:55:09history that we should understand today?

3:55:11And second question is uh have we have

3:55:16we approached St. Paul's school to do a

3:55:19pilot? I don't believe they pay anything

3:55:22to the city. Correct me if I'm wrong

3:55:25because they have an a1 $1 billion

3:55:27endowment that uh I feel fits nicely

3:55:31with the speech I gave earlier today.

3:55:33Tell me if I'm wrong.

3:55:34>> So starting at second one, yes, they pay

3:55:37uh for the property that's under state

3:55:40law taxable. So they pay for those for

3:55:43those properties. There's some that are,

3:55:44some that aren't. It's kind of very much

3:55:45like Caret Hospital in Darm. Good.

3:55:48>> Um the um have we done capital campaigns

3:55:53in the past? Yes. But in generally

3:55:55they're run by because you got to be

3:55:58careful because if you're out asking the

3:56:00the general community for cash and

3:56:03favors, they're used to that, but

3:56:05they're used to also getting something

3:56:06in return. Um so uh so in the past many

3:56:11times what's happened is separate uh

3:56:13separate groups or neighborhood groups

3:56:15sometimes neighborhood groups and

3:56:17sometimes um for example the the uh the

3:56:20White Park playground uh the Marramac

3:56:23Lodge I use the Marramac Lodge as a good

3:56:25example um that was I'm going to say

3:56:28roughly $550,000

3:56:30each. David. Um the city would put in

3:56:34$550,000 bond. The um uh and the and the

3:56:38private group go out and raise $550,000.

3:56:41And the private group did everything

3:56:43from I think the mayor was involved. I

3:56:44think Jennifer was involved. I don't

3:56:46know who else may have been involved.

3:56:48I'm sorry. Council um uh Mayor Boule was

3:56:53involved. So, and what you uh so the

3:56:55city had its money and and that way the

3:56:58private group that was out there raising

3:56:59the money could say, "Yes, if we can

3:57:00raise our money, the city's standing

3:57:02behind us." So, they went out and raised

3:57:04money and I I'm going to guess it's

3:57:05$430,000. They weren't able to get to

3:57:08the total amount. Um and they owed $150

3:57:11$170,000.

3:57:13So, when it came time for to float the

3:57:15bond, I came forward to the city council

3:57:18and said, "Hey, we have money in

3:57:20surplus. Instead of floating in the bond

3:57:22and paying interest on this for 20

3:57:24years, why don't we use cash? And you

3:57:27use cash not only to cover the city's

3:57:29portion, but use cash to cover the

3:57:31portion. And you thank the group who

3:57:33raised the money and said, "Hey, we

3:57:35realize you tried hard. You couldn't

3:57:36quite get there, but we're going to

3:57:38cover your shortfall, too." So, they

3:57:40covered they got came up with 43% of the

3:57:42project. And that and then you went to

3:57:45the Marramatic Lodge. I went to the

3:57:46board of directors meeting and we said

3:57:48hey would you be willing to give us I

3:57:50can't remember Dave was $50,000

3:57:53higher.

3:57:53>> Yeah it was about 90 was it 90 David

3:57:56>> $80,000 and it was over five so so many

3:58:00years and they pay a portion and that's

3:58:02why it's called the Marramac Lodge.

3:58:04>> It's under the Marramac County Savings

3:58:06Bank. That's why and they and they

3:58:07actually we worked with them to come up

3:58:08with a lodge. So, there's all kinds of

3:58:09ways to do these things, but then again,

3:58:11you didn't b you went into it thinking

3:58:13you were going to bond it, but you

3:58:15didn't bond it because you had the cash

3:58:16because you had money at the end of the

3:58:18year and you knew how much your surplus

3:58:20was and then you took those dollars and

3:58:22you used that to underwrite that cost.

3:58:24>> Thank you.

3:58:24>> So, does there's dozens of examples like

3:58:26that, did you have your hand up earlier?

3:58:29>> I did. Thank you, your honor. U picking

3:58:32up what uh councelor

3:58:35Kob mentioned, I'm always very

3:58:38reluctant. Hey, I got her name right. Um

3:58:42what she was saying is I I I I'm also

3:58:47have concerns about bonding it when we

3:58:49have pots of money around. They're not a

3:58:52lot. And yes, we could get skinny, but

3:58:55you know, when you bond, you're paying

3:58:56interest. And I'm going to guess there's

3:58:58a transaction cost to for the bond as

3:59:01well. So that's for me that's throwing

3:59:03good money away

3:59:06just I that's why I support I would

3:59:08support if someone made a motion to pay

3:59:11it out of a a pot of money that we have

3:59:13in different areas currently just

3:59:15because of reasons like that.

3:59:17>> Councelor Todd. Excuse me.

3:59:19[clears throat] Thank you, your honor.

3:59:20Um I uh I appreciated councelor

3:59:23Schultz's remarks a moment ago about uh

3:59:26the manager and I won't take it there.

3:59:28I'm going to take it in a different

3:59:30direction and say that uh I'm going to

3:59:32miss when you're gone to be able to

3:59:35reenapsulate 20 years of history in a

3:59:37few moments, right?

3:59:38>> Whether it's a question about the the

3:59:40citywide community center or how we did

3:59:42the Marramac Lodge project or it goes on

3:59:45and on and on. And personally, I would

3:59:48rather take a ride with a uh 20 a driver

3:59:52that has 20 years experience than one

3:59:54that just got their license. So, I'm

3:59:55going to really miss all of that. I'm

3:59:58going to miss all of that uh uh part of

4:00:00it. Let me go back though to the point

4:00:02at hand, which is uh the uh whether or

4:00:05not to use bonding. Uh my concern is

4:00:09that uh I will want I would want us to

4:00:12be in a position as council uh when we

4:00:14go next May and June to the fiscal year

4:00:172028 budget to have as much flexibility

4:00:20during that budget as possible. Um, I

4:00:22know this isn't a tremendous amount of

4:00:24money, but I still think that um that is

4:00:27going to be a very challenging budget.

4:00:28We thought that this last budget was

4:00:30it's going to be a repeat and maybe even

4:00:32more challenging next year. So, my view

4:00:35is this is not a huge dollar amount and

4:00:38I think I would rather keep those

4:00:40reserve funds and everything else that

4:00:42we have available to us in place because

4:00:44we don't know what those needs are going

4:00:45to be when we're going to do the next

4:00:46budget next year.

4:00:47>> Is that a motion?

4:00:50already a motion. I know, but

4:00:52>> if it's a motion, I'll second it.

4:00:53>> That's true.

4:00:55>> I'll I'll make it a motion. I don't know

4:00:56what the motion is for the city clerk,

4:00:58but I'm

4:00:58>> move the question.

4:00:59>> Yeah, move the question.

4:01:01>> All right. All right. Second. Second.

4:01:03>> All right. All those in favor move the

4:01:04question signify by saying I

4:01:06>> I

4:01:06>> oppos. No.

4:01:08>> All right. Well, that means I don't get

4:01:10to make a speech

4:01:12>> because there's no more debate. It was

4:01:13worth it right [laughter] there.

4:01:14>> That was worth it right there. Good

4:01:15work. Good work for you.

4:01:16>> All right. All those in favor of the

4:01:18motion is presented, please signify by

4:01:20saying I.

4:01:20>> I.

4:01:21>> Wait.

4:01:22>> Roll call.

4:01:24>> We've already started the vote. I'm

4:01:25sorry, councelor.

4:01:26>> But you didn't even give us a chance to

4:01:27say roll call. I think this

4:01:29>> citizens would want to know how each of

4:01:30us voted.

4:01:31>> Well, councelor, I already started. I

4:01:32already start the votes already started.

4:01:34I opposed.

4:01:36>> No. No.

4:01:37>> Motion passes with the necessary

4:01:39>> chance to vote either.

4:01:40>> You need you need to do that over.

4:01:44>> I know it's late, but you have to be

4:01:45fair [clears throat] to the citizens. to

4:01:47know where we are. I mean, sure, a

4:01:48reporter can ask us later, but I think

4:01:50you're being unclear,

4:01:51>> counselor, the time, you know, you're in

4:01:54the state legislature. You understand

4:01:56the parliamentary procedures,

4:01:57>> and we would do a vote over if we

4:01:59weren't clear. I realize that's your

4:02:01call as the mayor, but you have a

4:02:04responsibility.

4:02:04>> I have checked with our parliamentarian,

4:02:06>> council. Council veness,

4:02:08>> I will offer a motion to reconsider.

4:02:11>> In the interest of time.

4:02:13>> Thank you, councelor. All right.

4:02:14>> In the interest of time. In the interest

4:02:16of time.

4:02:16>> In the interest of time. Counselor.

4:02:18>> Roll call.

4:02:19>> All right. Roll call. A roll call has

4:02:20been requested.

4:02:21>> We have to vote on my motion to

4:02:22reconsider first.

4:02:23>> Oh, that's right. Thank you.

4:02:25>> All those in All right. Is there a

4:02:26second? Who said it?

4:02:28>> All those in favor of reconsideration,

4:02:30please signify by saying I.

4:02:32>> I.

4:02:32>> No.

4:02:33>> No.

4:02:34>> Eyes have it. Uh, all right. Uh,

4:02:38councelor Schultz request a roll call.

4:02:40Madam city clerk. Councelor Schultz.

4:02:42>> No. Councelor Seiko.

4:02:44>> Yes. Councelor Todd,

4:02:47>> yes.

4:02:49>> Councelor Brown,

4:02:50>> no.

4:02:51>> Mayor Champlain,

4:02:52>> yes.

4:02:53>> Councelor Davyy,

4:02:54>> yes.

4:02:55>> Councelor Fennessy,

4:02:56>> yes.

4:02:57>> Councelor Foot,

4:02:58>> yes.

4:02:59>> Councelor Grady Sexton,

4:03:00>> yes.

4:03:00>> Councelor Horn,

4:03:01>> no.

4:03:02>> Councelor Caleb,

4:03:04>> yes.

4:03:05>> Councelor Ke,

4:03:06>> yes.

4:03:07>> Councelor Credick,

4:03:08>> yes.

4:03:09>> Councelor Curts,

4:03:10>> yes.

4:03:11>> And councelor Schlasher,

4:03:12>> yes. The motion passes.

4:03:15>> The motion passes by the necessary

4:03:17two-thirds majority. All right. That

4:03:19takes us to item 27.

4:03:23>> Whenever you're ready,

4:03:25maybe

4:03:26[laughter]

4:03:27I don't know. I have to pick up Ben at

4:03:30the airport. So I

4:03:31>> All right.

4:03:32>> Thank you, council.

4:03:33>> The rest.

4:03:35>> Thanks.

4:03:35>> Yeah. Be careful.

4:03:36>> Be safe.

4:03:37>> All right.

4:03:38>> Yeah, that's clerk. Item 27.

4:03:43Yes, it is an ordinance amending the

4:03:45code of ordinances title 2 traffic code

4:03:47chapter 18 parking stopping standing and

4:03:49parking. Parking time is limited in

4:03:52designated places modifying time limits

4:03:55for parking spaces on the north side of

4:03:57Marramac Street and Panak approval.

4:04:00>> Moved and seconded. All those in favor?

4:04:02>> Opposed?

4:04:04>> Eyes have it. Madam city clerk item 28.

4:04:07It is an ordinance amending the code of

4:04:09ordinances title 4 zoning code chapter

4:04:1128 zoning ordinance by amending article

4:04:1428-7 access circulation parking and

4:04:17loading move approval

4:04:19>> second move and seconded discussion

4:04:21right all those in favor please signify

4:04:23by saying I

4:04:24>> I post no I have item 29

4:04:28>> is an ordinance amending the code of

4:04:29ordinances title 4 zoning code chapter

4:04:3228 zoning ordinance by amending article

4:04:35288

4:04:36uh section 288-5 and 288-5D

4:04:41>> move approval. Moved and seconded. Any

4:04:43discussion?

4:04:44>> All those in favor, please signify by

4:04:46saying I.

4:04:47>> I. No.

4:04:48>> Eyes have it.

4:04:50>> Madam City Clerk, item 30

4:04:52>> is an ordinance amending the code of

4:04:53ordinances title 4 zoning code chapter

4:04:5628 zoning ordinance amending article

4:04:5828-2-3

4:05:00and section 282-3B1.

4:05:04>> Move approval.

4:05:05>> Second. Second.

4:05:05>> Moved and seconded. Any discussion? All

4:05:08of all those in favor signify by saying

4:05:09I.

4:05:10>> I.

4:05:11>> No. [clears throat] Eyes have it. Madam

4:05:12city clerk. Item 31

4:05:14>> is an ordinance amending the code of

4:05:16ordinances title 4 zoning code chapter

4:05:1828 zoning ordinance by amending appendix

4:05:22B and appendix C.

4:05:24>> Move approval. Second.

4:05:25>> Moved and seconded. Mr. Thompson, would

4:05:28you

4:05:29please answer the question about uh why

4:05:32we label streets arterial

4:05:34>> from Miss Fox?

4:05:36Certainly uh the the recommendations for

4:05:40the changes to arterials and collector

4:05:42streets were done at the request of the

4:05:44city's transportation engineer based on

4:05:46the analysis of the volumes and

4:05:49characteristics of those streets.

4:05:50>> Super. Thank you so much. Right.

4:05:54Any other discussion? All right. All

4:05:57those in favor of the motion as

4:05:58presented, please signify by saying I.

4:06:00>> I.

4:06:00>> Post no. Eyes have it. Madison clerk,

4:06:03item 32

4:06:05>> is an ordinance amending the code of

4:06:06ordinances title one general code

4:06:08chapter 8 fire.

4:06:10>> Excuse [clears throat] me.

4:06:11>> Don't we have to vote on 32 and 33

4:06:13together?

4:06:14>> Yes.

4:06:14>> Yes. That's what we combined last time.

4:06:17>> One vote or two.

4:06:17>> Is that one vote?

4:06:18>> Two votes.

4:06:19>> It can be one vote for

4:06:21>> it can be two separate votes.

4:06:23>> They should be taken together.

4:06:25>> They should be. So we should have one

4:06:26vote on both of them.

4:06:27>> Yes.

4:06:27>> Thank you. That's a clarification. Would

4:06:29you please read item 33?

4:06:32It is an ordinance amending the code of

4:06:34ordinances, title 3 building and housing

4:06:36codes, chapter 26, building regulations,

4:06:39and chapter 27 housing maintenance and

4:06:42occupancy code.

4:06:43>> Okay.

4:06:45>> Second.

4:06:45>> Moved and seconded for both items 32 and

4:06:4833. Any discussion? Thank you,

4:06:50councelor. Right. All those in favor,

4:06:52please signify by saying I.

4:06:54>> I.

4:06:55>> Opposed? No. The eyes have it. Madam

4:06:57City clerk, item 34

4:06:59>> is a resolution appropriating the sum of

4:07:01$23,397

4:07:04for law enforcement related programs and

4:07:06accepting the sum of $23,397

4:07:10in unmatched grant funds from the United

4:07:12States Department of Justice.

4:07:14>> Move approval.

4:07:15>> Moved and seconded. Discussion. Council

4:07:17Brown.

4:07:17>> I'm recusing myself from this item.

4:07:21>> Purpose reason.

4:07:22>> The reason has not changed from earlier.

4:07:24Could you state it again please for the

4:07:26rules?

4:07:27>> Um, sure. Councelor Grady Saxton, my

4:07:32husband is a police officer.

4:07:34>> Thank you.

4:07:37>> Thank you. Uh, all those in I'm sorry.

4:07:39All those in favor, please signify by

4:07:40saying I.

4:07:41>> I.

4:07:41>> Oppos? No. The eyes have it. This brings

4:07:43us to consideration of items pulled from

4:07:46the consent agenda.

4:07:48Mayor, city clerk. Item seven.

4:07:51This was pulled from consent by

4:07:52councilors Kredic and Grady Ston. It is

4:07:55an item uh a proposed ordinance amending

4:07:58the code of ordinances title 2 traffic

4:08:01code chapter 17 vehicles and traffic

4:08:03article 176 miscellaneous rules by

4:08:06adding section 176-12

4:08:09Noise Street and Cypress Streets

4:08:11restricted access during school dropoff

4:08:14pickup hours.

4:08:15>> Motion to uh um move this item to a

4:08:18public hearing in December. Second move

4:08:20and second. Would you like to speak to

4:08:21your motion?

4:08:22>> Yes, sir. Um members of the council, um

4:08:25I'm not inclined to continue delaying

4:08:28the conversation further around the

4:08:30traffic patterns around uh the new

4:08:32Runland Middle School. I think that in

4:08:35the city, we all want to have a place

4:08:37where we live, work, stay, play, and

4:08:39thrive in our neighborhoods. And our the

4:08:42children in these neighborhoods have

4:08:44been living, walking, biking, and

4:08:46playing here in a shared space on the

4:08:48roadway for more than 70 years. The full

4:08:51existence of the time that Runlet Middle

4:08:53School has been here. The traffic pla

4:08:55patterns have changed over time

4:08:57certainly, but the what has changed is

4:09:00the number of parents that come to pick

4:09:02up kids at school. And these proposals

4:09:05around the school are really putting the

4:09:08needs of the parents picking up their

4:09:10students in advance of the kids that are

4:09:12walking and biking to school in that one

4:09:14and a half mile radius. We've worked

4:09:17with the school districts successfully

4:09:19at other schools managing parent pickup

4:09:23in our schools without need the need for

4:09:26disrupting neighborhoods. And I think

4:09:28that we need to have this conversation

4:09:30again. I also think it's important that

4:09:32our legal department review this

4:09:34ordinance, but I think to be expedit

4:09:37expeditious to the needs of the

4:09:39neighborhood that we take this up sooner

4:09:40rather than later, which is why I made

4:09:42this motion.

4:09:44>> Other discussion? Council second.

4:09:47>> I just have a question. So, when you

4:09:48said you need our legal department to

4:09:51take a look at this, what are you

4:09:53looking for?

4:09:55The ordinance itself may have

4:09:57restrictions on it because it is public

4:09:59roads that would be restricted. But I

4:10:02think given that this would be posted 30

4:10:04days in advance and of our November

4:10:06meeting, whatever revisions needed to be

4:10:08made, he'd be have time to do so or his

4:10:11department would.

4:10:12>> Did you mean to say November?

4:10:14>> Uh November. Yes. Thank you.

4:10:15>> It's it's late.

4:10:17>> Thank you.

4:10:18>> Just a followup.

4:10:18>> Yeah. Follow Is that a recommendation to

4:10:20send it to the legal council or is that

4:10:23just a suggestion because those are two

4:10:25different things?

4:10:26>> It's a suggestion, but I'd like to see

4:10:28this in December.

4:10:29>> Thank you, Councelor Sassa.

4:10:31>> So, I think uh the noise and Cypress

4:10:35residents who I've talked to and I've

4:10:36been there have a legitimate concern. At

4:10:39the same time, this issue has been

4:10:41reviewed and adjudicated in many levels

4:10:44by uh both by the school board and by

4:10:48the city council, our traffic engineers,

4:10:51residents, traffic engineers um employed

4:10:55by the school board for the design. I

4:10:58think what the school board is trying to

4:10:59do is how to balance the the concern

4:11:03about those narrow streets which I think

4:11:04is real and I appreciate that concern

4:11:07with the overall concern the benefit of

4:11:09separating parent and bus traffic which

4:11:12I think is considerable and we've heard

4:11:14there's been much testimony both at

4:11:16among the building committee and TAC and

4:11:19traffic operations committee that

4:11:22there's uh benefit overall benefit by

4:11:25separating parent and school traffic. So

4:11:28before we and I don't know the actual

4:11:31legality of the wording of this

4:11:33ordinance, so I think we'd want that

4:11:34reviewed thoughtfully by our city

4:11:36solicitor, but I guess in all matters

4:11:38like this, I appreciate the advice of

4:11:42our committees with experts on it with

4:11:45engineers and residents uh who think

4:11:47about traffic uh issues, you know, every

4:11:50month. So, I would oppose setting up for

4:11:54public hearing at this time and

4:11:56recommend that we refer it to the city

4:11:58solicitor and refer it to transportation

4:12:00policy advisory committee so they can

4:12:02have another shot at it and advise us

4:12:04what they think is the best path

4:12:05forward.

4:12:07>> Thank you, councelor. Council Fenny,

4:12:08>> I just had a point of clarification

4:12:09because I've heard both set it down in

4:12:11November and December. Which date are we

4:12:14talking about? I believe that it would

4:12:16be on our agenda in November for a

4:12:19public hearing in December.

4:12:21>> Okay.

4:12:22>> Council sex.

4:12:23>> Thank you, your honor. Um and thank you,

4:12:25Councelor Kredbec. Um I also support

4:12:28setting this for a public hearing, so

4:12:31noticing it next month, having a hearing

4:12:33in December. I know that the uh school

4:12:36board is looking at alternatives, and

4:12:38I'm certain that if they come up with a

4:12:40solution before December, then there

4:12:41would not be a need for a public hearing

4:12:43on this item. But we have already heard

4:12:46from TAC. The council has heard from

4:12:48legal and we've heard from engineers and

4:12:50I respect their expertise. But being the

4:12:53safest option that was presented to them

4:12:56does not mean that this option is safe.

4:12:58Um I think the issue is much bigger than

4:13:00a traffic study or a legal opinion. I

4:13:03think it's about resident safety, about

4:13:05their quality of life and the future of

4:13:07an entire neighborhood. And I personally

4:13:10support this ordinance, but others may

4:13:12not. Um, I think my point is that

4:13:15further referrals postpone this decision

4:13:17that the council needs to make. I think

4:13:19it's really time to hear from the

4:13:22community through a public hearing and

4:13:24decide one way or another. And I think

4:13:26that we owe that to the south end.

4:13:29>> Thank you, Councelor Kurts.

4:13:31>> Thank you. Uh, a question. If we were to

4:13:35notice this uh next month for a hearing

4:13:37in December, does that two-month window

4:13:40give legal and both of the recommended

4:13:42committees an opportunity to review the

4:13:44ordinance such that by the December

4:13:46public hearing we could have information

4:13:48from all three of those entities?

4:13:50>> My understanding is the motion does not

4:13:52refer this to the committees or the or

4:13:54the solicitor.

4:13:55>> Let's a followup.

4:13:58Should uh if I were to make a friendly

4:14:00amendment to that effect, would the

4:14:02timing play out?

4:14:05[laughter]

4:14:06>> I would I would assume that those

4:14:07committees would and the solicitor would

4:14:10take up the issue with elacrity.

4:14:15No

4:14:16>> and you're not Mr. Confor is not

4:14:20>> counselor. Why don't you come up to the

4:14:21table if you

4:14:23>> your honor? I can I can only speak for

4:14:24our office. We can certainly turn our

4:14:26portion of this around in terms of what

4:14:28TPAC um has what their availability is

4:14:32to turn around a report in that time

4:14:34frame. I

4:14:36>> Okay.

4:14:37>> Thank you,

4:14:38>> Council Schultz.

4:14:40>> Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I feel like uh

4:14:42councelor Todd would be better than me,

4:14:45but he motioned that I could go ahead

4:14:47and say that we had already had a

4:14:50lengthy discussion with many citizens

4:14:53testifying on this. Uh I personally feel

4:14:57maybe the other two members of of city

4:15:00council on TAC agree with me, but um I

4:15:03feel we did due diligence that night,

4:15:06but I guess I'm only speaking for

4:15:08myself.

4:15:10Council, [clears throat]

4:15:11>> I think the baton has been handed over

4:15:12to me by council. I take it. Um, well, I

4:15:15think that um I would support uh maybe

4:15:19having a venue here uh at council to

4:15:22hear from the public, but I wouldn't

4:15:25support that without first referring and

4:15:27getting reports back from the city

4:15:29solicitor's office, TAC, and traffic

4:15:31operations committee. Uh particularly,

4:15:33I'll I'll just pick traffic operations

4:15:35committee. there where they would meet

4:15:36and uh we have police presence there on

4:15:38that committee and they would be able to

4:15:40tell us well is this uh ordinance as

4:15:42it's written enforceable.

4:15:45I have concerns about that. Um how how

4:15:48are you going to enforce uh uh

4:15:50preventing parents from traveling down?

4:15:52Who you how are you going to know who's

4:15:53a parent, who's not a parent? So um so

4:15:55there may be some issues with that. Um

4:15:57but I'm not the person to examine that.

4:15:59I think traffic operations is so if in

4:16:02fact the motion were to uh as I believe

4:16:05the friendly amendment was being made or

4:16:07suggested to

4:16:08>> to [snorts]

4:16:10well [laughter] I would support that

4:16:11amendment that would uh uh refer them as

4:16:14originally suggested refer this to city

4:16:18solicitors TAC and TOC uh and then if we

4:16:22also wanted to set a a a public hearing

4:16:24for December I' I'd support that as well

4:16:27but not without having the referral

4:16:29because otherwise we're going to be

4:16:30sitting here. We're not going to know

4:16:31what to do.

4:16:32>> Right. Thank you, Council Councelor

4:16:33Davey.

4:16:35>> I don't support the ordinance as

4:16:36written, but I do support another venue

4:16:39to discuss it, whether that's peer or

4:16:41one or both committees.

4:16:43>> Council, did you have your hand up?

4:16:44>> Yes. Thank you, your honor. I also sit

4:16:46on TAC with other counselors and uh I I

4:16:50thought we had a very deliberate

4:16:52discussion. I thought it was lengthy. I

4:16:54think that the we heard loud and clear

4:16:57from the public about safety. We just

4:16:59talked about safety with Memorial

4:17:01Fields. I think that um [clears throat]

4:17:03as someone who went to Runlet, whose

4:17:06kids went to Runlet, whose father went

4:17:07to Runlet,

4:17:08>> I asked at the T at the TAC meeting

4:17:11about these different alternatives and I

4:17:13asked has there ever been a single

4:17:16pedestrian vehicle conflict and the

4:17:21answer is no. So I think that

4:17:24[clears throat]

4:17:24we should bring this to a public hearing

4:17:27and you know let the let the folks hear

4:17:31let's hear from the folks. What I'm also

4:17:33concerned about [clears throat]

4:17:35um if we don't move quickly is you know

4:17:37we look at um other school projects uh

4:17:41I'll say Millville

4:17:43Beaver Meadow and Chris McAuliff schools

4:17:47those when those schools were built that

4:17:49created traffic problems where they

4:17:51didn't exist before. So um I would

4:17:55rather get it to a public hearing sooner

4:17:57rather than later. Again I'll I'll

4:17:58repeat I think TAC um we spent

4:18:02considerable amount of time. The room

4:18:03was packed. We heard loud and clear. Um

4:18:06I just think that what we

4:18:09unintentionally there's a lot of good

4:18:10people around. I am a licensed

4:18:12professional engineer and I think that

4:18:13um we may be creating a problem that

4:18:16doesn't exist today. And so I for that

4:18:18reason I would support uh moving this

4:18:21along sooner rather than later.

4:18:23>> Are you saying to have a public hearing?

4:18:26>> Just one more time. I I find that this

4:18:28body is has a lot of challenges making

4:18:29decisions and I think sometimes not

4:18:32making a decision is making a decision

4:18:34and I just want to remind folks about

4:18:36that.

4:18:37>> Um I have reservations taking a an

4:18:41ordinance over the transom

4:18:44>> without [clears throat] having the

4:18:45appropriate committees take a look at

4:18:46it. I know that uh TAC uh and TPAC

4:18:50[clears throat] you know both discussed

4:18:52the issues around the traffic flow with

4:18:54and I believe that all the people who

4:18:57will be here for a public hearing on it

4:18:59were also at TAC and had a and and had

4:19:02an opportunity to voice their concerns

4:19:05there. Uh I'm not averse to giving them

4:19:07another opportunity to say the to voice

4:19:10their concerns. However, I want to do

4:19:12this in an organized manner and I think

4:19:14that looking at a specific ordinance is

4:19:16a lot different than talking in

4:19:18generalities about various traffic

4:19:19patterns and whatnot. So, I would have a

4:19:23higher degree of confidence in the end

4:19:25product if we make sure that city

4:19:27solicitor TAC and TAC take a look at the

4:19:31actual ordinance and what it actually

4:19:33does and what it what impact it actually

4:19:35would have. So, I would support a motion

4:19:39to uh to uh notice uh this for a public

4:19:46hearing in November, for a public

4:19:49hearing in December

4:19:51with the proviso that it go through

4:19:52legal tact.

4:20:01>> There's a motion.

4:20:01>> Was that a motion? because I'm not

4:20:03seconding it. But

4:20:05>> no, I I'm saying what I would

4:20:07>> unless it's a friendly motion.

4:20:08>> Yeah. Well, I'll make it a friendly

4:20:10motion if you want.

4:20:11>> I I just want to make sure that the

4:20:14conversation is around the ordinance

4:20:16that the conversation is not around

4:20:18sidewalks on Noise Street and Cypress

4:20:20because the decision by the school board

4:20:22was made for these traffic patterns

4:20:24without sidewalks. And I believe all the

4:20:26engineers have agreed that if there are

4:20:29sidewalks, it would be safe. There are

4:20:31not sidewalks today. So that is the

4:20:34purpose for the neighborhood raising

4:20:36concerns. It is about the addition of

4:20:38sidewalks to make it safe in order to

4:20:42separate buses from the parent traffic,

4:20:46not the kids that were walking and

4:20:47biking to school. So if the conversation

4:20:50is around the ordinance, then it should

4:20:52be around the ordinance and not a

4:20:54further discussion around sidewalks that

4:20:56didn't exist when decision

4:20:57>> council. Did I say anything about

4:20:58sidewalks? Nope, you didn't.

4:21:00>> Specifically, the ordinance. This is

4:21:02about the ordinance. That's all this is

4:21:04about is we I'd like I'd like to see

4:21:07what the the committees recommend

4:21:09relative to the ordinance and the city

4:21:12solicitor's office.

4:21:13>> If we're going to come back and we're

4:21:14going to have a public hearing, I'm

4:21:15going to vote on Schulz.

4:21:18>> Second.

4:21:19>> There's already

4:21:20>> Sorry, what was

4:21:21>> I said move the question.

4:21:23>> Move the question seconded. All in

4:21:24favor? I

4:21:25>> opposed. No.

4:21:26>> Passes by the necessary 2/3.

4:21:30So, we have

4:21:32>> Well, don't hold it.

4:21:33>> So, what's next?

4:21:34>> Well, basically

4:21:37there's only one motion on the table.

4:21:38>> I thought you had an amendment. No,

4:21:40>> correct.

4:21:40>> It was not second.

4:21:41>> It was not seconded.

4:21:43>> And I'm voting on things I shouldn't

4:21:45vote on [laughter]

4:21:46>> and the hour is late. [clears throat]

4:21:49>> Are you making is the floor open?

4:21:52>> Let me let me explain the parliamentary

4:21:54situation.

4:21:56moving the question is a non-debatable

4:21:58motion and it moves the motion that's on

4:22:00the floor which is to to post this for

4:22:02public hearing. However, if that fails,

4:22:06I will make a motion to post this for

4:22:08public hearing with the provisos that I

4:22:10mentioned. All right. So, the vote is on

4:22:13the motion uh on council credic's

4:22:16motion. All those in favor signify by

4:22:18saying I.

4:22:19>> I opposed.

4:22:20>> No.

4:22:21>> Nose have it. Uh I move that uh we

4:22:25notice um this ordinance uh for in

4:22:30November for public hearing in December

4:22:32>> with referrals to the city solicitor's

4:22:35office to TAC and to talk.

4:22:38>> Second.

4:22:39>> Second. All right.

4:22:41>> Councelor.

4:22:41>> So

4:22:43if we notice it in November, this is a

4:22:46question. We notice it in November

4:22:48>> and we get information that the

4:22:51ordinance as written is really illegal

4:22:54or uninforceable or something not

4:22:56workable in some way.

4:22:58>> What will that do to our notice for the

4:23:00December?

4:23:01>> Absolutely nothing because that would be

4:23:02a recommendation that would come

4:23:04>> to the floor

4:23:05>> on in December

4:23:06>> in December with it.

4:23:07>> Okay. Okay. Right. That's

4:23:09>> great.

4:23:09>> Like a staff report.

4:23:10>> Thank you.

4:23:11>> Okay.

4:23:11>> So it would have no impact.

4:23:13>> Okay. on having the public hearing

4:23:16December council secret.

4:23:17>> Thank you honor. So my understanding is

4:23:19that all the committee that we are of

4:23:22course as our city solicitator said he

4:23:24cannot respond on behalf of other

4:23:26committees but there is one to three

4:23:30committees plus the city solicitator

4:23:33>> two plus the city.

4:23:35>> Do we think it will make it for December

4:23:37for public hearing? That's my question.

4:23:39>> I think it should. Okay,

4:23:41>> councelor Schultz,

4:23:42>> I think it's also helpful to know, if

4:23:44you don't already, the fact that what

4:23:47was initially given to us came from an

4:23:49outside lawyer. So, really, it's about

4:23:51checking all the boxes to make sure that

4:23:54uh our solicitor and our city staff are

4:23:58comfortable with what's being presented,

4:24:00but it seems pretty unoffensive, but I'm

4:24:03not the person that says that. Council

4:24:05>> Brady.

4:24:05>> Um, thank you, your honor. I uh will

4:24:07support this motion. I will also say

4:24:09that I think it's really unfortunate

4:24:11that this neighborhood has had to employ

4:24:13a lawyer to do this. I think that we

4:24:16have created a uh extraordinary amount

4:24:20of stress on the neighborhood. I think

4:24:22that um that it makes sense uh to move

4:24:26forward on this and I'm glad and I hope

4:24:27that we can. I'm not sure who the chair

4:24:29of the other committee is. Uh so

4:24:32[clears throat]

4:24:33um councelor Todd, you can you feel that

4:24:36you can um

4:24:39have some sort of adjudication of this

4:24:41issue with your committee prior to decac

4:24:46I'm actually not the ch I'm the vice

4:24:47chair but uh but I would assume that

4:24:50there is meeting scheduled I mean and if

4:24:52there isn't there will be now because

4:24:53we've have a referral so I'm sure that

4:24:55everyone's on on notice that

4:24:58>> so I would I would say the answer to

4:24:59your question is yes there should be

4:25:01time

4:25:01>> good thank you so much

4:25:03>> and I'll ask the city uh the city clerk

4:25:06to notify tomorrow Morning the chairman

4:25:09of T.

4:25:10>> Thank you.

4:25:11>> Coming quickly.

4:25:12>> Are we ready for the vote?

4:25:14>> All those in favor, please signify by

4:25:16saying I.

4:25:16>> I posted. No.

4:25:18>> Right. Eyes have it. Uh that brings us

4:25:20to item number 22. Madam city clerk.

4:25:23>> This was pulled from the consent agenda

4:25:25by councelor Brown. It's a report from

4:25:27councelor Kredik, the rules committee

4:25:29chair, recommending proposed changes to

4:25:32the rules of the city council by

4:25:34adopting an ethics complaint form. Do

4:25:36you have a motion?

4:25:38>> Move approval.

4:25:39>> Second.

4:25:40>> Seconded. Council Brown.

4:25:41>> Yes. I'm speaking to the voluntary

4:25:43ethics complaint form recommended by the

4:25:45rules committee. The form is a useful

4:25:48resource that prompts for dates,

4:25:50location, pattern versus one-time

4:25:52occurrence, evidence, and specific code

4:25:54of ethics provisions. But it doesn't

4:25:56change ordinance 30-3-29.

4:26:01Citizens may still file any written,

4:26:03sworn, specific, and to the point

4:26:06complaint in any format that meets the

4:26:08ordinance. Other improper activity

4:26:11remains available. The rules committee

4:26:14consists of five members. Only three

4:26:16were present at the last meeting that

4:26:18advanced this form. There was no

4:26:19discussion about adjusting the meeting

4:26:21time to make it more accommodating to

4:26:23the other members or to the public. that

4:26:26limited attendance and lack of

4:26:27discussion about accessibility should be

4:26:29noted as the form moves forward. I also

4:26:32note that the committee advancing this

4:26:33form includes members who have

4:26:35themselves been subjects of ethics

4:26:37complaint involving dual roles. One as a

4:26:41documented member of the city golf

4:26:43course who participates in rate setting

4:26:45and related decisions and another as a

4:26:48registered lobbyist while chairing the

4:26:50public safety board who has used council

4:26:52chambers to lobby for bills. paid to

4:26:55promote.

4:26:56>> Move the question.

4:26:57>> Move the question. Is there a second?

4:26:59>> Sorry, counselor.

4:27:00>> Excuse me. Can you explain?

4:27:01>> It's a non It's a non-debatable motion

4:27:03>> because I brought up that councelor

4:27:04Grady Stton held held meetings in

4:27:07council chambers to lobby for bills.

4:27:09>> Seconded. All those in favor?

4:27:11>> I.

4:27:12>> All those opposed?

4:27:13>> No.

4:27:13>> All right. Eyes have it. The question is

4:27:15moved. All in favor of the motion

4:27:16signify by saying I.

4:27:18>> I.

4:27:18>> Opposed? No.

4:27:19>> No.

4:27:20>> Eyes have it. Motion is passed. Thank

4:27:22you. Does anybody have any energy in

4:27:25them for any last comments?

4:27:27>> Yes.

4:27:28>> Uh we'll start with council.

4:27:30>> I'll be very brief. I just want to thank

4:27:32everyone involved in the first uh fall

4:27:34festival in the village. There was this

4:27:35past Saturday. So special thank you to

4:27:37Sweet Dreams Ice Cream and Irene Ortega

4:27:40and the other volunteers who helped make

4:27:41this event happen. Hopefully we can look

4:27:43forward to having it uh in future years

4:27:45as well. Um and then the Pentagon

4:27:47Historical Society has a couple of

4:27:49events coming up. Their annual Halloween

4:27:51celebration is on October 24th from 1 to

4:27:543:00 p.m. at the 1834 Ralph House on

4:27:56Penuk Street. This is a uh free all ages

4:27:59Halloween costume parade and community

4:28:02celebration. Great way to kick off

4:28:04Halloween fun. Reminder to folks,

4:28:06Pinnacook trick-or-treating this year is

4:28:07on October 30th from 5:00 to 7:30.

4:28:10Conquered trick-or-treating is on

4:28:12October 31st from 5 to 7:30. That's

4:28:15twice the candy for our lucky residents.

4:28:17That's the way I look at it. Uh, and

4:28:18then coming up on November 6, the

4:28:20Pinnacle Historical Society will be

4:28:22hosting a community potluck dinner and

4:28:24event, what's the history of your house?

4:28:26Sponsored by funding from the New

4:28:28Hampshire Humanities. Erin Molton will

4:28:30be the guest speaker and discuss how to

4:28:32access information regarding researching

4:28:34your home. So, if you're interested in

4:28:35learning more about the history of your

4:28:36house, then this is the event for you.

4:28:38Thank you.

4:28:38>> Thank you, Council Horn. Council

4:28:40Predict,

4:28:41>> your honor, we have a celebrity among

4:28:43us.

4:28:43>> We do. We have the citizen of the year

4:28:46that sits at the table next to you.

4:28:48Congratulations, Mr. [applause]

4:28:53>> Very nice surprise. Thank you.

4:28:54>> Yeah, it was. We'll see you in November

4:28:55for the party.

4:28:56>> Yeah, November 4th.

4:28:58>> Thank you.

4:28:59>> Um, while we still have two members of

4:29:01the community development department

4:29:02here, um, I just want to thank your

4:29:04department for the master plan workshop

4:29:06in September. That was very well done.

4:29:08Um, and [applause] please extend our

4:29:10thanks to the consultants um for their

4:29:13presentations and it seemed like you had

4:29:14basically your entire staff there. Super

4:29:17duper well done. Um, please vote in

4:29:19November.

4:29:20>> Council Schultz.

4:29:21>> Well, that that ties nicely to what I

4:29:23was going to say. Uh, wishing well to

4:29:26our wonderful city clerk and her staff

4:29:29and all the wonderful folks uh that will

4:29:31be at the polls on November 3rd. I feel

4:29:34like anybody watching this is already

4:29:35going to vote, but uh so there is that.

4:29:39I do encourage folks though to uh

4:29:43on the second ballot measure to vote

4:29:47against the tax trap. That's what I'm

4:29:49calling it. Um

4:29:52also we've rebooted the transportation

4:29:55subcommittee on public transportation.

4:29:58We're meeting tomorrow 3:30 at the

4:30:00second floor of the uh city hall. If you

4:30:04can't make it but want to be involved in

4:30:06the committee, please let us know. And I

4:30:09am honored to be the chair of that

4:30:11committee. Thank you.

4:30:14>> All set.

4:30:15>> All set. All set. All set.

4:30:17>> I just echo what councelor Schultz said

4:30:19to the clerk's office. I know you'll do

4:30:21a great job on November 3rd and thank

4:30:24you for all your hard work in advance.

4:30:26>> Thank you.

4:30:29>> [applause]

4:30:31>> That's a second.

4:30:32>> That's another star. We have a second

4:30:33star. [laughter] City clerk, are you

4:30:36going to address the fun ethics and

4:30:38rules and respect around city council

4:30:41tonight or what is your plan?

4:30:43>> What?

4:30:45>> I'm sorry.

4:30:47>> No.

4:30:47>> Oh. Oh. Oh, yeah. Well, when I get when

4:30:49it gets to me. Sorry. I'm sorry. I had

4:30:51to I had to recalibrate. Go ahead,

4:30:54Council Brown.

4:30:55>> Great. [clears throat] Uh because the

4:30:57250th anniversary of our country uh hap

4:31:01is this year, four important historical

4:31:03figures of conquered and New Hampshire

4:31:06will be speaking on Friday, October 30th

4:31:09from 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. The event lasts

4:31:12one hour with the spirits speaking for

4:31:1515 minutes about their history and how

4:31:18they embody the spirit of these figures

4:31:20in their own work and daily life. This

4:31:23is completely separate and unrelated to

4:31:26the 250300 committee. These are not

4:31:29fictional characters but actual

4:31:32important historical figures to be

4:31:34celebrated. Please join us. Thank you.

4:31:37>> Thank you, Council Foot.

4:31:38>> Thank you, your honor. Uh quickly,

4:31:41[clears throat] October is breast cancer

4:31:42aware awareness month. Uh just a good

4:31:46reminder to uh seek routine screening

4:31:48for all types of cancer for both men and

4:31:50women. Um and uh also along those same

4:31:54lines [snorts] um if you can please

4:31:56donate blood platelets

4:31:58uh if you were able. Uh and then lastly

4:32:01good friend uh yesterday was his last

4:32:04day as the president of the American

4:32:08Dental Association, our very own

4:32:10conquered resident, Rich Rosado.

4:32:12Thank him for such a great job and very

4:32:15proud of him being a conquered resident.

4:32:17It's great stuff.

4:32:18>> Thank you counselor.

4:32:19>> Thank you. Uh only a few things on my uh

4:32:22calendar. Uh one is uh that last month

4:32:26uh we had an unfortunate accident uh

4:32:29where uh a personal cell phone emitted

4:32:33noises uh most disturbingly while one of

4:32:35the council members uh was uh

4:32:38memorializing the anniversary of 911. uh

4:32:42that this was an accident, but I just

4:32:44want to use it as an opportunity to ask

4:32:46counselors to we're all wedded to our

4:32:49phones, but when you're in this body and

4:32:51we're in uh uh meeting, please put your

4:32:54phones on silent uh and uh and be very

4:32:58judicious about about using them because

4:33:00the uh you know uh we need to uh we need

4:33:05to maintain the proper decorum around

4:33:07the table. Uh the other things I wanted

4:33:10to mention were uh not only is the city

4:33:12clerks going to do a magnificent job on

4:33:15election day, but uh sample ballots are

4:33:18right now on the city website, uh uh

4:33:21Monday, October 26 is the last day to

4:33:23register to vote. Uh and absentee

4:33:27ballots are also available.

4:33:28>> You can still register to vote at the

4:33:30polls.

4:33:30>> You can Thank you. You can register to

4:33:32vote at the polls. And finally, I want

4:33:34to congratulate uh Marramac Valley uh

4:33:37football uh at their for their six-0

4:33:40record. Uh and here's hoping that they

4:33:42win their next game and tie their seven

4:33:44and two record. So way to go Pride and

4:33:48that's it. Uh so

4:33:51>> motion to adjurnn. Second move

4:33:53>> in a second. All in favor?