2026-11-04 - Tedford Road Design Meeting
Summary
Built from the video's auto-generated captions only; no agenda or minutes were read. The meeting was a public design meeting, not a regular Select Board meeting; a Select Board quorum attended. Names and figures may be misheard, and private residents are not named.
- Introductions: the Town Manager, Mark Waltz, opened the meeting with the police chief (Chief Hagan), the public works director (Mac Hunter), the deputy public works director and two civil engineers from the design firm.
- Background: residents have long asked for a sidewalk. About two years ago, residents at a draft-plan meeting preferred the west side of the road. The road is roughly 200 years old and was never properly built, so a sidewalk requires a full rebuild with drainage; the estimate grew from about 200,000 dollars to about 2 million. Tedford Road Sidewalk and Reconstruction
- Funding and schedule: about 1 million dollars is available now, with roughly another 1 million expected to come through next year's capital budget. After design is finished the Select Board would approve going to bid, and everything is subject to town meeting approval. The target is summer of 2027 (fiscal year 28), with about 3 to 4 months of construction. The water district is joining the project to replace the water line and will pay its share.
- Design presented: a 5-foot sidewalk on the west side of about 4,000 feet of road, including the railroad crossing and a tie-in to the existing sidewalk at the culvert; two 11-foot lanes with a yellow center line; a 2-foot gravel shoulder on the east side. The right of way is a narrow two-rod (about 33 feet) road, so the road is being re-centered, with curb directly beside the sidewalk, no green strip, and no room for bike lanes. Shared-lane markings were mentioned as possible. Sidewalk placement works around the existing power poles to avoid costly pole moves.
- Drainage: more grade (about one-half percent in the flattest first section) and a crown to move water, catch basins and an underground storm drain along about three quarters of the road, existing outlets reused south of the railroad, and a new outfall near the new culvert crossing north of it. No stormwater treatment is proposed (not required for municipal projects), though basins have sumps for debris. A question about a ditch and drainage at one property was answered with a proposed inlet and catch basin at the low point. Engineers will look at adding catch basins on the non-sidewalk side.
- Water main: the main will be extended to the end of the road, all fire hydrants replaced and added (placed behind the sidewalk), and residents on wells asked about connection costs. Connections would be at the owner's cost, either through the contractor or privately before paving; details are for the water district, and the Town Manager will pass along residents' interest, including complaints about long-standing water and sewer charges without service.
- Trees: no arborist has assessed the road. The road work requires a 2 to 3 foot box cut, so trees directly at the road edge will likely come down; larger trees farther back should be less affected. Residents with tree or fence concerns were invited to point them out on the maps; fences would be replaced or moved back.
- Mailboxes: the post office wants all mailboxes on the east side, opposite the sidewalk. The contractor would likely relocate them as part of the project, with placement field-fitted; some residents said an earlier assurance was different.
- Railroad crossing: the state transportation department wants the tracks kept and has offered to pay for the rebuild, which would close the crossing for about 2 days. The town would seek temporary use of a private road to the north for access. Discussion covered a possible lease for storing rail cars, which is a state decision outside town control, and the Town Manager's hope to eventually remove the Elm Street trestle for a rail trail connection.
- ATV and snowmobile trail: a depressed 8-foot at-grade crossing is planned so riders need not climb the curb, with the sidewalk set back at least 12 feet from the tracks; the power company appears to be fine with it.
- Long-term connection: a through connection from the schools to Tedford Road via a future public road depends on a developer building a memory care facility and bringing that road up to town standards; no date exists. Nothing is in the immediate plan.
- Bicycles and pedestrians: a Bicycle Pedestrian Committee member asked whether lanes and a sidewalk were needed given traffic volumes. A show of hands among residents in the room favored both the sidewalk and the center line. Children are allowed to ride on the sidewalk.
- Traffic and speed: three studies over the past year averaged about 883 to 968 cars a day, with 85 percent of vehicles at 33 to 34 mph or less in a 25 mph zone. Police said 11 enforcement details, including 7 hours in the two months after the last meeting, caught few speeders because drivers warn each other; residents said speeding is a continuing problem.
- Next steps: engineers return with a survey crew the following week to verify points, then finish design and seek Select Board approval to bid. After the recorded large-group portion, attendees reviewed drawings with the engineers.
Agenda
Agenda not yet posted or not read.
Sources
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8U66YoVhic (town YouTube channel; auto-generated captions)
- Meetings pages: https://www.topshammaine.com/bosmeetings (Select Board) and https://www.topshammaine.com/planning-meetings (Planning Board); other boards list meetings on their own Meetings pages
- Town: Topsham
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard. Private names are redacted.
Transcript
So, good evening everyone. Thank you for
coming to our meeting tonight about the
Tedford Road reconstruction and the
sidewalk. I'm I'm Mark Waltz, the town
manager, and we'll go around and do some
introductions here and then I'll just
kind of set the stage before we turn it
over to our engineers.
Chief Hagan?
>> Mark Hagan, chief of police.
>> Max Hunter, public works director.
>> I'm [name], a civil engineer
with BH2M.
>> [name], also a civil engineer with
BH2M.
>> [name], deputy director of public
works.
>> So, um many of you were here probably 2
years ago um when we had a draft plan to
basically help us choose which side of
the road we wanted the sidewalk on.
And the consensus of the group that
night was that um
the preferred side was the west side of
the road.
And
for those of you that weren't here, this
project has been requested by uh your
neighborhood for a long time.
Um people have said it'd be much safer
to walk on the road, they'd like to have
a sidewalk there. Our former public
works director initially um was hoping
it would be a much easier project. You
may have noticed a few years back we
added sidewalks to Topsham Fair Mall
Topsham Fair Topsham Mall.
>> Yeah.
>> Topsham Fair Mall Road. Anyway,
um
down by Best Buy. And uh for that one
all we basically had to do was pave a
part of the shoulder. Um but it quickly
became apparent once the engineers got
involved in Tedford Road that because of
the road is so flat, um if we just paved
the sidewalk in, what we'd do is create
all kinds of drainage issues.
Um, and then as most of you know, your
road is about 200 years old and was
originally for horses and then just kind
of got paved over and was never properly
built. Um, so to do this project, we end
up having to rebuild the road, which is
good because we'll have a, you know,
good quality road, but it certainly
increased the cost a lot.
Um, we went from a project that we
thought would be
um, roughly 200,000 to one that's going
to be about 2 million to rebuild the
road, put the drainage in, put the
sidewalks.
Um, the first piece of this was done a
couple of years ago when we had to redo
the culvert at the end of the road. Uh,
we thought since we're digging it up, we
may as well put the sidewalk in there.
Uh, so that piece already has it in, but
now we're looking for the the rest of
it. Uh,
the select board approved an RFP
um, earlier this year for the design
work to follow on from the
um, the preliminary choice that that you
folks have made of which side of the
street. And BH2M engineering firm won
that. Um, they've been out a number of
times viewing the road with town staff.
Uh, they're actually going to be out
once more next week with a survey crew
just to verify the locations that are in
the prior survey and see what may have
changed. Um, and now that they know
pretty much what they think they want to
do with the design, they want to again
verify points, figure out where drainage
is going to be, stuff like that.
Um,
we had a question earlier which I'll
address now and then we'll certainly
take more questions and comments in a
few minutes after they open up with
their presentation. Uh, the question
earlier was when would you hope to do
this? Uh, the hope would be we would try
to do this next summer. Uh, so the steps
that are remained to be involved is they
would finish their design. Um, the water
district has joined in this project
because they need to replace your water
line that goes down Tedford Road. Uh, so
they are going to be paying any costs
associated with that portion of it. Um,
and there should be a little at least a
little bit of overlap of things that are
mutually beneficial, so it should be a
little cheaper for both the town and the
water district to do the project at
once.
Um
So, what would happen is they finish
their design, then get approval for the
select board to put things out to bid.
Um we would then get actual numbers back
rather than estimates. Um heard a little
bit that maybe some of the contractors
are getting a little hungrier for work
next summer. So, hopefully that might
mean a little more favorable prices than
we would have gotten otherwise.
Uh
and then we have that we could access in
our kitty through various things,
somewhere around a million right now. Um
and then there'll probably be roughly
final numbers based on what the bids
come back, be another million that we
need to go on the capital improvements
for next year's budget that would make
it through the budget process.
Um [snorts] all this is subject to
approval of a town meeting. Uh so, we
won't be able to say absolutely certain
this is happening next summer until the
end of the budget process including town
meeting. Um but that's the plan right
now is to try to uh make that happen cuz
as I know some of you have been
frustrated this is dragging on forever.
We'd like to get it done too. So, that's
certainly our goal is to try to find a
way to make that happen.
Um with that said, I'll turn it over to
our engineers and then we'll take
comments and questions after that.
>> The floor.
>> Okay. Uh well, again thanks everybody
for coming by. Um my name is [name]
from BH2M. Um one of the
design engineers on this project. Um so,
Ten Rod the um existing conditions on
this road show about a 20 to 22-ft wide
road um with no shoulders on either side
and the road length is about 4,000
linear feet.
Um
what we are proposing to do is to design
and construct a sidewalk along
the western side of the road. Um and in
the plan that Steve has up here, you can
kind of see the very beginning of it
anyway.
When we say west side of the road as
we're looking up the road, that would be
on the left side as we're as we're going
from Middlesex up.
Um so, the project looks to put sidewalk
along that entire west side.
Um, that'll include going across the
railroad tracks,
um, and then up to meet the existing,
um,
culvert crossing that, um, as Mark said,
was constructed a couple years back. So,
basically, the sidewalk would meet that
existing sidewalk.
Um, as far as the drainage aspects of
the project, given that we're going to
be given that we're going to be putting
in a sidewalk on the western side,
one of the things that happens with the
curb line is is that the runoff kind of
hits the curb, so we need somewhere for
that water to go. And so, what we're
looking at doing is strategically
putting catch basins in along the
sidewalk side to be able to capture that
water and then, uh, drain that water
away from the road.
Um, on the opposite side of the road
from the sidewalk, um, we are proposing
to put in about a 2-ft wide shoul- gra-
gravel shoulder.
Um, and again, that's just to make sure
that there's appropriate width for the
road.
Um, on the water main side of the
project, uh, the project is currently
proposing to extend the existing water
main. Um, the existing water main goes
to, um, I I I forget the name of the
road. Um,
the existing water main goes to about,
you know,
I think it's like somewhere around 3 or
400 ft from where the, uh, stream
crossing is today. And so, effectively,
what will happen is is that the water
main will be extended, um, to provide
service all the way to the end of
Tedford Road, to the end of Tedford
>> Hemlock.
>> Hemlock, thank you. Just past Hemlock.
Um, and so, the proposed water line will
extend water all the way to the end. Um,
as far as what you may see on the
surface for that, the other thing that
the project is proposing to do is
replace all of the fire hydrants that
exist along Tedford Road, as well as,
um, adding some additional fire hydrants
in that area of main extension. Um, and
I guess the biggest note in the fire,
uh, fire hydrants is is that, um, our
current proposed, um, alignment with
those has the, um,
uh, fire hydrants behind the, um,
proposed, um,
sidewalk. So, basically what we'll be
doing is is taking the fire hydrants and
putting them on the opposite side of the
road where they exist today.
Um,
and I think that's the the the meat of
the project. Um, a couple of quick notes
on this. Um, the right of way on Tedford
Road today, um, is relatively narrow.
It's only It's a two-rod road, so it's
about 33 ft wide.
Um, and where we're proposing to put in
2-ft shoulder, 2 11-ft lanes, and a 5-ft
sidewalk, that takes up a lot of the
right of way.
So, as as the road gets One of the
reasons why the road needs to be
reconstructed is so that we can center
the sidewalk and the road within the
right of way. If we just simply kept the
road in exactly the same place it is,
the sidewalk would go over the right of
way. So, in some ways we're kind of
realigning the road a little bit. And
the other thing as far as proposed
conditions, we discussed drainage a
little bit. Um, one of the things that
we're looking at is trying to add a
little bit more grade to the road in
areas so that we can get
positive drainage along the curb lines,
so that again the road will drain
properly. And I know in existing
conditions today, there's a lot of
especially on the Middlesex side, um,
there's a lot of flat areas. So, what
that's leading to is is some of the some
of the divots and depressions you see in
the road. And then, um, I believe there
was some, uh, pavement work that's been
done over the past couple of years as
well, where that pavement breaks up. One
of the big reasons why that happens is
is water just sitting. So, um, as part
of this project, we looked to try to
improve the drainage along, uh, Tedford
Road to try to give that a more lasting,
uh, subbase.
>> And and part of that drainage work
includes an an underground storm drain
system. So, um, along along that
proposed curb line, we would have catch
basins and an underground storm drain.
Um, just we'll have it in along most of
the stretch of road. It's not quite
4,000 ft, but it's probably probably 3/4
of the road where we would have that.
Um, and just just due to the nature of
of adding a curb to an existing road,
uh we we have to include something to to
drain that
along the curb line as well. So, there
are we have plans up on the screen. We
have a hard copy a full-size hard copy
of of the draft plans here, and then we
also have
um
a larger scale
uh
blowup of the entire corridor that we're
looking at. Um each one of these plans
has some has a few different colors on
it um that that we just wanted to
highlight. So, anything blue would be
waterline, anything green would be the
proposed storm drain.
Um and then anything red is what what
we're looking at for um the proposed
limit of work for construction.
>> Couple of the things that may be of note
um is they've had some discussions with
the post office because some mailboxes
need to be moved, and the post office is
asking that all the all the mailboxes be
moved to the east side of the road, so
they'd be on the opposite side of the
road of the sidewalk.
Um and another interesting thing of note
is the railroad crossing. Um
we were anticipating or hoping that we
wouldn't have to rebuild it at the end
and save that money um because of the
fact that the state has approved the
railroad there to become a trail until
rail. Um however, when we reached out to
the state, the portion of DOT that deals
with the railroad tracks, um they were
not at all in favor of not replacing the
railroad tracks. Um they said they've
got someone that's proposing to lease
the railroad tracks. Um and it appears
that the lease is basically not to
really go anywhere.
Um but the tracks in Brunswick that go
up along Route 1 have been leased to a
company that has rail service to
Rockland, and they don't have enough
place to store their cars that aren't
being used. Um so, you may have noticed
when you take Route 1 through Brunswick
now over the highway, you see some
um cars in storage.
They're being the state's being asked to
lease this part of the railroad track uh
to store some of their cars. Uh so,
because they haven't made a decision
yet, um um, and I've asked whether
that's considered important enough just
to use it as storage that it could,
um,
defeat the trail.
They said, "Well, that's a good
question." and they're still thinking
about it, but they said, "We have an
obligation under federal law that
there's any possible chance it could
still be used for rail that we can't
allow the tracks to be taken up yet."
The good news is that they've offered to
pay for the the railroad rebuild. Um, so
the town wouldn't have to pay for that
part. So, I guess that shows how
committed they are. They want to keep
the tracks there.
Um, so what would happen is the tracks
would get pulled up as part of the
project and then the state would hire a
crew that would put the tracks back
together.
Um, the most, probably the biggest
inconvenience for anyone that lives
north of the railroad tracks is that be
about a 2-day period when you wouldn't
be able to cross the railroad tracks.
Um, so what we would do for that is
similar to what we did when we had to
build the culvert and the people north
of the culvert couldn't get there, is
would approach the owner of the
Highlands and asked if we could
temporarily use Audubon Way for 2 days
so people could get in and out of that
end. Um, in the past we traded the use
of Audubon Way for the grading of it and
he was more than happy to do it. So,
that's what we'd work on so that people
could still get back and forth to the
houses and we could get fire trucks and
whatever else.
Um, but we were happy to know at least
we wouldn't have to pay for the rebuild
of the railroad tracks. So, that will
save us a little money there.
Um, so what we'd like to do is take any
questions generally about this or
comments. Um, as we were walking down
the street, we had some people approach
us and they seemed quite anxious to have
this happen and,
um, but if you don't want this to happen
or if you do want it to happen,
feel free to step up to the mic. Just
say your name and address. Make a
comment and then once we've taken any
comments in general, um, we'll let the
group kind of devolve into looking at
the maps and these guys can answer
specific questions. You may ask, "Is my
tree going to be affected?" Or maybe you
want your tree affected and also that it
would get taken down.
Um,
so feel free to ask questions, things
like that whether regarding trees,
mailboxes like probably into the mailbox
part already but
and these guys can address your
questions and and
we're happy to discuss more. So, if
anyone like to make a ask a general
question or a comment, feel free to step
up to the microphone.
>> Go ahead. I have a question.
All the water once you get past the
railroad tracks
comes to the backside of my property and
comes to a broad and goes to the road.
Um
the
drainage system there and I
don't know who did it but the water
comes from What's the what's the road
past right in my I don't know what it is
but I don't know what it is. All that
water there. How are you going to
address cuz we have a ditch that runs
the whole length of our property?
>> Can you give your name and address just
so these guys can identify better?
>> [address].
>> And your name is?
>> We got We got that We got that cuz it
comes and then it turns and it goes
right down the road. It comes to all All
the water from out back there comes
right through our property.
>> Yeah, I
>> Once you put a
sidewalk there, we're going to lose that
ditch and I'm assuming you're going to
put a bulkhead catch basin in on my
property
the
>> Yeah, I'm familiar with which which
property that is. It's like a masonry
building and there's the ditch line that
comes down then follows the road and
there's a culvert that goes across.
>> All the water from out back down through
there.
>> Yeah, it sure does. So, yeah, we we've
actually been looking at that area
pretty intently trying to trying to work
that out.
And what we're proposing right now is is
that where your swale comes down and
then makes that 90. So, where it makes
that 90 degree now, what we'll propose
to do is is put a basically like a
culvert inlet at that point.
And then we'll have a the ditch line
that goes across along the road there.
What we're because to your point, the
sidewalk is basically going to kind of
come into that. So, rather than trying
to re-grade a swale and everything else,
what we're going to do is try to take
advantage of the low point, put a catch
basin in there with maybe like a a dome
top on it or something like that similar
to what you see on the on the southern
side of the railroad tracks on the
flatter areas. There's some There's some
yard drains. So, we would basically do
something similar to that. That would
then tie into the closed drainage
system. That closed drainage system will
then proceed down to the uh cul- to a
culvert crossing and empty out into the
um
into that pond area.
>> Mr.
>> [name], [address].
There are a lot of large pine trees
right next to that property and
all along the road.
Have you had an arborist come out or
anybody make sure when you adjust the
road, you're not going to deteriorate
Are you going to make sure you have
somebody double-check you're not going
to deteriorate the trees to the point
where they could fall on
our houses, neighbors' houses,
anything like that?
>> I'd be too explicit to answer your
question. No, we have not had an
arborist come out and and do that. Um
and we haven't um had a chance to assess
each individual tree.
Um
I I think that the
I I guess in consideration of that,
the trees that are very close to the
road, we're going to be looking at a
full box cut, that's what we would what
we would call it, which is basically
that we're going to go have to go
through because as Mark mentioned, the
road is kind of an older road which
never really had an appropriate subbase.
One of the parts of the reconstruction
of this road is is that we'd have to dig
down, you know, 2 to 3 ft and box cut
out that existing area, put back in um
appropriate materials to rebuild the
road back up. So, the impacts that we're
talking about along most of the road um
are relatively shallow in comparison to
to tree roots. Um so,
I
I I think that some of the larger trees
that are farther back from the road
should not be affected. Um I think the
the bigger question is the road the
trees that are directly on the road now
where we're going to be widening the
road, those Those ones that are probably
going to be affected and those are the
ones that we would look to probably take
down during the construction of it.
>> I I live across the street at [address], and they have a large pine right
on their side of the road at 87.
Uh
if the if the root system's disturbed,
my tree roots the only the taproot grows
deep. The rest of it's shallow. So, when
you disturb the root system of that
tree, it it can reach my house, and it
can reach my child's bedroom.
Um so, that's a major concern of mine.
Yeah, I don't want to have to spend
every night wondering if a tree's going
to crash on my children's bedroom. I now
I'm in favor of the project. I just want
to make sure that the safety of my house
is addressed as well.
>> I'd say use um tonight the the
once we kind of break up to them
call these guys' attention, the
particular trees. Um like for instance,
there's one in front of [name]'s that
when we were out walking the road,
there's a large one there that they
said, "Yeah, it'd probably be better to
be gone." And we talked to [name],
and he said, "Yeah, it'd be fine with me
if it came." So, if you've got trees
that you're particularly concerned about
that are near the road, call it to their
attention, and we can figure out how to
address it.
>> Um
[name], [address].
Does any part of this plan involve I
thought
in the past when they talked about this,
there was plans to like open the other
end of the road up.
Is that ever a plan to like alleviate
some of this traffic from
>> So, the owners of the Highland Highland
have come into our planning board
multiple times to get a plan approved
for a memory care facility that would be
on Audubon.
Um they have said at different points
that if they when they build that, they
would build the road similar to what
they did with what they used to call
Mountain Road, which is now the public
portion of K&M. So, you'd have a
multi-modal path on one side, and you'd
have the street in the other.
Um then they've said at that point, they
would like to propose to turn it over to
the town to become a town road.
Um
the town had a traffic study done
mid-2000s that said it would it would
like to have another way to get traffic
than going through the four corners at
196 and 201.
So, kind of the vision we've been
working on in pieces is to eventually
have a connection that goes from the
schools that the buses are already using
even though it's not public road yet. Um
but come up K&M uh the part that's
private and then get to the K&M part
that's public out to Village Drive.
Village Drive is now public uh and then
eventually have Audubon become public
and connect to Tedford. Um so, that's
kind of the long range but there's a
couple pieces that need to happen before
that.
One is the K&M piece
um needs to become built appropriately
to be a town road and then be accepted.
And then the second piece would be the
Audubon one. But see, the K&M would
probably happen before the Audubon one.
>> So, it's not in the plan though.
>> So, long-term plan but yet nothing in
the immediate future. Discussion.
>> Thank you.
>> Um I see
[name] who's the president of the
Topsham Trail Riders here. Can you guys
talk a minute about the the ideas that
we've got for dealing with where the ATV
trail in the area of the river tracks?
You want to show that section and talk
about it?
>> I have a question on that lease.
>> The lease?
>> Yeah, the lease that they're going to
Who Who are these people that coming in
and going to store cars out there by the
Tedford road on the railroad track?
>> It's the the Whoever the company is
that's leasing the Rockland to Brunswick
piece of the railroad tracks.
>> Okay.
>> They're currently storing cars on the
piece of the railroad tracks that is
basically between Route 1 and what they
used to call Hobo Junction.
>> So, the
Brunswick
>> Right now, they're currently storing
there but they've asked for a lease so
they could back cars further up
basically to come as far as the Cathance
Road sidings.
>> Well, that's just funny you use that
word hobo because I'm thinking of
storing cars and we've got a lot of
people walking up down Tedford Road.
Now, now we have that connection going
up into the Highlands.
The
concern of mine would be who's who's
going to monitor this? Are they going to
be locked? Is it going to be hazardous
material in them? What what could What
What's the rules this company Can they
store anything they want in these cars?
You know?
>> I think they're empty cars, but
at this point the state hasn't granted
them the lease. So, I don't really know
any details on that part. I mean, to be
honest and
[name] has heard from me before, my
hope was we could actually take the
trestle down um that's on Elm Street
because we've got an 18-in sidewalk on
Elm Street um and no bike lane. Uh so,
what we would do is working on pieces of
a master plan, it would be nice to be
able to take down the trestle at Elm
Street and then if Thompson were to be
involved in the the first section of
this um trail over the railroad tracks
would go from Elm Street to Tedford Road
um and you'd kind of go in a decline
from Tedford Road to Elm Street so that
you could bring the traffic or the
pedestrian and bike traffic or the trail
traffic down to Elm Street level so then
people could get onto the Androscoggin
River bike path and cross over the
Merrymeeting Bridge. Um but the state
right now is reluctant to listen to me
too much because they've said as long as
they've got a trestle that still could
hold a train, they don't want to have it
removed. Um
so, but uh you know, things may change.
They haven't made any final decisions.
That's what I'm lobbying for is to try
to get permission that we could get rid
of that trestle um but as of yet this
because of this proposed lease, the
state hasn't been to the point that they
want to say we don't want uh
we'll let you take the tracks up.
>> Well, no, no, that the state doesn't
live down there either, but I'm just
saying. You know, that I'd rather keep
it on the budget side so I'm on the
southern bottom.
>> That
>> You don't know what this company is
going to bring those railroad cars and
>> And Thompson is not asking to have
railroad cars.
>> And they're going to have hazardous
material stored right there. And the
state giving them the license and we
won't be there.
But that doesn't We don't okay it. We
have no
>> role in that. It's the the state geo
Yeah, exactly.
>> It's a state decision.
>> I'm asking for to them to consider
letting us It first was just not to put
the tracks back in crossing Tedford
Road.
And then the next piece would be for
them to consider letting us
take down the trestle and build that as
the first piece of you know the rail
trail.
>> And how long would that be speed for?
Lifetime or
>> I doubt it. Again, it's not with us.
It's with the state. But usually there's
a period of years and usually the
railroad eventually goes bankrupt and
then
you know at least the Brunswick to
Rockland Railroad seemed to go bankrupt.
They only last a few years and then
>> Yeah, it seems like we got some
questions on that now.
>> The
the cement plant is closing and it looks
like I think the cars that I see at
least over the railroad tracks are ones
that would carry cement stuff. So if
this once the cement plant is done, that
may negate some of that desire anyway.
But we have we have no ability to
approve the lease.
We're actually again at trying not to
get the lease there.
>> You're trying not to let that happen.
>> Right.
>> Okay.
>> Cuz cuz I would like to see the trestle
go away so that we could make Elm Street
better and then have a nice bike
pedestrian connection from Elm Street to
Tedford Road.
>> May we end?
>> Hi.
Are you done?
>> Yeah, one more comment on that.
It was my interpretation also that the
actual car storage was going to be
further up from like Madeline Drive to
Camden Road where it's a double set of
tracks.
I wouldn't foresee them storing anything
on the the the line cuz it'd keep them
from making those. That was my
interpretation.
>> Yeah, it's a it's
you know certainly opens up a a big path
for anybody. I don't know what the lease
lease looks like or what it's going to
say but
>> We don't even You know, it's
>> But there is a double set of little
known double set of tracks.
>> Yeah.
>> A little bit further up
>> They're talking headed up
>> headed towards Camden Road.
>> Yeah, yeah. Camden and then
mile and then you know, where it crosses
over there.
>> Pass that too. Pass that.
>> I don't understand.
>> Yeah, it actually is
it's funny it goes past Cat ants but in
on Cat intro the double set is down to
single.
>> Which is close.
>> Yeah, so it's like double single double.
>> Well, I like your idea Mr. Manager.
>> No, it's not.
>> I just learned that I got a plus from
the bike ped committee and as long as
you're talking about bike pads.
Wouldn't it make sense
to try and put bike lanes on this road?
>> No.
>> Yeah, um
it would be great to be able to include
that if we could. Unfortunately,
the width of the right away just won't
allow it. Um we we have the the right
away that goes along Tedford Road right
now is defined as a two two rod road
which is effectively 33 ft wide.
Um and so when you have the two 11 ft
travel lanes and then the 5 ft sidewalk,
that effectively takes up most of the
right away as it is. So, unfortunately
for Tedford Road, it's not a great fit
only because there just isn't the real
estate there to support that many lanes
all the way across.
>> And my other question is the sidewalk,
is there any space between the road and
the sidewalk?
>> Oh, and again, just given the width of
the road, it it's going to basically be
a curb and sidewalk. So, there won't be
a there won't be room for an esplanade
in between the sidewalk and the and the
driveway.
>> I just most roads are third three or
three rods wide or or 50 ft. So, this is
a little bit unique or it's a very old
road. It's it's it's very narrow, you
know, it's it's 17 ft narrower than a
than a typical road.
So, we just we don't have room to do
anything within that right away beyond
reconstructing the road and just
building a new sidewalk.
>> [clears throat]
>> Well, my name is [name] and I live at [address].
Myself and the neighbor on either side
of me is willing to give up land in
order to have a green strip. But if the
lady was willing to ask for it.
Is that possible?
>> If you wanted to give up Well, let me
qualify that.
You probably couldn't give it up as long
as you You need to have enough setback.
You know, moving the property line. Um
but it doesn't do us too much good just
to have two houses that want to would
need
>> but then I know that's still a small
number.
>> So, yes, it is certainly possible to
give the town land or an easement to go
on your land if you wanted.
Um
but unless we could do that for a big
chunk of the road would
doesn't really help us widen the road.
The other problem we've got is where the
CMP poles are.
Um the sidewalk's going to be basically
right up against the CMP poles and we
don't want to have to move poles cuz
we'll add hundreds of thousands of
dollars to the project. So, we're trying
to use the poles where they are.
>> Okay, thank you.
With the back center siding up to the
poles?
>> Yeah.
>> [name], [address].
I was wondering uh how you anticipate
the road
looking when you're done. You Could you
talk in drains on west side?
And I know now when I wash my wash a
vehicle in my yard,
the water runs to the road and clay to
the corner.
So, is the road elevation going to be
pitched
to the west and lower or is it going to
be
How is it going to take care of
In the winter, it freezes from my house
to the corner.
>> Yeah, and Steve, if you could bring up
the profile on that beginning
uh um yeah. So, yeah, we we've taken a
look at the of the running slope of the
road, if you will, so the grade that
runs, you know, along it. Um and that
that first section of Tedford Road is
very flat. Um typically,
you know,
typically you'd like to see
well, I won't throw numbers out there,
but
given how flat it is, that's one of the
that's one of the issues leading to some
of the the drainage concerns or the
drainage problems that you're seeing out
there today. So,
one of the things that we're trying to
do with this road reconstruction is to
add some pitch to the road. Now, of
course, we can't add a ton because we
just have to raise the road up, you
know, those impacts have to go off. So,
we're trying to balance, you know,
keeping the road within the right-of-way
and keeping the impacts to a minimum,
but still provide enough pitch in the
road to to be able to drain. So, in that
beginning section, we're looking at
about 1/2%, which, you know, to be quite
frank with you, is still a pretty flat
road, but at least it gives it some
improvement over um how conditions are
out there today.
In your specific area, the storm water
is still in the runoff is still going to
run in the same direction,
um and it'll still go to Middlesex to
drain.
Um but again, adding some pitch to the
road, we expect there will be some
improvement on letting that water run
instead of it having it slow down or not
even move.
Um
>> Cuz there was some talk about putting a
catch basin
or catch basins on that side
to take care of that.
Cuz we talked about tying into the end
of the road.
But that was explained that that's a
state road
versus Tedford Road
drainage.
>> Right. And to be frank with you, it's a
great it's a great comment and something
that we can look into a little bit more
to see if it's appropriate to put some
catch basins on the non-sidewalk side.
Um
but again, you know, I
for the non-sidewalk side, most of the
drainage on that is going to remain
relatively close to how it is today. Um
again, what we're trying to do is we're
trying to make sure that there's enough
pitch in the road so so can sheet it
appropriately so that it won't stagnate
on the road. So, if you get trying to
minimize the icing conditions and that
sort of thing.
>> Is that the only thing
in my driveway, even if it does drain to
the other side of the road, it's going
to run across the road, you know.
>> Well, right. And we wouldn't do that,
either. We're proposing to have a
And that's kind of part of road
reconstruction, as well, is putting a
crown back in the road. Um in the some
areas of the road that are just really
flat and just kind of really beat up,
you know. So,
that's one of the other other things is
trying to put a crown in the road going,
you know, kind of across it, so that the
water will sheet off, and then putting
pitch in the road, so then the water
will run. Um and so, as part of
reconstruction, the the curb lines or
gutter lines will be better defined, so
that that water will run away from the
road and run along the edges instead of
down the middle.
>> Yeah.
I know on the plans, it says possible
impact. I have two pine trees and a
chain link fence.
Do you anticipate that that's going to
be
We're going to cut those trees, and I
was asking you earlier if you'd move the
fence back or
what would happen there?
>> Yeah, if if the fence if the fence
doesn't, in fact, need to be impacted,
then the fence would get replaced or
pushed back, depending on on what the
configuration of the fence would be.
On trees, again, we'll have to look at
that on a on a case-by-case basis. Um
I I'll say this off the top that the
trees that are very close to the road, I
think it would be in most people's best
interest to have them taken down, if if
if there is if if that's amenable.
>> Right.
>> Um we could try to work around trees to
the best of our ability,
but again, discussing the box cut and
the shallow roots that were discussed as
as well,
you know, there's a risk to keeping some
of those larger trees. So, the the more
trees that we could take down as part of
this, I think the safer that the road
will be and, you know, less problems
will be in the future.
>> Yeah.
>> I had a question to add to that. We're
[address] on the gangs where you have
that long run
of trees at the end of the Tedford Road.
So we have all those trees going to the
culvert.
>> You're on the forested side of the
>> Yes. So I know I don't know how far
you're [clears throat] going to go back,
but do you foresee a lot of those trees
having to come down cuz a lot of them
are really close to the road.
>> Yeah, I know I know which section you're
talking about. So that's really between
the culvert crossing and kind of the the
first houses. So it's a really wooded
area.
Um I think that that section will see
some trees taken down.
Um
we don't anticipate going very far from
the existing edge of of road on that
side where the you know where the where
the sidewalk isn't going. Um so you
know, I would say one or maybe two trees
back would be would be about what we
would expect.
>> Okay. And the other thing we wanted to
ask is with with you bringing the water
up the road, most of us, you know, we
have wells. What is going to be the cost
for us if we wanted to tap into the
water?
>> Yeah. Um so
>> Well, on the west side you're going to
have you're going to have the sidewalk
there and you have to defend where you
you don't tie in prior to the sidewalk.
>> Yeah. And and
so some of this will have to be
discussed with um Brunswick and Topsham
Water District, but I what we had talked
with TC about is that
um
possibly we could
we could [sighs] we could we could work
something out where the contractor
that's doing the work
puts in the services at a cost to the
homeowner. Um the alternative to that
would be while the work is going on, you
know, before the surface pavement is
down, um each individual property owner
that that would like a service hires a
contractor to tap into the main and and
and bring a service in into their into
their property. So
um the the idea with extending the main
would be to, you know, for the the the
people that live along that stretch the
ability to to tie into public water,
but it would be at those individuals
costs at least in terms of tapping in a
a service.
>> We will be losing benefits on the path
fee.
>> I I can't speak for the water district,
so I those those are things that we'll
probably have to figure out later on
just in terms of how how that gets how
that gets paid for.
>> Cuz we're getting charged for water that
we're not using for the past how long?
>> Sewer, too.
>> Well, that's probably what we
>> 15 years.
>> 15 years and sewer.
>> That we don't even use.
>> have We don't have We don't have the
service.
>> We don't have the service.
>> They they put in the sewer and
>> After the railroad tracks.
>> And they put in the water. And they they
made us pay a minimum fee for the last
five or six dollars we ever had water.
>> So, have you bought that?
>> We yes, we've all
>> on it.
>> I think we're going to have to do it
about it.
>> I don't think we need to be fine.
>> I don't
>> Those people should have some kind of we
were hoping to get some kind of stipe on
the path fee, you know, because we've
been paying for something that we
haven't used forever.
>> So, you've been paying for water even
though you can't get it?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah, and sewer, too.
>> It's It's a sewer
>> Well, the sewer line does go by there,
so that makes sense.
>> It's the sewer fee that we pay, but
everybody else on the Tedford Road
We don't have any water meters to to get
that. And we've been paying a water fee.
We only get just the sewer line. That's
it.
>> They And but they charge us a flat fee
because that's how we get our water.
>> That's that's part of the reason they
joined in this project cuz they want to
put a water line there.
>> Exactly. I mean, I'd like to and run it
up there.
>> We'd like to tap into it.
>> Right.
>> I don't want to pay three bucks cuz I've
already paid three thousand bucks for
something I haven't used.
>> Well, the the water district and the
sewer district are two different
entities. So, if you've been paying if
the sewer line goes in front of your
house and you don't join in, yes, I do
believe you end up paying just because
it goes by your house.
Um hopefully you haven't been paying a
water fee yet in that area cuz if there
isn't a water line to tap into then
>> You have to meet a stranded. You have to
meet a the water to get the sewer bill.
That's what they mean and this is
>> What I can tell you what we will do is
I'll pass along to the water district
engineer that there's people here
tonight that are interested in knowing
more about how the connection water
would go and um, maybe they'll do like a
mailing or something or we could put
something on our website with the
answers.
>> I don't think anybody is against
the water coming down there.
It would just be nice like you said
to get something for your for your, you
know, 15 years of paying.
The money you've been paying for
nothing.
>> Yeah, and again, I'll have to leave that
to defer to the water district cuz
that's up to their policies, management,
their laws, which I'm not actually up on
those.
>> Um, just one other quick question. Um,
with moving the mailboxes to the other
side
is that are you going to tell us where
they're going to put them along that
tree line cuz there's going to be you
have like you know there's a bunch of
trees there that is a brutal system.
It's kind of brutal there to bring those
mailboxes across.
Are you going to state where they need
to go or are we just going to talk with
our neighbors and figure it out?
>> That's a that's a great question. I
>> a wooded area there. There's there's
nothing out there as you know on 149 so
yeah, at the end.
>> And I heard the same thing. I heard that
you you guys are going to pay to have
the mailboxes put in just like the
hydrants, the new hydrants. I heard you
guys are going to take care of
mailboxes. Is that true? I don't know.
>> If we're making the mailbox be moved,
it's likely we would make that be part
of the project.
>> You would. Okay.
>> And um
Sorry.
>> No, go ahead.
>> Yeah, I guess I'm just going to answer
your question and I think
part of this
part of part of the answer with the
mailboxes is is some of this will likely
have to be done kind of during
construction with the contractor working
with you when we have to relocate those
mailboxes and and field fit the best
location for those, you know, both from
a vegetation perspective, but also
safety perspective. Um so, we'll we'll
have we'll place holders on the plans.
Uh the contractor would be responsible
for for relocating the mailboxes, but
um we'll we'll probably just need to be
a little bit cautious about that during
construction and make sure they get put
in the place that's that's safest for
for, you know, whoever needs to walk
across the road to to pick up their
mail.
>> I think the biggest thing is is like on
our end down there it's the vegetation
as you saw is really super thick.
>> Yeah.
>> You're going to have to remove a lot of
vegetation to put a mailbox.
Possibly.
>> Yeah. Yeah, the
Sure. And these these will still be
close to the road, maybe the idea is
that, you know, there we have a shoulder
on that side and they're they're going
to want to put they're going to want to
pull up and be be able to put the mail
in. So, we're not going to be setting
these back really far. They'll still be
pretty close to the road. Um so, I I you
know, we we would have we would avoid as
much vegetation disturbance as possible
with, you know, with where we're
locating the mailboxes.
>> When we were walking the street last
week, we got nervous that we were going
to have to move a cemetery. Cuz
there was there was a house just before
that wooded stretch that had a cemetery
by their mailbox.
>> Yeah.
>> Good news is it wasn't real. So, it
wasn't it was that just a decoration.
>> Yeah, we were worried about that, too.
Like if we had to if we had to move all
that stuff back that we have there, but
I think it's far enough back, but we can
talk about that.
>> Yeah. No, as I said, on that side of the
road it's pretty much the back of the
pavement. It's not going much past that
where our car leaves is.
>> We have a question.
>> Where do you guys Where's the outlet for
the storm drain?
>> Um that's a great question. Yeah,
there's there's a few. Um so, for the
beginning of Tedford Road, again, the
flat area, kind of, you know, south of
the railroad tracks, there's already
existing catch basins
that are along the road. And so, for the
majority of those, the intent is is that
we're going to be using the existing
drain outlets for those. So, really what
we would do is is that we'd have to
replace the basins themselves just to
align them better with where the
proposed curbs will be, but the outlets
for those will all be the same.
For the area north of the railroad
tracks, um, we are looking at proposing
a new outfall that's basically going to
be in the same area, um, as the riprap
for the cross the the riprap is the
stone that that, um, lines the that new
crossing. And so, what we would look to
do is is to bring the stormwater from
the about from where the railroad tracks
are, bring that north, and then outlet
it out the bank that way.
>> So, are you going to have some provision
to make sure that that water doesn't
contaminate the farm water crop
on my own farm land?
Cuz that's what's going to end up cuz
that's it's going to go right down
through our farm.
And that that water is used.
>> We are not proposing any treatment for
the stormwater as part of this project.
>> To make sure it's not contaminated?
>> It always gets contaminated.
>> Right. Roads all come close. People
throw trash everywhere.
>> Yeah, what is the law on that? You can
just run a storm drain any way you want,
just dump it? Is that what you're saying
to us?
>> But, for municipal projects, treatment
is not required. Correct.
>> And the water's probably [clears throat]
going to end up in that same stream down
there anyway. It's just it will be more
organized how it gets there.
>> Well, there used to be a beautiful pond
there.
>> Yeah.
>> I mean I mean the the the structures
that we'll build, they'll have they'll
have sumps in them that are that are
designed to, you know, take a lot of
large debris.
>> Right. You're going to have a sediment
grease trap type of thing.
>> Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So, it's
there there is some level of treatment
just just through the nature of of how
the the underground structures are
designed.
>> They actually had designed when they did
the culvert, they intentionally designed
that to drain the pond because we were
damaging people's wells because when we
get a big storm event, not enough water
could get underneath the the road. So,
the intent They wanted it with the more
frequent rains and higher rain amounts
and stuff, they wanted to make sure they
could get the water down the stream. So,
that was intentionally drained. Um
wasn't an accident that the pond went
away.
Okay.
Um can you take a minute talking about
what the ideas for the ATB trail?
>> Oh, yes. Um so, uh the uh
at the railroad crossing, there's a uh
there's an ATB trail that kind of comes
down on one side of the railroad tracks,
crosses the railroad tracks, runs along
the shoulder line, and then goes across
down the power lines.
Um so, as part of this design, um we are
incorporating a um
what what's called a tip-down, which is
basically just like when you have a
sidewalk that comes to a driveway or to
a road, uh the sidewalk tips down, and
then kind of runs at grade along the
road. So, what we're proposing is is
that effectively opposite where the uh
trail goes up the um
um along the power lines, we're going to
have an 8-ft wide area that will allow
for at grade crossings there. So,
snowmobiles, ATVs won't have to ride up
the curb
to get to the back of the sidewalk.
There'll be a depressed area where they
can cross there. Then they can ride
along the edge of the sidewalk and then
rejoin up with the existing trail.
>> So, currently the trail
they kind of
they come in drive, go along the side of
the road, and then get this way. So, the
thought is
the sidewalk is going to end has to be
at least 12 ft from the railroad tracks
under the for the railroad rules. And
then things will be at grade until you
get 12 ft after. The sidewalk will start
again. The ATVs will be on the back of
the sidewalk until there's a place they
can cross perpendicular to the trail. Um
And we're probably started talking to
CMP, and it looks like they will be fine
with that. Um so it keeps the ATV
traffic from having to go along the
road. It will so they'll just cross it
perpendicularly.
>> In in that same area that's it's
probably worth noting too as far as the
the sidewalks and and tip downs is that
there's there's a trail that's that
comes out right there but there's also
an existing gravel road that kind of
creates a little triangle there. So the
sidewalk will still respect that. So the
sidewalk tip downs will be on the other
side of that gravel drive. So the gravel
drive and the trail will still have
access through them.
>> Looks like there's a question in the
text.
Does the current plan take into account
bicyclists who may be traveling on
Tedford Road?
>> And I believe we've already answered
that question earlier but unfortunately
given the the narrow width of the
right-of-way and the need for
11-ft lanes and a sidewalk,
we just don't have available
right-of-way to be able to include
dedicated bike lanes.
>> But sharrows are a possibility, right?
>> Sharrows?
>> You know the the sergeant
>> Oh, right. Oh, right. Um
I I think that's Yeah, that I think that
could be something that could be
incorporated into it but it would
certainly be a shared lane rather than a
dedicated bike lane.
>> And there's also
I think we talked this 2 years ago that
if someone wanted if child's riding a
bike on the sidewalk, the police
department isn't going to have a problem
with that.
>> We're not going to have a problem with
that. So they're allowed allowed on the
sidewalk. Okay.
>> Yes.
>> Um [name], Bicycle Pedestrian
Committee. Um I have two related
questions. One is about the long-term
traffic plan.
Mark, you talked about that a little
bit. Could you just maybe say a little
bit more about the long-term traffic
plan? And then the second question is
regarding current traffic volumes on the
road.
Um do current traffic volumes
necessitate two 11-ft lanes?
That's the That's the second question.
Uh
so, for the first one, what I've talked
about is pieces that could be put
together, you know, hopefully to
eventually get this connection that goes
from the schools out to Middlesex Road
using Tedford Road, Kittery and Village
Drive.
Um at this point,
the Audubon piece is just that, you
know, it's just an idea. Hopefully, we
can make that happen.
Um
the what it certainly isn't going to
happen until such time as Highland Green
decides to build a memory care facility
and upgrade Audubon.
Um in the Kittery and that's still a
private piece of Kittery and
uh
between the top of the Everett Hill and
Republic that isn't public. Uh
so, [clears throat] I can't tell you
what day any of this would come to
fruition because it's things we'd like
to make happen, but there's nothing in
place. Um I'll let you guys answer the
second part of what you're asking.
>> So, would part of that plan be like
when when all that comes to pass to
route school buses, etc. through that
route? Is that the idea?
>> I doubt the schools would ever want, you
know, other than maybe a school bus to
go to Tedford Road if that all came to
pass. They might decide to do that. But
all the buses that they've got right now
going up Kittery and down Village Drive
to take advantage of the lights to get
on 201 to go to Harpswell or something,
I'm sure they wouldn't want to bring
those up Audubon. There wouldn't be a
reason to.
Um your second question was about
>> lane width compared to traffic volume.
>> So, so yeah, I'm I'm wondering if if the
current traffic volume necessitates 2
11-ft lanes.
>> Yes. Well, so the 11-ft lanes that we're
proposing here actually um mimic the
existing conditions on Tedford Road. So,
that's about That's about what we have
right now. It's about a 22-ft wide road.
So, what we're trying to do is replicate
those those conditions and not make
things um
and try to at least maintain the same
amount of traffic um
uh
traffic conditions that we would have
out there today.
>> And this would have a
This would have a uh yellow center line.
>> Yes, that would. Yes.
>> So, for example, in on Green Street in
Topsail,
we have a lane or excuse me, an old road
similar width with no center line and
we've got a painted
sidewalk/bike lane on one side. I'm
wondering if something like that Do you
need a center line? Could you buy
yourself some space on the sides by
getting rid of the center line?
And then maybe you don't need the
sidewalk because by
the traffic volume on the road currently
is fairly low by
by road standards, could you get away
without doing the sidewalk and having an
at-grade facility for both bicyclists
and pedestrians?
>> Well, it's a good
>> There's enough foot traffic on that road
right now that you do need a sidewalk.
I mean,
I think about that. We need a sidewalk.
I see people with carriages and kids.
>> Yeah, we
>> Going up and down that road again.
Get off the road or there's someone's
wall and protect themselves. We really
need that sidewalk. The traffic is on
the one on the opposite side of the road
to get away from us while we're trying
to walk.
>> It's Green Street is far from a safe
street
It's a very difficult situation, but I'm
just leaving the plan as it is and
that's my preferred situation.
>> Eventually, the sidewalk but from the
other side of the road.
If that bank had just came down with
>> Maybe I'll do a quick survey. Raise your
hand if you're in the room and you live
on Tedford Road or one of the roads off
of it.
Put your hand down if you would rather
not have a sidewalk.
If you'd rather not have a sidewalk, put
your hand down.
Okay.
>> If you want a sidewalk
>> If you want it
If you live on Tedford Road and you want
a sidewalk, keep your hand up.
And then, if you live on Next Question,
but my general sense is that people that
live on the road want a sidewalk.
Next question, right again, put your
hand up if you live on Tedford Road.
Raise your hand if you would rather have
a
road without a yellow center line.
I'm sorry, put your hand down if you'd
rather have a road without a yellow
center line.
All right.
So, from my my informal survey, it
appears of the Tedford Road residents
here tonight, there's a general
consensus that people would like the
sidewalk, and they would like the yellow
center line.
Steve actually can address the daily
traffic.
>> Just in case any of you are wondering
about your daily traffic, we've done
three studies in the last year out there
for traffic and speed, and you average
Well, we did one last November, you
average 901 cars a day out there. We did
another week in March, and it was 883
cars daily. And then we did one in July,
it was 968. So, you're just under 1,000
cars
>> How many speeding tickets did get
written?
>> I'm sorry, what?
>> How many speeding tickets did get
written?
>> Well, we didn't
So, when we do the surveys like this,
we're putting boxes out there that
they don't stand out, they just
Let me explain this real quick. In the
past, before we had these traffic survey
boxes, we used to put the trailer out
there, the big trailer that has the sign
to tell people what their speed is. Now,
the problem with that is I don't think,
and it kind of proved, we don't get
accurate numbers with that, because
somebody pulls onto the road, they see
the sign, and everybody slows down. So,
since in the last two years Well, last
fall, we bought these small white
innocuous boxes. You don't even really
notice they don't get noticed by people.
We can put them up on a pole
and it just sits there and counts
traffic and counts speed. So, we've been
using those for the last year in town.
So, it gives us a better idea of what
the average traffic is going on the
road. So, if you'd like to know, I can
tell you real quick. We've done three
studies. 85% of the cars last November
were going 34 or less. Uh we did a study
in March. 85% again were going 34 or
less. We did one in July, they were
going 33 or less. Half the cars
>> It's 25.
>> I'm sorry?
>> They were all speeding but it's 25. I've
called multiple times but the people are
just flying down the road. I feel like
there's more control there. I've offered
for
police to sit in my driveway.
>> I told you.
>> Please, by all means.
>> Yeah, we've done 11 studies. We've We've
done 11 enforcement details out there
and when we're out there, we're not
getting
we're not getting the speeders.
>> I live on [address]. I have a
fence. So, just sit right there.
Guaranteed
you'll get a lot of people.
>> Well, I don't I'll tell you to be
perfectly honest. We generally don't
write I mean, yes, 1 or 2 or 5 mph is
speeding but we don't write people
summonses for that.
>> Well, they must have been tipped around
because you haven't caught the dragsters
yet.
>> Yeah, no. I mean simple fact is the
people are warning each other when we're
out there. There's only so much we can
do. We put the boxes out there, they
show
that you know, 85 are going 9 over or
less. But when we go out there, nobody's
doing it. Two years ago when we had this
meeting,
there was quite a bit of comment about
speeding. We spent 7 hours over the next
2 months out there. We got a car at 34,
we got a car at 35, one at 38, 37. So,
the simple fact is we're going out there
but you know, people give each other
lights. We don't
We're not getting it when we're out
there. There's only so much we can do. I
hear you.
>> That's one reason why I was asking about
the trees in front of my house and that
chain link fence.
Cuz I understand that was
Those trees were planted and the fence
was put there when a car came out of the
old Rusty's probably sideways and hit
the house.
>> I mean I I hear what
Again, we're getting most of cars are 9
over or less. And when we go out there,
we're not getting them. So
>> Yeah.
>> You know, we do.
>> You got to hide though.
>> Well, you know, people always tell us
that. The problem is the science of
radar. We need to have a straight shot
to get them. We can't be up somebody's
driveway and have a car go by and get
it. It's just radar doesn't work.
>> You can come sit by my mailbox cuz every
time I go to get my mail, there's people
going down the road at least 40, 50.
>> Going to the cul-de-sac.
>> Cul-de-sac.
>> Yeah, and again, when we go out
we're not getting it. Everybody's
warning each other and
I'm sure what
>> the information along. Car's sitting out
there, so they slow down.
>> You can use a white car.
You can sit in a white car with your
radar.
>> [laughter]
>> Other questions?
Yes.
In years and years we've been talking
about connecting the Highlands from the
end of the after growth and they brought
down the sewer and brought down the
water and drained the pond and
everything else. So they're all set up
that way.
Do you have any
you know, future
prediction when that is going to be
connected? I know there was a process
This has been going on for I've been
hearing about it 10, 15
>> That's what I was talking about earlier
in the meeting. But it won't happen
until they build that memory care
facility.
And they
The Highlands is trying to be or
Highland Green I should say
is trying to be or wants to be full
service. So you could go from
independent living to assisted living to
and then there's memory care facility.
That's what's proposed for Audubon.
They've come in They have to come in to
keep getting their permits renewed cuz
they It's all been permitted, but then
they don't build it. So, they got to
come in in 6 months or a year to get
permits renewed. They've been doing that
for years.
Um so, at this point there's no firm
date when they would
uh build that facility. So, there's no
firm date when they would finish
Audubon.
>> Okay.
Yeah, that particular subject was talked
about back when they put the big
neighborhood down there.
>> Yeah.
>> Because and that became evident this
past week. They had a head-on collision
uh down by Rusty's
and all the traffic had to go through
either Rusty's yard or make their way
through the accident scene.
>> Yeah, they've been When we've needed
them, you know, to help us out with the
connection, they've been willing as I
mentioned when we did the culvert work
and I know they would work with us on
the railroad piece.
Um but
the town doesn't want to build that
road. You know, so we're basically
waiting for them to do their memory care
facility then they would build it to
town specs and then we could accept it.
>> Right.
>> I have a quick question. Um I'm sorry
for being late earlier. Uh question,
could you speak to the timeline wise?
Like is this a a
5 year down the road? Is this like we're
starting July of next year? Again, my
apologies for being late if this was
already
>> No worries. Um
it'll It's all going to depend on the
final budget numbers that come in and
then planning is the budget goes through
this spring. But the hope is to have it
summer of 2028 would be the project.
Sorry, 2027.
I'm getting my years confused. Fiscal
year 28, which is
>> How long do you estimate it would take
to do the project?
>> Um
It's a big question.
>> It would be mostly solid.
>> Yeah, I I I would say so. Like, you
know, probably 3 4 months.
>> Okay.
>> Thank you.
>> Other questions?
Any more online? Or
I know.
>> I have one more for me.
Uh
when the past
uh
road commissioner was here,
he told me that we could still keep our
mailboxes on our side of the road. And
I'm wondering what changed that.
>> Postmaster.
The post The Brunswick postmaster's in
charge of all the rural delivery. And
when these guys contacted him, he said
they could probably leave your box, but
they all have to be moved to the side of
the road. Correct?
>> Correct.
He said they he had a place where he was
doing it right now
that they had some place where the
mailboxes were staying on the sidewalk
side. So, he says, "[name], you won't have
a problem. You'll still be able to have
your mailbox on your side of the road."
>> I I think what's happened is is you've
all seen the stories on TV about people
aren't getting their mail.
Um or the post office can't find enough
workers. And so, I think they're using
this as an opportunity to try to make
their mail more efficient on Tedford
Road cuz it's certainly easier for them
to deliver all the mail on one side of
the street. Um so,
>> That doesn't make sense to me because
they got to come back down our road. So,
as many stops as they have, they're
going to have that same amount of
>> Yeah, but now they
>> They got to go in two directions
>> Now there's a sidewalk in the way so
they can't They They have that They have
that gap between the road
Yeah.
>> No, they told They told me that it it
could be done with the sidewalk and my
mailbox could still be on the edge of
the road.
>> Yeah, they changed that.
>> They hadn't changed it.
>> Cuz believe me, we'd rather not move it
if we didn't have to cuz it costs us
more money to move the mailboxes.
>> There's a There's a method through the
postal service where you can put in a
hardship and you can try to get them
forced to hand deliver your mail to If
you have an issue, you can make a
complaint to the post I'm just letting
you know that
>> I don't like that.
>> Thank you.
>> Any other questions?
Um if no other questions, what we'll do
is we'll stop the recorded portion,
large group portion of the meeting, and
you're free to look at any of the
drawings and if you have particular
trees you want to call to these guys
attention, feel free to do that or any
other issues you want to call their
attention and uh
we'll
move on to that now.
>> We brought a bunch of cookies, too, so
please take some.
Otherwise, the chief's going to have
them all himself.
>> I think he already ate all of them.
>> All right.
