2026-11-02 - City Council Meeting

Summary

Built from the final agenda and the video captions; minutes are not yet posted.

  • Historic preservation package: adoption of the Mesa Historic Preservation Design Guidelines (Res. 12590) and Title 11 code amendments (Ord. 6036); see Historic Preservation Design Guidelines.
  • Flood control cost share: Res. 12582 with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County for the Pecos Road Basins and Storm Drain project, up to $22M total with Mesa paying 50% (up to $11M) from the Local Streets Sales Tax; see Pecos Road Basins Storm Drain Agreement.
  • Land use: Ord. 6035 rezoning ZON25-00895 "Terrible's Commercial Development" to LC for a 4,689 sq ft convenience market with service station (District 5); Ord. 6037 introduced for the Waffle Flower Warehouse Rezone, hearing set for November 16.
  • Agreements: development agreement with The Grove at Lehi Community Association for landscape maintenance (Res. 12588, District 1); IGA with Queen Creek and Maricopa County on right-of-way for the Sossaman/Germann Road and Union Pacific rail crossing, at no cost to Mesa (Res. 12589, District 6).
  • Four liquor licenses: Valley Liquors, Jin BBQ, Walmart #3089 and Walmart Fuel Station #3089.

Discussion highlights (from the video)

  • The consent agenda, including the minutes, the four liquor licenses, the Grove at Lehi and Queen Creek rail-crossing agreements, the Pecos Road Basins agreement (Pecos Road Basins Storm Drain Agreement) and the Terrible's convenience market rezone with service station, passed unanimously.
  • Items 7A and 7B were removed from the consent agenda for a staff presentation. The historic preservation code amendments consolidate the rules into Chapter 74, Historic Preservation Procedures, and extend the demolition moratorium on projects in a proposed or existing historic preservation overlay from six months to one year. The Historic Preservation Board and Planning and Zoning Board had unanimously recommended the amendments, and the design guidelines run seven chapters (Historic Preservation Design Guidelines).
  • Council adopted the amendments and the design guidelines unanimously.
  • Public comment covered license-plate camera surveillance and a city arts center event.

Auto-caption wording may contain errors. The captions did not show the Waffle Flower introduction.

Agenda

Consent agenda unless noted.

Sources

Video

Watch the video

Transcript

*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.

Transcript

00:01Welcome to the Mesa City Council meeting

00:04for Monday, November uh

00:07for Monday, November 2nd, 2026. I know

00:10today's Monday. I don't know why we

00:12don't It didn't say Monday, but anyway,

00:13November 2nd. All council members are

00:15present. Before we get started, I'd like

00:18to recognize our Mayor's Youth Committee

00:20who is here with us today, and thank you

00:22for joining with us.

00:24We'll begin this meeting by an

00:25invocation by Dr. Darrell Elliott, if

00:28he's here. Dr. Elliott, if you're here,

00:30thank you.

00:31And then after Dr. Elliott, I will have

00:34a pledge of allegiance led by our

00:35Mayor's Youth Committee. So, with that,

00:38uh Dr. Elliott, the time's yours. Thank

00:39you.

00:41Please stand.

00:47>> Please join me in prayer

00:50in your tradition as I pray in mine.

00:54Gracious and loving God,

00:59we gather this evening with gratitude

01:01for the city of Mesa,

01:04for the people who call this community

01:06home,

01:08and for those entrusted with the

01:10responsibility of servant leadership.

01:15In a nation where differences too often

01:18become

01:21division,

01:23where fear sometimes speak louder than

01:26compassion,

01:28and where challenges

01:31seems

01:33too greater to overcome.

01:37Oh God, remind us.

01:40Remind us that our shared humanity is

01:44stronger than the things that separate

01:46us.

01:49Bless our mayor,

01:52our city council,

01:54and all who serve this community.

01:58Grant them wisdom listen before

02:01speaking.

02:03Courage to make difficult decisions.

02:07And humility to

02:10remember that they are called to serve

02:14the public.

02:17As they consider the needs of this

02:19growing city, oh God,

02:22remind them that

02:24behind every budget there is a family.

02:27Behind every policy there is a person.

02:30Behind every decision is a community

02:34whose future is being shaped.

02:38Help us, oh God.

02:41Help us build a Mesa where every

02:44children can flourish, every seniors

02:48can live with dignity, every neighbor

02:51can find opportunity.

02:56Oh God, as our nation approaches another

02:59election,

03:02remind us that democracy calls for

03:05participation,

03:08respect,

03:10and commitment to the common good,

03:12even when we disagree.

03:16Bless this council, oh God.

03:19Bless this community.

03:21And bless all who labor for peace.

03:24I pray this in your son Jesus' name.

03:28Amen.

03:28>> Amen.

03:30Thank you, Reverend Elliott.

03:32If the Mayor's Youth Committee would

03:33come up,

03:35come up here to the microphones, those

03:37and

03:39lead us on the Pledge of Allegiance.

03:40Thank you.

03:43>> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the

03:46United States of America, and to the

03:48republic for which it stands, one nation

03:52under God, indivisible, with liberty and

03:55justice for all.

04:01>> Thank you ladies.

04:05Alzheimer's affects millions of

04:07individuals and families touching every

04:09part of our community. Alzheimer's

04:12Awareness Month gives us an opportunity

04:14to recognize those living with the

04:16disease,

04:17honor their caregivers, and raise

04:19awareness about the importance of early

04:21detection, research, and support.

04:24We're proud to recognize this month and

04:25reaffirm our commitment to building a

04:27compassionate and supportive community.

04:29With that, I would like to turn it over

04:31to Council Member Heredia to say a few

04:33words.

04:34>> Thank you, Mayor. Uh I'm proud and to

04:36sponsor this proclamation because I want

04:39Mesa residents living with Alzheimer's

04:41and the families caring for them to know

04:44that their community sees them and

04:45supports them.

04:47Uh an Alzheimer's diagnosis brings

04:49changes and uncertainty that touch an

04:52entire family. Spouses, children,

04:54friends often take responsibilities they

04:57never expected, balancing caregiving

05:00with work, raising children, and their

05:02own health.

05:03Alzheimer's Awareness Month is an

05:05opportunity to gain strength from those

05:07experiences, encourage people to seek

05:09support, and recognize the caregivers

05:12who give so much of themselves. And

05:15tonight, I want I'm pleased to introduce

05:17a a long-time

05:18Carriage

05:20uh Carriage Lane resident uh uh

05:23Kathy Norris Wilhelm

05:25uh

05:26an Alzheimer's advocate and ambassador

05:28who knows these challenges personally.

05:31Uh Kathy cared for her wife, Jean, who

05:34was diagnosed with uh younger-onset uh

05:37Alzheimer's at just 55 years old. Uh

05:40since Jean's passing, Kathy has

05:41continued to share her story and

05:44advocate for others. So, really

05:45appreciate Kathy being here. Uh glad to

05:48support and uh welcome Kathy to say uh a

05:51few words here.

05:56>> [clears throat]

05:58>> Thank you so much. Can you hear me?

06:01Good evening. My name is Kathy Norris

06:03Wilhelm, and I became involved with the

06:05Alzheimer's community after my late

06:06wife, Jean, was diagnosed in 2016 at the

06:09age of 55.

06:11Jean was a high school math teacher for

06:13nearly 20 years, and after struggling

06:15with symptoms of memory loss, repeated

06:17stories, and misplacing things, we were

06:20persistent in getting a definitive

06:22answer to what could be causing this.

06:24After nearly 2 years of testing and

06:26thousands of dollars later,

06:28a PET scan finally revealed her

06:30diagnosis.

06:32She accepted this diagnosis with bravery

06:34and courage and wanted to share her

06:36story openly and publicly to help change

06:39the stigma and misconceptions of

06:41Alzheimer's.

06:42We reached out to the Alzheimer's

06:43Association to learn as much as possible

06:46about the disease and what our future

06:48may bring.

06:49We were We were determined to face this

06:51next chapter of our lives with grace and

06:53dignity.

06:55We took every opportunity to help raise

06:57awareness and advocate for better care,

06:59participate in media interviews,

07:01conferences, and meeting with our state

07:03and federal legislators. Not once did

07:05Jean decline an opportunity she to share

07:08her story.

07:09It was the honor of my life to care for

07:11her until her last breath in March of

07:132021.

07:15Since our journey began 10 years ago, I

07:17have never been more hopeful and

07:19inspired by the advances in research and

07:21drug treatments that are now available.

07:24When we were given our diagnosis,

07:26we were essentially told to go home and

07:28prepare to die.

07:30We're now living in an era of treatments

07:32with two FDA-approved drugs, a biomarker

07:35blood test that can provide provide a

07:37diagnosis that is non-invasive,

07:39inexpensive, and a scientific proof

07:41through the pointer study that we can

07:43improve brain health and cognitive

07:45function with healthy lifestyle

07:47modifications.

07:49If you know someone who is a caregiver,

07:52reach out.

07:54Call. Send a text.

07:57They're under incredible stress and are

07:59at a greater risk of dying before their

08:01loved one.

08:02Caregiving is the hardest job in the

08:03world, and no one can or should do it

08:07alone.

08:09Thank you, Mayor Freeman, Council Member

08:11Heredia, and the entire City Council for

08:14recognizing this

08:15and proclaiming November Alzheimer's

08:17Awareness and Caregiver Month. Thank

08:19you.

08:19>> Thank you, Kathy. With that, Kathy, if

08:22you'll stay there, we're going to come

08:23down with Council for a photo with

08:25proclamation. Council, if you'll join

08:27me.

08:30>> [clears throat]

09:48[clears throat]

09:53>> Again, thank you, Kathy and Council

09:54Member Heredia for that. Item one is the

09:57consent agenda. Mr. Christopher, if you

09:59would please read the consent agenda.

10:03>> Good evening, Mayor and Council Members.

10:04These are the items on the consent

10:05agenda. All items listed with an

10:07asterisk will be considered as a group

10:08by the City Council and will be enacted

10:10with one motion. There'll be no separate

10:12discussion unless a council member or a

10:13citizen requests, in which event the

10:15item will be removed from the consent

10:16agenda and considered as a separate

10:18item. Item two, approval of minutes of

10:20previous meetings as written. Item three

10:22A, action liquor license application for

10:24Valley Liquors, 1160 East University

10:27Drive. Item three B, action liquor

10:29license application for Jin Barbecue,

10:31111 South Dobson Road. Item three C,

10:33action liquor license application for

10:35Walmart, 6306 South Mountain Road. Item

10:38three D, action liquor license

10:40application for Walmart, 11143

10:43East Destination Auto Drive. Item four

10:45A, approving a resolution to enter into

10:47a development agreement with The Grove

10:48at Lehigh Community Association, located

10:51North McDowell Road, east of the 202 Red

10:53Mountain Freeway. Item four B, approving

10:55a resolution to enter into an

10:56intergovernmental agreement with the

10:58Town of Queen Creek and Maricopa County

11:00to establish the transfer of

11:01jurisdiction over right-of-way

11:03associated with improvements to the

11:04Sossaman Road and Germain Road

11:06intersection and the Union Pacific

11:08Railroad at Great Crossing. Item four C,

11:10approving a resolution to enter into an

11:12intergovernmental agreement with the

11:13Flood Control District of Maricopa

11:14County for construction, construction

11:16management, operation, and maintenance

11:18of the Pecos Road Basins and Storm Drain

11:20Improvements Project. This project is

11:22funded by the local street sales tax.

11:24Item five A, introduction of ordinance

11:25zoning case 25-943

11:28for property located at the northwest

11:29corner of Thomas Road and 54th Street.

11:32This is for a rezone, site plan review,

11:33and special use permit to allow for

11:35industrial development. Item six A,

11:37approving ordinance zoning case 25-895

11:40for property located south of the

11:41southwest corner of Crismon Road and

11:43Hampton Avenue. Rezone, site plan

11:45review, and special use permit to allow

11:47for convenience market with a service

11:49station. Item seven A and seven B have

11:51been removed from the consent agenda.

11:52Mayor and council members, these are the

11:54items on the consent agenda.

11:56>> Thank you, Mr. Christopher.

11:57Uh Council, I'll entertain a motion to

12:00approve the consent agenda.

12:03Please to cast your vote. Thank you, Ms.

12:04Duff. Thank you, Vice Mayor.

12:10Okay, that motion passes unanimously.

12:12Thank you. Next, we'll go to item 7A and

12:147B.

12:16As requested, we'll have a presentation

12:18about our

12:19historic preservation that we're doing

12:22in our city municipality.

12:24And with that

12:28we have

12:30Rachel

12:33cued up.

12:35So we thought it'd be important for

12:36those listening to our presentation

12:38about our historic

12:40things that guidelines that have been

12:42modified.

12:45>> [laughter]

12:46>> All [clears throat] right.

12:47>> There you are.

12:48>> I I know I'm hidden. I'm so short. I'm

12:50hiding behind that. Um

12:52good evening, mayor and council members.

12:54Uh Rachel Phillips, assistant planning

12:56director, and I'm pleased to be here

12:58tonight with Matthew Kriegel, who is our

13:00um historic preservation officer, to

13:02present two different policy

13:04recommendations tonight that both the

13:06historic preservation office and

13:08different um planning staff have been

13:09working on for the last couple of years.

13:12So the first one of those that we'll be

13:14discussing are um the historic

13:16preservation text amendments.

13:19And there are are there really are kind

13:21of four main highlights or or goals of

13:24these text amendments.

13:26One is the reorganization of the various

13:29historic preservation policies. I'll be

13:32uh discussing this in a little bit more

13:33detail in the next slide, but but

13:35currently um the historic preservation

13:37regulations and policies are really

13:39spread throughout the zoning ordinance.

13:41So the first goal was to really organize

13:44that and simplify it to to better um

13:46administer and for it to be easier for

13:48residents and property owners to to find

13:52and understand. Um the next is to

13:54clarify. Um so Matthew will be

13:56discussing um as part of the text

13:58amendments, there's the introduction of

14:00several uh definitions for terms that

14:02are commonly used throughout the

14:04ordinance today and and in um our

14:06application of historic preservation. So

14:09really clarifying terminology and

14:11requirements and making it easier to

14:13understand processes was the second

14:15goal.

14:16Next is consistency. So, we wanted to

14:19make sure that across all the historic

14:21preservation

14:22policies that there is some consistency

14:25in those processes and procedures. And

14:27then finally looking to really have

14:30compliance with applicable state and

14:33federal laws.

14:36So, as far as the reorganization of the

14:39historic preservation regulations, you

14:41can see on the screen there are there's

14:44various aspects to talk about historic

14:46landmarks and overlays,

14:48historic signs,

14:50and they're really currently scattered

14:52in different chapters in the zoning

14:54ordinance. So, what the first action of

14:56these amendments does is to consolidate

14:59those and to bring those all into one

15:01chapter under chapter 74, which is

15:03titled historic preservation procedures.

15:06So, as I mentioned earlier, so that is

15:08much easier for the public to find what

15:11the requirements are.

15:15And then the next goal to consolidate

15:18and to clarify. So, there were currently

15:22different

15:23sections that talked about historic

15:25preservation overlays. And those can be

15:27for historic landmarks, which are either

15:30singular properties or buildings, but

15:32also our historic districts. So,

15:35bringing those all all those procedures

15:37under under one section, clarifying what

15:41those processes are for the public

15:43notice and for the public hearing

15:45process itself.

15:47And then the other part of this is

15:48improving the supplemental inventory

15:51list for these are resources that are

15:54eligible to be designated, but are not

15:56yet designated by those property owners.

16:00And then finally revising eligibility

16:02criteria to really make sure that we're

16:05aligning with

16:06national historic preservation

16:08standards. So, that includes

16:11requirements or criteria such as age,

16:13significance, and integrity of historic

16:15properties.

16:17And I'm going to pass it over to Matthew

16:19now.

16:22>> Good afternoon, Mayor and members of the

16:24council.

16:25A big portion of this

16:27realignment of the historic preservation

16:30ordinance was to streamline the

16:31certificate of appropriate process.

16:33Essentially, so that it could work

16:35better with other city processes.

16:37And that is

16:39to identify the work that requires a

16:40certificate of appropriateness and

16:43also ordinary maintenance and repair

16:44activities that may be exempt from that

16:46review. To clarify application

16:48requirements and review timelines.

16:51To coordinate the CFA review with

16:54building permit issuance. And to debate

16:56and to base the review on the Secretary

16:58of Interior standards for the treatment

17:01of historic properties.

17:05It also is to strengthen the duty to

17:08maintain provisions within the existing

17:11ordinance.

17:12And then to clarify the demolition

17:15review process that we have. And that

17:17would be to extend the demolition

17:19process from a what a 6-month moratorium

17:22on projects to a 1-year moratorium on

17:26projects within a proposed or existing

17:29historic preservation overlay.

17:35It's also to create a dedicated historic

17:38uh dedicated historically to create a

17:40dedicated historically designated sign

17:42section. Which establishes the

17:44procedures for designation, restoration,

17:47maintenance, modification

17:49of those signs. It updates eligibility

17:52requirements.

17:54Uh the application and review

17:55procedures.

17:56And establishes a process for future

17:58revocation of the designation if the

18:00requirements are not met.

18:04It also establishes an archaeological

18:06review compliance procedure.

18:09Which requires all development to comply

18:11with all applicable local, state, and

18:13federal laws governing cultural

18:15resources.

18:16Before excavation, city-owned property

18:19or city-controlled property will require

18:21consultation with our city

18:23archaeologist, the State Historic

18:25Preservation Office,

18:26the

18:27uh

18:28the two TIPOs and the other qualified

18:30professionals.

18:32The city archaeologist may also conduct

18:35other archaeological assessments if

18:37necessary.

18:40As uh Rachel mentioned, we also added

18:43some previously undefined terms. Those

18:45include certificate of appropriateness,

18:47historic district, historic landmark,

18:50historic preservation overlay, historic

18:52resource, historically designated sign,

18:55and state of disrepair.

18:59Throughout this process, we've had

19:00extensive community outreach.

19:03This began in 2023, and we've discussed

19:07this with the Historic Preservation

19:08Board at least three times that year.

19:11We held an open public house that year,

19:13and we presented to the Planning and

19:15Zoning Board.

19:17In 2026, we had three additional

19:19Historic Preservation Board meetings. We

19:21had an additional public open house, and

19:24we took it to the Planning and Zoning

19:27Board study session and Planning and

19:29Zoning uh hearing. We also worked with

19:32the Arizona State Historic Preservation

19:34Office,

19:35the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian

19:37Community

19:38community uh Tribal Historic

19:40Preservation Office, the Gila River

19:42Indian Community Tribal Historic

19:44Preservation Office, and the Mesa

19:46Preservation Foundation. So, we had

19:47multiple rounds of board review, public

19:49outreach, and stakeholder consultation.

19:54In the end, the board made

19:55recommendations, both the Historic

19:56Preservation Board on September 1st and

20:00the Planning and Zoning Board on

20:01September 9th unanimously recommended

20:04these text amendments for adoption.

20:08We're here for any questions and

20:10discussion.

20:12>> Any questions, Council?

20:15I have one, Matt. What is the uh age of

20:18a home or property that constitutes a

20:21historic timeline?

20:24>> Technically, there's no age Technically,

20:26but it's considered 50 years or older.

20:30>> 50 years.

20:31So, we have a lot of properties in Mesa

20:33over 50 and well over 100.

20:36Okay.

20:38Is this

20:40easy to navigate, Rachel?

20:43Is this process easy to navigate for

20:45somebody coming in?

20:47>> It is, Mayor. Um the the process, if you

20:50wanted to designate your property or

20:52designate a group of properties as a

20:54historic district, is the same as a

20:56rezoning. So, as you're pretty familiar

20:59with that, that's a pretty pretty easy

21:01process to go through that in the public

21:03notification. But, I think that these

21:05text amendments really go a far away to

21:08help the public understand what those

21:10are and to really ensure that it's clear

21:13when they're all in the same place in

21:15the zoning ordinance.

21:18>> Okay. Well, I would think some of our

21:20council districts have a lot of

21:21neighborhoods that would be eligible for

21:23the 50-year minimum timestamp. And

21:26so

21:28Okay.

21:29That's all I have. Thank you, Rachel.

21:31Matt.

21:32>> Well, we have one more for you, Mayor

21:34and Council, and that is for the

21:36historic preservation guidelines.

21:40I don't think I have that

21:42>> [clears throat]

21:43>> figured out. So, we currently do have a

21:46set of historic preservation guidelines

21:49here in the city, but um they're they're

21:51quite old. So, we're very pleased to

21:53bring forward an amendment to these.

21:57They're [clears throat] um 25 years old.

21:59As you can imagine, a lot has changed in

22:01historic preservation. At that time,

22:04there were only two designated historic

22:06districts, and now we have eight within

22:08the city.

22:09Um there's also a lot that has changed

22:11as far as our processes and procedures.

22:14Um in addition to that, um there's

22:17really the opportunity here to to

22:19modernize these design guidelines and to

22:21to clarify and make them easier to use.

22:24The exor- the existing document is over

22:27200 pages long. It's a a scanned PDF, so

22:31it's not very, you know, user-friendly

22:34if someone wants to go on there and try

22:35to find some some advice on how to

22:39rehabilitate or

22:41you know, maintain their property. Um

22:44and finally, we wanted to update this to

22:46really make sure that it supports our

22:48our CLG program. That's our Mesa

22:50Certified Local Government Program

22:52through the State SHPO

22:55office.

22:56So,

22:57as a an overview of these design

23:00guidelines, it consists of seven

23:02chapters and and Matthew is going to go

23:04over those in in better detail, but

23:06those talk about the historic

23:08preservation program itself and project

23:10reviews. And then it provides guidelines

23:13for rehabilitations, additions, new

23:15construction, signage. And then there's

23:18also portions that talk about Mesa's

23:21historic context themselves.

23:23Um In addition to this, there's five

23:26different appendices that are there as

23:28resources. So, those are things that

23:31discuss and define what are

23:33character-defining features, for

23:35example. Um and then they give context

23:38behind our existing historic districts

23:41and landmarks.

23:42Um so, this is really supposed to be a

23:45resource for for property owners and

23:47residents to understand what they can do

23:49with their properties.

23:51And I'm going to pass it along to

23:53Matthew to explain each one of these

23:55chapters.

23:58>> Thank you, Rachel. So, we really tried

23:59to make this more user-friendly than the

24:02older document. The older document has a

24:04lot of information and like Rachel said,

24:06it's about 200 pages long. I think this

24:08one's about 100 pages, so we cut it we

24:11cut it in half. So, chapter one is the

24:13introduction and establishes the purpose

24:15and role of the design guidelines. It

24:17explains when the design guidelines

24:18would be used or necessary and provides

24:21like who would be able to use this or

24:23who should use it or who would benefit

24:25from using these design guidelines. It

24:27also explains that the city that these

24:29guidelines supplement the city

24:30regulations and should be used alongside

24:33the text amendments, the code, and

24:36building code.

24:38Chapter 2 talks about certificates of

24:40appropriateness. It brings the COA

24:43process together in one location.

24:45It describes the application and review

24:47procedures in more detail than the

24:49ordinance does.

24:51It explains the relationship between the

24:53Mesa Historic Property Register, the

24:55Historic Preservation Overlay, the

24:56National Register, and Certificate of

24:58Appropriateness review. And it also

25:01reaffirms the Secretary of the Interior

25:03standards for rehabilitation as the

25:04foundation for preservation decisions

25:07made in Mesa.

25:10Chapter 3 is a pri- is primary guidance

25:13for working on historic on existing

25:15historic buildings. So, it emphasizes

25:17the repair rather than replacement of

25:19historic materials when feasible.

25:21It addresses windows, doors, roofs,

25:23porches, paint, landscaping, other

25:25character-defining features, and

25:27provides practical recommendations

25:29without prescribing a single design

25:32solution. So, it leaves it open-ended so

25:34people can make their own decisions on

25:36how best their property fits into

25:37certain situations.

25:39Chapter 4 is guidance for additions to

25:42historic buildings. It emphasizes

25:43compatibility while preserving the

25:45original structure. It addresses

25:46placement, size, scale, massing,

25:49materials, and design. And it encourages

25:51contemporary design that remains

25:52subordinate to the historic building and

25:54that provides character-defining

25:56features.

25:58Chapter 5 is guidance for new

26:01construction within historic district.

26:03This emphasizes compatibility rather

26:05than replication. It considers scale,

26:07massing, setbacks, materials, and

26:09overall design. It also addresses

26:11assess- accessory buildings and

26:13accessory dwelling units, fences, walls,

26:15mechanical equipment, and

26:17solar

26:18solar

26:20panel systems.

26:22Chapter 6 is guidance for preserving and

26:24rehabilitating historic signage. It

26:27provides recommendations for appropriate

26:28new signage on historic buildings and

26:31and provides consistent framework for

26:33evaluating historic and new signage

26:35within the district.

26:39Chapter 7 it talks about Mesa's historic

26:42and architectural context. So this

26:44provides a more updated context for

26:46understanding Mesa's historic buildings,

26:48neighborhoods, and architectural

26:49character.

26:50As Rachel mentioned, the old the the

26:53existing design guidelines are 25 years

26:55old and so a lot has changed since then.

26:57So our architectural character and

26:59architectural history has expanded from

27:02to include this other 25 years of

27:04history that was never even mentioned in

27:06the original design guidelines.

27:08This recognizes Mesa's history from

27:10long-standing Autumn and P Posh

27:12connections through agricultural

27:14development and post World War

27:15subdivision growth.

27:17And it organizes Mesa's development to

27:20major and to major historical periods.

27:23Including visual architectural reference

27:25explaining building type styles and

27:27common residential architecture.

27:30There are five appendices.

27:32One is the or A is the historic

27:34preservation program overview. Second

27:36one is certificate of appropriate review

27:39standards.

27:40The C is character defining features.

27:43Then we have historic district and

27:44historic landmark information which has

27:46maps and details on each individual

27:49historic district and also all of our

27:51landmarks.

27:53And then we have a section on cultural

27:55heritage and the heritage neighborhoods

27:57of which includes the Le High Heritage

27:59Neighborhood and the Washington Escobedo

28:01Heritage Neighborhood.

28:05Oh, well, just like the the the text

28:08amendments, we had a lot of outreach and

28:09engagement on these as well.

28:12Starting in 2023, we had three historic

28:14preservation board meeting discussions.

28:16We had a public open house meeting and

28:18then we brought it to planning and

28:19zoning study session.

28:22We picked back up in 2026 where we also

28:24had three additional historic

28:26preservation board meetings, public open

28:28house, and we took it to the planning

28:31and zoning board as well a couple times.

28:34Just like the text amendments, we

28:37took this to major stakeholders

28:39including the Arizona State Historic

28:40Preservation Office, the Salt River

28:42Pima-Maricopa Indian Community,

28:45uh Tribal Historic Preservation Office,

28:47the Gila River Indian Community Tribal

28:49Historic Preservation Office, and the

28:51Mesa Preservation Foundation.

28:55On September 1st, the Historic

28:58Preservation Board uh recommended

29:01adoption of the

29:03the design guidelines, and on September

29:069th, the Planning and Zoning Board

29:08followed with a recommendation for

29:09adoption as well.

29:12So, if there are any questions and

29:13discussion.

29:14>> Ms. Duff, and then as well then Mr.

29:16Adams.

29:19>> Oh, thank you. Just a quick question.

29:22I noticed in both timelines uh about a

29:242-year gap, 2023 to 2026, were we

29:29studying something or looking for

29:31resources, or what was the purpose of

29:33that 2-year gap?

29:35>> Mayor, Council Member Adams. So, the

29:37reason with the gap is because we had

29:39quite a few few turnover with staff, so

29:41we went through two different historic

29:43preservation officers before Matthew

29:45came on board, and we also hired a city

29:47archaeologist. So, in each one of those

29:50transitions, there was some onboarding

29:52time and then re-review and engagement

29:55of various um organizations.

29:58>> So, okay, thank you for that

29:59explanation. So, when we probably had to

30:01bring the two boards up to speed cuz

30:04there'd been board turnover, I assume.

30:06So, okay, thank you for that.

30:09Ms. Duff.

30:11>> I didn't have any questions. I just

30:13wanted to thank you for

30:15your tremendous amount of work to put

30:17this together and get it through.

30:20Um

30:22like you mentioned, that 200 pages of of

30:24text in a PDF was

30:28no one really read it, okay?

30:30>> [laughter]

30:30>> People would just ask questions, but now

30:32online, I can view the guideline under

30:35resources on the historic preservation

30:37page.

30:38And it has a lot of graphics and it has

30:40each distinction, whether it's roofing

30:42or doors or windows, in separate and

30:45really takes it like hands-on. Now, you

30:48can easily digest it and not have to

30:51read a ton of text. So, you can have

30:53that immediate interpretation of what I

30:56can or need to do to preserve my home,

30:59as well as other information if you'd

31:02like to

31:03um register your home and it's 50 years

31:06or more. We have a a lot of mid-century

31:10homes that are beautiful and I hope they

31:12do get restored as districts in our

31:15city.

31:16Um

31:17our historic

31:19um

31:20districts bring a lot of character and

31:23history

31:24um to our city that we're proud of and

31:26tells our story.

31:28Um it's the richness of our community

31:31that binds us.

31:33Um otherwise, we we just become another

31:36city that looks like any other city and

31:39um so, I appreciate all the efforts of

31:41the homeowners and and business owners

31:43that do preserve our buildings to tell

31:46the the story of our city.

31:48Um

31:50I think that's about it, but I just

31:52wanted to bring attention to it. It is

31:54much easier now and we have Matthew in

31:57charge here, so you can reach out. We

31:59have a person in charge um to be able to

32:01answer those questions. It's taken some

32:04time to really get the office sorted

32:06out. Um we didn't have an office for a

32:08while and our planning director had to

32:11weed through that. Um so, now it's

32:14it's we have Matthew's a very talented

32:16and and has the um

32:19education and knowledge about historic

32:21preservation. I look forward that all we

32:23can do in our city to

32:26preserve our

32:27historic buildings. Thank you.

32:30>> Thank you, Ms. Duff. Ms. Taylor.

32:33>> Thank you so much for the presentation.

32:35I appreciate it. I'm

32:37learning about our historic

32:38preservation, our historic land

32:40landmarks. And I was curious to know

32:42just for the general public, if you have

32:44a home that's let's say 1975, so it's

32:47just a little over 50 years,

32:49if I'm the home homeowner,

32:51am I automatically categorized into

32:54being in the historic preservation

32:56requirements, or do I come to the city

32:59of Mesa and say, I would like to

33:01designate my home to be a historically

33:03preserved home, and therefore I kind of

33:05submit myself to the rules of this these

33:08text amendments? Is that Is that

33:10correct?

33:11>> Correct.

33:11So, in the city of Mesa, we we are an

33:13opt-in program. So, if your house is 75

33:17years old,

33:19the city doesn't go after particular

33:20houses or neighborhoods. The

33:21neighborhoods and homeowners come to us

33:23and ask if what we can do to help them

33:25preserve their property. So, it's not

33:27something that we would go actively to

33:30the neighborhoods. It's something that

33:31the neighborhoods and homeowners would

33:33come to us.

33:34>> Can one person in a neighborhood do that

33:37if they really just love We We've done

33:40kind of historic remodels to bring homes

33:42back to their original footprint in the

33:44Evergreen Historic District. And so,

33:46they were really excited to kind of

33:48revive that 1960s feel of their homes.

33:50So, if one person wanted to have just

33:52their house designated, can they, or

33:54does it have to be the whole

33:55neighborhood?

33:56>> So, um Mayor Council member Taylor,

34:00so, we have two different programs, one

34:02which we've which we've condensed into

34:04one system. So, it used to be a historic

34:06district overlay and historic landmark

34:08overlay, and now it's historic

34:09preservation overlay, but it still

34:11encompasses the two portions, which is

34:13historic district, which is the

34:14collection of buildings,

34:16and historic landmark. So, if the

34:17building is in particular of a

34:20particular importance and historical

34:22significance, then we can work with the

34:23homeowner to make that a historic

34:25landmark.

34:26>> Okay.

34:26>> And if it's part And if they want if the

34:28homeowner wants to get its their

34:29neighbors involved, we can work with

34:31them to try to maybe make a historic

34:33district.

34:33>> Okay.

34:34>> And both of those are still opt-in uh

34:37uh

34:37paths paths forward.

34:38>> That's very helpful. Thank you. I kind

34:40of figured somebody might ask me, am I

34:42just automatically put into this or can

34:44I just do it at will? So, that's a

34:46helpful answer. I'm from the East Coast,

34:48we have a lot of historic areas and I

34:50drove to say it's so charming to go into

34:53like downtown Orlando where all the

34:54craftsman style homes are and they're

34:56just very unique to that area. So, I

34:58know that some areas are they're shining

35:01examples of how this can really make a a

35:03unique space to live in

35:05and be. So, thanks for explaining it.

35:06That helps me give that back out to the

35:08public.

35:09>> I'd like to just to chime in a little

35:11bit. If you have a historic home, but

35:13not necessarily in a district, a

35:15district is a collection of homes in

35:17which

35:18at least 50%, 51%, something like that,

35:21have the original character of the home.

35:23It hasn't been altered or changed. At

35:26least 50% of the homes have retained

35:28[clears throat] their original character

35:29within a neighborhood that you could get

35:33that many homes. But, if you have a home

35:35that is in you know, you've preserved or

35:38it has preserved its historic character

35:41and you want designation and but the

35:43neighborhood does not have enough homes

35:45or chooses not to participate, you can

35:48register with the State Historic

35:50Preservation Office and get historic

35:52designation. There are some property tax

35:55advantages for that and it also gives it

35:59is now in the registry and hopefully

36:02future homeowners would also protect it

36:04since it is in the registry.

36:06>> That's really Thank you. That's very

36:07helpful. I also just wanted to thank um

36:11our City of Mesa staff who have walked

36:12me through some of this because I've

36:14asked a lot of questions regarding

36:15Buckhorn Baths specifically and it was

36:17extremely insightful. So, thank you for

36:19spending time in multiple meetings with

36:21me so you can walk through it together.

36:23And thank you, Matt, for all the work

36:24you've done and thank you, Rachel. We

36:25didn't get to see you from here, so we

36:27just I wanted to say thank you for

36:29giving the presentation.

36:32>> Council, any other comments? If not,

36:34I'll entertain a motion to approve item

36:367A and 7B. Is there a motion to that

36:39effect?

36:41Thank you, Mr. Thank you, Vice Mayor.

36:43Please cast your vote.

36:49Okay, motion passes unanimously. Thank

36:51you, everyone, and thank you for the

36:52conversation.

36:54With that, we'll move over to item eight

36:55as items from citizen present.

36:58Ms. Mosley, do I have two wish to speak?

37:01>> Yes, Mayor. Uh Jerica Trimble and Chris

37:04Hamlin.

37:05>> Okay, first uh Jerica Trimble, come on

37:08forward. You have 3 minutes, and after

37:10Jerica, Chris Hamlin is on deck.

37:18>> [snorts]

37:19>> Hi, Council. Here to speak to you again

37:21about Flock. So, um just have some

37:24updates for you, just some new things in

37:25the news that I've seen that are just

37:27concerning, and I really just hope that

37:29this that the Council will consider

37:31doing its own separate investigation.

37:33Just I I understand that the police here

37:36say they have safeguards and things like

37:37that, but I just have major concerns

37:39about like Flock as a company. Like,

37:41they've only existed for like 8 years,

37:43and there's just a lot of problems with

37:44them in general. So, I just wanted to go

37:47over some of the new things that I've

37:48seen recently. So,

37:49um a judge in Oklahoma did rule that the

37:51Flock system it's a dragnet style mass

37:53surveillance network, and it violates

37:55the Fourth Amendment. So, a judge did

37:57did recently rule on that in a case, and

37:59that person's case was completely thrown

38:00out because their Fourth Amendment

38:02rights were violated because the police

38:04used Flock without a warrant. So, so a

38:06judge did did rule on that. Departments

38:09of transportations across the country

38:11are also auditing the poles that they're

38:13attached to because they're not

38:14following the permits that they file

38:16with the cities. So, they're finding

38:18that these poles are just installed

38:19right into the ground, and there's not a

38:21breakaway plate in cement so that if a

38:22car ran into it, it wouldn't kill the

38:24people in the car. So, that people are

38:26going out there doing these audits and

38:27realizing that these poles are not

38:29properly installed, um and that they're

38:31actually quite a hazard a safety hazard

38:33considering they're also like right on

38:35the roadway. A lot of times they need to

38:36be like a certain distance away from the

38:38road, and then they're like too close.

38:40So, there's just issues with those

38:42poles.

38:43Um and then lawsuits are are piling up,

38:45and they're not suing Flock, right?

38:47These lawsuits are filed against the

38:49city and the police department. So, like

38:51in Tennessee, a woman is suing for 10

38:53million. Um a man in Washington state

38:56won a case for 300,000.

38:58Um a woman in Florida was held for 13

39:00days in jail wrongfully, and she's

39:02suing. A man was held at gunpoint in New

39:04York uh city or in New York state, he's

39:06suing the police department. Uh and

39:08another one in San Diego, a man was

39:09jailed for a month, and he's suing the

39:11police department for 1.5 million. So,

39:13like these are also very expensive,

39:15these lawsuits, and it's not going to

39:17Flock, it's the cities who are who are

39:19taking the brunt, and so that's quite

39:21expensive for the city to you know, so

39:23then I just wonder, is that technology

39:25worth that cost then if there's this

39:28risk that the city could potentially be

39:29sued? So, like that's a concern.

39:31Um and so, I'm just really hoping that

39:34uh I know um Mesa PD allegedly does

39:37audits every 30 days. I would love some

39:39transparency on that. If there could be

39:41maybe a website or something where this

39:43audit data could be reviewed, or if even

39:45if y'all could review it, um because

39:47they're saying that they're not misused,

39:48but who's defining what misuse is? And

39:51so, I would just more transparency on

39:53those types of things. I think that's a

39:54fair ask considering like I understand

39:56app surveillance and things like that on

39:58our phones. Like I understand

39:59surveillance is everywhere, but I cannot

40:01opt out of Flock driving around my city

40:03where I live. I can choose what apps I

40:05have on my phone. I can't opt out of

40:07Flock. So, like I would just hope that

40:09you all would listen to what people are

40:11concerned about. Do your own private

40:13investigation. I have so many more

40:14stories about Flock. Um I am going to

40:17start requesting um audiences with y'all

40:19so I can go over these things in more in

40:20depth that I've discovered. So, just

40:22thank you very much for your time.

40:24>> Thank you, Jerica.

40:25Mr. Hamlet.

40:34>> Good evening, Mr. Mayor, council

40:35members. Um

40:38most of you know me that do know me know

40:39that that I I fight the spiritual battle

40:42on the on the ground zero level at the

40:44school boards and fight against the

40:46indoctrination and the grooming of our

40:47children in our public schools. But the

40:49last two times, the last two meetings

40:51I've come to you were the first two

40:52meetings I've only two meetings I've

40:54been to at this city council.

40:56And and I have to tell you that's God.

40:59That's all God and that's the reason I'm

41:00why I'm here is cuz he wants me to speak

41:02out against a drag queen Christmas

41:04coming to the Mesa Arts Center.

41:07All right, this is not art. This is an

41:09abomination. I know the pressure's

41:11getting intense. I see you guys out

41:12there all the time. I see others coming

41:14in talking to you and I understand that

41:16but you guys need to understand that

41:18it's only going to get worse from here

41:19cuz time is short. This is coming

41:20December 15th. We want to stop now. Your

41:23consistent constituents do not want this

41:25in our city in our city limits and I

41:28hope it's crystal clear to you all by

41:29now. We don't want excuses. We don't

41:31want kicking cans down the street. We

41:33want action. You have the power to do

41:35it. Millions and millions of dollars are

41:37going to the Mesa Arts Center of our of

41:40our that are taxpayer funded money and

41:43you guys are asking for two bonds for

41:45public safety and for transportation for

41:48millions and millions more and tomorrow

41:50we'll know the outcome of those two. How

41:52are we supposed to trust that you are

41:54going to spend that wisely when our when

41:57our tax dollars are currently going to

41:59abominations like a drag queen Christmas

42:01at at a at property that that the that

42:04you guys own at the city of Mesa owns.

42:06We need you guys to stop this and we

42:07need to put policies in place. I don't

42:09know if you've received the petition yet

42:10but it's going around. We need you to

42:12put policies in place that will stop

42:14abominations and debauchery like this

42:16from coming into our city limits moving

42:18forward. Thank you all for listening.

42:20God bless you all and have a good night.

42:22>> Thank you, Mr. Hamlet.

42:24>> [clears throat]

42:24>> With that, Ms. Mosley, is there any

42:26others to speak?

42:27>> I have no other requests, Mayor.

42:29>> Okay, with that uh

42:31Council will entertain a motion to

42:32adjourn.

42:33>> So moved.

42:33>> Thank you, Ms. Taylor. Thank you, Vice

42:35Mayor. All in favor say I. I. Motion

42:37adjourned. Have a good evening and

42:38remember to vote.

42:48>> [music]

42:49>> Woo!

42:59>> [music]

```*