2026-11-02 - City Council Meeting
Summary
Built from the final agenda and the video captions; minutes are not yet posted.
- Historic preservation package: adoption of the Mesa Historic Preservation Design Guidelines (Res. 12590) and Title 11 code amendments (Ord. 6036); see Historic Preservation Design Guidelines.
- Flood control cost share: Res. 12582 with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County for the Pecos Road Basins and Storm Drain project, up to $22M total with Mesa paying 50% (up to $11M) from the Local Streets Sales Tax; see Pecos Road Basins Storm Drain Agreement.
- Land use: Ord. 6035 rezoning ZON25-00895 "Terrible's Commercial Development" to LC for a 4,689 sq ft convenience market with service station (District 5); Ord. 6037 introduced for the Waffle Flower Warehouse Rezone, hearing set for November 16.
- Agreements: development agreement with The Grove at Lehi Community Association for landscape maintenance (Res. 12588, District 1); IGA with Queen Creek and Maricopa County on right-of-way for the Sossaman/Germann Road and Union Pacific rail crossing, at no cost to Mesa (Res. 12589, District 6).
- Four liquor licenses: Valley Liquors, Jin BBQ, Walmart #3089 and Walmart Fuel Station #3089.
Discussion highlights (from the video)
- The consent agenda, including the minutes, the four liquor licenses, the Grove at Lehi and Queen Creek rail-crossing agreements, the Pecos Road Basins agreement (Pecos Road Basins Storm Drain Agreement) and the Terrible's convenience market rezone with service station, passed unanimously.
- Items 7A and 7B were removed from the consent agenda for a staff presentation. The historic preservation code amendments consolidate the rules into Chapter 74, Historic Preservation Procedures, and extend the demolition moratorium on projects in a proposed or existing historic preservation overlay from six months to one year. The Historic Preservation Board and Planning and Zoning Board had unanimously recommended the amendments, and the design guidelines run seven chapters (Historic Preservation Design Guidelines).
- Council adopted the amendments and the design guidelines unanimously.
- Public comment covered license-plate camera surveillance and a city arts center event.
Auto-caption wording may contain errors. The captions did not show the Waffle Flower introduction.
Agenda
Consent agenda unless noted.
- Res. 12588: development agreement, The Grove at Lehi Community Association, landscape maintenance (District 1).
- Res. 12589: IGA with Queen Creek and Maricopa County, Sossaman/Germann Road rail crossing right-of-way, no cost to Mesa (District 6).
- Res. 12590: adopts the Mesa Historic Preservation Design Guidelines (26-0868).
- Res. 12582: IGA with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Pecos Road Basins and Storm Drain; up to $22M total, Mesa 50% (up to $11M) from the Local Streets Sales Tax (26-0873).
- Ord. 6035: ZON25-00895 "Terrible's Commercial Development", rezone to LC, 4,689 sq ft convenience market with service station (District 5).
- Ord. 6036: historic preservation amendments to City Code Title 11 (26-0870).
- Ord. 6037: Waffle Flower Warehouse rezone introduced, public hearing November 16 (26-0892).
- Liquor licenses: Valley Liquors, Jin BBQ, Walmart #3089, Walmart Fuel Station #3089.
Sources
- Agenda (final): https://mesa.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1336068&GUID=AEE91F3A-C834-4747-A526-1278E4BDB1D8
- Earlier-posted agenda PDF: https://legistar1.granicus.com/Mesa/meetings/2026/11/4490_A_City_Council_26-11-02_Meeting_Agenda.pdf
- Minutes: not yet posted.
- Video: https://youtu.be/NpzRLJx8P9s
Video
Transcript
*These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:01Welcome to the Mesa City Council meeting
00:04for Monday, November uh
00:07for Monday, November 2nd, 2026. I know
00:10today's Monday. I don't know why we
00:12don't It didn't say Monday, but anyway,
00:13November 2nd. All council members are
00:15present. Before we get started, I'd like
00:18to recognize our Mayor's Youth Committee
00:20who is here with us today, and thank you
00:22for joining with us.
00:24We'll begin this meeting by an
00:25invocation by Dr. Darrell Elliott, if
00:28he's here. Dr. Elliott, if you're here,
00:30thank you.
00:31And then after Dr. Elliott, I will have
00:34a pledge of allegiance led by our
00:35Mayor's Youth Committee. So, with that,
00:38uh Dr. Elliott, the time's yours. Thank
00:39you.
00:41Please stand.
00:47>> Please join me in prayer
00:50in your tradition as I pray in mine.
00:54Gracious and loving God,
00:59we gather this evening with gratitude
01:01for the city of Mesa,
01:04for the people who call this community
01:06home,
01:08and for those entrusted with the
01:10responsibility of servant leadership.
01:15In a nation where differences too often
01:18become
01:21division,
01:23where fear sometimes speak louder than
01:26compassion,
01:28and where challenges
01:31seems
01:33too greater to overcome.
01:37Oh God, remind us.
01:40Remind us that our shared humanity is
01:44stronger than the things that separate
01:46us.
01:49Bless our mayor,
01:52our city council,
01:54and all who serve this community.
01:58Grant them wisdom listen before
02:01speaking.
02:03Courage to make difficult decisions.
02:07And humility to
02:10remember that they are called to serve
02:14the public.
02:17As they consider the needs of this
02:19growing city, oh God,
02:22remind them that
02:24behind every budget there is a family.
02:27Behind every policy there is a person.
02:30Behind every decision is a community
02:34whose future is being shaped.
02:38Help us, oh God.
02:41Help us build a Mesa where every
02:44children can flourish, every seniors
02:48can live with dignity, every neighbor
02:51can find opportunity.
02:56Oh God, as our nation approaches another
02:59election,
03:02remind us that democracy calls for
03:05participation,
03:08respect,
03:10and commitment to the common good,
03:12even when we disagree.
03:16Bless this council, oh God.
03:19Bless this community.
03:21And bless all who labor for peace.
03:24I pray this in your son Jesus' name.
03:28Amen.
03:28>> Amen.
03:30Thank you, Reverend Elliott.
03:32If the Mayor's Youth Committee would
03:33come up,
03:35come up here to the microphones, those
03:37and
03:39lead us on the Pledge of Allegiance.
03:40Thank you.
03:43>> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
03:46United States of America, and to the
03:48republic for which it stands, one nation
03:52under God, indivisible, with liberty and
03:55justice for all.
04:01>> Thank you ladies.
04:05Alzheimer's affects millions of
04:07individuals and families touching every
04:09part of our community. Alzheimer's
04:12Awareness Month gives us an opportunity
04:14to recognize those living with the
04:16disease,
04:17honor their caregivers, and raise
04:19awareness about the importance of early
04:21detection, research, and support.
04:24We're proud to recognize this month and
04:25reaffirm our commitment to building a
04:27compassionate and supportive community.
04:29With that, I would like to turn it over
04:31to Council Member Heredia to say a few
04:33words.
04:34>> Thank you, Mayor. Uh I'm proud and to
04:36sponsor this proclamation because I want
04:39Mesa residents living with Alzheimer's
04:41and the families caring for them to know
04:44that their community sees them and
04:45supports them.
04:47Uh an Alzheimer's diagnosis brings
04:49changes and uncertainty that touch an
04:52entire family. Spouses, children,
04:54friends often take responsibilities they
04:57never expected, balancing caregiving
05:00with work, raising children, and their
05:02own health.
05:03Alzheimer's Awareness Month is an
05:05opportunity to gain strength from those
05:07experiences, encourage people to seek
05:09support, and recognize the caregivers
05:12who give so much of themselves. And
05:15tonight, I want I'm pleased to introduce
05:17a a long-time
05:18Carriage
05:20uh Carriage Lane resident uh uh
05:23Kathy Norris Wilhelm
05:25uh
05:26an Alzheimer's advocate and ambassador
05:28who knows these challenges personally.
05:31Uh Kathy cared for her wife, Jean, who
05:34was diagnosed with uh younger-onset uh
05:37Alzheimer's at just 55 years old. Uh
05:40since Jean's passing, Kathy has
05:41continued to share her story and
05:44advocate for others. So, really
05:45appreciate Kathy being here. Uh glad to
05:48support and uh welcome Kathy to say uh a
05:51few words here.
05:56>> [clears throat]
05:58>> Thank you so much. Can you hear me?
06:01Good evening. My name is Kathy Norris
06:03Wilhelm, and I became involved with the
06:05Alzheimer's community after my late
06:06wife, Jean, was diagnosed in 2016 at the
06:09age of 55.
06:11Jean was a high school math teacher for
06:13nearly 20 years, and after struggling
06:15with symptoms of memory loss, repeated
06:17stories, and misplacing things, we were
06:20persistent in getting a definitive
06:22answer to what could be causing this.
06:24After nearly 2 years of testing and
06:26thousands of dollars later,
06:28a PET scan finally revealed her
06:30diagnosis.
06:32She accepted this diagnosis with bravery
06:34and courage and wanted to share her
06:36story openly and publicly to help change
06:39the stigma and misconceptions of
06:41Alzheimer's.
06:42We reached out to the Alzheimer's
06:43Association to learn as much as possible
06:46about the disease and what our future
06:48may bring.
06:49We were We were determined to face this
06:51next chapter of our lives with grace and
06:53dignity.
06:55We took every opportunity to help raise
06:57awareness and advocate for better care,
06:59participate in media interviews,
07:01conferences, and meeting with our state
07:03and federal legislators. Not once did
07:05Jean decline an opportunity she to share
07:08her story.
07:09It was the honor of my life to care for
07:11her until her last breath in March of
07:132021.
07:15Since our journey began 10 years ago, I
07:17have never been more hopeful and
07:19inspired by the advances in research and
07:21drug treatments that are now available.
07:24When we were given our diagnosis,
07:26we were essentially told to go home and
07:28prepare to die.
07:30We're now living in an era of treatments
07:32with two FDA-approved drugs, a biomarker
07:35blood test that can provide provide a
07:37diagnosis that is non-invasive,
07:39inexpensive, and a scientific proof
07:41through the pointer study that we can
07:43improve brain health and cognitive
07:45function with healthy lifestyle
07:47modifications.
07:49If you know someone who is a caregiver,
07:52reach out.
07:54Call. Send a text.
07:57They're under incredible stress and are
07:59at a greater risk of dying before their
08:01loved one.
08:02Caregiving is the hardest job in the
08:03world, and no one can or should do it
08:07alone.
08:09Thank you, Mayor Freeman, Council Member
08:11Heredia, and the entire City Council for
08:14recognizing this
08:15and proclaiming November Alzheimer's
08:17Awareness and Caregiver Month. Thank
08:19you.
08:19>> Thank you, Kathy. With that, Kathy, if
08:22you'll stay there, we're going to come
08:23down with Council for a photo with
08:25proclamation. Council, if you'll join
08:27me.
08:30>> [clears throat]
09:48[clears throat]
09:53>> Again, thank you, Kathy and Council
09:54Member Heredia for that. Item one is the
09:57consent agenda. Mr. Christopher, if you
09:59would please read the consent agenda.
10:03>> Good evening, Mayor and Council Members.
10:04These are the items on the consent
10:05agenda. All items listed with an
10:07asterisk will be considered as a group
10:08by the City Council and will be enacted
10:10with one motion. There'll be no separate
10:12discussion unless a council member or a
10:13citizen requests, in which event the
10:15item will be removed from the consent
10:16agenda and considered as a separate
10:18item. Item two, approval of minutes of
10:20previous meetings as written. Item three
10:22A, action liquor license application for
10:24Valley Liquors, 1160 East University
10:27Drive. Item three B, action liquor
10:29license application for Jin Barbecue,
10:31111 South Dobson Road. Item three C,
10:33action liquor license application for
10:35Walmart, 6306 South Mountain Road. Item
10:38three D, action liquor license
10:40application for Walmart, 11143
10:43East Destination Auto Drive. Item four
10:45A, approving a resolution to enter into
10:47a development agreement with The Grove
10:48at Lehigh Community Association, located
10:51North McDowell Road, east of the 202 Red
10:53Mountain Freeway. Item four B, approving
10:55a resolution to enter into an
10:56intergovernmental agreement with the
10:58Town of Queen Creek and Maricopa County
11:00to establish the transfer of
11:01jurisdiction over right-of-way
11:03associated with improvements to the
11:04Sossaman Road and Germain Road
11:06intersection and the Union Pacific
11:08Railroad at Great Crossing. Item four C,
11:10approving a resolution to enter into an
11:12intergovernmental agreement with the
11:13Flood Control District of Maricopa
11:14County for construction, construction
11:16management, operation, and maintenance
11:18of the Pecos Road Basins and Storm Drain
11:20Improvements Project. This project is
11:22funded by the local street sales tax.
11:24Item five A, introduction of ordinance
11:25zoning case 25-943
11:28for property located at the northwest
11:29corner of Thomas Road and 54th Street.
11:32This is for a rezone, site plan review,
11:33and special use permit to allow for
11:35industrial development. Item six A,
11:37approving ordinance zoning case 25-895
11:40for property located south of the
11:41southwest corner of Crismon Road and
11:43Hampton Avenue. Rezone, site plan
11:45review, and special use permit to allow
11:47for convenience market with a service
11:49station. Item seven A and seven B have
11:51been removed from the consent agenda.
11:52Mayor and council members, these are the
11:54items on the consent agenda.
11:56>> Thank you, Mr. Christopher.
11:57Uh Council, I'll entertain a motion to
12:00approve the consent agenda.
12:03Please to cast your vote. Thank you, Ms.
12:04Duff. Thank you, Vice Mayor.
12:10Okay, that motion passes unanimously.
12:12Thank you. Next, we'll go to item 7A and
12:147B.
12:16As requested, we'll have a presentation
12:18about our
12:19historic preservation that we're doing
12:22in our city municipality.
12:24And with that
12:28we have
12:30Rachel
12:33cued up.
12:35So we thought it'd be important for
12:36those listening to our presentation
12:38about our historic
12:40things that guidelines that have been
12:42modified.
12:45>> [laughter]
12:46>> All [clears throat] right.
12:47>> There you are.
12:48>> I I know I'm hidden. I'm so short. I'm
12:50hiding behind that. Um
12:52good evening, mayor and council members.
12:54Uh Rachel Phillips, assistant planning
12:56director, and I'm pleased to be here
12:58tonight with Matthew Kriegel, who is our
13:00um historic preservation officer, to
13:02present two different policy
13:04recommendations tonight that both the
13:06historic preservation office and
13:08different um planning staff have been
13:09working on for the last couple of years.
13:12So the first one of those that we'll be
13:14discussing are um the historic
13:16preservation text amendments.
13:19And there are are there really are kind
13:21of four main highlights or or goals of
13:24these text amendments.
13:26One is the reorganization of the various
13:29historic preservation policies. I'll be
13:32uh discussing this in a little bit more
13:33detail in the next slide, but but
13:35currently um the historic preservation
13:37regulations and policies are really
13:39spread throughout the zoning ordinance.
13:41So the first goal was to really organize
13:44that and simplify it to to better um
13:46administer and for it to be easier for
13:48residents and property owners to to find
13:52and understand. Um the next is to
13:54clarify. Um so Matthew will be
13:56discussing um as part of the text
13:58amendments, there's the introduction of
14:00several uh definitions for terms that
14:02are commonly used throughout the
14:04ordinance today and and in um our
14:06application of historic preservation. So
14:09really clarifying terminology and
14:11requirements and making it easier to
14:13understand processes was the second
14:15goal.
14:16Next is consistency. So, we wanted to
14:19make sure that across all the historic
14:21preservation
14:22policies that there is some consistency
14:25in those processes and procedures. And
14:27then finally looking to really have
14:30compliance with applicable state and
14:33federal laws.
14:36So, as far as the reorganization of the
14:39historic preservation regulations, you
14:41can see on the screen there are there's
14:44various aspects to talk about historic
14:46landmarks and overlays,
14:48historic signs,
14:50and they're really currently scattered
14:52in different chapters in the zoning
14:54ordinance. So, what the first action of
14:56these amendments does is to consolidate
14:59those and to bring those all into one
15:01chapter under chapter 74, which is
15:03titled historic preservation procedures.
15:06So, as I mentioned earlier, so that is
15:08much easier for the public to find what
15:11the requirements are.
15:15And then the next goal to consolidate
15:18and to clarify. So, there were currently
15:22different
15:23sections that talked about historic
15:25preservation overlays. And those can be
15:27for historic landmarks, which are either
15:30singular properties or buildings, but
15:32also our historic districts. So,
15:35bringing those all all those procedures
15:37under under one section, clarifying what
15:41those processes are for the public
15:43notice and for the public hearing
15:45process itself.
15:47And then the other part of this is
15:48improving the supplemental inventory
15:51list for these are resources that are
15:54eligible to be designated, but are not
15:56yet designated by those property owners.
16:00And then finally revising eligibility
16:02criteria to really make sure that we're
16:05aligning with
16:06national historic preservation
16:08standards. So, that includes
16:11requirements or criteria such as age,
16:13significance, and integrity of historic
16:15properties.
16:17And I'm going to pass it over to Matthew
16:19now.
16:22>> Good afternoon, Mayor and members of the
16:24council.
16:25A big portion of this
16:27realignment of the historic preservation
16:30ordinance was to streamline the
16:31certificate of appropriate process.
16:33Essentially, so that it could work
16:35better with other city processes.
16:37And that is
16:39to identify the work that requires a
16:40certificate of appropriateness and
16:43also ordinary maintenance and repair
16:44activities that may be exempt from that
16:46review. To clarify application
16:48requirements and review timelines.
16:51To coordinate the CFA review with
16:54building permit issuance. And to debate
16:56and to base the review on the Secretary
16:58of Interior standards for the treatment
17:01of historic properties.
17:05It also is to strengthen the duty to
17:08maintain provisions within the existing
17:11ordinance.
17:12And then to clarify the demolition
17:15review process that we have. And that
17:17would be to extend the demolition
17:19process from a what a 6-month moratorium
17:22on projects to a 1-year moratorium on
17:26projects within a proposed or existing
17:29historic preservation overlay.
17:35It's also to create a dedicated historic
17:38uh dedicated historically to create a
17:40dedicated historically designated sign
17:42section. Which establishes the
17:44procedures for designation, restoration,
17:47maintenance, modification
17:49of those signs. It updates eligibility
17:52requirements.
17:54Uh the application and review
17:55procedures.
17:56And establishes a process for future
17:58revocation of the designation if the
18:00requirements are not met.
18:04It also establishes an archaeological
18:06review compliance procedure.
18:09Which requires all development to comply
18:11with all applicable local, state, and
18:13federal laws governing cultural
18:15resources.
18:16Before excavation, city-owned property
18:19or city-controlled property will require
18:21consultation with our city
18:23archaeologist, the State Historic
18:25Preservation Office,
18:26the
18:27uh
18:28the two TIPOs and the other qualified
18:30professionals.
18:32The city archaeologist may also conduct
18:35other archaeological assessments if
18:37necessary.
18:40As uh Rachel mentioned, we also added
18:43some previously undefined terms. Those
18:45include certificate of appropriateness,
18:47historic district, historic landmark,
18:50historic preservation overlay, historic
18:52resource, historically designated sign,
18:55and state of disrepair.
18:59Throughout this process, we've had
19:00extensive community outreach.
19:03This began in 2023, and we've discussed
19:07this with the Historic Preservation
19:08Board at least three times that year.
19:11We held an open public house that year,
19:13and we presented to the Planning and
19:15Zoning Board.
19:17In 2026, we had three additional
19:19Historic Preservation Board meetings. We
19:21had an additional public open house, and
19:24we took it to the Planning and Zoning
19:27Board study session and Planning and
19:29Zoning uh hearing. We also worked with
19:32the Arizona State Historic Preservation
19:34Office,
19:35the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian
19:37Community
19:38community uh Tribal Historic
19:40Preservation Office, the Gila River
19:42Indian Community Tribal Historic
19:44Preservation Office, and the Mesa
19:46Preservation Foundation. So, we had
19:47multiple rounds of board review, public
19:49outreach, and stakeholder consultation.
19:54In the end, the board made
19:55recommendations, both the Historic
19:56Preservation Board on September 1st and
20:00the Planning and Zoning Board on
20:01September 9th unanimously recommended
20:04these text amendments for adoption.
20:08We're here for any questions and
20:10discussion.
20:12>> Any questions, Council?
20:15I have one, Matt. What is the uh age of
20:18a home or property that constitutes a
20:21historic timeline?
20:24>> Technically, there's no age Technically,
20:26but it's considered 50 years or older.
20:30>> 50 years.
20:31So, we have a lot of properties in Mesa
20:33over 50 and well over 100.
20:36Okay.
20:38Is this
20:40easy to navigate, Rachel?
20:43Is this process easy to navigate for
20:45somebody coming in?
20:47>> It is, Mayor. Um the the process, if you
20:50wanted to designate your property or
20:52designate a group of properties as a
20:54historic district, is the same as a
20:56rezoning. So, as you're pretty familiar
20:59with that, that's a pretty pretty easy
21:01process to go through that in the public
21:03notification. But, I think that these
21:05text amendments really go a far away to
21:08help the public understand what those
21:10are and to really ensure that it's clear
21:13when they're all in the same place in
21:15the zoning ordinance.
21:18>> Okay. Well, I would think some of our
21:20council districts have a lot of
21:21neighborhoods that would be eligible for
21:23the 50-year minimum timestamp. And
21:26so
21:28Okay.
21:29That's all I have. Thank you, Rachel.
21:31Matt.
21:32>> Well, we have one more for you, Mayor
21:34and Council, and that is for the
21:36historic preservation guidelines.
21:40I don't think I have that
21:42>> [clears throat]
21:43>> figured out. So, we currently do have a
21:46set of historic preservation guidelines
21:49here in the city, but um they're they're
21:51quite old. So, we're very pleased to
21:53bring forward an amendment to these.
21:57They're [clears throat] um 25 years old.
21:59As you can imagine, a lot has changed in
22:01historic preservation. At that time,
22:04there were only two designated historic
22:06districts, and now we have eight within
22:08the city.
22:09Um there's also a lot that has changed
22:11as far as our processes and procedures.
22:14Um in addition to that, um there's
22:17really the opportunity here to to
22:19modernize these design guidelines and to
22:21to clarify and make them easier to use.
22:24The exor- the existing document is over
22:27200 pages long. It's a a scanned PDF, so
22:31it's not very, you know, user-friendly
22:34if someone wants to go on there and try
22:35to find some some advice on how to
22:39rehabilitate or
22:41you know, maintain their property. Um
22:44and finally, we wanted to update this to
22:46really make sure that it supports our
22:48our CLG program. That's our Mesa
22:50Certified Local Government Program
22:52through the State SHPO
22:55office.
22:56So,
22:57as a an overview of these design
23:00guidelines, it consists of seven
23:02chapters and and Matthew is going to go
23:04over those in in better detail, but
23:06those talk about the historic
23:08preservation program itself and project
23:10reviews. And then it provides guidelines
23:13for rehabilitations, additions, new
23:15construction, signage. And then there's
23:18also portions that talk about Mesa's
23:21historic context themselves.
23:23Um In addition to this, there's five
23:26different appendices that are there as
23:28resources. So, those are things that
23:31discuss and define what are
23:33character-defining features, for
23:35example. Um and then they give context
23:38behind our existing historic districts
23:41and landmarks.
23:42Um so, this is really supposed to be a
23:45resource for for property owners and
23:47residents to understand what they can do
23:49with their properties.
23:51And I'm going to pass it along to
23:53Matthew to explain each one of these
23:55chapters.
23:58>> Thank you, Rachel. So, we really tried
23:59to make this more user-friendly than the
24:02older document. The older document has a
24:04lot of information and like Rachel said,
24:06it's about 200 pages long. I think this
24:08one's about 100 pages, so we cut it we
24:11cut it in half. So, chapter one is the
24:13introduction and establishes the purpose
24:15and role of the design guidelines. It
24:17explains when the design guidelines
24:18would be used or necessary and provides
24:21like who would be able to use this or
24:23who should use it or who would benefit
24:25from using these design guidelines. It
24:27also explains that the city that these
24:29guidelines supplement the city
24:30regulations and should be used alongside
24:33the text amendments, the code, and
24:36building code.
24:38Chapter 2 talks about certificates of
24:40appropriateness. It brings the COA
24:43process together in one location.
24:45It describes the application and review
24:47procedures in more detail than the
24:49ordinance does.
24:51It explains the relationship between the
24:53Mesa Historic Property Register, the
24:55Historic Preservation Overlay, the
24:56National Register, and Certificate of
24:58Appropriateness review. And it also
25:01reaffirms the Secretary of the Interior
25:03standards for rehabilitation as the
25:04foundation for preservation decisions
25:07made in Mesa.
25:10Chapter 3 is a pri- is primary guidance
25:13for working on historic on existing
25:15historic buildings. So, it emphasizes
25:17the repair rather than replacement of
25:19historic materials when feasible.
25:21It addresses windows, doors, roofs,
25:23porches, paint, landscaping, other
25:25character-defining features, and
25:27provides practical recommendations
25:29without prescribing a single design
25:32solution. So, it leaves it open-ended so
25:34people can make their own decisions on
25:36how best their property fits into
25:37certain situations.
25:39Chapter 4 is guidance for additions to
25:42historic buildings. It emphasizes
25:43compatibility while preserving the
25:45original structure. It addresses
25:46placement, size, scale, massing,
25:49materials, and design. And it encourages
25:51contemporary design that remains
25:52subordinate to the historic building and
25:54that provides character-defining
25:56features.
25:58Chapter 5 is guidance for new
26:01construction within historic district.
26:03This emphasizes compatibility rather
26:05than replication. It considers scale,
26:07massing, setbacks, materials, and
26:09overall design. It also addresses
26:11assess- accessory buildings and
26:13accessory dwelling units, fences, walls,
26:15mechanical equipment, and
26:17solar
26:18solar
26:20panel systems.
26:22Chapter 6 is guidance for preserving and
26:24rehabilitating historic signage. It
26:27provides recommendations for appropriate
26:28new signage on historic buildings and
26:31and provides consistent framework for
26:33evaluating historic and new signage
26:35within the district.
26:39Chapter 7 it talks about Mesa's historic
26:42and architectural context. So this
26:44provides a more updated context for
26:46understanding Mesa's historic buildings,
26:48neighborhoods, and architectural
26:49character.
26:50As Rachel mentioned, the old the the
26:53existing design guidelines are 25 years
26:55old and so a lot has changed since then.
26:57So our architectural character and
26:59architectural history has expanded from
27:02to include this other 25 years of
27:04history that was never even mentioned in
27:06the original design guidelines.
27:08This recognizes Mesa's history from
27:10long-standing Autumn and P Posh
27:12connections through agricultural
27:14development and post World War
27:15subdivision growth.
27:17And it organizes Mesa's development to
27:20major and to major historical periods.
27:23Including visual architectural reference
27:25explaining building type styles and
27:27common residential architecture.
27:30There are five appendices.
27:32One is the or A is the historic
27:34preservation program overview. Second
27:36one is certificate of appropriate review
27:39standards.
27:40The C is character defining features.
27:43Then we have historic district and
27:44historic landmark information which has
27:46maps and details on each individual
27:49historic district and also all of our
27:51landmarks.
27:53And then we have a section on cultural
27:55heritage and the heritage neighborhoods
27:57of which includes the Le High Heritage
27:59Neighborhood and the Washington Escobedo
28:01Heritage Neighborhood.
28:05Oh, well, just like the the the text
28:08amendments, we had a lot of outreach and
28:09engagement on these as well.
28:12Starting in 2023, we had three historic
28:14preservation board meeting discussions.
28:16We had a public open house meeting and
28:18then we brought it to planning and
28:19zoning study session.
28:22We picked back up in 2026 where we also
28:24had three additional historic
28:26preservation board meetings, public open
28:28house, and we took it to the planning
28:31and zoning board as well a couple times.
28:34Just like the text amendments, we
28:37took this to major stakeholders
28:39including the Arizona State Historic
28:40Preservation Office, the Salt River
28:42Pima-Maricopa Indian Community,
28:45uh Tribal Historic Preservation Office,
28:47the Gila River Indian Community Tribal
28:49Historic Preservation Office, and the
28:51Mesa Preservation Foundation.
28:55On September 1st, the Historic
28:58Preservation Board uh recommended
29:01adoption of the
29:03the design guidelines, and on September
29:069th, the Planning and Zoning Board
29:08followed with a recommendation for
29:09adoption as well.
29:12So, if there are any questions and
29:13discussion.
29:14>> Ms. Duff, and then as well then Mr.
29:16Adams.
29:19>> Oh, thank you. Just a quick question.
29:22I noticed in both timelines uh about a
29:242-year gap, 2023 to 2026, were we
29:29studying something or looking for
29:31resources, or what was the purpose of
29:33that 2-year gap?
29:35>> Mayor, Council Member Adams. So, the
29:37reason with the gap is because we had
29:39quite a few few turnover with staff, so
29:41we went through two different historic
29:43preservation officers before Matthew
29:45came on board, and we also hired a city
29:47archaeologist. So, in each one of those
29:50transitions, there was some onboarding
29:52time and then re-review and engagement
29:55of various um organizations.
29:58>> So, okay, thank you for that
29:59explanation. So, when we probably had to
30:01bring the two boards up to speed cuz
30:04there'd been board turnover, I assume.
30:06So, okay, thank you for that.
30:09Ms. Duff.
30:11>> I didn't have any questions. I just
30:13wanted to thank you for
30:15your tremendous amount of work to put
30:17this together and get it through.
30:20Um
30:22like you mentioned, that 200 pages of of
30:24text in a PDF was
30:28no one really read it, okay?
30:30>> [laughter]
30:30>> People would just ask questions, but now
30:32online, I can view the guideline under
30:35resources on the historic preservation
30:37page.
30:38And it has a lot of graphics and it has
30:40each distinction, whether it's roofing
30:42or doors or windows, in separate and
30:45really takes it like hands-on. Now, you
30:48can easily digest it and not have to
30:51read a ton of text. So, you can have
30:53that immediate interpretation of what I
30:56can or need to do to preserve my home,
30:59as well as other information if you'd
31:02like to
31:03um register your home and it's 50 years
31:06or more. We have a a lot of mid-century
31:10homes that are beautiful and I hope they
31:12do get restored as districts in our
31:15city.
31:16Um
31:17our historic
31:19um
31:20districts bring a lot of character and
31:23history
31:24um to our city that we're proud of and
31:26tells our story.
31:28Um it's the richness of our community
31:31that binds us.
31:33Um otherwise, we we just become another
31:36city that looks like any other city and
31:39um so, I appreciate all the efforts of
31:41the homeowners and and business owners
31:43that do preserve our buildings to tell
31:46the the story of our city.
31:48Um
31:50I think that's about it, but I just
31:52wanted to bring attention to it. It is
31:54much easier now and we have Matthew in
31:57charge here, so you can reach out. We
31:59have a person in charge um to be able to
32:01answer those questions. It's taken some
32:04time to really get the office sorted
32:06out. Um we didn't have an office for a
32:08while and our planning director had to
32:11weed through that. Um so, now it's
32:14it's we have Matthew's a very talented
32:16and and has the um
32:19education and knowledge about historic
32:21preservation. I look forward that all we
32:23can do in our city to
32:26preserve our
32:27historic buildings. Thank you.
32:30>> Thank you, Ms. Duff. Ms. Taylor.
32:33>> Thank you so much for the presentation.
32:35I appreciate it. I'm
32:37learning about our historic
32:38preservation, our historic land
32:40landmarks. And I was curious to know
32:42just for the general public, if you have
32:44a home that's let's say 1975, so it's
32:47just a little over 50 years,
32:49if I'm the home homeowner,
32:51am I automatically categorized into
32:54being in the historic preservation
32:56requirements, or do I come to the city
32:59of Mesa and say, I would like to
33:01designate my home to be a historically
33:03preserved home, and therefore I kind of
33:05submit myself to the rules of this these
33:08text amendments? Is that Is that
33:10correct?
33:11>> Correct.
33:11So, in the city of Mesa, we we are an
33:13opt-in program. So, if your house is 75
33:17years old,
33:19the city doesn't go after particular
33:20houses or neighborhoods. The
33:21neighborhoods and homeowners come to us
33:23and ask if what we can do to help them
33:25preserve their property. So, it's not
33:27something that we would go actively to
33:30the neighborhoods. It's something that
33:31the neighborhoods and homeowners would
33:33come to us.
33:34>> Can one person in a neighborhood do that
33:37if they really just love We We've done
33:40kind of historic remodels to bring homes
33:42back to their original footprint in the
33:44Evergreen Historic District. And so,
33:46they were really excited to kind of
33:48revive that 1960s feel of their homes.
33:50So, if one person wanted to have just
33:52their house designated, can they, or
33:54does it have to be the whole
33:55neighborhood?
33:56>> So, um Mayor Council member Taylor,
34:00so, we have two different programs, one
34:02which we've which we've condensed into
34:04one system. So, it used to be a historic
34:06district overlay and historic landmark
34:08overlay, and now it's historic
34:09preservation overlay, but it still
34:11encompasses the two portions, which is
34:13historic district, which is the
34:14collection of buildings,
34:16and historic landmark. So, if the
34:17building is in particular of a
34:20particular importance and historical
34:22significance, then we can work with the
34:23homeowner to make that a historic
34:25landmark.
34:26>> Okay.
34:26>> And if it's part And if they want if the
34:28homeowner wants to get its their
34:29neighbors involved, we can work with
34:31them to try to maybe make a historic
34:33district.
34:33>> Okay.
34:34>> And both of those are still opt-in uh
34:37uh
34:37paths paths forward.
34:38>> That's very helpful. Thank you. I kind
34:40of figured somebody might ask me, am I
34:42just automatically put into this or can
34:44I just do it at will? So, that's a
34:46helpful answer. I'm from the East Coast,
34:48we have a lot of historic areas and I
34:50drove to say it's so charming to go into
34:53like downtown Orlando where all the
34:54craftsman style homes are and they're
34:56just very unique to that area. So, I
34:58know that some areas are they're shining
35:01examples of how this can really make a a
35:03unique space to live in
35:05and be. So, thanks for explaining it.
35:06That helps me give that back out to the
35:08public.
35:09>> I'd like to just to chime in a little
35:11bit. If you have a historic home, but
35:13not necessarily in a district, a
35:15district is a collection of homes in
35:17which
35:18at least 50%, 51%, something like that,
35:21have the original character of the home.
35:23It hasn't been altered or changed. At
35:26least 50% of the homes have retained
35:28[clears throat] their original character
35:29within a neighborhood that you could get
35:33that many homes. But, if you have a home
35:35that is in you know, you've preserved or
35:38it has preserved its historic character
35:41and you want designation and but the
35:43neighborhood does not have enough homes
35:45or chooses not to participate, you can
35:48register with the State Historic
35:50Preservation Office and get historic
35:52designation. There are some property tax
35:55advantages for that and it also gives it
35:59is now in the registry and hopefully
36:02future homeowners would also protect it
36:04since it is in the registry.
36:06>> That's really Thank you. That's very
36:07helpful. I also just wanted to thank um
36:11our City of Mesa staff who have walked
36:12me through some of this because I've
36:14asked a lot of questions regarding
36:15Buckhorn Baths specifically and it was
36:17extremely insightful. So, thank you for
36:19spending time in multiple meetings with
36:21me so you can walk through it together.
36:23And thank you, Matt, for all the work
36:24you've done and thank you, Rachel. We
36:25didn't get to see you from here, so we
36:27just I wanted to say thank you for
36:29giving the presentation.
36:32>> Council, any other comments? If not,
36:34I'll entertain a motion to approve item
36:367A and 7B. Is there a motion to that
36:39effect?
36:41Thank you, Mr. Thank you, Vice Mayor.
36:43Please cast your vote.
36:49Okay, motion passes unanimously. Thank
36:51you, everyone, and thank you for the
36:52conversation.
36:54With that, we'll move over to item eight
36:55as items from citizen present.
36:58Ms. Mosley, do I have two wish to speak?
37:01>> Yes, Mayor. Uh Jerica Trimble and Chris
37:04Hamlin.
37:05>> Okay, first uh Jerica Trimble, come on
37:08forward. You have 3 minutes, and after
37:10Jerica, Chris Hamlin is on deck.
37:18>> [snorts]
37:19>> Hi, Council. Here to speak to you again
37:21about Flock. So, um just have some
37:24updates for you, just some new things in
37:25the news that I've seen that are just
37:27concerning, and I really just hope that
37:29this that the Council will consider
37:31doing its own separate investigation.
37:33Just I I understand that the police here
37:36say they have safeguards and things like
37:37that, but I just have major concerns
37:39about like Flock as a company. Like,
37:41they've only existed for like 8 years,
37:43and there's just a lot of problems with
37:44them in general. So, I just wanted to go
37:47over some of the new things that I've
37:48seen recently. So,
37:49um a judge in Oklahoma did rule that the
37:51Flock system it's a dragnet style mass
37:53surveillance network, and it violates
37:55the Fourth Amendment. So, a judge did
37:57did recently rule on that in a case, and
37:59that person's case was completely thrown
38:00out because their Fourth Amendment
38:02rights were violated because the police
38:04used Flock without a warrant. So, so a
38:06judge did did rule on that. Departments
38:09of transportations across the country
38:11are also auditing the poles that they're
38:13attached to because they're not
38:14following the permits that they file
38:16with the cities. So, they're finding
38:18that these poles are just installed
38:19right into the ground, and there's not a
38:21breakaway plate in cement so that if a
38:22car ran into it, it wouldn't kill the
38:24people in the car. So, that people are
38:26going out there doing these audits and
38:27realizing that these poles are not
38:29properly installed, um and that they're
38:31actually quite a hazard a safety hazard
38:33considering they're also like right on
38:35the roadway. A lot of times they need to
38:36be like a certain distance away from the
38:38road, and then they're like too close.
38:40So, there's just issues with those
38:42poles.
38:43Um and then lawsuits are are piling up,
38:45and they're not suing Flock, right?
38:47These lawsuits are filed against the
38:49city and the police department. So, like
38:51in Tennessee, a woman is suing for 10
38:53million. Um a man in Washington state
38:56won a case for 300,000.
38:58Um a woman in Florida was held for 13
39:00days in jail wrongfully, and she's
39:02suing. A man was held at gunpoint in New
39:04York uh city or in New York state, he's
39:06suing the police department. Uh and
39:08another one in San Diego, a man was
39:09jailed for a month, and he's suing the
39:11police department for 1.5 million. So,
39:13like these are also very expensive,
39:15these lawsuits, and it's not going to
39:17Flock, it's the cities who are who are
39:19taking the brunt, and so that's quite
39:21expensive for the city to you know, so
39:23then I just wonder, is that technology
39:25worth that cost then if there's this
39:28risk that the city could potentially be
39:29sued? So, like that's a concern.
39:31Um and so, I'm just really hoping that
39:34uh I know um Mesa PD allegedly does
39:37audits every 30 days. I would love some
39:39transparency on that. If there could be
39:41maybe a website or something where this
39:43audit data could be reviewed, or if even
39:45if y'all could review it, um because
39:47they're saying that they're not misused,
39:48but who's defining what misuse is? And
39:51so, I would just more transparency on
39:53those types of things. I think that's a
39:54fair ask considering like I understand
39:56app surveillance and things like that on
39:58our phones. Like I understand
39:59surveillance is everywhere, but I cannot
40:01opt out of Flock driving around my city
40:03where I live. I can choose what apps I
40:05have on my phone. I can't opt out of
40:07Flock. So, like I would just hope that
40:09you all would listen to what people are
40:11concerned about. Do your own private
40:13investigation. I have so many more
40:14stories about Flock. Um I am going to
40:17start requesting um audiences with y'all
40:19so I can go over these things in more in
40:20depth that I've discovered. So, just
40:22thank you very much for your time.
40:24>> Thank you, Jerica.
40:25Mr. Hamlet.
40:34>> Good evening, Mr. Mayor, council
40:35members. Um
40:38most of you know me that do know me know
40:39that that I I fight the spiritual battle
40:42on the on the ground zero level at the
40:44school boards and fight against the
40:46indoctrination and the grooming of our
40:47children in our public schools. But the
40:49last two times, the last two meetings
40:51I've come to you were the first two
40:52meetings I've only two meetings I've
40:54been to at this city council.
40:56And and I have to tell you that's God.
40:59That's all God and that's the reason I'm
41:00why I'm here is cuz he wants me to speak
41:02out against a drag queen Christmas
41:04coming to the Mesa Arts Center.
41:07All right, this is not art. This is an
41:09abomination. I know the pressure's
41:11getting intense. I see you guys out
41:12there all the time. I see others coming
41:14in talking to you and I understand that
41:16but you guys need to understand that
41:18it's only going to get worse from here
41:19cuz time is short. This is coming
41:20December 15th. We want to stop now. Your
41:23consistent constituents do not want this
41:25in our city in our city limits and I
41:28hope it's crystal clear to you all by
41:29now. We don't want excuses. We don't
41:31want kicking cans down the street. We
41:33want action. You have the power to do
41:35it. Millions and millions of dollars are
41:37going to the Mesa Arts Center of our of
41:40our that are taxpayer funded money and
41:43you guys are asking for two bonds for
41:45public safety and for transportation for
41:48millions and millions more and tomorrow
41:50we'll know the outcome of those two. How
41:52are we supposed to trust that you are
41:54going to spend that wisely when our when
41:57our tax dollars are currently going to
41:59abominations like a drag queen Christmas
42:01at at a at property that that the that
42:04you guys own at the city of Mesa owns.
42:06We need you guys to stop this and we
42:07need to put policies in place. I don't
42:09know if you've received the petition yet
42:10but it's going around. We need you to
42:12put policies in place that will stop
42:14abominations and debauchery like this
42:16from coming into our city limits moving
42:18forward. Thank you all for listening.
42:20God bless you all and have a good night.
42:22>> Thank you, Mr. Hamlet.
42:24>> [clears throat]
42:24>> With that, Ms. Mosley, is there any
42:26others to speak?
42:27>> I have no other requests, Mayor.
42:29>> Okay, with that uh
42:31Council will entertain a motion to
42:32adjourn.
42:33>> So moved.
42:33>> Thank you, Ms. Taylor. Thank you, Vice
42:35Mayor. All in favor say I. I. Motion
42:37adjourned. Have a good evening and
42:38remember to vote.
42:48>> [music]
42:49>> Woo!
42:59>> [music]
```*
