2026-11-03 - City Council Agenda Review

MORE. GOOD MORNING EVERYONE AND

WELCOME BECKY AGAIN TO THE VERY

CARGO GATE UNCLE, PRESIDENT

[name]. OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER

[name] BUT COUNCIL MEMBERS IT

COMES NOT TO TELL US HASN'T

COME FROM MEMBER YET BUT THE

RECORD REFLECT THAT COUNCIL

MEMBER [name] IS BLOCKED IN

AND COUNCIL MEMBER IS CURRENTLY

ABSENT. THANK YOU. INDICATED TO

ME TO COME THANK YOU COUNCIL

PRESIDENT JUST A FEW THINGS FOR

BRIEFING TODAY MOVING FIRST TO

THE PENDING ITEM SECTION WE

HAVE MARKED CAPITAL TO BRIEF

RESOLUTION TO GO TO 6-08 THREE

RELATED TO THE WATER SYSTEM

PLAN.

>> GOOD MORNING. GOOD MORNING.

YEAH THIS ITEM AS I BRIEFED AT

.THIS IS JUST AN AMENDMENT TO

OUR 2023 WATER SYSTEM PLAN

ALTHOUGH IT DOESN'T HAVE AN

APPENDIX TO IT WHICH INCLUDES

OUR 2027 TO 2032 LIST AND

REALLY JUST AS AN EFFORT FOR US

TO BE MORE ELIGIBLE FOR FUNDING

TO ANY QUESTIONS ON EQUAL

FOOTING. I THINK I COULD [name]

THE WEEK A LITTLE BIT MORE

CLEARLY WHAT THAT WAS GOING TO

BE ALL INCLUDED I THINK. SURE.

THANKS, [name]. TURNING BACK TO

RESOLUTION TO THE 2026 DASH

SEVEN ZERO, WE HAVE [name]

HERE TO BRIEF THAT PERHAPS WITH

SUPPORT FROM THE PROVIDER WIFI

.YEAH. SO THIS IS A RESOLUTION

RECOGNIZING THE DIVISION THREE

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

PLAN AND GUIDANCE FOR FUTURE

PLANNING AND LAND USE POLICY

AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AS

WELL AS PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE

INVESTMENT ON THE DIVISION

STREET CORRIDOR SPECIFICALLY ON

THE SOUTH CAPUT GONZAGA

UNIVERSITY AND THE WILLIAM

STREET NODE. AND FRANKLIN PARK

AND FROM WILLIAM FRANCIS. SO

THOSE ARE THE TWO PRIORITIES

AREAS WITH THE HIGHEST

POTENTIAL FOR TRANSIT ORIENTED

DEVELOPMENT AND THIS IS A

RESULT OF THE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

PROJECT GOING IN. SO THE 100

MILLION DOLLARS OF PUBLIC

INVESTMENT IN FEDERAL TRANSIT

ADMINISTRATION GOING INTO THE

DIVISION THREE CORRIDOR AND

THIS STUDY WAS THE RESULT OF A

GRANT FROM THE FEDERAL TRANSIT

ADMINISTRATION. IT'S CALLED THE

TOD PILOT PROGRAM GRANT AND IT

GOES TO COMMUNITY WHERE MAJOR

TRANSIT INVESTMENTS ARE

HAPPENING RECOGNIZING THAT TO

GET THE MOST BENEFIT FROM THE

PUBLIC DOLLARS REQUIRED CHANGES

ON THE LANDED SIDE OF THINGS AS

WELL COULD NOT THAT INVESTMENT

BETWEEN THE CURB AND SO WHAT

THIS GRANT HELPED US DO IS LOOK

AT WHERE THE GREATEST

OPPORTUNITIES ARE AND COME UP

WITH PLENTY OF POLICY

DEVELOPMENT REGULATION CONCEPT

AND TRAIL TRANSPORTATION

DESTINATION PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY

AND URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

THAT MAKE THE MOST OF THOSE BUS

RAPID TRANSIT THAT HE THAT'S

GOING IN. AND THIS IS A FOUR

YEAR PLAN THAT DOESN'T CHANGE

ANYTHING ON FEES OR DEVELOPMENT

REGULATIONS IN THE SHORT TERM

THAT WOULD COME THROUGH

ADDITIONAL FOR THE PLANNING. SO

THE NEXT STEP ON THIS IF

ADOPTED AND RECOGNIZED WOULD BE

TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE HIGHEST

POTENTIAL AREAS FIRST. SO THAT

WOULD BE THE SOUTH COUPLET BIKE

AND THE UNIVERSITY AND AND GOOD

IN DEPTH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AT

THE SOUTH COUPLET TO LOOK AT

WHAT TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT MAKES

THE MOST SENSE IN THE SHORT

TERM AND POTENTIALS OUT AND

THEN START WORKING WITH

DEVELOPERS IN THE AREA AND MAKE

SOME OF THOSE FIRST THAT

HAPPENED THAT WE ACTUALLY CAME

BACK ON THE GROUND SO THAT'S

WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT AND

HAPPY TO TALK MORE ABOUT IT AND

ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE

GET GO. YEAH AND THIS IS THE

SAME PLAN THAT WAS PRESENTED

SIX WEEKS AGO OR SO BUT HAS

THERE BEEN ANY ANY CHANGES TO

THE PLAN? YEAH, WE MADE SOME

ADJUSTMENTS BASED ON COMMENTS

WE HEARD BACK AND WE ALSO

RECEIVED COMMENTS FROM FDA

ABOUT CONSULTED DESIGN GREEN

ROOF OR SOMETHING THAT IS IN

THE DESIGN STANDARD FOR BUS

RAPID TRANSIT OR HIGH

PERFORMANCE CONFIGURATION. SO

WHILE LANDSCAPING CAN HAPPEN

NEARBY WE CAN MAKE THE

INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT AND

CITY INVESTMENTS IT'S JUST NOT

PART OF THE SHELTER DESIGN

THING. AND SO TAKING A FEW

THINGS OUT LIKE THAT THERE WERE

A FEW THINGS THAT WE DISCUSSED

THAT AREN'T NECESSARILY CITY

RECOMMENDATIONS BUT THEY ARE

STATE REQUIREMENTS AND STATE

RECOMMENDATIONS AROUND

AFFORDABLE HOUSING. SO THOSE

MENTIONED ARE STILL IN THERE

ONLY INSOFAR AS THEY RELATE TO

STATE REQUIREMENTS IN SO YEAH

AND OBVIOUSLY I HAVE SOME

CERTAIN OPINIONS PERSPECTIVES

ON THAT AND I DON'T IMAGINE THE

NECESSARILY BE INCORPORATED BUT

THE TWO THINGS I WOULD JUST

POINT OUT ONE IS ON THAT I

THINK THE PLAN CALLS FOR

ACTUALLY A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF

MANDATORY AFFORDABLE AND

INCLUSIONARY ZONING THAN THE

STATE LAW REQUIRES. SO THAT WAS

JUST ONE THING. SO TO SAY IT'S

BECAUSE OF STATE LAW, IT'S A

FULL FLIGHT MISNOMER BUT THEN

THERE WAS THE ONE LINE IN THERE

THAT WAS REFERENCING OUR THAT I

POINTED OUT FOR YOU GUYS THAT

WAS NOT FACTUALLY CORRECT AND

I'M WONDERING IF THAT GOT

CORRECTED. YEAH, YEAH, WE

CREATED THAT. OKAY. I SEE.

YEAH, I THINK I THINK AGAIN I

THINK IT MAY YOU THINK ON

MOVING NOW TO FINAL ITEM IF WE

HAVE ONE FOR YOU THIS MORNING

AND THAT IS OPEN TO 30 6-087

ZERO AND I BELIEVE WE HAVE

[name] HERE TO BRIEF THAT ON

THEIR BEHALF GOING TO ACCOUNT

FOR SO THIS IS A CONTRACT WITH

FOR FOR DESIGN WORK FOR THE

REPLACEMENT OF THE LAKE PUBLIC

LIBRARY CONTRACT FOR ALL THOSE

THAT WONDERFUL BREAK FOR THE

THE WORK SO THIS WILL GET A

5,060% DESIGN WILL WORK ON THE

NEPA AND WE'LL HAVE TO BE MORE

PREPARED FOR WHAT'S

GRANDFATHERED BECOME AVAILABLE

AND QUICKLY TO THE FIX THE GIG

AND CAPABILITY THEY'RE NOT

GOING TO GO DOWN TOMORROW OKAY

OKAY ANYTHING WE'RE DOING IN

FACT UPGRADES AND WE'VE KEPT A

CLOSE EYE ON IT. I THINK [name]

POINTED OUT A PIE IS MIDDLE TO

THAT. WE'RE GETTING PRETTY

BEEFY BECAUSE THEY WERE BUILT

BACK IN THE DAY FOR THE TROLLEY

THAT LAND ON THAT LINE. SO WE

ARE COMFORTABLE WITH HAVING

TRAFFIC ON THAT ON THAT BRIDGE

WHILE WE WORK TOWARD A

REHABILITATION OF IT YOU GET A

KICK KICK IF HE THE BRIDGE THAT

HAS THE WORST IN THE WORST

STATE OF REPAIR VERSUS ANY OF

THE OTHER BRIDGES AND SPOKANE

YOU KNOW YOU KNOW I'D HAVE TO

ASK IN A QUICK TEAM WILL HE

DOES THE BRIDGE INSPECTIONS AND

YOU KNOW THEY HAVE A THERE'S

DIFFERENT THINGS WHERE THIS IS

A CONCRETE BRIDGE. IT'S NOT THE

SAME LIKE SOME OF THE THE

PLACES THAT YOU FIND OTHER

PLACES THAT THE MORE SINGLE

POINT OF FAILURE TYPE BRIDGES

THIS IS NOT THAT KIND OF A

BRIDGE SO I MEAN IT JUST

DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING

AT AND WE'VE DONE A LOT OF WORK

UNDER BRIDGES FREQUENTLY

OBVIOUSLY WE WE FIX A LOT OF

THE DEFICIENCIES IN THE PARK ON

SUSPENSION BRIDGES ON ON THE

HOWARD STREET BRIDGE. WE'VE

OBVIOUSLY REPLACED HISTORY AND

I'M A NURSE IT REALLY ISN'T

THAT LONG AGO AND IT COMES UP

AGAIN LIKE SO WE'VE DONE A LOT

OF WORK ON BRIDGES SO WE BUT WE

CONSTANTLY KEEP AN EYE ON THEM

BECAUSE THEY OBVIOUSLY ARE

CRITICAL STRUCTURES AND HAVE A

DIFFERENT KIND OF FAILURE THAN

A ROAD. SO YOU GIVE ME ALL

RIGHT, WE'RE GOING TO GO TO

MOVE THE RIGHT FOR

CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT IF

YOU SEE THANK YOU. COUNCIL

PRESIDENT THE FIRST ITEM

RELATES TO A PROPOSAL AGENDA

ITEM RESOLUTION 20 20 THAT

FILLS THE EIGHT NINE AND THEN

THEN A COUNCIL WOLF COUNCIL

PRESIDENT REQUESTING A MOTION

TO DEFER THIS RESOLUTION TO

JANUARY 30TH, 2012 AND PROPOSED

AGENDA HE COULD I REALLY

QUICKLY IF I MIGHT YOU KNOW,

HISTORICALLY WE DO OUR COUNCIL

WE GET TO TAKE A YEAR AND IT

KIND OF GOES OUT OF OUR CYCLE

AND I FEEL I CAN GET THERE NEXT

WEEK AND THE COUNCIL AND HOW WE

GET BACK ON THIS TAKE THAT THE

COMMITTEE MONEY AND COME WEEK

WEEK AGAIN HOW TO WORK THROUGH

THAT I THINK SO AT THIS POINT

IN TIME I DON'T SEE THE NEED HE

CAN ANYTHING YOU KNOW A TAKING

ON WHEN WE DO ARE OR COUNCIL

RULE IT IN JANUARY SO THAT

WOULD BE I MEAN THE REQUEST FOR

THE DEFERRAL COME ON WITH THE

MOTION YET WASN'T YET OKAY YEAH

ALL MOTION TO DEFER TO JIM 1327

I THINK IT KICKED OFF BECAUSE

THAT YEAH I DON'T SUPPORT THIS

BECAUSE I THINK THAT THIS ISSUE

HAS BEEN AN ONGOING ISSUE FOR

US FOR THE LAST COUPLE MONTHS

AND IT HAS BEEN A CONSTANT

ISSUE ON AMENDMENT AND WHEN THE

MINUTES ARE NOT ALLOWED AND ARE

ALLOWED WHETHER THEY CAN COME

THE DAY OF A MEETING AND NOT

DURING A MEETING AND I THINK

THIS PROVIDES THE CLARITY THAT

WE WERE TRYING TO THINK WHEN WE

ACTUALLY CREATED THE RULE. I

BELIEVE THAT THE COUNCIL ASKED

WE'VE BROUGHT IT UP AT

COMMITTEE THAT THEY LIKE FORM A

GROUP TO WORK THROUGH THIS. WE

CAME UP WITH THAT LANGUAGE TO

CREATE A RESOLUTION TO THAT. I

THINK THAT THE CURRENT RULES AS

STATED ACTUALLY IN THIS RIGHT

NOW BUT WE HAVE HAD THEM WE'VE

INTERPRETATION OF THOSE RULES

FOR ALL THE TIME AND I THINK

THAT THIS GETS BACK TO WHAT WE

HAD INTENDED BACK IN JANUARY

FEBRUARY WHEN WE ADOPTED THE

RULE KNOWING THAT IT WAS THE

GOAL OF BOTH WE THOUGHT ABOUT

IS WHAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED. SO

I DON'T THINK THAT WE TO DELAY

IT. I DO WORRY DELAYING IT

ANYWAY LIKE LAST YEAR THERE

WERE A LOT OF OTHER CHANGES IN

THE LITTLE COOL AND THAT GOT

DELAYED AGAIN AND AGAIN AND I

THINK IN THE MEANTIME IT WOULD

BE CLEAR IF YOU HAVE AMENDMENT

PROCESS THAT'S CLEARLY LAID OUT

AND THAT WOULD RESOLVE A LOT OF

THE MOTIONS THAT WE ARE

CURRENTLY SEEING THAT KIND OF

GET COMPLICATED AND WOULD

PROVIDE THE CLARITY AROUND

THOSE AMENDMENTS FOR THAT WE

KNOW EXACTLY WHAT'S HAPPENING

AND THEY CLEAR THE WAY FOR THE

PUBLIC AND FOR US AND THEN WE

CAN WORK THE OTHER I WOULDN'T

ANTICIPATE THAT THESE RULES

WILL NEED TO BE CHANGED AROUND

AMENDMENT IN ANY WAY AS TO WHAT

WE'RE DOING NOW. THANK YOU.

OKAY. I THINK I MY PERSPECTIVE

I THINK ONE THING I THINK THE

ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM IS YOU

DON'T HAVE AN OFFICE YET AND

LIKE A LOT OF THE THINGS THAT

WE HELD WITH OF AN OFFICE

DIRECTOR INTO THAT WHEN WE YEAH

I GUESS I WOULD SAY I'M FINE

WITH IF THE POOL COULDN'T GET

INTO A CONVERSATION BUT MY

SUGGESTION WOULD BE AND WE'VE

DONE RULES IN DECEMBER WE DONE

IN JANUARY WE PUT THEM OFF THE

FEBRUARY SO THERE'S DIFFERENT

TIME BUT MIKE SUGGESTION WOULD

BE THAT THREE COUNCIL MEMBERS

SHOULD BE ON A WORKGROUP AND

ACTUALLY JUST WORK THROUGH

RULES WITH [name], MAYBE GET

SOME INPUT FROM [name] AND OUR

FORMER OFFICE DIRECTOR IF HE

CAN PROVIDE SOME INPUT AS WELL.

I THINK THAT WOULD HELP BRING

THINGS TOGETHER IN A MORE

CONCLUDED WAY AND YOU CAN GO

THROUGH ALL THE DIFFERENT

BENEFITS AND AND NEGATIVES OF

ANY OF THESE CHANGES RATHER

THAN JUST DOING IT AS A ONE OFF

.OKAY. YEAH. I'M NOT SURE THEY

COME FROM THAT BUT HE FOR AN

OFFICE DIRECTOR BECAUSE THIS IS

NOT ABOUT THE OTHER POLICIES

AND PROCEDURES THAT IS SOLELY

ABOUT THEM AND SO THIS IS

CLEARLY PURELY I THINK

COMFORTABLE WITH LIKE HE YEAH

THAT THIS IS NOT ABOUT ANY OF

THE OPERATIONS OF THE OFFICE

IT'S JUST ON HOW WE DID

AMENDMENTS DURING THE ONLY FORM

FOCUS ON THIS LITTLE THING AND

I THINK I'M TO REMEMBER WE'VE

RAISED THIS ISSUE WE'VE HAD THE

DISCUSSIONS ABOUT

INTERPRETATION OF THIS RULE AND

WE ASKED IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE

TO WORK ON THOSE AND WE DID

FORM OUR GROUP WITH THAT THE

CLERK [name] AND [name] RIGHT

AND MYSELF TO WORK THROUGH THIS

NOT A COME FROM NUMBER WANTED

TO BE A PART OF IT FOR THIS ONE

THAT WE KEEP THE FEEDBACK TO

THE KEY FOR THE COUNCIL I WOULD

BE OPEN TO DOING A SHORT A TIME

PERIOD IF THERE IS CHANGES BUT

WHEN WE PRESENTED THIS AT

COMMITTEE LAST WEEK THERE WAS

NO OTHER FEEDBACK EXCEPT THOSE

COME FROM THE CATH CODE

FEEDBACK NO THEY COME FROM

THEM. THEY HAD FEEDBACK FROM

THEM BUT IF THERE IS FEEDBACK

TO CHANGE I THINK WE COULD DO

THAT. BUT I THINK THE CLEAR THE

AROUND THE RULES TO BE A

POSITIVE STEP FORWARD FOR THAT

COUNCIL COUNCILMEMBER KICKED IT

AND IT WASN'T ME THAT KNEW

ABOUT COMING IT WOULD WAS

SOMETHING INDICATES BUT I GAVE

A FEW DID THEY GET

CLARIFICATION OF WHAT WE'RE

ALREADY TRYING TO DO AND I WAS

INVOLVED IN THOSE DISCUSSIONS

EARLIER SO I DON'T SEE THIS AS

A MAJOR KEY TO IT IN KIND OF

KEEP DOING IT. THEY COULD HAVE

TAKEN I DON'T THINK THAT THE

DELAY IT AND I THINK THAT IF

FOLKS WANT MORE TIME TO DISCUSS

IT I'M HAPPY TO BUT BUT BUT I

DON'T THINK YOU NEED TO DEFER

TO THE NEXT MEETING AT THE I

THINK FEEDBACK ON THAT IS NOW

THE NOVEMBER SO WILL BE

ECLECTIC AND GANG WE'RE TALKING

ABOUT POSSIBLY EIGHT MORE

MEETING BEFORE THE END OF THE

YEAR AND FOR ALL THE RESOLUTION

THAT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE A KEY

COUNCIL RULE I TAKE IT NOW IT

WOULD BE ABLE TO ADVANCE ON ITS

OWN WITH OTHER COUNCIL MEMBER

TO HAVE SOME INPUT INTO HOW

THEY GO FORWARD. SO I AGAIN IN

MY MIND IT'S NOT LIKE KIND OF

THINKING IT YET WE TAKE ACTION

ON IT BETWEEN NOW AND THE FIRST

OF THE YEAR GOING FORWARD SO

QUICKLY HAVE [name] COMMENT.

OKAY. OKAY. I WAS JUST GOING TO

ASK IF OUR PARLIAMENTARIAN CAN

HIS PERSPECTIVE MAYBE HAVE ANY

THOUGHTS IN TERMS OF WHETHER WE

DO THIS NOW OR THE ONE OFF

LATER OR MORE? TIME TO DISCUSS

WHAT THE BUDGET WELL, I DON'T

THINK THAT THE HARM EITHER WAY

YOU KNOW WE HAVE A RUNNING LIST

OF TACTICAL CHANGES WE'RE GOING

TO NEED BECAUSE I NEED THE

COUNCIL AFTER THE FIRST OF THE

YEAR. THEY'RE PROBABLY NOT A

SUBSTANTIAL ASSET TO COVER THE

ONE THAT BILL WOULD REQUIRE THE

MOST DISCUSSION I'M AGNOSTIC AS

TO WHETHER HE DID IT NOW OR

LATER. I DO HAVE OPINIONS ABOUT

THIS APPROACH. I DO FEEL THAT,

YOU KNOW, WE'VE PLAYED FAR

ENOUGH FROM ROBERT'S

TRADITIONAL VIEW OF THAT. I

WORRY THAT THE PARTICULAR EVENT

IN THIS CASE A LITTLE TOO

COMPLICATED BUT IT'S ALWAYS

BEEN MY CONCERN ABOUT THE

ADOPTED THAT THERE ARE A LITTLE

COMPLICATED AND SO THEN THAT'S

AS FAR AS I WANT TO SAY I DON'T

WANT TO SUGGEST THAT I HATE

THIS BECAUSE I DID TOLD A

LITTLE OF THE PERSON I DON'T

HATE IT BUT I'M MORE DUTY. I

THINK ABOUT THE SIMPLER PART OF

MOVE AGAIN YEAH I WILL SAY THAT

THERE IS A TIME SENSITIVE ISSUE

THAT RIGHT NOW UNDER THE

CURRENT INTERPRETATION IN THE

LAST TWO MONTH OF THE LAW THAT

WE DO ALLOW PEOPLE TO BRING UP

THE FOR A VOTE AND THEN A

GENERAL REVIEW RIGHT NOW IT

DOESN'T HAVE TO BE CIRCULATED

TIRED INTO THIS WOULD REQUIRE

THAT THOSE THINGS MUST BE

CIRCULATED IN THE PACKET WHICH

I BELIEVE WAS THE INTENT ONLY

TO HAVE THE RULE ORIGINALLY IS

THAT IT SHOULD BE PUBLISHED IN

THE PACKET AT FOR COUNCIL

MEMBERS TO DELIBERATE ON IT FOR

THE PUBLIC TO KNOW IT RIGHT NOW

ANY AMENDMENT CAN BE CIRCULATED

AT THE MEETING ITSELF AND THAT

IS NOT THE INTENT THAT WE

PASSED ORIGINALLY AND SO I DO

THINK THAT WE HAVE HAD ISSUES

OF THAT OCCURRING IN THE LAST

COUPLE OF MONTHS AND SO THIS

GETS BACK TO OUR ORIGINAL

INTENT AND THEN WE CAN WORK WE

CAN FIX THAT TOO IF THE RIGHT

POINT I THINK ONE OF THE MAJOR

ISSUES IS ABOUT THE FIVE

THRESHOLD THIS IS FOR THRESHOLD

AND IF THE RIGHT WOULD PREFER A

DIFFERENT STRATEGY TO DO THAT.

BUT I THINK WHEN WE TALKED

ABOUT THIS IN THE FEEDBACK THAT

WE'VE GOTTEN FROM COUNCIL

MEMBERS IS THAT INSTEAD OF

DOING MULTIPLE MOTION IT'S

EASIER TO JUST DO ONE MOTION

AND INSTEAD OF DOING FOR THE

MOTION TO HAVE BEEN RULED AT

IT, THE IT TO DO IT AS ONE

MOTION. AND SO THAT'S WHAT THE

MAIN THING IS ABOUT THAT IF THE

RIGHT DOESN'T LIKE BUT THE

FEEDBACK THAT I'VE HEARD FROM

COUNCIL MEMBERS IS THAT WE

PREFER SIMPLICITY AND CLARITY

AROUND IT. THEN OBVIOUSLY THEY

CAN ONLY ACT IN THE ROOM TO ADD

NOT GO MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO

DEFER TO THE ANYWAY THEY KEEP

EVERYTHING TO INDICATE LIKE

THEY I I KNOW NO NO I BELIEVE

THAT BY KITTY THANK YOU MR. I

THANK YOU COUNSEL ONE MORE ITEM

RELATING TO PENDING ONLY WITH

ANOTHER REQUESTING A MOTION TO

ADOPT THE BUILDING COLORS AND

THEN THE TWO ORDINANCES 339

THREE SEVEN NUISANCE PROPERTY

YOU'LL REMEMBER THIS IS THE

AMENDMENT THAT WAS TIMELY

CIRCULATED A WHILE AGO BUT

OVERLOOKED BY ALL AND NOT

INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA SO WOULD

LIKE TO SEE THAT MOTION TO

ADOPT THE MOKI IF IT PASSES

WITH FIVE VOTES IT WILL STAY ON

PENDING FOR THIS WEEK AND FINAL

FOR NEXT WEEK IF IT'S ADOPTED

WITH FOUR VOTES IT WILL BE

DEFERRED ONE WEEK TILL BEYOND

THAT IT CAME OKAY THANK YOU.

OKAY. YEAH SPEAK TO THEM A

LITTLE BIT AND APPRECIATE THE

PATIENCE IN THIS ORDINANCE DOES

NOT HAVE TO GO INTO EFFECT

UNTIL JAN ONE, 2027 SO OKAY

WITH THE GO AND I KNOW THAT

YOU'RE HAPPY TO CALL GOOD BUT

THESE CHANGES REALLY CAME FROM

A SPEEDY AND LEGAL IT DID

CLARIFY AND IT WAS AN

ACCIDENTAL DELETION AROUND

UNDER THE SECTION OF GOOGLE

RELATED ACTIVITY INCLUDE USING

AS WELL AS DELIVERING FILLING,

STORING OR GUESSING IT AT AND

CLARIFYING DEFINITIONS AROUND

ABANDONED PROPERTY PERSON IN

CHARGE. IT ALSO THINK SOME OF

THE LANGUAGE AND MOVED IT

AROUND AROUND IF A PERSON WAS

POTENTIALLY YOU KNOW DEALING

WITH A SPEEDY OFFICER OR CODE

ENFORCEMENT ONE ISSUE THAT CAME

UP THAT I THINK A SPEEDY AND

COULD FORESEE IN CITY LEGAL

TROUBLE IS KIND OF THE IS

COMPLIANCE AND THEN HAVING AN

EASY OUT SO IF THERE IS

CONTINUING ACTIVITY RESULTING

FROM A FAILURE TO ABIDE BY AN

ABATEMENT AGREEMENT AND THERE

WOULD BE A CIVIL INFRACTION

BREACH BETWEEN THE INFECTIVITY

AND THEN OFF AGAIN KEEPING THE

AMOUNT OF THE IF ANY PERSON

CHARGED FAILED TO RESPOND TO

THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR DESIGNEE

WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AS OPPOSED TO

THE CURRENT TEN DAY TAKING

MOTION AND SECOND ON THE

AGGREGATE AND THING I I YOU

KNOW COME COMFORT AND I'D LIKE

TO MAKE A MOTION TO KEEP IT ON

THE PENDING AGENDA BECAUSE I

BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN ALL RIGHT

I THINK DOING OKAY YOU MAKE IT

KEEP IT ON THE KIND OF I JUST

THINK THAT BECAUSE I BELIEVE

THE RULES ARE NOT CLEAR AND SO

I WILL BE MAKING A POINT EVERY

DAY MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE MAKING

A MOTION TO HAVE CLARITY AROUND

THE DATE BECAUSE IT'S NOT CLEAR

I THINK YOU CAN CAN WE GET HOME

GOING OFF OF THE AGENDA THAT

INDICATED THAT THERE WERE FIVE

VOTES IT WOULD BE ON EFFECTIVE

DATE FOR VOTE. IT WOULD BE ON

THE COUNCIL. I DON'T BELIEVE

THAT ACTUALLY IN THE RULE. SO

I'M MAKING A MOTION TO MAKE

CLARITY HOW WE'RE DOING. YEAH,

I THINK ALTHOUGH I DO

APPRECIATE THAT BECAUSE I THINK

PART OF THE CHALLENGES THAT WE

HAVE HAD IS THE DATE WHEN YOU

ARE TRYING TO THE DATE AND

CERTAINLY CLEAR THAT WE ARE

MEANING THAT I THINK THAT IS

THAT IS CRITICAL. SO THANK YOU.

YEAH BAKING IT RIGHT IF YOU CAN

I CAN DO IT AGAIN FAVOR THE

SECOND DO WE HAVE A SECOND TO

THAT OKAY EATING OKAY IN

KEEPING ON THE AGENDA FOR

NOVEMBER 4TH IF ANY I THINK I I

I YOU KNOW AT STAKE [name] THAT

COMPLETES DINNER WITH YOU. I'LL

MAKING A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF

MODIFY FOR THE IN THE SECOND OF

THE WEEK INDICATE BY THING I I

YOU KNOW I THINK IN THE AGENDA

IS MODIFIED WE ARE NOW GOING TO

GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION WITH

P AND TAKE A LITTLE GEEKY AND

FOR ME TO GET HERE BE A TECHIE

WE WILL BE GOING INTO A CLOSED

SESSION AND AFTER THAT STARTING

AT NOON TO DISCUSS FLAVOR OF

THE NEGOTIATIONS. SO IF WE IF

THE EXECUTIVE SESSION YOU KNOW

DOESN'T LAST, YOU KNOW, 20, 35

MINUTES, THEN I'LL PROBABLY DO

A BREAK AND THEN WE'LL GO INTO

A CLOSED SESSION AND YOU'LL SEE

I KNOW I CAN E OKAY. OKAY. I

WILL NOW GOING TO GET

A