2026-11-05 - Civil Service Commission
Summary
Built from the YouTube auto-generated caption transcript only. Auto-captions are imperfect, so numbers may be misheard; speakers are not identified here. No agenda or minutes were read. Personnel matters are described at process level only.
- Opening: the meeting was called to order for November 2026 after some audio and livestream setup; roll call showed the commissioners, the city attorney, HR staff, a police sergeant and the interim police chief present.
- Public comment: one emailed comment from October 23 was summarized. The commission has stopped listing disqualified applicants by name in public records and uses candidate ID numbers instead; the feedback was positive, and a former applicant asked that previously posted records be updated. After consulting legal counsel, HR will work backward to replace names with candidate IDs in posted documents. Past recordings will not be redacted.
- Minutes: October minutes were approved with a minor correction to a name spelling; the vote was unanimous.
- Interim police chief: the interim chief, who is also the permanent assistant chief, introduced himself, described his career and ties to the community, and said he wants to build trust with the commission so routine matters can move more smoothly. He said he expects to name an acting assistant chief within a day or so.
- Workforce analysis (CPSM): the consultant's study is complete and sent to the publishers; a draft is expected within a week or two for the city manager and HR to review for gaps (for example, how findings fit the collective bargaining agreement and civil service rules). The commission expects to see the final report around mid to late December.
- Appeal: an appeal of a removal from the police eligibility list was withdrawn and the hearing canceled; no action was needed.
- Eligibility list changes: the commission went into a roughly 10 minute executive session under the state open meetings act (RCW 42.30.110) on two disqualifications from the entry-level police officer list. Back in open session it voted to disqualify two candidates, identified by ID number only. Other removals from the entry-level, lateral and community service officer lists were withdrawals or hires by this or another agency.
- Certifications: the commission certified, by unanimous voice votes, the entry-level police officer, lateral police officer and community service officer eligibility lists.
- Police staffing report: the department has nine openings. Backgrounds, field training and oral boards are underway (oral boards the following week). Plans include recruiting at public safety testing sites, refreshing the recruiting kiosk at the military out-processing center, community events and school outreach, and employee referrals. The chief said the department would rather run short than fill slots with poor fits. Applicants must be 21 at commissioning. The city will invite the department to a November 18 job fair at Clover Park. The department gets roughly 10 to 20 new names weekly from public safety testing.
- Detective list and patrol staffing: the detective eligibility list is expiring and cannot be extended; retesting is likely after the first year of 2027 because the department lacks capacity to promote now. Officers were reassigned so patrol starts 2027 with all 42 positions filled.
- Applicant demographics: HR presented third quarter hire data and applicant and interview pie charts by gender, ethnicity and state of origin, compared with 2020 census figures for the city. The chief said applicant demographics are close to the city, aims for the workforce to reflect the community without lowering hiring standards, and discussed the 30 by 30 initiative, early outreach, and recruiting from outside Washington. A commissioner asked for actual counts rather than percentages and a continuous view from applicant pool through hiring; HR said it will work toward combining its data sources. A count on the community service officer list was corrected by one.
- Other: a commissioner asked why a police captain was not present; the sergeant said he can cover. Commissioners discussed a recent annual training on civil service law and suggested it be mandatory for new commissioners, to be discussed next month. The city manager plans a permanent police chief recruitment after the new year. The meeting was adjourned.
Agenda
No agenda located for this meeting.
Sources
- YouTube auto-generated caption transcript (redacted below)
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObwiLwgbpIw (City of Lakewood YouTube channel)
- Town: Lakewood
Video
Transcript
YouTube auto-generated captions, lightly redacted: names of staff, commissioners, candidates, applicants, hires and other individuals, candidate ID numbers, and personal details are removed or generalized.
Transcript
Oh, no. I unmuted us on the um
boomerang thing.
Okay.
And streaming live on YouTube. Okay,
we're good.
>> All right. You ready?
>> We're ready.
>> We're ready.
>> All right. So
our meeting's going to be called to
order for the Lakewood Civil Service
Commission uh
meeting today
for November and
present
Wow.
>> Not your meeting anymore.
>> I think the YouTube needs to be muted.
>> There's a little delay and
>> Yeah, that's a delay.
>> You don't even have to talk.
>> [laughter]
>> Done.
>> Hey, they're talking for you.
>> If you go into the screen where it's
actually showing, there'll probably be a
volume option in there.
And we can probably
>> So we officially called the order when I
called the order again.
>> Okay.
Testing, testing.
>> Sounds great.
>> Okay, much quieter.
>> Oh, there we go.
Give me up there.
All right. So our meeting is going to be
called to order
for the Lakewood Civil Service
Commission meeting meeting for the month
of November
2026.
And with us today for roll call,
myself, a commissioner,
a commissioner on the end
here, and a commissioner.
Our city attorney is with us today.
She's not built in the room right now,
but [name] is with us today.
HR analyst [name]
and
HR director, chief of civil service
examiner [name].
Police sergeant [name]
and
acting interim police interim police
chief
[name]. So
we're all here for today and
and we'll be moving on to our
first thing first item of Oh, actually
we have a public comment
from October 23rd. Is that right?
>> Thanks, [name].
>> So on our first item here on the after
the call to order
the public comment October 23rd, 2026
email submission
a public name redaction.
I'm going to speak to that.
>> Do you have the actual actual email do
you want to summarize?
>> Summarize.
>> Okay, so we did get feedback on our
change of our process of how we
are no longer putting disqualification
names in the public records, but we're
referencing using a candidate ID number.
Um, we got positive feedback from making
that change as well as somebody who was
a former
applicant who had been disqualified
requesting to have their records that
were posted um updated to use the
candidate ID number. So we worked with
legal and confirmed that is something
that we can do. So the HR team is going
to be working on going backwards to um
replace some of those records with
candidate ID numbers versus names.
>> And I want to be clear, if somebody
pulled something off the site or
something if that name had been in there
previously, people have the name because
of the way we were doing it. But going
forward it will be a number.
>> Right. And recordings and stuff, we are
not going to
redact any sort of former recordings,
but as far as the posted documents, um
like we can make those updates. So that
was the request. We were able to to
grant the request and are working on
kind of that retroactive
patient.
>> Good.
Thank you.
It's the first time I've seen a public
comment on here in a since I've been
here.
Okay, that's good though. Somebody's
watching.
Um,
next uh we'll be looking for our our at
our minutes
and uh from October.
Everybody had an opportunity to look at
those minutes and we have a motion.
>> Yeah, I move to approve them uh just as
error of my last name. That's all. It's
an E.
>> Got your name?
>> E. [name].
>> Second.
>> All right. So
with the adjustment.
>> I was like your name was wrong too.
>> [laughter]
>> We're batting zero.
[laughter]
All right, it's been moved and seconded
to approve the uh minutes uh from
October 1st. All those in approval say
aye.
>> Aye.
>> None opposed.
Moving on.
All right, so we are moving down to our
unfinished business of today
is our introduction of our interim
police chief.
[The interim police chief introduces himself and describes his law enforcement career and ties to the community; personal and family details omitted.]
>> I officially would like to thank you for
being here and taking this job
>> Thank you.
>> being here with our city.
>> Yeah,
I'm excited to be here.
>> Again we all thank you for for being
coming on board and
looking forward to you know what you're
serving the community here.
If there's one thing about Lakewood that
you have to say hey this is why I love
Lakewood what would it be?
>> One thing why
so one of the biggest things
two things
it's
when I left the county and went to Fife
super awkward super cool opportunity
but truly the one thing that I missed
was the the the level of community
right?
Fife's a unique community because where
most of it's all commercial
and so I missed
like the community events there was only
like one or two main events in the city
of Fife
so when one of the
truly one of the things that even drew
me to the city of Lakewood
back in 2010 was the community
and then on top of that
it's a unique diverse community as well
which I love right? So that's that's
what draws me to the city of Lakewood is
the the
the bigness that's not even a word
how big the community is as far as like
the population goes we do have
commercial stuff but it's mostly you
know we do have a lot of residential as
But I love the diversity and the melting
pot type
atmosphere of of Lake Linden. It reminds
me of where I grew up.
Grown up on the East Side is nothing but
diversity.
I love it.
[Brief personal conversation about growing up in the area; omitted.]
>> Well, thank you.
>> Yep.
>> Thank you.
>> Good introduction.
Appreciate that.
>> I have one question.
How often do you plan on dropping into
Arby's?
>> As frequently as I can.
Right now it's a a I have a unique
dynamic,
right? I am the permanent assistant
chief,
uh but I'm also filling the role as the
chief. And so my calendar gets full
pretty quick. Um
I don't want to take away from what
[name] already does here,
um but I but I truly am invested in what
we are doing as an agency, so
uh and Civil Service is a big part of
that. So
what I my goal
is to continue to build on
um what the department has already done,
but the trust of the Civil Service
Commission with the department that we
are following the things that we need to
be doing so that there is a bigger trust
between the Civil Service Commission and
us. And so it's versus like, hey, we
want to do this, and you're instead of
going, well, we need to meet talk about
that, we'll get to a point where it's
oh, okay, take care of it, right? It's,
you know, so
that's my goal.
>> Thank you.
>> Yeah.
>> All right.
All right, so next on our unfinished
business looks like uh
CPSM workforce analysis, contract and
project update.
>> We're still waiting to go forward.
>> So we did get an email. I guess I can
take that one All right. I did get an
email from
uh one of the main uh folks that came to
do the CPSM study and uh the study is
complete has been set to the sent to the
publishers and that was earlier in this
week. So we should see it early next
week or early the following week
uh as far as uh
as far as what that looks like. City
manager and I had a a verbal debrief,
but we're
we're anticipating to see what that full
uh written product is at the end of it.
>> And it's not unusual in a situation like
this that we'll take a look at it and if
we feel like they're just missing a
piece, like did you guys not look at
this or how did you take this that way?
And it
some of that stuff out so that the final
report
we feel comfortable that we know what
they mean, we know what they're saying,
we know uh that anyone reading it would
read it the same way kind of thing. So
it may take a minute after we get it to
just look at it, digest it, and figure
out if they covered bases.
>> Well, and even talking with CPSM the
what we're what we're going to get
either next week or the following is the
draft.
>> Right.
>> And then the city manager and I can
review it
and we can like just like the city attorney said
that we can
make sure that the things that we need
covered in there are covered as well.
>> Sometimes they'll miss things like well,
our collective bargaining
agreement says this, how do you
anticipate implementing that given the
civil or the collective bargaining
agreement or if they've missed something
about our Civil Service Rules
>> Will the
draft be provided to us or we can wait
till the final prior to it provided to
us for reading it?
>> The final.
>> Yeah, it will be the final review.
>> So we're not they were not expecting to
look at it until December, mid to late
December?
>> I would I would say that is probably
safe, yes.
>> Anything else?
The commission noted that an appeal of a removal from the police eligibility list had been withdrawn, so the scheduled hearing was canceled and no action was needed.
>> All right. No problem with that. Removal
of names
of entry-level police officer
eligibility list.
We only have I'm sorry.
>> Go ahead. I was going to move that we go
into executive session.
>> Yes.
>> Uh looks like we just have two
disqualifications.
So we can complete that in 10 minutes.
>> I have a question prior to going into
We have
is there anything
wrong with us going over all of the
removals or do we have to do them one at
a time?
>> We can go over all the removals at the
same time.
>> Yeah.
>> But we only have removals on the
>> entry level
>> There's only two.
>> The other ones have a reason
>> But yes, as long as
you know you say what the reason is
>> Since we're going to leave, we can just
kind of meet and
>> Sorry, she was asking questions about
the
>> Oh, but we're going to step out.
>> Yeah, we're going to step out.
>> Yeah.
>> We'll go over the
>> Right.
>> And then we have the lateral
>> But they're they're not too complicated.
>> Okay, so we're just going to do the DQs.
>> Yes.
>> Yeah.
Yeah, because the other ones
>> What?
>> No problem.
>> I like to take one executive session
myself, so
>> All right. So we will recess into
executive session for 10 minutes?
>> 10 minutes.
>> Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110
1G
Am I wrong here?
>> No, I didn't know whether I we had
properly given you the script on it.
>> Oh, I I I can read.
>> I
>> I
>> I
>> I
>> I think not long ago I was at a wedding.
Funny when you start getting invited to
all these weddings from your former
athletes.
>> Yeah.
>> You're getting old.
>> All right.
>> All right.
I saw
coming back in the order and
I've gone over
Back in open session, a commissioner moved to disqualify one candidate, identified by ID number only, from the entry-level police officer eligibility list; the motion was seconded and carried.
>> That
So the other the other candidates on
this list are withdrawals and hires.
>> All the other candidates on the
entry level. entry level
Okay. And then
we'll move to the lateral.
>> And just making notification that the
two candidates on this list were hired
by another agency.
>> Two candidates hired by another agency
on the lateral list.
All right.
Removal of names on the CSO community
service officer eligibility.
>> The two candidates being removed were
hired.
>> All right.
Not Not thing.
All right. And then the um
certification
of the entry level
police officer eligibility list.
>> I move to certify the entry level police
officer eligibility list.
>> Move it.
>> Second.
>> And seconded.
We have any discussion?
No?
All right.
So all of them in favor of uh certifying
the entry level police officer
eligibility list, say aye. Aye.
And uh moving on to our certification of
the lateral uh level police officer
eligibility list.
>> I move to certify the lateral level of
police officer eligibility list.
Second.
>> And moving the seconded
for the lateral police officer
eligibility list. All those in favor,
say aye. Aye.
So moved. So accepted.
Um
certification of the CSO eligibility
list, the community service officer
eligibility list.
>> I move to certify the community service
officer eligibility list.
Second.
>> Moved and seconded the community service
officer eligibility list. All those in
favor, say aye. Aye.
That's been
unanimously approved.
Now we're done with the new business.
We'll move to the police chief's
staffing report.
>> Do we actually uh
I actually think we have a lot of things
going on. When I get emails saying, hey
chief, like all of our background
investigators are doing backgrounds.
All of our FTOs or PTOs are in the
process of working with folks.
That's actually a really good thing in
my eyes. So we do currently have nine
openings.
And we are
and then on top of that,
we've had discussions in our command
staff meetings about what are we doing
as far as recruiting goes.
So the cool thing is is that when I get
an email last night from one of our
officers who say, hey chief, I had a guy
that came and did a ride along with me
and he's in the pro or he has an
interview set up with a neighboring
agency, but he really wants to work for
the city of Lakewood.
Right? He's already tested. He's already
put his name on our list. We can
actually pull that information and
get him invited. In fact, the HR analyst and I
had that that conversation, get him
invited to the next round of oral
boards,
which are next week. Is that right,
the HR analyst? Next week. So
so as far as our staffing goes, yes, we
are down nine. We do have some folks
that are on modified duty or out on LNI
injuries.
But we are feverishly working in this
game
I almost liken it to the transfer portal
in NCAA football right now.
As far as we got new freshmen coming in.
And then we've got these guys that are
already and who who's looking for the
best fit for them, right? You can be at
the Georgia's, you can be at the
Tacoma's,
but that might not be a good fit. And if
we can attract folks to come over to
Lakewood,
then then we're going to do as much as
we can to do that.
Our biggest advocate and our biggest
recruiters are our own people.
Right? And again, like I said, I got the
email last night
from one of our officers who had nothing
but great things to say about this
candidate that he had a ride along with
him.
But on the flip side of that, he also
had nothing but great things to to
convey to this
this candidate about working in the city
of Lakewood.
And so
that's
So as far Everybody's working,
everything including HR, who's working
probably harder than we are,
because we are refining the process to
help streamline some streamline some
things to get
the process a little bit more in a good
flow from the time they hire with PST
to the time that we have an oral board
to go through the background, to go
through professional testing,
and the day they start or get hired with
the with the police department.
We are unlike any other industry where
I can apply to go work at Costco, which
by the way would probably be where I'm
going to work when I retire because
I probably won't be able to check
receipts because there'd be the backup
going all the way to because I'd
probably be asking about everybody's
stuff.
But I
when you apply there, you get an
interview.
And you start probably within a couple
days.
Unfortunately for us,
it is incumbent upon all the work that
our background units are doing to make
sure that we're just not filling the bus
with people and just filling spots just
to fill spots,
but it's to get the right fit for our
agency. There are some people that we
will I would venture to say that we will
disqualify
that may work out at a different agency
as a police officer.
They're just not a good fit for the city
of Lakewood and for the standards and
expectations that we have here.
And as I get a little bit more
outside of the 120-day window that I've
been here,
there will be more clear expectations
and what we what our standards are, what
our expectations are as far as And we
They're already there that we have a
great department.
But anytime that there's change in
executive leadership, there's always
change in in standards and in
expectations. So
to me, it's not about just the bus, but
it's getting the right people on the
bus.
And so,
I can't say enough good things about
HR
and our background unit,
PTOs, and our just our officers who are
everyday making contact with folks and
doing their own recruiting in their own
way. Now, one of the things that we will
be doing is recruiting is going out to
the public safety testing sites
and having we get an opportunity to get
like I call them elevator conversations
where we can
it's it's our most bang for our buck
when it comes to recruiting because
they're already there taking a test to
become a police officer,
but they didn't necessarily consider
Lakewood because they
weren't 100% sure that we were hiring
or they just had never really talked to
anybody about the police department.
If we could send folks to those testing
sites
and we could say, hey, come to us and
here's all the great things about the
Lakewood Police Department. Here's all
the great things about the Lakewood
community,
then we get that actually will add
qualified candidates to our list as well
that we have an opportunity to
interview.
So,
>> I know officer held that a couple of
years ago was kind of a recruiter
for us.
[clears throat]
But I know with the change in that
they needed
her around as but it it was very
successful to help
So, when I
I go based off of experiences I've had
at other agencies. One of and again one
of the biggest things that we had
success with
was sending people out to the public
safety testing
and our own officers advocated for their
own department.
And I and I would venture to say that
you if you did a straw poll with our
officers,
they'd rather go short than just fill
the slots just to fill slots.
>> Yeah.
>> Right? And because once we fill slots,
it's hard for us, especially if we get
problematic officers or officers who
create challenges for the city or for
the department, it's a little a a bit
more challenging to
send them on their way
than it is for us to correct behavior
or just not start with the problem to
begin with. So
unfortunately right now we don't have
the staffing to have dedicated
recruiters.
But again everybody that wears a
Lakewood patch, drives a Lakewood car
and is out at the Lakewood Town Center,
one of the things you guys will be
seeing is that we're
I don't drink coffee. So coffee with a
cop or coffee with a chief
>> They should start They should start
that. I'm just letting you know.
>> No.
It just seems like un un genuine. So but
I eat chicken wings.
And so I was In fact I got wings
yesterday cuz it was Wingstop Wednesday
at the PD.
It's kind of like Taco Tuesday.
But it was Wingstop Wednesday and I I
was like man what a
Oh you did that. Thank you. So what a
cool thing, right? To like we're going
to cuz there's several places throughout
the city that I know to sell wings and
I'm and I'm a wing connoisseur.
And so we're going to
but those are the kind of things where
we're where we're going to have our
recruiting at. There's a process and out
processing center on JBPM
that a lot of places have. There are
places as far as as San Diego PD that
have their own little kiosk set up there
with a QR code that says scan this, come
work for San Diego PD. Now Lakewood has
a hard time competing with San Diego PD
because it's San Diego.
If I weren't working in Lakewood and my
wife I could convince my wife to move to
San Diego and I could afford to live in
San Diego cuz the city attorney knows how expensive
it is to move one of her daughters down
there.
But I would go to San Diego in a
heartbeat, right? Cuz it's 70 degrees
year round. However,
here we are in Lakewood and we're going
to have that same that same kiosk for a
lot of the folks that get moved here
from JBPM because we have a good
population in the PD
that have all
spent their time whether it's at McCord
or whether it's at Fort Lewis.
They come out and now they're now
they're working for the city of Lakewood
and the Lakewood Police Department. So
>> So does that has that not
>> been in place before?
>> It has, but not as not as a permanent
thing or it has, but it's outdated. So,
our process is getting it updated,
getting it refreshed so that that all of
the information is current. So,
and I don't remember what the name of
the center is called, but it's
Do you remember that?
[name], [name] is the one
working on that cuz he has connections
with whoever is in charge of that out
processing center.
So, that's one of the things that we're
doing. And then just sending our
officers to the public safety testing
sites.
So,
yep.
>> So, that's why we haven't been seeing
you guys at the high schools.
>> That's
>> See you guys for the recruiters out
there all the time. We We haven't seen
you in a little bit. So, capacity.
>> So, so capacity, but we also
also communication.
Right? We have capacity to do community
events.
But the communication piece goes both
ways. We need to do a better job
communicating. Hey, when are these
events? Right? And that's on us.
But then also we established a good
working relationship with the school
district. Cool part is [name] and I
grew up five doors down from each other
in the back in back in the day. He was a
senior, I was a freshman.
And so I actually know Ron is a
childhood friend. So,
we've met a couple times, at least once,
and then I saw him on the football field
cuz I again I officiate high school
football.
And so
increasing communication relationships
is the biggest part of our
recruiting too is a big part of our
recruiting.
>> How do we get the information to give
the high school counselors or whoever
to contact?
>> You could start by me.
That's my contact info. Scan that.
>> Do you have to be You have to be 21 be
21 at the time of hire?
>> You have to be the time You have to be
21 at the time of commissioning.
>> Oh, so you could go through your
training at 20.
>> So, I have I have successfully hired two
20 year olds that have been 20 at the
time they're in the academy, but they
have to be 21 by the time they graduate
from the academy.
>> Okay.
[Chief describes the academy age requirement and hiring of young recruits; personal details omitted.]
>> So we have I don't know if this is on
your your list, November 18th.
>> Mhm.
>> We have uh
a job career job fair over at Clover
Park. Do you know if you guys have
anybody on there? If not, I will have
someone reach out to you, but
>> We don't, but will you will you reach
out?
>> Absolutely. I will have them add you
guys to the list.
>> Yeah, we'll figure it out.
>> See if they're all the time.
>> Yeah.
>> Thank you.
>> Anything else, Chief? We good?
>> We good.
>> What's the supposed detective?
>> About four different detectives, Chief.
>> Oh, four different things you took by
surprise.
>> Yeah, no you you you got everything
except for the police detective the last
one.
>> Well, I thought that was for the next
Oh, I guess this is for this Oh, cuz it
was this year. I don't know.
Uh welcome to my very first civil
service meeting. Uh
and you can talk to anybody sitting on
this side of the table. I'm probably a
little bit more unorthodox than Welcome
to the new Chief. Um so the acting
assistant Chief update
um standby for
that. I have had several conversations
in the last two weeks
um with a lot of different people at
different varying levels, whether it's
at the city, whether it's in the
department,
uh they're at positions of rank or
whether they're not ranking of
positions. So I will tell you I am the
permanent assistant chief,
interim chief. As everybody knows,
doing both roles is not sustainable at
this level of the department.
Um so it is very important that uh in
the next I would say that in the next 24
hours I will most likely have an acting
assistant chief
um
but not necessarily ready to announce
any of the details of that.
I talked about three and then the
detective eligibility
list extension. So
um
we just move into have this extended to
the 26 Oh, because it is
I think it's just informational.
>> Yeah.
>> It's
It can't be extended anymore, but it's
just that the register is going to be
coming down.
>> It's expiring in four days, two days.
>> Two days.
>> Third
fourth fifth two days, one day.
Two days.
Two days expiring.
>> It's expiring.
>> [laughter]
>> All right. And we And we are aware of
that, but we have made some personnel
changes to fully stop patrol
um to make sure that in 2027
that we are starting with We have 42
positions to bid in patrol, our patrol
division, which is the ones who handle
911 and everything else.
We are starting the year with 42 people
in those positions.
We have taken positions. We have taken
officers from other areas
to make sure that we're starting the
year with a full patrol division. And
then as we add
positions throughout the year, we will
start replacing them with where we
borrowed them from within the PD. So
um
yeah. So So we will retest
after the first year, we're most likely
retesting for a detective eligibility
list, but there's no need for us to
retest for it right now cuz we just
don't have the capacity to to move
anybody.
And then the the other thing, the
question that came up is there was um I
think that's number
>> I think it might be bleeding into your
report
>> Oh, I'll let you do that.
>> Yeah.
Uh
well, I'm just going to address what you
have. Um and this is part of the
citywide EEO data that we look at. So
part of your packet has our quarter
three hires to show department um
ethnic code, hire date, uh and position
title. So um we have this kind of as a
snapshot um
we have the data that she's going to go
over and for the future we'll work on
kind of how how we can present the the
um
data we get from PST, our data that we
collect in NeoGov, and our data of our
current employees um
you know, that are are not just our our
candidates to create kind of that full
picture of of the candidate pool who
we're engaging with as as candidates and
then who what the the overall makeup of
the
um department looks like.
>> Me?
>> You can go. Yeah.
>> So um first of all, I got to give all
the credit to the HR analyst on this because
this is not something that I would have
created um or
not necessarily had the capacity to
create at this point. Um but what it
does is it breaks down what we're doing
as far as recruiting goes from public
safety testing and who we're
interviewing.
One thing that I do want to talk about
is the the first one we'll talk about is
the gender. If you are not aware, there
is a national movement, a national
initiative I should say, not necessarily
a movement, and it's called 30 by 30.
And what that is is it's the a goal of
trying to reach 30% female officers by
the year 2030.
Um now that's a national initiative, not
necessarily broken down to um saying hey
and it's not required, it's not anything
else, but we recognize as an industry
that we are um that our female officers
uh grossly are under underrepresented
when it comes to uh positions within
police departments. Um so there is that
initiative and again it goes back to
recruiting and it goes back to in
intentional recruiting.
And uh which also goes back to high
schools. It goes back to middle schools.
Truly for me, recruiting and this is
touching on recruiting and also touches
on this too, but um our recruiting
should be starting in the middle
schools, right? And unfortunately, we
don't see the fruits of those labors
until they're to that 18 19 20 year old.
And the reason why I say in middle
school is because there are some
communities where
folks don't understand that first of
all, they're not having positive
experiences at home with the law
enforcement agencies because we don't
just knock on your we don't go door to
unfortunately, we don't go door to door
handing out popsicles and like coupons
for Slurpees at 7-Eleven. Right? We're
coming at times of crisis. We're coming
at negative experiences and so um
depending on what kids are being told at
those younger ages will steer them
directions away from or maybe even
towards a career in law enforcement.
Depends on what their upbringing is.
Um so if we can create positive
experiences for our younger populations
at a younger age, it's always going to
be in the back of their head, but we
have to get down to those younger kids
and say this is an option for you.
Right?
Um growing up in my neighborhood, I
didn't know that being a cop was like we
were all afraid of the school police
department anyway. Um and so it I didn't
know it was an option. My dad was a
federal agent. Um but I truly as I got
into my career,
we can get into all of the different
communities within our community and
say, hey, you know what? This is a good
career. First of all, all you have to
have is a high school diploma because
everybody wants to go to college and
everybody can afford to go to college.
High school diploma and this is what's
this is what has provided for my family
over the years.
Total another story off topic and I
won't even share it in this meeting, but
it's funny and I'll tell you it's one of
my kids made a funny comment to me one
time,
um, about having a dead-end job. And uh,
so um, it it I'll tell you after the
meeting's done. So um, so it's
deliberate, intentional recruiting at a
younger age,
but we're we're also having to do that
now.
Um, and so we're working on that. One of
the cool things that I and and this was
the HR analyst just typed this in. She put it
in, it popped up this chart, and as she
was popping up this pie chart, I also
looked up the 2020 census,
right? Because I was curious,
because I also think it's very important
that our police department represents
the community that we police,
right? When it comes to
um,
like ethnical backgrounds, right? And so
when you pull up the 2020 census, it's
not exact, but it's pretty close
as far as the demographics of our city
and the demographics of who we're
currently recruiting and interviewing
for jobs right now,
right? These percentages are almost
they're pretty close. I'm not and again,
I'm not saying they're they're exact,
but they're pretty close to the
percentages as far as our our white
Caucasian population, our African
American black population, um, Pacific
Islanders, um, you know, all of that. So
which I thought was
and I hadn't hadn't looked at that until
we were talking in a meeting, um, and it
was actually very refreshing. Now I will
tell you if you go back in the history
of the Lakewood Police Department, it
always hasn't been that way,
right?
And I think there are some contributing
factors to that because if you go back
to 2004 when the Lakewood Police
Department was was truly being formed,
we were the the folks that were here and
taking all of there was thousands of
applications that were coming in here.
Have you been here since 2004? I can't
remember.
>> 10.
>> Okay. So in 2004 there was thousands of
applications coming in from all over the
country,
and they were handpicking everybody,
right?
>> Pierce County, right?
>> No, it was everywhere. It was everywhere
because it was a brand they did take a
lot of Pierce County deputies, but there
were a lot of Pierce County deputies
that were like, nope, I'm good at the
county, right? And so
um they were just hand picking things.
And I think what happened was is they
started hand picking because I actually
applied for an agency down in in Arizona
that was doing the same thing. But when
you start hand picking everything, all
of a sudden you look back and go, hey,
everybody looks like the same.
Right? Because it's who's picking. It's
it's just what they know, right? So the
cool part is is our recruiting is now
more our interviewing at least is now
more in line with the demographics of
our city.
>> I will just say by taking a lot Pierce
County we weren't pulling a lot of
university when we did that either.
>> [clears throat]
>> Yeah. So uh and you've been here for a
long the duration of that. Yeah.
A really long She I said 97 days and
then and then the city attorney went up me at the
last budget meeting.
Yes.
>> Oh no, you did that too.
>> She did that while we were sitting in
the meeting which was
>> Oh, I love that.
>> So then and then obviously the second
[Discussion of the states applicants come from, including one former officer on the lateral list; individual details omitted.]
So um but anyway, and then the other
ones are just all the numbers where it's
at. Uh I I'm a visual guy and the the
the pie chart actually works really well
for me. Um if you want to look at it in
the table.
>> That's Colorado.
>> Is that Colorado or is that which one
are we looking at?
>> That's square one.
>> Oh.
>> Sorry.
>> Yeah, I guess it is, right?
>> my position I just say yes, chief.
>> But it is interesting to see that there
are people from outside, but you know.
>> Um so the the challenge
>> that we have is in and as many of you
might know, um, we have a challenge of
recruiting
police officers outside of Washington
State to come back to Washington only
because of the political environment
that we have in Washington State.
I have an opportunity to travel
nationwide to different police events.
Um, and there are a lot of different
things politically
that are passed here in the state of
Washington that people other officers
are like, you guys can't do what in
Washington?
And and I said, you know, it's it's not
an abnormal thing. It's just it's the
rules that we live in in Washington
State and that's how we do police. It's
just different. One
>> you give an example?
>> Uh,
so drugs is one of them. Drugs is a big
one. So I
>> on vacation in Alabama at Auburn. My
daughter's one of my daughters is there.
They had the police guy come up and talk
and he literally said, who here is from
a state where marijuana is legal?
And basically what he's saying is if
your kid's drunk or whatnot, we'll get
them back to their dorm. We're not going
to do anything terrible. He goes
literally quote, you're in the buckle of
the Bible belt. Marijuana is
legal here. And he said, your kid'll get
over it, but they'll have a conviction
and there's nothing I can do about it
here. You You just need to understand
it's not legal. They don't want it to be
legal. They think we're crazy for having
it be legal. I mean, and it's it's such
a cultural difference that when you hear
that they think it's nuts up here, it's
it's not like
I don't even think it's about judging
our state. It's more just like it's so
different.
It's so foreign to anything that they're
doing in these other states.
>> So like right for right now for us for
our our guidelines as far as marijuana
goes, marijuana is classified almost the
same as alcohol.
>> Mhm.
>> Right? So at the time of hire,
when we send you to your medical, you
just cannot test positive for active
THC. We would like to see people like
maybe abandon that like during the
interviewing process, right? But at the
time of hire, as long as it's not
active, if you have carboxy THC in your
system,
I mean, that's a
conversation that we'd have to have, but
but I know carboxyl is just the it's the
metabolized version of of THC.
I know that's I shouldn't No, it's like
after after the THC goes into your body
and your body metabolizes it, it turns
into carboxyl THC. That's the whole DRE
in me like the drug recognition expert.
Way more information I probably need to
share, but like if you have it's
non-active THC essentially. It's already
been metabolized and used. It's still in
there.
Uh but it's still in your system. So
when you talk people talk about having
THC in their system for weeks at a time
or 10 15 20 days after, it's that
carboxyl THC. It's the digested THC
that's already been metabolized.
>> Another example would be a couple of
years ago you might have seen in the
paper about the legislature saying that
the doctors couldn't pursue.
>> Yes.
>> Right.
>> You know, and so things like that there
are states where that just
>> Yeah.
>> But they're different states. They they
are facing different challenges
>> Sure.
>> here.
>> And I And And I would tell you again
like the different examples like I sit
in big rooms with guys that I've from
the South is the South is a different
place to do policing,
right? And And And when they say, man,
that's just But to me I look at it and
say, so who's leading who?
Right? Are we leading the industry as
like actually making the
the changes and that are Now we've had
some changes that I think that went
swayed way in the wrong direction.
However, there are some other things
where you know where we do focus on
empathetic and compassionate policing,
which is you know with our outreach
folks and going and talking to homeless
folks and not necessarily having them up
and taking them to jail because they're
on the sidewalk, right? Now we
we need to spend some time and find some
solutions for that.
But it's just again it's just different
when
when we have folks from other states.
One of the things that we do we can
attract people to Washington state is
our rate of pay.
Right? So when they look and go, oh, you
know what? Well, but the what about the
cost of living is so much more
expensive. I was like, okay, so the cost
of living in Virginia is like cheaper
than Washington state. think so. We pay
way more than they do in Virginia.
Right? And they just have to Somehow
there's that like that Mason Dixon line
of trying to get west of that, right? Or
the the Mississippi, whatever you want
to say it is, that in the middle of the
country somehow they they have a hard
time coming back over to the west. So um
but we but we do have enough people to
live in Washington state. Our
recruitment list I think right now we're
getting anywhere from 10 to 20 people's
names added to our list at Public Safety
Testing every single week. So it's not
like we have a a shortage of people who
are applying to the city of Lakewood
or that they're sending their testing
scores to city of Lakewood.
Um
so
uh I think that's the update on on all
of that
unless you guys have further questions
on on any of those cuz I think that we
are heading in the right direction
and we are we are doing
These guys are doing amazing work, these
three, and I just get to sit and talk
about it. Probably talk too much about
it.
Um but it is something I'm very
passionate about.
Um and I truly feel that our police
officers
um do need to represent
the demographic of our city as well.
>> I think your passion comes through uh
because of how much you talk.
>> You guys are like this is the longest
civil service meeting we've ever had.
>> No, it's not.
>> You're like wait a second. Did I say how
often you're going to come to these
>> No, no, no. Not at all.
Not at all. I think to
to to that end I appreciate it because
it simplifies and you know we have a
clearer understanding of where you stand
on these things. So that that's
appreciative.
Appreciative.
And I did I'm sorry. Go ahead.
>> No, no, no. Go ahead.
No, I said of course I'm the one Well it
was with a question but I'll let you
finish.
>> Oh. No, I I was at questions. I just
process. Um the uh the only other
question I have for, actually, I think
all all you guys are doing. Um,
there's another, is one of the captains
supposed to be here normally?
>> Typically it's, well, [name] is
who I work for uh directly. He's in a,
he's got an interview he's doing right
now.
>> No problem, but it's been a few months.
So so my question is,
is that part of the process where he
needs to be within this
or do are we can we go with just you for
this?
>> You can, I'm okay with covering it
unless you guys feel a need to talk
about it.
>> I'm not talking to Chief, too.
>> Yeah yeah, I I don't mind uh covering
for him when he's not able to be here.
In reality, he
[clears throat] he doesn't have as much
of a hand in the process as I do. Um, he
just got he's he's there as a as a
guidance, but I I tend to
I tend to do most of the
>> from the officer to chief,
sergeants can do exactly what uh
sergeants already do.
Right? And and captain captain has some
captain responsibilities.
>> Mhm.
>> And most of the time this is a this is
perfect for sergeant level stuff unless
>> That's fine. I just wanted to why why is
captain's name on here to be to be here.
>> Good question.
>> Uh today today he did, there was a last
minute scheduling of a meeting that he
had to take care of.
>> Yeah, there's nothing against him
either.
>> Yep yep yep yep
yep yep.
>> So my question is um coming back to your
statement regarding demographics, that
was one of the comments and questions
that I've been bringing up. So what is
your, I I think I heard you say that
you're comfortable with where it's at.
So and I'm looking at this and I'm I'm
I'm wondering what are the actual
numbers
because I'm not
I mean I'm I can see it, but it's not
giving me actual numbers unless, I mean
I'm even looking back here.
>> Just said just percentages?
>> Yeah, so
um
[Chief gives general examples of recent and in-process hires from varied backgrounds; names and personal details omitted.]
>> So my question is
what are your expectations? Are you
comfortable with this or do you have a
goal that you would like to reach uh, in
regards to the demographics?
>> I would my goal is that when when
someone does the if someone were to pull
our our staffing, our current staffing,
this is our recruiting, this is our
interviewing,
right? This reflects our department.
>> Okay.
>> And that our department
as best as we can
can reflect the demographics of our
city. And that and the only the only way
I can do that is from the census.
But the unfortunate thing is is that
this is great because these are the
people that are applying, these are the
people that we're interviewing.
At the end of the day, the unfortunate
thing is is that the ones that past
backgrounds
and the ones that we hire
that's where it comes a little bit
tougher
because we still have to
we have to make sure that we're still
getting the right people.
>> Quality, absolutely.
>> Yep.
>> So the recruiting is passing what you're
wanting, but the actual um, employee
is not
>> Got to dig deeper on that so that we're
so we're so that we are better where
we're at so that our actual hiring is
close to this as well.
>> We saw the numbers previously and
>> numbers didn't reflect. So that's why I
was curious
>> Cuz I saw the number I saw those
numbers.
>> but this is again they're from two
different places, correct?
>> Yep.
>> Right. So
so the actual
>> Right. So we need that continuity of
who were who's our overall pool, who's
applying, who are moving through our
process, and what the fallout and
attrition is of the different
>> And and and one of the biggest
challenges in that category
is when you go to gender.
>> Absolutely.
>> Right? Because when you have a male
dominant industry
and in trying to encourage females to
apply
some of them are like, ah, I don't know
if that's what I want to tackle in life,
right? So we can only interview who we
interview.
I think this is a little bit more
controllable.
This but again a lot of that stuff
is when we start having those the more
we build relationships with our
community
>> There you go.
>> the the
this stuff just falls into place because
people are excited to come to the police
department. They're they're like, man, I
want to do what that guy does or I want
to do what that girl does. And I and and
I honestly like I've been at the last
couple like huge community events. I've
seen more little girls that are like,
I'm going to be a police officer. And
[Chief mentions introducing young visitors at community events to a female SWAT officer; name omitted.]
>> Well, because of what the chief is
doing, I think we can also figure out
how does this change to who we hire? Is
it anything we can control for? Like as
we're going to schools, can we say to
kids, hey, here are things you can do
even now to make sure that you're a
great candidate when you come through?
Is it
>> Absolutely.
>> You know, is it physical testing? Is it
not understanding um how the oral
board's going to go? What is the thing
that's tripping some of those
candidates?
>> But it's also life choices that because
there are some life choices that will
unfortunately automatically disqualify
by you for a while.
>> But how great to tell them at an early
age. Here's another reason not to do
this because that's a door that's going
to close to you and we actually do look
at that when we hire. So sort of hearing
that.
>> And and one of the things that I
appreciate about the civil service is
that they do it is a checks and balances
because we can see this all day long
and then we say well we're just going to
like on this half of the circle what all
of a sudden there's all these
disqualifications from like our diverse
community, right? And it's like
well that doesn't make any sense.
Well yeah you're right it doesn't,
right? And all of a sudden this 54
becomes like 72 because I think at one
point back in 2004 was close to that.
Um
but I also am not willing to modify our
standards and expectations of new hires
>> Right.
>> just to have a pie graph look a certain
way.
Does that make sense?
>> Absolutely and I I I hope that by my
questions that does not
>> No not at all. I just
[A commissioner says the same service expectations apply to every officer and resident; personal details omitted.]
and every
person that works and lives in the city
of Lakeland is the same. I do not and I
do not expect and I do not want the
level of service
to get
um
er
eroded because of an expectation. We can
get to both but we just have to make
sure we don't lose sight
>> Right.
>> of what we're trying to get to.
>> That's why we're here.
>> to both.
>> That's why we're here.
>> It's called
intentional
recruiting.
>> Absolutely.
>> Yeah.
>> Absolutely.
>> Yeah.
>> Are we okay with time or are we good?
>> you.
Do we have anyone under after this room?
Okay.
>> Okay about somebody who's coming in
that's why
>> Well, that was
yeah, the
What time
[laughter]
It doesn't matter.
>> No, we're good. We're good.
We're good.
>> Okay. I know on the agenda I saw 9:30 to
11:30and I know I have a hard 11:30
stop, so y'all are good. Thank you.
>> I'm done talking unless anybody got more
questions.
>> This is good. Again, I think the the
training that that we got that's my
first training that I I've been through
at all since being here and I the city attorney
pointed me to the RCW's and those kind
of things and that was good.
But
I appreciate the city paying for that
and we will
discuss that maybe a little bit next
month about you know what we get out of
that.
And and I I think it should be for
anybody that's coming in to the
commission they should be
that should be mandatory.
But that they that they do that at least
at the beginning.
>> Yeah.
>> I imagine a commissioner's probably been through
that though.
>> No.
>> You have not?
>> That was the first time he's offered it.
>> Oh, well I didn't know that.
But
I think it's it's something that's
beneficial.
>> Like I said the expectations were I mean
mind blowing and I'm like wait a minute.
Maybe that's not something we do here in
Washington. [laughter]
>> So that's been going on for some time?
>> Yeah, it's an annual event and
>> And so why are we just hearing about it?
>> I don't know what to tell you on that
one. I really don't. I I have gone
occasionally over the years and I don't
know
why it wouldn't have been recommended or
why I didn't recommend it to you or
>> Well, we appreciate it at this point for
sure but
Yeah.
All right. Anything else?
This meeting is adjourned.
>> Oh, I did have one. No, no, no. No, no,
no. I want to make sure [name].
>> Oh,
just the only announcement I have is
city manager shared they're going to be
doing a permanent police chief
recruitment process after the new year.
So
>> Okay.
>> Yeah, Yeah. have one. I want to make
sure that have a point of clarification.
Sorry, I'm a numbers person.
On the community service officer
eligibility list, you marked seven, but
there are only six names on here. So
>> I removed I moved the the higher for why
I didn't
>> Because it said four males and three
females. So which which one was it?
>> So it would be the female.
It's the female because
>> Huh?
>> We have the female.
>> We have the female.
>> We have the female.
>> All right.
>> Yeah.
Yeah, we hired two officers and CSO on
Monday. So I updated it yesterday all
that. I had to go through their
orientation.
>> So on this, this is the one that's
reflective of So just subtract one from
here on here. Okay.
Just want to make sure
>> Yeah, I'll update it and yeah.
>> It's okay.
>> [laughter and clears throat]
>> I I did a lot this week.
>> No, I bet you did. I bet you did.
There's a lot going on. I think Yes.
>> Yeah.
>> Thank you guys very much.
