Old Hickory Boulevard Mixed-Use Rezoning

At a glance

What: BL2026-1506 rezones 14.03 acres at 610 Old Hickory Boulevard (110 feet west of Lombardia Lane) from RS5 and CS to Specific Plan to permit 33 single-family lots, 18 two-family lots and commercial uses (Proposal 2026SP-027-001). BL2026-1507 sets its building-material restrictions.
Where it stands: Passed third reading on September 15, 2026, 31 yes, 0 no, 1 abstain (Parker).

13181 Old Hickory Boulevard (BL2026-1411 and 1412): 4.97 acres at Twin Oaks Lane, AR2a to Specific Plan for a mixed-use development (Proposal 2025SP-046-001). August 4 public hearing: Council Member Lee requested it; citizens spoke for and against. Cortese moved to defer to August 18 but the motion died for lack of a second. Second reading passed by voice vote, Cortese voting no and Eslick and Styles abstaining. August 18 third reading: Lee offered Amendment No. 1 to BL2026-1411 (voice vote) and both bills passed 34 yes, 0 no, 1 abstain (Styles).
12802 Old Hickory Boulevard (BL2026-1484 and 1485): 3.6 acres, 148 feet southwest of Logistics Way, AR2a to Specific Plan for a mixed-use development (Proposal 2026SP-025-001). August 4 hearing requested by Styles; no one spoke; second reading passed by voice vote. Third reading came on the August 18 consent agenda (36-0-0).
610 Old Hickory Boulevard (BL2026-1506 and 1507): first reading August 4; the Planning Commission had approved with conditions and disapproved without conditions. Details below.

September 1 (second reading, public hearing): Council Member Hancock requested the hearing; no one spoke. Both bills passed by voice vote with Parker abstaining.
September 15 (third reading): The Planning and Zoning Committee approved both. Council Member Webb moved passage of each; 31-0-1 with Parker abstaining.
July 7 (first public-hearing date for 13181 Old Hickory Boulevard): Council Member Hill moved to defer BL2026-1411 and BL2026-1412 to the August 4 public hearing; approved by voice vote.
June 2 (first reading, 13181 Old Hickory Boulevard): BL2026-1411 and BL2026-1412 passed first reading on motion. The Planning Commission had approved both with conditions and disapproved them without conditions. Set for the next available public hearing.