2026-09-29 - Committee on Rules
Summary
- Format: a public hearing on six zoning bills, each taken with a Planning Commission witness, followed by a public meeting to vote. The committee chair was Cindy Bass. No members of the public signed up to testify, and no members raised objections.
- Closed school sites (Bills 260342, 260343, 260344, 260345): all four were introduced April 16, 2026 by Bass and would change the base zoning of former or closing school sites in the Upper Northwest planning district to special purpose civic, educational and medical (SP-CIV): the Parkway Northwest High School site, the former Ada Lewis Middle School site, the General Louis Wagner Middle School site on Shelton Avenue, and the Fitler Academics Plus site in West Germantown. The Planning Commission recommended against each on May 21, saying the change could prolong vacancy because the school district's plans are uncertain. Bass said the sites were improperly zoned residential in the first place and that the aim is to give communities a say if schools close; committee members agreed, with Jamie Gauthier calling the school facilities plan and its link to real estate development inappropriate. Planning staff said they started mapping schools as they came up in remappings and need parcel realignments first at some sites. See Closed School Sites Civic Rezoning.
- Frankford Creek trucking terminal (Bill 260429): introduced April 30 by Michael Driscoll, it changes zoning on an edge of a Conrail right-of-way near Butler Street to allow a trucking terminal for construction, demolition, salvage and reclamation. The Planning Commission recommended against it, citing added point-source pollution and nearby homes. No questions or testimony. See Frankford Creek Zoning Amendment.
- St. Joseph's Preparatory School (Bill 260462): introduced May 7 by Young, it remaps the campus area to SP-CIV and creates a sub-area in the Fifth District Overlay for a partially sunken parking garage with a rooftop athletic field. The Planning Commission recommended approval. The school's president described a roughly $100 million, privately funded campus project, said 935 students attend, and said part of a $73 million gift funds low-income scholarships; about 41 percent of students come from Philadelphia. Young said the school owns or is acquiring the properties in the footprint, nobody is displaced, and community meetings are continuing. In answer to questions, school representatives said varsity football games will not be held on the new field, and the field would be used for practices, other sports and community programs. Katherine Gilmore Richardson asked about city residents among scholarship students and displacement; Jones asked about homeowner share and tax abatements in the surrounding blocks. A representative explained the maps had not been introduced with the bill, so an amendment adds them. See Zoning map change and Fifth District Overlay (Bill 260462).
- Votes: the amendment to Bill 260462 was adopted by voice vote. Gilmore Richardson then moved all six bills, as amended, to be reported favorably with the rules suspended to allow first reading at the next Council session; the voice vote carried with no opposition. The captions do not record individual votes.
- Captions: they stop about a minute before the end of the video and open with several minutes of noise.
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:20Heat. Hey, heat. Hey, heat.
00:25Heat. Heat. N.
00:35Heat. Heat. N.
00:45Heat. Heat.
00:55Heat. Heat. Heat.
01:05Heat. Heat. Heat.
01:15Heat. Heat.
01:52The best
01:55man.
02:03Heat. Heat.
02:13Heat. Heat. Heat.
02:23Heat. Heat. N.
02:39Everybody has a free
03:28Good morning. This is the public hearing
03:29of the committee on rules. Members and
03:31guests, please take their seats. And
03:33this hearing is now called to order. The
03:35clerk clerk will now take the role.
03:39>> Chair member Bass,
03:40>> present.
03:41>> Member Gilmore Richardson,
03:43>> present.
03:44>> Member Jones,
03:45>> present.
03:46>> Member Goautier,
03:47>> present.
03:48>> Member O'Neal,
03:50>> Vice Chair, and member Thomas.
03:54>> Thank you. A quorum of the committee is
03:56present and the clerk will please read
03:57the title of the bills.
04:00>> Bill number 260342,
04:03an ordinance to amend the Philadelphia
04:05zoning maps by changing the zoning
04:07designations of certain areas of land
04:09located within an area bounded by East
04:11Washington Lane, Credin Street, East
04:14Topal Hawin Street, East Hayne Street,
04:16and Arley Street. Bill number 260343,
04:21an ordinance to amend the Philadelphia
04:23zoning maps by changing the zoning
04:25designations of certain areas of land
04:27located within an area bounded by East
04:29Washington Lane, Stanton Avenue, East
04:32Hayne Street, and Arley Street.
04:35Bill number 260344,
04:38an ordinance to amend the Philadelphia
04:40zoning maps by changing the zoning
04:42designations of certain areas of land
04:44located within an area bounded by North
04:4618th Street, Colonial Street, North 17th
04:49Street, and Shelton Avenue. Bill number
04:52260345,
04:55an ordinance to amend the Philadelphia
04:56zoning maps by changing the zoning
04:58designations of certain areas of land
05:01located within an area bounded by West
05:03Seymour Street, Knox Street, West Logan
05:06Street, and Kaiser Street. Bill number
05:09260429,
05:11an ordinance to amend the Philadelphia
05:13zoning maps by changing the zoning
05:15designations of certain areas of land
05:17located within an area bounded by
05:19Frankfurt Creek, Aramingo Avenue, Butler
05:22Street, and Frankfurt Avenue. Bill
05:25number 260462,
05:28an ordinance to amend the Philadelphia
05:30zoning maps by changing the zoning
05:32designations of certain areas of land
05:34located within an area bounded by
05:36Thompson Street. 17th Street, Gerard
05:39Avenue, Ridge Avenue, 19th Street, Cabat
05:44Street, 18th Street, and amending
05:47section 14-500 of the Philadelphia Code
05:50entitled overlay zoning districts by
05:53amending section 14-529
05:56entitled VDO, fifth district overlay
05:59district, all under certain terms and
06:01conditions. There are no other bills
06:03under consideration today.
06:10Thank you, Madame Clerk. Do any members
06:12have any opening remarks on any of the
06:14bills slated by stated by the clerk
06:16today? And seeing none, we'll proceed to
06:19the first witness. I think who's the
06:22only witness today?
06:24>> Paula Bumblo Burns, director of
06:25legislation for the Philadelphia City
06:27Planning Commission.
06:31>> Good morning.
06:32>> Morning everyone.
06:34Please state your name for the record
06:35and proceed with your testimony.
06:37>> My name is Paula Brumbello Burns. I am
06:39the director of legislation for the
06:42Philadelphia Planning Commission. And
06:43good morning.
06:44>> Good morning,
06:44>> Chairperson Bass and members of the
06:46Rules Committee.
06:46>> Good morning.
06:47>> It's good to be back.
06:48>> Good to see you.
06:50>> So, I am here to testify on bill number
06:52260342
06:54introduced into city council on April
06:5616th, 2026 by council member Bass. Bill
06:59number 260342
07:01proposes to change the base zoning of
07:03the Parkway Northwest High School site
07:05from RSA2 residential single family
07:07attached to SP CIV special purpose civic
07:10educational and medical. The site
07:15is part of Alberry Superblock, an area
07:18with a mix of residential and other
07:20institutional uses in the upper
07:21northwest planning district. The
07:23Philadelphia City Planning Commission
07:25considered bill number 260342
07:27at its meeting of May 21st, 2026 and
07:30recommended that the bill not be
07:31approved, noting concern that the change
07:33would could prolong vacancy since the
07:35school district plans for the site
07:37remain uncertain. I'll be happy to
07:39answer any questions at this time.
07:42>> Well, thank you for your testimony and
07:44I'll state as the author of this uh
07:46legislation as well as the the next
07:48three that are coming forward. um that
07:51or the next two, excuse me. Uh I
07:53certainly understand the planning
07:55commission's uh desire to uh keep things
07:58as they are for, you know, numerous
08:01reasons. Um but I will state that the f
08:03the first thing is that they were
08:05improperly zoned in the first place.
08:07They were never supposed to be
08:09designated as residential. Um they were
08:13built as schools. So, I don't even
08:14understand how that happened and why it
08:16was allowed to go on for such a long
08:19period of time. Nonetheless, we are
08:21certainly open to having a dialogue. The
08:25purpose of this resoning is strictly to
08:28give the community some input and say
08:31about what happens in their community.
08:33If we are closing these schools, which
08:35we hope um you know that there may be
08:37some last minute hail Mary that will
08:39save them, but if we are closing these
08:42schools, then the community has to have
08:44an opportunity to have a say in what
08:46goes on those sites. And so that is the
08:49sole purpose of uh this this legislation
08:52that we have before us today. This and
08:55the other um pieces of legislation that
08:57you'll be uh testifying against in the
09:00in the next few minutes. So, thank you,
09:02>> Madam Chair.
09:03>> Yes, chair recognizes Council Member
09:05O'Neal.
09:07>> I go back a little further than a lot of
09:08people here. Uh, there was no school
09:12zoning. Uh, every school was zoned
09:14residential.
09:15>> There was no recreation and park zoning.
09:18>> It was all zoned residential.
09:20>> Um, this is, you know, we've caught up
09:23to and and we have zoning for that now.
09:27Uh but you know if you don't do
09:30remappings and nobody brings it brings
09:32it up to you and um you know things stay
09:35the same. So um the fact that you're
09:38changing it to recognize that I think is
09:40a good thing. Thank thank you uh council
09:44member and um and I will state that you
09:46know it it just in terms of the way the
09:48city works
09:50>> at the time when the zoning designation
09:52became available that that schools um
09:55could be designated as schools
09:58>> it was really I believe the
10:01responsibility of the planning
10:02commission to come forward at that time
10:05and and to notate every school that was
10:07not properly designated and to get it
10:10done at that time. I'm not exactly sure
10:12when that was. I'm sure it wasn't um on
10:14your watch, but I'm just saying that
10:16when it was when when it came forward
10:20that this would be a new zoning
10:22designation, the next appropriate step
10:25should have been to then go back and say
10:28who does not have that zoning
10:30designation and let's make that a
10:33priority to to fix it, to get it right.
10:36And it's it's something approximately
10:382018 2019 the designation was made when
10:43we were going into communities with
10:44remappings or a property was getting
10:48remapped and we saw a school on it. Our
10:50strategy was to get to them as we got to
10:53them. We did not make a large plan for
10:57all of the schools. We ran into COVID
11:00with different priorities. So we are
11:02trying to catch up. So, but you
11:04understand the idea that when we get to
11:07things, when we get to them, we never
11:09get to them.
11:10>> We are trying our hardest. I know I
11:12listen that is not to say that, you
11:14know, folks aren't working hard on this,
11:16but you know, um it it's clear that we
11:19could have a list of every school in the
11:22city of Philadelphia and have a list of
11:24all of the zoning designations and then,
11:28you know, uh parcel it out to the
11:30district council members to get it done
11:32so that we're effective and efficient in
11:34the way that we operate. So, again, no
11:37no blame game going on here. you know
11:39what my team's going to be working on
11:40right now.
11:41>> Oh, I'm I'm so excited for that.
11:42>> I think they're watching this. So,
11:44>> I think that we're all so excited for
11:45that and we'd be happy to help
11:47>> in any way that we can.
11:48>> And I do want to note there is a
11:50particular challenge with schools and we
11:51definitely ran into this with the third
11:53council district and the fourth council
11:55district. The schools purchased
11:58property. They may have never
12:00consolidated the properties. They may
12:03have been deeded some land that doesn't
12:06necessarily, especially in council
12:08district 4 with Lanol, it was a property
12:10that had no bounding streets that were
12:12legally on the city plan. So, we've been
12:15having to work with records is doing a
12:17parcel realignment and we have to ask
12:19and request that the parcel realignment
12:21be done first. Then we have to go back
12:23and review historic deeds. So sometimes
12:26schools are a particular challenge in
12:29mapping which is why these have taken
12:32these are why we had to ask you to give
12:34us a little more time to make sure we
12:35get the maps correct.
12:37>> Okay. Uh chair recognizes council member
12:39Jones.
12:40>> Uh thank you madam chair and thank you
12:42for reinforcing some of these overlays.
12:46My concern I probably most likely share
12:50with my colleague in the third when we
12:53start talking about Roersonson and it
12:56started down the bottom now real estate
12:59wise is at the top.
13:00>> Mhm. When you look at Lanov, that was
13:04bucallic from the beginning, but now
13:07wouldn't be a bad place to put uh town
13:10homes in.
13:13Differences in property values
13:17should not determine our urgency to
13:19protect those sites. If you look at uh
13:22Barry,
13:23you know, nobody's talking about Barry,
13:27but they're talking about Overbrook
13:29Elementary, which has come up in
13:32property values all around it. So, as we
13:35look at prioritizing these things, um we
13:38should do it with a sense of urgency
13:41that a looks at where the students want
13:44to go and b where the developers should
13:47not go.
13:49Thank you, Madam Chair.
13:50>> Thank you. Chair recognizes council
13:52member Gothier.
13:54>> Thank you, Madam Chair. I'll I'll add in
13:56I also did this type of zoning in the
13:58third district last council session
14:01session and for me it was sort of
14:02twofold. It was absolutely corrective.
14:05Um these are schools uh and should be
14:08zoned as such. But for me there was
14:11another um motive and that was focusing
14:14the conversation. I was very dismayed
14:17when um the facilities plan was finally
14:21unveiled to us the day before it went to
14:23the press that I did not understand the
14:25reason for the closure recommendations.
14:28And not only did I not understand them,
14:30particularly when it um as it related to
14:33high performing schools like Robson,
14:36like Lanenol, I found it gross that this
14:39school facilities conversation was mixed
14:41with a real estate conversation where
14:44the plan targeted several schools that
14:47our children were still sitting in um
14:50for the development of other facilities.
14:53So to me, not only was it corrective
14:55zoning, but it was also to focus the
14:57conversation because if we are talking
14:59about facilities, we need to talk about
15:01facilities and student success. Not we
15:03don't need to be mixing that
15:05conversation with speculative real
15:07estate development. And so for me, I
15:10took away that as a part of the
15:12conversation because it was
15:13inappropriate from the beginning. Thank
15:15you.
15:17>> Thank you, ma'am. Uh thank you, council
15:18member. chair recognizes California.
15:20>> I just add corrective zoning is really a
15:23good thing.
15:24>> Yes.
15:24>> But but protective zoning is much
15:27better.
15:28>> Yes.
15:30>> Mic drop.
15:33>> Thank you, Councilman O'Neal. Um and and
15:36uh I think that you can guess from the
15:39um panel here the sentiment of members
15:42of council that um you know we have some
15:45very challenging times ahead obviously
15:48with the conversation around schools but
15:50mixing
15:52the the the issue around housing and
15:55mixing that with the closure of schools
15:58it just didn't make sense. It doesn't
15:59make sense. I know that that's not
16:01really your lane, but we what we're
16:04trying to do is make sure that we have
16:05the protective zoning in place. These
16:07communities where these schools exist in
16:09my district, I'll speak for my district,
16:11folks want them to remain as educational
16:14institutions.
16:15um you know, dropping a um uh you know,
16:19basically a whole neighborhood um
16:21because some of these parcels are
16:23extremely large pieces of real estate,
16:25but dropping basically an entire
16:27neighborhood into the fabric of an
16:30existing community without any input
16:32from the community itself uh is
16:35obviously a no-go. So, um that's
16:37something that we all stand very firm on
16:39uh that I stand very firm on, I'll say.
16:42And um you know, we look forward to
16:44having further conversation. We realize
16:45that it hasn't been flushed all the way
16:47out by the planning commission, but once
16:49it is, we're certainly willing to come
16:51back to the table and have those
16:52conversations, and I want to make that
16:54clear. So,
16:55>> thank you.
16:55>> Thank you.
16:56>> I needed I needed a winter project.
16:59>> I needed a fall winter project.
17:01>> Yes. Okay. Any additional conversation
17:05from the panel? Okay. No. All right.
17:07Thank you, madam. Is there anyone else
17:09here to testify on bill number 260342
17:12whose name has not been called?
17:15No. Okay. Hearing none, I want to thank
17:17the witness for her testimony. And can
17:19we have the clerk please call the next
17:20panel to testify on 260 343.
17:24>> Paula Brolo Burns, director of
17:26legislation for the Philadelphia City
17:28Planning Commission.
17:31>> Please say your name for the record and
17:32proceed. I am Paula Brumblo Burns,
17:35director of legislation for the
17:36Philadelphia City Planning Commission.
17:38I'm here to testify on bill number
17:40260343
17:42introduced into city council on April
17:4316th, 2026 by council member Bass. Bill
17:47number 260343
17:49proposes to change the base zoning of
17:51the former Ada Lewis Middle School site
17:53from RSD3 residential single family
17:55detached to SPIV special purpose civic
17:58educational and medical. The site is
18:01part of the Alberry Super Block, an area
18:03with a mix of residential and other
18:05institutional uses in the Upper
18:06Northwest Planning District. The
18:08Philadelphia City Planning Commission
18:10considered bill number 260343
18:13at its meeting of May 21st, 2026 and
18:16recommended that the bill not be
18:18approved, noting concern that the change
18:20could prolong vacancies since the school
18:21district's plans for the site remain
18:23uncertain. I'll be happy to answer any
18:25questions at this time.
18:30Thank you for your testimony.
18:34Uh any questions from the committee? And
18:37seeing none, uh is there anyone here to
18:40testify on bill number 260343?
18:44Anyone else to testify on that bill?
18:46Seeing none, thank you very much for
18:48your testimony. Madame Clerk, can we
18:50have you call the next uh or the same
18:54witness?
18:56>> Paula Brumblo Burns, director of
18:58legislation for the Philadelphia City
19:00Planning Commission.
19:01>> Testify on bill number 260344.
19:03Please state your name for the record
19:04and then proceed.
19:05>> I am Paula Brolo Burns, director of
19:07legislation for the Philadelphia City
19:09Planning Commission. I am here to
19:10testify on bill number 260344
19:13introduced into city council on April
19:1516th, 2026 by Council Member Bass. Bill
19:18number 260344
19:20proposes to change the base owning of
19:22General Lewis Wagner Middle School site
19:25from RSD3 residential single family
19:27detached to SPIV special purpose civic
19:30educational and medical. The site is
19:32located on Shelton Avenue in the West
19:34Oaklane section of the Upper Northwest
19:36Planning District. The Philadelphia City
19:39Planning Commission considered bill
19:40number 260344
19:42at its meeting of May 21st, 2026 and
19:45recommended that the bill not be
19:46approved, noting concerned that the
19:48change could prolong vacancy since the
19:50school district's plans for the site
19:51remain uncertain. I'll be happy to
19:54answer any questions at this time.
19:56>> Thank you for your test.
19:59>> Thank you for your testimony. Any
20:00comments, questions from the committee?
20:02Um the only thing I'll say is that the
20:04school district doesn't have plans for
20:06that and it's been vacant for about 20
20:08years now. So
20:11unacceptable. Um but not again not you.
20:14Um thank you so much for your testimony.
20:17Is there anyone else here to testify on
20:20bill number 260344?
20:23Anyone else? And seeing none, thank you
20:26so much for your testimony.
20:31Will the clerk please call the first
20:32panel to testify on bill number 260345.
20:37>> Paulo Brumalo Burns, director of
20:38legislation for the Philadelphia City
20:40Planning Commission.
20:41>> Thank you. Please state your name for
20:42the record and proceed. I am Paulo
20:44Brumblo Burns, director of legislation
20:46for the Philadelphia City Planning
20:47Commission. I am here to testify on bill
20:50number 260345
20:52introduced into city council on April
20:5416th, 2026 by council member Bass. Bill
20:57number 260345
20:59proposes to change the base zoning of
21:00the Fit Fitler academics plus school
21:04site from RSA3 residential single family
21:07attached to SP CIV special purpose civic
21:10educational and medical. The site is
21:12located in the West Germantown
21:13neighborhood of the Upper Northwest
21:14Planning District and is owned by the
21:16city of Philadelphia.
21:18The Philadelphia City Planning
21:20Commission considered bill number 260345
21:22at its meeting of May 21st, 2026 and
21:25recommended that the bill not be
21:26approved, noting concern that the change
21:28could prolong vacancies since the school
21:30district's plans for the same for the
21:32site remain uncertain. I'd be happy to
21:34answer any questions at this time.
21:36>> Thank you for your testimony and seeing
21:37there are no questions from the panel.
21:41Uh is there anyone else here to testify
21:42on bill number 260 345? Nope. And seeing
21:46none, thank you for your testimony.
21:48Madame clerk, please call the first
21:50panel to testify on bill number 260429.
21:55>> Paula Brumblo Burns, director of
21:57legislation for the Philadelphia City
21:58Planning Commission.
21:59>> Good morning. Please state your name for
22:01the record and proceed.
22:02>> I am Paula Brumblo Burns, director of
22:04legislation for the Philadelphia City
22:06Planning Commission. I am here to
22:07testify on bill number 260429
22:10introduced to the city council on April
22:1230th, 2026 by council member Driscoll.
22:15Bill number 260429
22:17proposes changes to the zoning map for
22:19an edge section of a Conrail right ofway
22:22near 2173 Butler Street to enable a
22:25trucking terminal supporting
22:27construction, demolition, salvage, and
22:29reclamation activities. The Philadelphia
22:31City Planning Commission considered bill
22:33number 260429 at its meeting of May
22:3621st, 2026 and recommended that the bill
22:39not be approved, expressing concern
22:40about additional point source pollution
22:43and proximity to nearby residential
22:44areas. I'll be happy to answer any
22:46questions at this time.
22:49>> Thank you for your testimony. Any
22:51questions from the committee? Okay. And
22:54seeing none, um, is there anyone else
22:57here to testify on bill number 260429?
23:01Okay. And seeing none as well, thank you
23:05very much for your testimony,
23:07will the clerk please call the next
23:09panel to testify on bill number 260462.
23:14>> Paula Brumbo Burns, director of
23:16legislation for the Philadelphia City
23:17Planning Commission.
23:19>> Thank you for
23:21good morning. Please state your name for
23:22the record and please proceed.
23:24>> I am Paula Brumblo Burns, director of
23:26legislation for the Philadelphia City
23:28Planning Commission. I'm here to testify
23:30on bill number 260462
23:32introduced into city council on May 7th,
23:352026 by council member Young. Bill
23:37number 260462
23:39proposes to remap parcels around St.
23:41Joseph's Preparatory School from a
23:43current mix of residential and
23:44commercial zoning to SPIV special
23:46purpose civic educational and medical.
23:49The bill also proposes to create a sub
23:51area within the VDO, fifth district
23:54overlay district, to enable a parking
23:56garage with a rooftop athletic field and
23:58related campus improvements. The
24:00Philadelphia City Planning Commission
24:02considered bill number 260462
24:05at its meeting of May 21st, 20 26 and
24:08recommended the bill for approval. I'll
24:10be happy to answer any questions at this
24:12time.
24:16>> Thank you very much for your testimony.
24:18Thank you.
24:18>> Is there anyone else here to testify on
24:20bill number 260462?
24:23And I know that the uh bill sponsor is
24:26also uh in attendance and is in route I
24:29believe to this hearing.
24:31>> Please state your name for the record
24:32and proceed with your testimony.
24:38>> Good morning.
24:39>> Good morning.
24:41>> Um
24:44chairwoman, members of the committee,
24:45good morning. Can you please uh thank
24:46you for taking the time. My name is John
24:48Marinachi, M A R I N A CCI, and I'm the
24:52president of St. Joseph's Preparatory
24:53School in Philadelphia. We would also
24:56like to acknowledge and thank Council
24:57Person Young for his sponsorship and
24:59support of bill number 260462 and for
25:02his ongoing support of St. Joseph's
25:03Prep. The bill before you today, if
25:06approved, would allow us to execute the
25:07next stage of the transformative renewal
25:09of our North Philadelphia campus. It
25:12would revamp the entire St. Joe's Prep
25:14campus located between 17th Street and
25:1619th Street from Gerard Avenue to South
25:19Street to the uh excuse me to the civic
25:22institutional and medical special
25:24purpose district or SPIV.
25:27The bill also amends the fifth district
25:29overlay
25:31to amend certain development standards
25:33that will apply only to the newly
25:34created St. Joseph's Reparatory School
25:36sub area. These standards will allow for
25:39the construction of a partially sunken
25:41parking garage and rooftop athletic
25:43field.
25:44Before diving to the details of the
25:46project, I'd like to share more about
25:47our institution, its relationship with
25:48the city of Philadelphia. The prep has
25:51175-year history of educating young men
25:53from across the Delaware Valley to
25:54become men foreign with others, and we
25:56are deeply committed to our North
25:57Philadelphia neighborhood.
26:00Following a devastating fire in 1966,
26:02the prep was offered land to move to the
26:04main line, but chose to remain in the
26:06city because of the opportunities it
26:07presents to our students. Today, 935
26:11students from 180 zip codes attend the
26:13prep, where they receive an excellent
26:14education both in and out of the
26:16classroom.
26:18St. Joseph's Prep is renewing our
26:20commitment to Philadelphia and is
26:21planning a major renovation of our
26:22campus that will greatly impact their
26:24students and the surrounding
26:25neighborhood. Our vision is to create a
26:27campus courtyard that presents academic,
26:29social, and spiritual opportunities, a
26:31native plantings garden that will serve
26:32as an educational resource, a
26:34multi-purpose athletic field, and a
26:36parking facility that enhances safety
26:37and security for the entire community.
26:40Developing a multi-purpose athletic
26:42field will address a major challenge
26:43that has existed at the Prep for
26:44generations. For the first time in the
26:46history of the school, a student will be
26:48able to walk across 18th Street and
26:50experience the convenience of an onampus
26:52field to practice, play, or watch a home
26:54game. A new parking facility located
26:57under the field will address a major
26:58parking challenge by significantly
27:00increasing the number of spaces
27:01available to students and faculty and
27:03removing cars from local streets.
27:05Continuing our long tradition of active
27:07neighborhood involvement, we have
27:08drafted these plans with the community
27:09in mind. Today, our indoor facilities
27:12are utilized by multiple community
27:14organizations and we regularly host
27:16grocery giveaways and gatherings that
27:18benefit our neighborhoods along with
27:19youth sports organizations.
27:21This project will enhance those
27:23opportunities and while addressing
27:24safety with parking issues. With the
27:26help of Council Member Young, we have
27:28hosted and held uh community meetings
27:30with the with members of our community
27:32to receive and incorporate feedback on
27:33the project. We're very appreciative of
27:35their ongoing support for the prep and
27:37this project. The $100 million project
27:40itself will be privately funded. In
27:42April of this year, St. Joseph's Prep
27:43announced an historic gift that will be
27:45used to advance the Prep's mission and
27:47help transform our campus. Of the $73
27:50million gift received, 29 million will
27:52be used to fully fund 20 low-income
27:54student scholarships per grade for the
27:56next 15 years. 37 million will be used
27:59for the campus project, which will
28:00benefit the neighborhood by removing the
28:02blighting influence of numerous empty
28:04lots and dilapidated structures. Allow
28:06for the expansion of the prep's ongoing
28:07tradition of partnering with the local
28:09community and provide access to modern,
28:11clean, and secure recreational
28:12facilities. We respectfully request the
28:14committee support for bill number 260462
28:17which would allow the prep to bring this
28:19vision to reality. We appreciate your
28:21consideration and are happy to answer
28:22any questions the committee may have.
28:24Thank you.
28:25>> Thank you for your testimony. Mr.
28:26Mccclure, can you hold for one second? I
28:28do want to recognize the author of the
28:30bill. Uh chair recognizes Council Member
28:32Young.
28:33>> Thank you, Madam Chair. Um and I just
28:35want to say for the record for the
28:36members of the committee that my office
28:38has been working with, uh St. prep. Um
28:42throughout the duration of this process
28:44um we have uh met with community members
28:46um and that conversation is still
28:48ongoing. Uh but we believe that uh there
28:51is uh enough uh support in the community
28:54to move this project uh forward um today
28:58and ask that you um vote favorably to
29:01push this bill out of committee today.
29:03Um, you know, the the prep has been a uh
29:07an institution in North Philly that has
29:10given back to the community. Um, and we
29:12want people to know that this project
29:14does not uh displace anyone. Um, for the
29:18most part, uh, the prep owns all the
29:21properties that are around or in
29:22conversations to own um, every property
29:24that is uh, in the footprint of of this
29:27uh, new plan. Um, so there are no uh
29:30residents being forced out um or or
29:32pushed out. Um, and I I can tell you
29:34that um every transaction that the prep
29:36has um engaged in uh with uh property
29:39owners have been arms length
29:41transactions where folks were fairly
29:43compensated for their uh properties.
29:47>> Thank you uh council member. Appreciate
29:49it.
29:49>> Thank you.
29:50>> Okay. Chair Oh, chair recognizes council
29:53member O'Neal.
29:54>> First like to thank Council Member
29:56Young. uh he's probably been more
29:58involved with the prep than any of the
30:01uh uh other fifth district members um
30:05since I've been here and that only goes
30:07back 12 terms. But uh the uh and and so
30:11I I want to recognize that. But I I was
30:14a junior uh when the fire happened. So
30:17my last year and a half was spent in
30:20cafeterias becoming classrooms and
30:22everything. And uh uh so the fact that
30:26we stayed, the fact that uh we're now
30:30reaching our full potential uh and it it
30:34it's a miracle and um I also
30:36congratulate you on good counsel here. I
30:39understand he had pretty good high
30:40school education. Uh so so uh it's good
30:44good choices all all around and uh just
30:47want to say first class institution and
30:50it's just even getting better. I don't
30:52know how you get better in first class,
30:53but uh somehow you're managing. So,
30:56congratulations and thank you, uh,
30:57Councilman.
30:58>> Thank you, Councilman Young. Thank you,
31:00Councilman Neil.
31:01>> Thank you, uh, Council Member O'Neal.
31:04Chair Chair recognizes uh, Majority
31:06Leader Gilmore Richardson. Thank you.
31:09Thank you very much, Madame Chair, and,
31:10uh, thank you so much, uh, to our fifth
31:12district council member, Council Member
31:14Young, um, for all of your work on this
31:16project. I wanted to have the
31:17opportunity to review, uh, the prepared
31:20testimony. So, I apologize. I was trying
31:22to hear what you were stating, but I
31:24didn't have it in the book. Uh, it's
31:26stated here that it's a $100 million
31:30project, uh, privately funded, and you
31:34all will fund 20 lowincome student
31:36scholarships per grade for the next 15
31:39years. Will all of these, uh, lowincome
31:42student scholarships be from young
31:44people who live in the city of
31:45Philadelphia?
31:47>> Um, that's not a stipulation of the
31:49scholarship. they tend so the funer
31:51already sponsors uh 15 students a year
31:54so this is in there this 20 are in
31:56addition to um and all of them come from
31:59inside of the I I don't want to misspeak
32:03the vast majority of them come from
32:04inside uh of the school we are currently
32:08uh 41% from inside Philadelphia county
32:10in terms of our population right now as
32:12it stands
32:13>> okay I I just wanted to ask particularly
32:15for the young people who live in and
32:17around that 19121
32:19um zip code. I had an opportunity to
32:22visit uh St. Joe's Prep recently um and
32:25thought it was a really wonderful campus
32:27um was there to utilize some of the
32:30existing um athletic facilities actually
32:33with my son who's a part of a wrestling
32:34program uh and we were there for a
32:37wrestling match over the weekend. So I I
32:39was able to see the facilities. Uh
32:41lastly, I wanted to to ask about the uh
32:44numerous empty lots and the dilapidated
32:47structures that you referenced. Is that
32:49mostly on the side streets like closer
32:51to Kabad and 18th?
32:53>> Okay. And just talk to us about what you
32:55all are going to do there.
32:56>> Yes. So, um, currently, uh, the from
33:00Styled Street to Kabat between 18th and
33:0319th. Um, there there are structures
33:05that have been empty for some time. We
33:07own a good number of those structures.
33:08There are empty lots or or structured
33:11parking lots that we own. Okay. Um and
33:13uh by structured I mean paved and lined
33:15and things along um that uh would be in
33:18all of those would be incorporated into
33:19the footprint of this project. So the
33:21project would go to the
33:23>> the construction itself would go to the
33:25south side of Kabat Street. So it would
33:27cross styles and go all the way up to
33:29Kabat. Yes, that's correct.
33:31>> And then on the north side of Kabat um
33:34we own uh will have owned by the time we
33:38start um a majority of the lots there.
33:41And uh something we've been talking with
33:42the council person about and people in
33:44the neighborhood councilman about is
33:46what our neighborhood needs and an
33:47ability to do something whether it be a
33:50playground or green space or something
33:51along those lines either there or on
33:54another property that we owned on the
33:55east side of campus. What makes sense uh
33:57to partner and provide something for the
33:59neighborhood as well.
34:00>> Great. Great. Well, I want to thank
34:01Council Member Young um for working with
34:03the community on this project and also
34:06for responding to my question relative
34:09to ensuring that no one would be
34:11displaced um as a result of this
34:13project. So, thank you very very much.
34:16>> One more
34:20let him go.
34:21>> I'll wait.
34:22>> Madam Chair,
34:27>> I have one comment.
34:30Okay. Just thanking council
34:33>> thanking you and your good judgment with
34:34council. Uh and um I see Mr. Aori who's
34:38filled me in from as if I'm at the
34:40project. Uh and while he's not a prep
34:43grad, he's Jesuit trained. So um little
34:47Scranton areas I I believe somewhere up
34:49that way. But uh uh he's he's excellent.
34:53Thank you.
34:55>> Madam Chair, may I add some
34:58>> Matt? Do you want to go ahead and state
34:59your go ahead and do your testimony?
35:01>> Sure.
35:01>> So we can have it on the record and then
35:03we'll go back to questions.
35:04>> Great. I apologize. Uh Madame Chair, um
35:07members of the committee, Council Person
35:08Young, thank you so much. Uh Matt
35:10McCclar from Boward Spar uh here on
35:12behalf of St. Joseph's Prep Preparatory
35:14School. One quick uh point of order just
35:16to bring up there is a amendment we have
35:19just remind you of the of the
35:21legislation. The maps were not
35:23introduced when the bill was introduced.
35:25So we have a there's an amendment which
35:27is the maps to the bill because the bill
35:29does both a remapping to SP as well as
35:32as well as um the technical amendments
35:35to the fifth district council council
35:37overlay. So
35:39but if there's any other technical
35:40questions I'm available.
35:43>> Thank you so much.
35:44>> Thank you so much for your testimony.
35:46Chair recognizes Council Member Jones.
35:48>> Thank you so very much Madam Chair. Uh
35:51Matt, you are well acquainted with
35:55institutional
35:56development and its impact on
35:59surrounding neighborhoods. I reference
36:01St. Joe's uh and thank you for uh being
36:05a part of that discussion. What I would
36:08ask is what is and maybe a map of a four
36:12square block area of the residential
36:15properties. what is the percentage of
36:18residents that own those properties
36:20versus uh
36:22>> so the institution?
36:23>> This is a fairly unique situation. Um
36:26the main parking lots that are between
36:30Ridge Avenue um Style Street and 18th
36:34Street are actually zoned as CMX4 CMX 3,
36:39which is probably pretty inappropriate
36:41for the community. Uh the prep itself is
36:45zoned primarily CMX3 including the JZoo
36:49church which makes no sense whatsoever.
36:52The properties uh north of Style Street
36:54to the south street south side of Kabat
36:57are zoned a combination of RMM1 which is
37:01right on 19th Street and then the rest
37:03are RSA 5. The vast majority of them
37:07other than two structures right now are
37:09owned by the St. Joe's Preparatory
37:11School. One's one is under contract and
37:14the other is about to be under contract.
37:16So yes, we are reszoning to SP civ. Yes,
37:22there's residential to the north side of
37:24Kabat.
37:26Vast majority of that is already owned
37:27by the prep. But at the end of the day,
37:31compared to SP CIV, we believe that this
37:33is a more appropriate remapping for the
37:35community. uh anyone knows and I'm sure
37:37the councilman O'Neal knows obviously
37:38that CMX3 has very few protections for
37:41the community. SP Civ was really I
37:44really want to
37:45>> have none in I have none in my district.
37:47>> No, not in your district. So SP but SP
37:49is a is a great district because it
37:51recognizes
37:53that we have all throughout Philadelphia
37:56educational institutions that need to
37:58grow. Yes, the yes, the dimensional
38:01requirements are different than
38:03residential, but they're not they're not
38:06CMX3. They're not SP uh SP uh INST. They
38:12they are designed for neighborhoodbased
38:17um u based institutions like the prep.
38:19Uh so with that, I think that you know,
38:21Councilman, I applaud Councilman Young
38:23for the remapping for this uh this uh uh
38:26of this for this for St. just prep
38:28because it's in in keeping with what the
38:30neighborhood is in the planning. So, we
38:31think that is good.
38:35>> Uh,
38:37member Young, what I'm trying to get to,
38:39if this is a map at a prep, four blocks
38:42each way, how how many residents still
38:47own those properties and for you to make
38:50sure they are well aware of any tax
38:53abatements.
38:55So that yeah, we want their property
38:57values to go up but not their tax
38:59obligations.
39:00>> Right. If I may, uh, council member,
39:02thank you for that. So this area, um,
39:04again, as uh, Mr. McClure mentioned, is
39:06a mix between RM1 and RSA 5. So there is
39:10there are a number of home owners um, in
39:14this area. uh there was our some special
39:17um developments that happened in this
39:19area where the homes are unique uh where
39:22they're all homeowners there and and
39:24then to the RM1 buildings where there is
39:26a mix of uh apartment owners as well. So
39:29there's a there's a good mix in this
39:30area. Um there's some new construction
39:32development that's happened in this
39:33area. Uh so this area has experienced a
39:36tad bit of uh gentrification. Um um but
39:39it's it's it's a mix of homeowners,
39:41long-term homeowners, uh some new
39:43homeowners and some renters uh in this
39:45area because and also most of the
39:48renters that are in this area have come
39:50from Temple University area because been
39:52pushed down toward that way. Um so it's
39:54a it's a it's a I I would call it a nice
39:56mix of a community um where the where
39:59the prep is.
40:00this project would not have um too much
40:04of a like a a negative impact on the
40:07homeowners who live in this area just
40:09because of uh the footprint of um where
40:12this is and how the prep already uh
40:14operates. Um the the traffic studies
40:18have been done to show where vehicular
40:19traffic will travel um in and around
40:21this particular area. Um, so it will not
40:24have too much of an impact on the actual
40:25homeowners who reside. Typically to the
40:28it would be to the east of where the
40:30prep is. So the northeast where the prep
40:31is.
40:31>> So I would only say you're getting your
40:33money's worth with Mccclure.
40:37>> Matter of fact, if you can increase my
40:39pleasure,
40:39>> you should increase it.
40:40>> And just on the north side of Kabat,
40:43there are no residents there. There's
40:44actually nobody residing there. So even
40:46the boundary to the north of where we
40:48would be doing construction. Could you
40:49provide the chair a map of where the
40:53prep intersects with residential?
40:58>> I think that the closest area where the
41:00St. Joe's Prep intersects with
41:03residential is where the back of the
41:05Jay-Z is. So the Joo, which is the giant
41:09Jesuit Baroque uh facility. I know well
41:12because my boys are graduates of St.
41:13Jose Prep and we go there for mass a
41:15lot. So on on the north side on the
41:18north side of uh sorry on the north side
41:20of of the church is Kabad Street. Across
41:23the street from Kabad Street there are
41:24residences but again right now that
41:27structure is zoned CMX3.
41:30It's going to be remapped to SPIV under
41:32this legislation. It is historic preview
41:34protected. Nothing's changing there. So
41:36it is so it's more just to make sure
41:39that the uses that are allowed by SP civ
41:43are consistent. I mean there are things
41:45in CMX3 that are inappropriate for this
41:47site useful wise and there are things in
41:49SPIV that you want for this site because
41:51it is an institutional use. And one of
41:54the things that was very important is
41:55that there was a text amendment last
41:57year that the council uh and council
42:00approved that allowed for a modification
42:03of SPIV to have for religious activity.
42:05Believe it or not SP originally did not
42:08allow for religious uh assembly and now
42:10it does. It makes it a perfect fit for
42:13the prepare.
42:16>> One more question.
42:18>> Chair recognizes council member Young.
42:20>> Thank you. I do have a question. So
42:23So St. Joe's Prep is definitely lo known
42:26for its sports programs, particularly
42:28football, right? It's akin to some
42:31college football. Um can you talk to us
42:34uh publicly about what will happen on
42:38this new facility? Are you going to have
42:40varsity games here? What varsity
42:42programs will be using this? Um is there
42:44opportunity for community to use this
42:45space and things like that?
42:47>> Certainly. Yes. Thank Thank you,
42:48Councilman. Um we will not have varsity
42:52football games there uh because it would
42:54be uh too much of a stress on the
42:55neighborhood to be quite honest. We have
42:58uh several thousand people come to our
42:59home varsity football games. Uh so um at
43:03at the moment anyway. So if prep
43:04football continues to have the success
43:06it does, uh that would be too much of a
43:08stress in the neighborhood. Other uses
43:10of the field for the prep would be
43:12practicing varsity football, under squad
43:14contests for football, JV and freshman,
43:17uh, lacrosse at all levels because that
43:19is a very manageable number, soccer at
43:21all levels, varsity, JV and freshman
43:23because those are manageable numbers
43:25that mix that match the size of the
43:27facility that we have. Um, rugby again
43:32similar ultimate frisbee and any other
43:35outdoor practice type activities that go
43:37along with it. As far as the community
43:38is concerned, we already have
43:39partnerships with some organizations
43:41that use our inside facility that are
43:43field sports. Uh we would continue
43:45those. So, um SWAG is a North
43:47Philadelphia soccer program for youth.
43:50Uh they use our indoor facilities. We
43:52would have them use our outdoor
43:53facilities as well. Um we work right now
43:55with Blackhawk football. Uh partner with
43:57them at Cecil Moore. Um there's
43:59opportunity for them to come. Uh, and
44:01then we host events like um a flag
44:03football league for uh our RCO um has a
44:07has an organization that has a flag
44:09football league that we currently do on
44:11a roof play space. They would be able to
44:12move out to the turf. Opportunities
44:14along those lines for us. A hu Halloween
44:17trunk or treat that would happen there
44:19uh in in the courtyard. So those
44:21opportunities would would continue and
44:22be enhanced.
44:27>> Okay. Any additional questions?
44:28>> Thank you, Madam Chair. Okay. All right.
44:31And seeing as there are none, is there
44:33anyone else here who to testify on bill
44:35number 260462?
44:39>> Okay. And seeing none, thank you very
44:40much for your testimony today.
44:42>> Thank you.
44:50>> Being that there are no further
44:51witnesses, we'll now proceed with taking
44:53public comment. Is there anyone here in
44:55chambers that wishes to testify before
44:58the committee today?
45:02Okay. All right. Seeing none,
45:09this concludes the public hearing. We'll
45:10now go into a public meeting uh to
45:13consider the action to be taken on the
45:14bills before the committee today. Madame
45:16clerk, can we have a quorum check?
45:20>> Chair member Bass.
45:22>> Present. Uh, member Jones
45:25>> present.
45:26>> Member Gilmore Richardson
45:27>> present.
45:28>> Member Goautier.
45:29>> Member O'Neal,
45:31>> Vice Chair Member Squila, member Thomas.
45:36>> Okay. Thank you. A note for the record
45:37that a quorum of the committee is
45:39present. Chair now recognizes council
45:41member Gilmore Richardson for a motion
45:43on the amendment to bill number 260462.
45:50>> Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh, I move that
45:52the amendment to bill number 260
45:56>> 462.
45:56>> 462
45:58be reported from this committee with a
46:00favorable recommendation.
46:02>> Second.
46:03>> Thank you. It's been moved and properly
46:04seconded that the amendment to bill
46:07number
46:09>> hold on wait
46:11hold on one second. I got it. Hold on.
46:24Okay, we're going to run that again.
46:27>> The amendment
47:02Okay,
47:04thank you. Okay, so we're going to run
47:05that back.
47:06>> Okay.
47:06>> All right. Uh, the chair now recognizes
47:09Majority Leader Kathy Gilmore Richardson
47:11for a motion on the amendment to bill
47:13number 260462.
47:15>> I offer an amendment to bill number
47:17260462.
47:18A copy of the amendment has been
47:20circulated to all members of the
47:21committee and I move that the amendment
47:23to bill number 260462 be adopted.
47:26>> Second.
47:27>> Thank you. It's been moved and properly
47:28seconded that the amendment to bill
47:30number 260 462 be adopted. All of those
47:34in favor of this motion will signify by
47:35saying I.
47:36>> I. Any nays? Okay. The eyes have it. The
47:40motion carries. And the amendment to
47:41bill number 260462
47:44has been adopted. The chair now
47:46recognizes majority leader Kathy Gilmore
47:48Richardson for a motion on bills number
47:50260-34260-343
47:54260 344 260 345 260249
47:592-60 462 as amended.
48:03>> Thank you, Madam Chair. I move that
48:05bills number 260 34260
48:08343 260 344. This should be 29.
48:29>> Yeah, I think you start this one.
48:35>> Okay, hold on.
48:41All right, starting from the top.
48:44Um, chair now recognizes council
48:46majority leader Gilmore Richardson for
48:49motion on bills number 26034260343
48:53260344
48:55260345
48:57260429
48:59260462
49:02as amended.
49:05>> Thank you, Madam Chair. I move that
49:07bill's number 260-342,
49:09260343,
49:11260344,
49:12260345,
49:14260429,
49:16and 260462
49:18as amended be reported from this
49:20committee with a favorable
49:21recommendation and further move that the
49:23rules of council be suspended as to
49:25permit first reading of this bill at the
49:27next session of council.
49:28>> Second.
49:29It has been moved and properly seconded
49:31that bills number 260 34260
49:35343 2-60 344 260 345 260429
49:41and 260 462 as amended be reported from
49:45this committee with a favorable
49:47recommendation and further move that the
49:48rules of council be suspended to permit
49:50first reading on this bill at then on
49:53these bills at the next session of
49:55council. All of those in favor of this
49:57motion will signify by saying I.
49:59>> I.
50:00>> Is there anyone opposed? The eyes have
50:02it and the motion carries. And if there
50:04are no additional remarks from the
50:05committee or our guests, this concludes
50:07the business of the committee on rules
50:08for today. Thank you all very much for
50:10your attendance.
50:12>> Thank you, Madam Chair.
50:13>> Thank you.