City Fee Waiver Criteria
At a glance
Based on auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
- What: A committee conversation, prompted by R-39-26 Clydesdale Event Fee Waiver, about whether the city should set criteria, caps or baselines for waiving fees on events.
- Where it stands: No action. The committee agreed to take the topic up at its next meeting with the staff member who manages these requests, then consider a resolution and a budget cap.
- Main ideas: Criteria published ahead of time so applicants can self-screen; a budgeted annual cap on waivers with ranked applications; partial waivers (for example half) for very large events; a baseline of city resources per event; asking applicants what they donate to charity.
Positions
- Alderman Thorp wanted criteria, a deadline to have them before the next annual fee-waiver block, and a budgeted cap. Alderman Huntley cautioned against forcing every case into one box but wanted to work toward a resolution and a budget cap.
- Alderwoman O'Neill favored a common baseline to avoid favoritism by ward and to help groups that do not know to ask, and asked why fees exist if they are routinely waived.
- Members noted that waivers are currently unlimited and that staff may already screen requests informally.
Sources
- https://annapolismd.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=1372784&GUID=60AFBD5A-55ED-426C-BCDD-9F865ED794D5
- 2026-10-21 - Finance Committee
Discussion time
About 15 minutes across 1 meeting (from transcript timestamps; approximate).
| Meeting | Minutes |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 - Finance Committee | 15 |
Log
- 2026-10-21 - Finance Committee - Wide-ranging discussion of criteria, caps and baselines (47:33-1:03:01). Agreed to invite the staff member who manages these requests to the next meeting. No vote.