Local Politics
  1. Home
  2. US
  3. Connecticut
  4. Bridgeport
  5. Issues

Ethics Commission Appointments

At a glance

  • What: City Council must approve three candidates to serve on the newly created Ethics Commission established by Charter Revision: Rosella Criss (Unaffiliated, former Ethics official at Pitney Bowes), Faith Sweeney (Democrat, educator), Kristen Mennillo (Unaffiliated, attorney).
  • Where it stands: All three appointments have failed or been withdrawn as of August 3, 2026. Criss and Mennillo appointments each failed 6-9 with 2 abstentions (need 14 votes). Sweeney appointment withdrawn per City Attorney legal opinion declaring her ineligible. Further appointments remain uncertain.
  • Why it matters: The Ethics Commission was approved by voters in Charter Revision and is central to Bridgeport's governance reform. Contention over appointment process has stalled the Commission's full staffing.

At a glance

Process and eligibility concerns divided the Council over three successive meetings. Critics raised questions about Charter compliance, minority party status of unaffiliated voters, and whether the appointment process was compromised by political influence and insufficient transparency. Supporters emphasized that candidates were highly qualified and that the process followed established procedures. Council President Herron opposed the Charter Revision and cited procedural violations; Council Member Pereira questioned whether unaffiliated voters meet the minority representation statute requirements. Council Members Murray, Nieves, Spell, and Boyd supported the candidates and criticized colleagues for process complaints without evidence.

Detailed history

Background and Charter context

  • Ethics Commission created by voter-approved Charter Revision, 2026.
  • Commission has seven seats; requires appointment of three more members to reach full staffing (four returning members already serve).
  • Candidates applied through Mayor's Office; referred to Miscellaneous Matters Committee.
  • Committee meetings were poorly attended by Council Members.

June 1, 2026 — appointments tabled

  • Rosella Criss, Faith Sweeney, Kristen Mennillo candidates presented to Council.
  • Extended public speaking forum featuring supporters of ethics reform emphasizing Bridgeport's reputation crisis and need for independent oversight. Residents urged Council to approve highly qualified nominees.
  • Council Member Pereira raised concerns about unaffiliated voter eligibility under minority representation statute (Connecticut General Statute 9-167A); stated she found no case law supporting unaffiliated status as qualifying for minority representation.
  • Council Member Medina emphasized that Ethics Commission importance required getting process right, not fast.
  • Council Member Dubac urged restart of process; expressed concern that public confidence was already questioned.
  • Council President Herron cited Charter procedures violations and noted she did not vote for Charter Revision.
  • Council Member Murray criticized colleagues for making vague process complaints without examining candidates' actual qualifications.
  • Motion to table all three appointments (moved by Maria Valle, seconded by Aidee Nieves) passed 9-8.

July 6, 2026 — Criss and Mennillo fail; Sweeney withdrawn

  • Vote requirement: 14 affirmative votes (two-thirds of 21-member Council).
  • Rosella Criss (Unaffiliated) appointment voted on first.
    • Council Member Newton expressed shame at political involvement in Ethics Commission process; said he would vote no.
    • Council Member Pereira reiterated concerns about unaffiliated voter eligibility and cited lack of case law; said she would vote no on all unaffiliated Commissioners until clarification.
    • Council Member Nieves defended the appointment process and explained that lobbying is normal legislative practice.
    • Council Member Spell supported appointment, noting candidates had stepped up willingly and possessed excellent qualifications.
    • Council Member Medina expressed deep concern; said residents felt Council lacked transparency and worked behind closed doors.
    • Council Member Murray noted 49 days had passed since previous tabling with no Council caucus held to address concerns.
    • Council Member Nelson stated she had straddled the fence; said she was not clear on some information provided.
    • Vote failed 6-9 with 2 abstentions: 6 in favor (Murray, Spell, Smith, Boyd, Nieves, Valle); 9 opposed (Taylor-Moye, Cruz, Herron, Dubac, Ortiz, Medina, Pereira, Martinez, Newton); 2 abstentions (Nelson, McBride-Lee).
  • Faith Sweeney (Democrat) appointment: City Attorney Toms presented legal opinion concluding Sweeney was ineligible to serve due to unspecified Charter provisions. Council President Herron moved to withdraw appointment; passed unanimously.
  • Kristen Mennillo (Unaffiliated) appointment: vote outcome identical to Criss (6-9 with 2 abstentions).

August 3, 2026 — no new votes on appointments

  • Appointments not voted on at this meeting; issue addressed only indirectly through extended public speaking comments by Jorge Cruz about Christopher Columbus statue and Eneida Martinez rebuttal on press conference coordination.

Sources

Log

2026-08-03 - City Council

No vote; issue not discussed at this meeting.

2026-07-06 - City Council

Rosella Criss and Kristen Mennillo appointments each failed 6-9 with 2 abstentions (need 14 votes). Faith Sweeney appointment withdrawn per City Attorney legal opinion. Extensive debate on process, Charter compliance, unaffiliated voter eligibility.

2026-06-01 - City Council

All three appointments tabled 9-8 on motion by Council Member Valle. Extended public speaking in support of ethics reform and appointment of candidates.