2026-09-23 - Planning and Zoning Commission
Summary
Based on auto-generated captions; names and figures may be misheard.
- The commission met virtually from about 6:10 to 6:29 p.m. with five of seven members present; Riley, the second vice chair, presided. Two members had excused absences. Minutes for September 9 were approved without objection, as was the agenda.
- The only item was a staff-initiated amendment to the unified development ordinance's permitted use table to remove data centers as a permitted use in the mixed-use office institutional zone. The change was directed after an August 24 council study session. The zone is spread citywide and covers many schools, and it was the only mixed-use zone where a data center was allowed by right. Data centers stay permitted in the airport, accident potential zone, business tech and medium industrial districts, and conditional in the mixed-use regional and mixed-use airport zones. Staff had received one public comment in support, and nobody signed up to speak.
- The commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval to City Council. One member said data centers provide few permanent jobs and that water recycling is untested over time. Riley and another member asked for more than two weeks of public notice and more public comment opportunities on future data center proposals, since more are expected.
- The planning division manager's report listed one administrative approval, a minor site plan amendment for the Prairie Point residential community on the south side of the city. The commission thanked a departing staff member on what was said to be their last meeting. Public invited to be heard on non-agenda items: none.
Issues discussed
Sources
Video
Transcript
These are auto-generated captions; names and numbers may be misheard.
Transcript
00:17[clears throat]
00:26[clears throat]
00:39Uh we're at 6:10 uh p.m. I believe the
00:43recording has started. Uh Commissioner
00:46Riley, over to you.
00:48>> Thank you, Connley. So, good evening
00:50everyone. It's Wednesday, September
00:5223rd, and welcome to the Planning
00:53Commission virtual public hearing. I am
00:56Commissioner Riley, the second vice
00:57chair, and I call this regularly
01:00scheduled virtual meeting of the Aurora
01:03Planning and Zoning Commission to order.
01:05I will call the role of commissioners
01:08now. Commissioner Jetic,
01:11>> present.
01:12>> Commissioner Bush,
01:14>> present.
01:15>> Commissioner Becker,
01:18>> present.
01:19>> Commissioner Banka,
01:21>> present.
01:22Commissioner Hogan has an excused
01:24absence. Commissioner Walls has an
01:27excused absence. And I, Commissioner
01:29Riley, am present as well. So, we have a
01:32quorum.
01:33The pledge of allegiance will not be
01:35said tonight as this meeting is virtual.
01:39On to the next item, approval of the
01:41minutes for September 9th, 2026.
01:45Did the commissioners receive a draft of
01:47the minutes? And did you all have an
01:49opportunity to read them?
01:52Yes.
01:53>> Yes.
01:53>> Very good. Are there any amendments or
01:56corrections to the minutes?
02:00>> Seeing none, I move to approve the
02:02minutes as presented without objection.
02:05Is there a second?
02:06>> I second.
02:08>> Thank you, Commissioner Bush. Any
02:10discussion on the motion to approve
02:12without objection?
02:15Is there any objection?
02:18Very good. We'll move on to the one item
02:20of business this evening, item 8, alpha.
02:23The second vice chair moves to approve
02:25the agenda as presented without
02:28objection. Is there a second?
02:30[clears throat]
02:32Thank you, Commissioner Banka. Is there
02:34any discussion on the motion to approve
02:36the agenda as presented without
02:38objection?
02:40Any objections?
02:43Seeing none, I will now read a summary
02:45of our policies and procedures for this
02:48evening's meeting. Excuse
02:50[clears throat] me. Please make sure
02:52your home or computer microphone is on
02:54mute unless you are speaking. The
02:57planning and zoning commission meeting
02:58is a quasi judicial hearing. There is no
03:01swearing in of those who will give
03:03testimony, but it is presumed that all
03:06parties are telling the truth. When
03:08addressing the commission as an
03:10applicant or the representative, please
03:12state your first and last name as well
03:15as the organization that you are
03:17representing. And you may additionally
03:19state if you are an Aurora resident. If
03:22you are addressing the commission as a
03:24member of the general public for public
03:26testimony, please state your first and
03:29last name. And if you are an Aurora
03:31resident,
03:33for each agenda item, there will be
03:35initial presentation by city staff.
03:38Afterwards, commissioners may ask
03:40questions of staff.
03:42Discussion of agenda items by
03:44commissioners will be conducted only
03:46following a motion and a second.
03:49Following the staff presentation, the
03:52applicant or their representative may
03:55choose to make a presentation or answer
03:58questions. The applicant will have 10
04:00minutes for their presentation.
04:03Commissioners may ask questions of the
04:05applicant.
04:06Members of the public that have signed
04:08up to speak will each have three minutes
04:10to speak on the agenda item during this
04:13public comment period. It is asked that
04:16only new information be presented. The
04:18same arguments should not be repeated.
04:22Commissioners may ask questions of the
04:23public following their comments. After
04:26public comments, the applicant will have
04:28five minutes to address any public
04:30comments. Commissioners may ask
04:33questions of the applicant.
04:36The chair will ensure all commissioners
04:37have no further questions of the
04:39applicant or staff. The chair will then
04:41call for the question. After a motion
04:44has been made and seconded, the
04:46commissioners will then discuss the case
04:48amongst themselves.
04:50After the discussion, the chair will
04:52call the question. Commissioners are
04:54finders of fact and will vote based on
04:56their evaluation of the evidence
04:58presented as compared to code section
05:01146.
05:03All routings by the planning and zoning
05:05commission are normally final.
05:08Exceptions are zoning map amendments,
05:10zoning code amendments, and
05:13comprehensive plan amendments that need
05:15city council approval.
05:18Decisions by the commission can be
05:20appealed to city council by presenting a
05:22written repeal to the city manager
05:25within 10 calendar days of the public
05:27hearing.
05:29City Council also has the decret
05:31discretion to call up any case whether
05:33an appeal has been made or not.
05:37Notices for this virtual meeting were
05:39published, posted to the city website,
05:42and the development projects were posted
05:44with signs on the properties. Notices
05:46were also mailed to adjacent land owners
05:48per city requirements. As an additional
05:51note for this virtual meeting, the
05:53commission asks that any applicant or
05:56applicant representatives please turn on
05:58their cameras if able when speaking or
06:00presenting the to the commission.
06:04The evening's case agenda item 8A, a
06:08unified development ordinance amendment
06:10text change to permitted use table
06:13project number 1 1998014
06:16with case manager Stacy Wasinger. Stacy,
06:20we turn it over to you for your
06:22presentation.
06:24>> Good afternoon or evening. Thank you.
06:26Um, as stated, I'm Stacy Wasinger and
06:28I'll be presenting the staff
06:30presentation for this item.
06:33click here. So the request at hand here
06:36is a uh recommendation from this body on
06:39an amendment to the unified development
06:41ordinance permitted use table. Um
06:43specifically to rem remove a data center
06:46as a permitted land use in the mixeduse
06:48office institutional or MU-I zone
06:52district. Um this request would be need
06:55to be in conformance with the city of
06:57Aurora zoning ordinance section um
07:00146-5.4.1 4.1.3b
07:03which contains the approval criteria for
07:06text amendments to the zoning ordinance.
07:08Um the applicant in this case is the
07:11city of Aurora and it is project
07:13location would affect the MUI zone
07:16district citywide.
07:19So in summary, this was an item that was
07:21discussed at the August 24th city
07:24council study session. Um from that
07:26discussion there was direction to bring
07:28forward a an ordinance that modifies the
07:30permitted use table for data center
07:32uses. Um specifically to remove data
07:35center as a permitted use in the
07:37mixeduse office institutional MUI zone
07:40district. Um for this ordinance what
07:43essentially would happen is the the P in
07:46that permitted [snorts] or in the land
07:47use table would be removed and the cell
07:50would be left blank meaning that the use
07:51would then be prohibited in the MUI
07:53zone. Um there's no other proposed
07:55change to the MUI zone or other elements
07:59of the UDO at this time. Um staff did
08:02receive one public comment uh in support
08:05of that change and that is in your
08:06packet as exhibit E.
08:10The background for this use um is that a
08:13data center is currently defined in the
08:15UDO as a facility containing one or more
08:17largecale computer systems used for data
08:19storage and processing for off-site
08:21users. Typical supporting equipment
08:23includes um backup batteries and power
08:26generators, cooling units, fire
08:27suppression systems, and enhanced
08:29security features. This use um so that's
08:32the current definition. This use is
08:34classified under industrial uses in the
08:36in the permitted use table. Um, as it
08:40currently stands, this use is a
08:42permitted use by right in the MUI zone
08:44district, which is the one um, under
08:46discussion tonight, and then also in the
08:49airport district, the accident potential
08:51zone district, the business tech
08:53district, and the medium industrial
08:54district. Um, and it is currently coded
08:58as a conditional use in the mixeduse
09:00regional and mixeduse airport um, zones.
09:04So the MUI zone um as stated in the UDO
09:07is intended to accommodate sort of
09:09office institutional related low impact
09:12users near um more residential uses. It
09:16does permit low to medium scale office
09:20and residential uses such as multifamily
09:23um
09:24which aids in buffering from some other
09:28lower uh res uh lower density
09:30residential uses. The zone, as you can
09:33see from the the map on the um right
09:36here, it is located without uh
09:38throughout the city of Aurora. Um many
09:41of the schools in Aurora are zoned under
09:44this district under MUI. And this is the
09:46only mixeduse zone where a data center
09:48is a permitted by right use. Um the
09:51other zones that it is permitted by
09:52right in are classified under special
09:55purpose district districts which um tend
09:57to allow in this case more industrial
10:00type uses than the MUI zone does.
10:04So this is just a um exhibit of what the
10:08change would be here. So the upper shows
10:10the permitted use right now in MUI and
10:13with this change if
10:16approval is recommendation and
10:17ultimately the city of council adopts
10:20that ordinance it would remove that that
10:22use from the MUI zone. [snorts]
10:26This is the approval criteria for
10:27ordinance text amendments. Um
10:30essentially that the ordinance text is
10:33required to be changed because of change
10:35conditions or circumstances in all or
10:37portion of the city. um that there's a
10:39an impact to public health health,
10:41safety, and welfare um or that the
10:44change promotes economic growth and
10:46investment that will not create material
10:48risks to the health public health,
10:50safety, and welfare.
10:53And so the question before the
10:54commission tonight is whether uh to
10:56recommend approval to the Aurora City
10:59Council of this unified development
11:01ordinance amendment to change the
11:04permitted use table. Um and the staff
11:06findings in the staff report here are
11:09listed that it's consistent with the
11:10spirit intent of the comprehensive plan
11:12and policies adopted by the city
11:14council. Um that this is a required
11:17change because of change conditions or
11:18circumstances in all are portion of the
11:20city and that this change would support
11:22the public health safety and welfare.
11:25And so with that um staff will conclude
11:27our presentation available to answer any
11:30questions the commission may have.
11:38Thank Thank you, Stacy. Commissioners,
11:40questions for staff.
11:45I see no hands raised.
11:49Very good. Then
11:52I will entertain a motion on agenda item
11:558A.
11:56Um, this was a citywide visit, so there
11:59were no visits required. Chair, if I
12:02may, we should clarify if there's any
12:04public wanting to to speak.
12:07>> Let me do that then. Are there any
12:10public waiting to speak on this item?
12:13>> No, sir, there is not.
12:15>> Thank you very much. I will go back and
12:18enter [clears throat] ask if there is a
12:21well, I will entertain a motion on the
12:22agenda item a alpha. Again, there were
12:25no site visits required because it's a
12:26city-wide um
12:29policy. So, is there a motion for this?
12:37>> Uh,
12:37>> yes. Uh, Commissioner
12:38>> Commissioner Banka,
12:40>> I got Commissioner Banker's hand up
12:41there. I'm sorry.
12:42>> Okay. Sorry.
12:43>> Okay. All right. Um, regarding agenda
12:46item 8A, ordinance text amendment based
12:49on the staff recommendation, the
12:51presentation and discussion at this
12:53evening's public hearing. I move to
12:55recommend approval to the city Aurora
12:57city council of the unified development
13:00ordinance amendment to change the
13:02permitted use table because the proposal
13:05complies with the requirements of code
13:07section 146-5.4.1
13:11C3.3B
13:13of the unified development ordinance for
13:16the reason stated in the staff report
13:19and I so move.
13:21>> Thank you. Is there a second?
13:23>> Yes. I would like to
13:25>> Thank you very much.
13:26>> Second.
13:27>> All right. With that second, is there
13:29any discussion?
13:33>> Again, is there any discussion? Go
13:35ahead.
13:36>> Yes. I would like to say that that that
13:38this is uh this is something that I
13:40think we uh um
13:45we needed to needed to do and we have to
13:49do because uh uh we have known for a
13:52while that data centers do not really
13:55provide a lot of jobs. uh when they were
13:59presented to us, they were always jobs
14:01doing the construction, but very few
14:04people actually uh uh actually work in
14:08in in those uh centers compared to the
14:11uh footage. Also, uh uh we we realized a
14:15while ago that um that the recycling of
14:20the water that was something new and
14:23really has hasn't been tested over over
14:25a period of time and that uh that water
14:30is uh definitely a uh issue on it. So,
14:34I'm uh very very proud that we uh
14:38[clears throat] we are taking a step
14:43Um, I'd like to make a comment as well.
14:46It goes back to transparency, public
14:49notice, and things like that for matters
14:53such as this because we're probably
14:55going to start seeing a lot more data
14:56center things. Um, I'd like to make sure
14:59that we are giving [clears throat]
15:01more than two weeks of notice to the
15:04public uh so that they have an
15:07opportunity to weigh in on this. And so
15:09I'm not sure how we can change that
15:11within
15:13um the notifications, but again I I feel
15:16it would be more beneficial for more
15:20public awareness and uh opportunity to
15:23comment.
15:25Are there any other discussion items?
15:29All right, I'll call the question.
15:31Commissioner Jetic,
15:33>> approve.
15:35>> Commissioner Bush,
15:36>> approve.
15:38Commissioner Becker,
15:40>> approve.
15:42>> Commissioner Banka,
15:43>> approve. And
15:44>> Commissioner Riley votes to approve as
15:46well on a vote of five. There were no
15:49nay votes carried.
15:52Thank you, Stacy, for your presentation.
15:56The next item we have on the agenda is
16:00public that is invited to be heard on
16:01non-aggenda items. Do we have any public
16:05signed up to speak this evening?
16:08>> We do not.
16:10>> Wow. Okay.
16:12N O. Item 10 are comments by
16:15commissioners and miscellaneous items of
16:18business. Commissioners,
16:24I do have one item. I'm going back to
16:26data centers again. Um
16:29I I've been reading in the papers. I'm
16:31seeing things occurring now. I know that
16:34the public is starting to get uh more
16:36and more interested about the data
16:38centers and again I I want to encourage
16:41more transparency and more opportunities
16:43for public hearings. Um I know there are
16:47some areas that are by right. I know
16:50there's other areas that might change
16:52and this this change that we saw tonight
16:54is one of those. Um, and I I go back to
16:57the uh staff statement of the impact of
17:00public safety, health, and welfare. Um,
17:02and the other concerns being around
17:06schools and things like that. And I I am
17:10going to continue to say we need to be
17:13uh more aware of getting public engaged
17:16and having more public comment um as
17:20some of these larger developments are
17:22addressed. So, I just wanted to air that
17:25this evening.
17:27Any other comments then? [sighs]
17:31Very good. We'll move to item 11, which
17:33is a report by our planning division
17:35manager, Brandon. [snorts]
17:40Uh, thank you, Commissioner Riley.
17:43um as part of my report uh
17:45administrative approvals over the last
17:47two weeks. Uh we just have one a
17:50relatively
17:52uh small one relatively speaking uh
17:55Prairie Point site uh plan. Uh so
17:58amendment and so Prairie Point is the
18:01residential master plan community uh
18:04getting close to
18:08advance uh on the south uh end of the
18:12city uh roughly speaking between you
18:15know Parker Road and where Gartra uh and
18:20Aurora Parkway ends uh currently. And so
18:23they made some minor amendments to some
18:26of their subdivisions.
18:28Um
18:30that's the only administrative update I
18:33have.
18:34Uh in terms I don't have any updates on
18:38on any proceedings that have advanced to
18:41council relating to things that have
18:43been here. And so I don't have any
18:46further updates. If you have any
18:47questions, I'd be happy to try to answer
18:50them.
18:51Commissioners, do you have any
18:52questions?
18:55Seeing none, we move on to our city
18:57attorney.
19:04>> No report this evening.
19:06>> Thank you very much. All right. Last
19:09item of business is I know everyone has
19:11been thanking Susan for her years of
19:13service. I believe this is your last
19:16planning commission meeting. Is that
19:17correct?
19:18>> Yes, sir. It is. Uh well, I'm sure
19:21you're [laughter]
19:22quite excited to be going, but I thank
19:26you. I know most other people have.
19:28You've got a couple events coming up and
19:30some that probably already have
19:31occurred. So, uh publicly, we thank you
19:34for your support, uh making this
19:36commission work as it does.
19:39>> Well, thank you very much. It's been a
19:40privilege and a pleasure working with
19:43you all. Thank you.
19:44>> Okay. Very good, folks. That is the last
19:47item on the agenda.
19:50So if there is a [clears throat] motion
19:51to adjurnn until the next public
19:53meeting.
19:55>> So moved.
19:56>> Sunny. Thank you very much. Is there a
19:58second?
20:01>> Thank you, Gail. And we adjourn at
20:046:29 p.m. Thank you all very much.
20:08>> All right. Good meeting.